Re: ApacheCon Europe 2005 Call for Participation is open

* "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The deadline is tomorrow, so I suppose it might be late to ask > a foolish question; > > conference/presentations are in English? Mein Deutch ist nicht > so gut. Das war doch schon mal gar nicht so schlecht ;-) Anyway, I think, English is

Re: Mailing from apache email address

* Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forget SSH. Use TLS and SMTP AUTH. Proven, tried and true 90ies > technology that works like a charm. ;-) Quite old, isn't it? SCNR, nd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Inappropriate use of announce@

I know, I shouldn't post this... * Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Life is not fair. [..] > If you voluntarily chose to stay in a location where you can't get what ^^^ How did you get that impression? > you need to keep up, you can't expect others to scale

Re: Inappropriate use of announce@

* Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I liked the idea of a general "announce" list where all this stuff is > sent and let my mail client sort it out. This is the 21st century. If > you have bandwidth, disk space or download time concerns, you're either > not using the right

Re: EU Software Patents

* Thom May wrote: > * Danny Angus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : >> >> If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to opposing >> software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo. > ditto and ditto. +1. nd

Re: No answer from [email protected]

* Brian Behlendorf wrote: > I don't think it's acceptable for moderators to miss valid messages, even > with the spam that comes through. Agreed, but ... > If anyone else has had valid messages rejected by moderators, please let > the corresponding PMC be aware of that. If you don't get a

Re: Jakarta Newsletter Issue 9 -- May-June 2003

* Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Jakarta has an announcement list. Guess what, most, if not all > announcements go also to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go figure. > > MHO is that a mail a month is not a big deal in any case. And now multiply one mail with the number of apache projects. Heh, *I* get about

looking for a new desktop background? ;-)

This one is from an article about Apache 2 in a German computer magazine and was voted by the readers to be the best of the particular issue. Funny :) nd -- >I have tried using ErrorDocument 401, but doesn't work.

Re: fyi wiki statistics

Perl::Another::Just;print [EMAIL PROTECTED] split/::/ =>__PACKAGE__]}~; # André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #

Re: [proposal] creation of communitity.apache.org

b{q~Hacker~}); my $japh = q[sub japh { }]; print join # [ $japh =~ /{(.)}/] -> [0] => map $_ -> () #André Malo # => @japh;# http://www.perlig.de/ #

Re: [proposal] creation of communitity.apache.org

* Henri Gomez wrote: > I've make a dream : yes... > http://name.apache.org/ ...a nightmare ;-) nd -- Treat your password like your toothbrush. Don't let anybody else use it, and get a new one every six months. -- Clifford Stoll (found in

Re: CLA for [email protected]

* Peter Donald wrote: >> Contributor License Agreement, see >> > > It's a must (or should be a must) for all committers. I agree with the terms described there (of course). IANAL, but I've some doubts that it has any legal

Re: CLA for [email protected]

* Henri Gomez wrote: > What's a CLA ? Contributor License Agreement, see nd, who didn't filled it yet...is it a must or may or what? -- s;.*;aoaaaoaaoaaaom:a:alataa:aaoat:a:a:a

Re: [proposal] creation of communitity.apache.org

n. (again, if I'm missing something, please give me hint and/or a pointer) nd -- print "Just Another Perl Hacker"; # André Malo, <http://www.perlig.de/> #

Re: [VOTE] Openness

* Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read > this mail list thru a web archive? > > [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable > [x] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private > VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible