Log InRegister
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreOur ScienceMindat Newsletter [Free Download]Contact Us
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageCorporate SponsorshipSponsored Pages
Learning CenterWhat Is a Mineral?The Most Common Minerals on EarthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesMindat Newsletter [Free Download]The ElementsThe Mineral Quiz
Search FormMinerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDMinerals by CountryAlphabetical Mineral IndexAlphabetical Locality SearchMineral Association SearchList of CountriesLocalities Near MePhoto SearchSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
MineralsPetrologyFossilsMeteoritesGeologic Time
Mining CompaniesStatisticsMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsDevice SettingsTime Machine
Read DiscussionsIdentification Request
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColourPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Ursilite

A synonym
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About UrsiliteHide

Formula:
(Mg/Ca)4(UO2)4(Si2O5)5.5(OH)5 · 13H2O
Lustre:
Vitreous, Silky
Hardness:
2 - 3
Specific Gravity:
3.25 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Name:
The name reflects the URANium and SILicon content.
"Ursilite" is now said to be an obsolete name. The correct minerals names are calcioursilite and magnioursilite.
Historically, calcioursilite and magnioursilite were described together in 1957 as “ursilite” from the Oktyabr’skoye deposit, Kyzyltyube-Saj, Samgar Steppe, Tajikistan. The original publication considered two varieties: calcium ursilite ("almost pure Ca-U-silicate") and magnesium ursilite ("almost pure Mg-U-silicate").
The analyses showed Ca >Mg and Mg > Ca. Subsequently, calcioursilite and magnioursilite were defined instead of ursilite, and “ursilite” was officially discredited in 2018.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
4119
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:4119:1

Similar NamesHide

IMA Classification of UrsiliteHide

Discredited
IMA Formula:
Mg4(UO2)2(Si2O5)5.5(OH)5 · 13H2O
Approval history:
Pre-2018: Status grandfathered.
Discredited by IMA in April 2018, executive decision taken by the officers of the IMA CNMNC.

Classification of UrsiliteHide

9..

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
:
:

Physical Properties of UrsiliteHide

Vitreous, Silky
Hardness:
2 - 3 on Mohs scale
Density:
3.25 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of UrsiliteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.570 nγ = 1.584
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.014
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Moderate (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

No measured or calculated 2V is on file for this mineral, so the value used here (90°) is estimated from its recorded refractive indices and optic sign, not from a direct 2V measurement.

Chemistry of UrsiliteHide

Mindat Formula:
(Mg/Ca)4(UO2)4(Si2O5)5.5(OH)5 · 13H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U39.576 %
O35.579 %
Si12.842 %
Ca6.664 %
Mg4.041 %
H1.299 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
U
O
Si
Ca
Mg
H

Crystallography of UrsiliteHide

Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Cell Parameters:
a = 11.60 Å, b = 14.68 Å, c = 12.83 Å
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.79 : 1 : 0.874
Unit Cell V:
2,184.80 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
6
Morphology:
Needlelike crystals (only visible in SEM)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Geological Setting:
Uranium deposit

First Recorded Occurrence of UrsiliteHide

Synonyms of UrsiliteHide

Other Language Names for UrsiliteHide

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
1 photo of Ursilite associated with Arapovite(K1-x◻x)(Ca,Na)2U4+Si8O20 (x ~ 0.5)

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 39.5758% 9,893,950 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity: –

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for UrsiliteHide

References for UrsiliteHide

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: November 1, 2026 01:33:13 Page updated: October 26, 2026 23:36:04
Go to top of page