Taxes and Global Impoverishment

Taxation is a social injustice issue:

Citizens’ groups around the world are increasingly raising concerns about the social costs that tax evasion is imposing on their societies. Offshore tax havens – commonly called offshore financial centers, or OFCs – are central to these concerns. Today there are more than seventy OFCs, many based in small island states such as the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. OFCs levy little or no tax on income and provide few rules on incorporation. Corporations can conduct their business without having a physical presence in these jurisdictions. Most importantly, OFCs guarantee secrecy so that their clients are beyond the scrutiny of tax authorities and regulators in their home countries.

[…]

These characteristics have attracted wealthy individuals and corporations to move their assets offshore. One-third of the wealth of the world’s richest individuals, or US$11.5 trillion, is now held offshore. More than half of all global trade is conducted through OFCs, and half the world’s money supply is estimated to pass through OFCs at some point.

OFC secrecy provisions are enabling massive amounts of tax evasion; the loss in global tax revenues is now estimated to be at least $500 billion annually. Secrecy provisions also facilitate bribery, theft, insider trading, drugs and arms trafficking, and money laundering. Today an estimated $1 trillion of “dirty” money flows into OFCs each year.

[…]

Wealthy individuals are also escaping their tax obligations by holding their assets offshore. A 2006 U.S. Senate report concluded that Americans with offshore assets avoid $40 to $70 billion in taxes each year. The Tax Justice Network (UK) calculated that if the returns on $11.5 trillion of individual wealth now placed in OFCs were taxed at 30 percent, it would generate $255 billion in tax revenues globally.

For developing countries, the loss of tax revenues of at least $50 billion annually has been disastrous. In addition, an estimated $148 billion of illegal capital flight leaves the African continent every year. This loss of tax revenues along with illegal capital flight has resulted in the deaths of thousands of vulnerable people as health services have been dismantled and public infrastructure crumbled. However, the role of OFCs in enabling tax evasion and illegal capital flight is rarely considered in debates about Third World poverty.

Someone should ask Barack Obama what he plans to do about this.  And remember this:

Bill Clinton gave the super rich, the 400 highest income people in America a big tax cut. They were paying 30 cents out of each dollar of their income to the federal government when he came into the office. When he left, it was down to 22. Bush has lowered it to 17. Now, first of all, notice you’re probably paying more than 17 cents. May well be paying more than 22. But Bush gave them an eight cent tax cut– I’m sorry. Clinton gave an eight cent tax cut and Bush only gave them five cents.

These people already have numerous available methods of tax evasion.  So Clinton and Bush give them the added advantage of tax cuts.  Aaaaand …

Obama just hired Clinton’s economists.

Wiki War

From CTV.ca:

OTTAWA — A skirmish has been raging for days over the online Wikipedia biography of Industry Minister Jim Prentice, with anonymous government workers airbrushing out controversial details or buffing Prentice’s image, while others just as quickly revised the revisions.

So intense was the battle that Prentice’s biography was locked Thursday by Wikipedia administrators “due to vandalism.”

Literally hundreds of changes had been made to Prentice’s biography over the past week, with many originating from IP addresses that were traced to Industry Canada computers at the department’s Queen Street address in downtown Ottawa.

“Even though someone from within Industry Canada thought they were making these changes anonymously – and they are, in the sense of not knowing the precise individual – it was not very difficult to trace back the fact these changes were coming from within the department,” Michael Geist, a professor at the University of Ottawa, said Thursday in an interview.

Prentice’s office was not immediately available for comment.

Geist’s professional interest in copyright law led him to discover the curious editing war.

Prentice is currently sitting on untabled copyright legislation that has been hotly anticipated for months. Critics have chastised the Conservative government for the secrecy of the policy deliberations and for failing to adequately consult consumers.

Last week, a Wikipedia entry on the copyright controversy was deleted from Prentice’s biography by someone using an Industry Canada address.

The same government computer then inserted a positively glowing review:

“Prentice has been praised for his strong management of the Industry portfolio. He has been dubbed the unofficial deputy prime minister, and is seen as the strongest Minister in the Harper government. He is widely praised in both political and private circles, as he personifies experience, confidence and competence, ability and capability.”

This bit of puffery was soon dispatched by another editor and the battle was on.

Among the fast-changing entries that appeared and disappeared from the Prentice biography was one that called the minister “a traitor to the Canadian People and hopes to sell of (sic) Canada’s copywrite (sic) law to struggling American conglomerates.”

‘Challenges about information are not uncommon’

By Thursday morning, the escalating rewrite war had been halted by Wikipedia’s volunteer administrators, although revisions continued throughout the day — albeit only by established, registered Wikipedia users.

It’s a periodic hazard for the immensely popular, free-content encyclopedia, which allows readers to revise and update entries on millions of subjects and individuals.

Jay Walsh, spokesman for the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco, said in an interview there are tens of thousands of living people with biographies on Wikipedia, “so challenges about information are not uncommon.”

Walsh said neutrality of language and guarding against conflicts of interest are two of the central pillars of Wikipedia.

“The edits which should be trusted would come from people who don’t possess a conflict of interest,” he said.

“In this case, it would be worthwhile saying that if someone is making edits from a computer within the government of Canada … if it was someone within that ministry, that would theoretically constitute a conflict of interest.”

Rather than changing one’s own biography to correct factual errors, or getting an underling to do it, Walsh said individuals can contact the volunteer content managers to ask for an intervention.

Geist agreed that Prentice’s staff has every right to challenge material posted on Wikipedia.

“One would think, though, that it’s appropriate to do so in a transparent fashion,” said the academic, an expert in privacy rights, copyright and the Internet.

“What I find compelling here is the lack of transparency around this particular issue – the attempt to anonymously buff up or scrub comments on what is a clear controversy over the copyright bill – and the lack of transparency within the copyright process itself.”

via impolitical

Illness of the Body Politic

Lloyd Axworthy says the Canadian body politic has been infected by an American virus:

There is a disturbing virus settling into Ottawa. Let’s call it the Spreading Northern Security Plague, a variation of a virulent strain of illegal counterterrorism practices imported from the Bush White House. Its symptoms were first detected in the Maher Arar case, where a Canadian was sent off to be tortured in a Syrian jail. Only years later was an inquiry established, presided over by a courageous judge who blew the whistle on such nefarious practices by our security forces.

But by then, the disease had become embedded in the body politic of successive governments with all the signs of a well-established syndrome in which security trumps human rights, international covenants can be disregarded, commissions of inquiry can be secretive and dismissive of rule and procedure, and vital information on crucial issues such as the transfer of Afghan detainees is deliberately withheld.

And now, we learn of Abousfian Abdelrazik, a Sudanese Canadian who was imprisoned in Khartoum, allegedly at the request of CSIS, and who has been stranded in the country for nearly five years. That the Canadian government, knowing full well the egregious human-rights record of the Sudanese regime, would leave one of its citizens marooned in the Sudan, is inexplicable.

The outbreak of this malady eating away at our valued respect for rules of law is also demonstrated by the cases of Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad El Maati and Muayyed Nureddin, three Canadians held in a Syrian jail who say they were tortured during interrogations.

From information already on the public record, it appears likely their disappearance and detention were prompted by Canadian influence, and that the information used in interrogations came from Canada.

It seems the spirit of Alberto Gonzales, the former Bush attorney- general who defended similar proceedings in U.S. courts, is alive and well in Ottawa.

Well, I’m not sure that Stevie Wevie needed Dubya to come up with the concept of secrecy but, no doubt, George and the gang have given him some good ideas.  And we’d be wise to find a vaccination for this bug sometime soon.  Maybe in time to save the life and sanity of our child soldier, currently languishing at Guantanamo.

Read the rest of Axworthy’s incisive artice   here