Books
I'm somewhat behind with reading book reviews.
As you may know I like to read reviews about one book from different reviewers. For three months now I have been reading reviews of The Magicians (2009) [US] [UK], by Lev Grossman. And finally, this week, I ordered a paperback copy. The reasons are simple: First I read Jame's review which finally convinced me that I have to read this book. Second the paperback will be available in Germany soon. I hope I don't expect too much out of the book. On the right you see the UK cover:Quentin Coldwater is brilliant but miserable. He's a senior in high school, and a certifiable genius, but he's still secretly obsessed with a series of fantasy novels he read as a kid, about the adventures of five children in a magical land called Fillory. Compared to that, anything in his real life just seems gray and colorless. Everything changes when Quentin finds himself unexpectedly admitted to a very secret, very exclusive college of magic in upstate New York, where he receives a thorough and rigorous education in the practice of modern sorcery. He also discovers all the other things people learn in college: friendship, love, sex, booze, and boredom. But something is still missing. Magic doesn't bring Quentin the happiness and adventure he thought it would. Then, after graduation, he and his friends make a stunning discovery: Fillory is real.Blogosphere
This week I read Waking the Dragon: George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire a wonderful post by Jo Walton. I really appreciate the term “IWantToReadItosity” (I-want-to-read-it) which she explains very well by using A Song of Ice and Fire (ASOIAF) as an example. I know there are people who don't read ASOIAF because it is not finished yet. I tell you that you definitely missing something. I still highly recommend to read ASOAIF. And don't forget to visit the best ASOAIF website: Westeros
Do you know clonehenges? I know Stonehenge and I hope I get the opportunity to go there at some point in my life. Clonehenge is a new artifical word. It is the combination of clone and henge. So you like to see some clonehenges? Then follow this link: Clonehenges: 20 Creative Recreations of Stonehenge. Hope you like it as much as I did.
Outrage of the week
Yes, this is a new section in my Roundup. When you follow several blogs then you know that there are heated discussions from time to time.
This week it all began with an interview over at Temple Library Reviews. Paul Stotts from Blood of the Muse gave the following statement about reviews and book ratings:
I think writing a review, and not giving it some sort of numerical score is a cop out; it’s cowardice—pure and simple—since many online reviewers don’t want to upset publishers or authors. So they write reviews that are open to interpretation, using nebulous terms like good, overemphasizing the positive aspects of the book, trying very hard not to have an opinion. It’s okay, you’re entitled to have an opinion, you’re entitled to take a stand and let people know what you think.
See, words lie; numbers don’t. And I don’t want to lie to my audience. So I score every book on a scale of 100. Like any review, the number is completely subjective; there are no underlying components. I score books by ranking them against other novels I’ve read in the genre. It’s rather simple. But effective.
As you can imagine it didn't take long until the first replies popped up. You will get links to some of the answers later. After reading Paul's statement, I wanted to leave a comment immediately. But then I thought it may be better to calm down first. And finally, I decided to share my thoughts with you in my Roundup.
People tend to categorize and rate nearly everything. It makes life much easier. Easier in the way they have to think and read less. Nobody is free of it; even me. But when it comes to books and book reviews I raise my voice and I say NO. I am well known for reading reviews in order to get more information about a book to support my decision whether to buy and read it, or not. That means I want to read a short summary, an explanation about the likes/dislikes from the reviewer, and appreciate a link to an excerpt. I can't get this information from a numerical rating.
It is definitely wrong that numbers don't lie. Numbers are just a replacement for words in case of book ratings. A 100/100 rating is the replacement for perfect book... So why should this be a lie?
As far as I can see, the main reasons for this outrage is the offense (cowardice) and the insinuation of brown-nosing among reviewers (they lie to their readers and they are submissive to publishers and authors). To be honest you can discuss and share different opinions, but to offend and insult people is poor form and entirely unhelpful.
Finally, it is up to us (blogger are also readers) whether we prefer numerical ratings or not. But you can be sure that I won't use numerical ratings of books on this blog.
Statements from other blogger:
James from Speculative Horizons,
Gav from NextRead,
Larry from OF Blog,
Aidan from A Dribble of Ink,
Dark Wolf from Dark Wolf's Fantasy Reviews,
The whole team from Fantasy Book Critic,
Jeff from Fantasy Book News and Reviews,
Joe from Adventures In Reading
Quotes
A few days ago I finished reading The Loch (2006) [US] [UK] by Steve Alten. It is about Loch Ness in Scotland. I'm sure you read or heard about Nessie. The depiction of the Loch Ness itself and the surroundings is awesome. Look at this picture gallery and you know why I want to visit Loch Ness, as well as Stonehenge. This week, instead of quotes, I decided to delight you with a few Scottish proverbs.
People tend to categorize and rate nearly everything. It makes life much easier. Easier in the way they have to think and read less. Nobody is free of it; even me. But when it comes to books and book reviews I raise my voice and I say NO. I am well known for reading reviews in order to get more information about a book to support my decision whether to buy and read it, or not. That means I want to read a short summary, an explanation about the likes/dislikes from the reviewer, and appreciate a link to an excerpt. I can't get this information from a numerical rating.
It is definitely wrong that numbers don't lie. Numbers are just a replacement for words in case of book ratings. A 100/100 rating is the replacement for perfect book... So why should this be a lie?
As far as I can see, the main reasons for this outrage is the offense (cowardice) and the insinuation of brown-nosing among reviewers (they lie to their readers and they are submissive to publishers and authors). To be honest you can discuss and share different opinions, but to offend and insult people is poor form and entirely unhelpful.
Finally, it is up to us (blogger are also readers) whether we prefer numerical ratings or not. But you can be sure that I won't use numerical ratings of books on this blog.
Statements from other blogger:
James from Speculative Horizons,
Gav from NextRead,
Larry from OF Blog,
Aidan from A Dribble of Ink,
Dark Wolf from Dark Wolf's Fantasy Reviews,
The whole team from Fantasy Book Critic,
Jeff from Fantasy Book News and Reviews,
Joe from Adventures In Reading
Quotes
A few days ago I finished reading The Loch (2006) [US] [UK] by Steve Alten. It is about Loch Ness in Scotland. I'm sure you read or heard about Nessie. The depiction of the Loch Ness itself and the surroundings is awesome. Look at this picture gallery and you know why I want to visit Loch Ness, as well as Stonehenge. This week, instead of quotes, I decided to delight you with a few Scottish proverbs.
"Twelve highlanders and a bagpipe make a rebellion.”
"Money is flat and was meant to be piled up.”
"They talk of my drinking but never my thirst.”
"Be happy while you're living, for you're a long time dead.”
"The day has eyes, the night has ears.”
"To marry is to halve your rights and double your duties.”
"What may be done at any time will be done at no time.”
