I recently subscribed to my own blog, The Coming of the Toads, curious to see what the email versions of a post look like. A reader can turn the email notifications off and still subscribe, looking for new posts in the WordPress Reader, which is how I read most blogs I follow. And I was aware that the Reader versions will look different than original versions, and WordPress recently improved the Reader by adding a button above the post to allow for one click to the original. But a reader who follows my blog via email recently mentioned I should use footnotes, or give the source of quotes, but I’ve always used footnotes and references and explained sources. Occasionally I might drop in an allusion for the fun of it without further explanation. But I checked a recent post on email and saw that all the references were missing. I don’t want to sound like a stickler or stuck with “Grammatical Pedantry Syndrome” (GPS), but I put the question of missing footnotes to the WordPress AI assistant, and found the situation is worse than I thought. Here is what the WordPress AI had to say:
“That’s a great observation — email newsletters sent by WordPress.com strip out or don’t render certain formatting, and hyperlinks/references embedded in block quotes or text can sometimes be lost in the email version.
Email clients often strip out custom font sizes and some block formatting, so the references in a smaller/medium font inside or after a Quote block may not survive the email conversion.
The most reliable fix is to make sure your references are in a plain Paragraph block (not inside the Quote block) with default font size — would you like to try that for your next post and see if it comes through in the email?
This is actually a known limitation of how email clients handle rich formatting, not something you did wrong.”
I wonder how many other known limitations I don’t know. I put the matter to Gemini, the Google AI assistant, and this is what she had to say, elaborating:
“Email clients are notorious for ‘sanitizing’ HTML to prevent security risks, which often means they discard custom CSS, specific font sizes, and complex nested block structures.
Why Your Footnotes Are “Vanishing”
When you put a citation inside a Quote Block or format it as “Small” text, the underlying HTML structure often looks like this:
HTML
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote"><p>Quote text...</p><small>Citation here</small></blockquote>Many email providers treat that
<small>tag as a styling suggestion rather than a requirement and will ignore it, or worse, they will discard the entire citation because it is nested within a container (blockquote) that they don’t fully support.
The solution, as we have long known from our Thoreau readings, is to “Simplify, simplify.” That advice follows his three word epizeuxis rant: “Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!” (Those are quotes from Thoreau’s “Walden,” 1854.)
Since I can’t preview the email version of this post, I’ll have to hit the Publish button and wait for the results to arrive in my email. If you are reading this post via email, and something seems amiss, that is, missing, you might look at the original. Or you can simply enjoy the unrelated, unnecessary, and irrelevant cartoon below; I read somewhere that posts with pics attract more readers. Is that a known thing or a blogging myth?





































