Guilty in Edmonton

From The Star:

An Edmonton judge on Tuesday found Thomas Svekla guilty of second-degree murder in the death of sex worker Theresa Innes, 36, whose body was found in a hockey bag in a home northeast of the city in May 2006.

However, Judge Sterling Sanderman found Svekla not guilty on charges of second-degree murder in the death of another sex worker, 19-year-old Rachel Quinney. Her body was found in a wooded area east of Edmonton in June 2004. Svekla told police he stumbled over the body while smoking crack cocaine with another prostitute.

The 40-year-old had been on trial for the past 3½ months.

Sanderman told the packed courtroom that although it’s human nature to want to hold someone accountable for the “cruel, callous behaviour directed towards two vulnerable human beings,” Svekla can’t be held responsible “for everything” just because he had a woman’s body in a hockey bag.

The judge called Svekla a “needy attention-seeker who has a grossly over-inflated sense of his own importance” and said he was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Svekla killed Innes.

He pointed to the fact that her body was elaborately wrapped in a shower curtain, garbage bags, and an air mattress, then bound with wire. Sanderman also found Svekla guilty of committing an indignity to a body, in connection with Innes’ death.

But the judge found that there was not enough evidence to prove the auto mechanic played any role in the younger woman’s death.

“There is no compelling evidence that ties Svekla to Rachel Quinney let alone her death,” he said.

Outside court, Crown prosecutor Ashley Finlayson provided only brief comments about the split decision of the court.

“The fact that it was a circumstantial case had a significant impact,” he said. “I’m sure it’s a difficult day for [Rachael Quinney’s family].”

Finlayson would not say what he will be seeking in the way of a sentence. Second degree-murder carries with mandatory life sentence, with a minimum of 10 years before parole eligibility. The judge can impose a lengthier time in prison.

The family of Theresa Innes refused to speak to reporters, angrily pushing cameramen and photographers out of the way.

Rachel Quinney’s sister-in-law, Charlotte Lajimodiere, was heartbroken.

“Great pain, great anger, because Rachel’s murder goes unsolved,” she said.

Svekla’s sentencing hearing is set for June 16.

He is also due to go on trial in September on charges of sexual assault and uttering threats in connection with an attack on a woman in High Level, Alta., in the summer of 2005.

The woman, who can’t be identified, testified at Svekla’s trial in Edmonton. She told the court Svekla attacked her and threatened to kill her after after sharing a six-pack of beer and going to back to his apartment.

Svekla is the first person charged by Project Kare, a joint task force between Edmonton city police and RCMP that is investigating the deaths and disappearances of more than 20 women since 1983, all of them prostitutes or others in what police call “high-risk lifestyles.”

Isn’t it amazing how judges can manage to insult women even while finding a woman-hater guilty of murder?  He can’t find the guy guilty of “everything” “just because he had a dead woman in his hockey bag”?  So much wrong, so little time … And I’m sure we’re all better off with something rather than nothing – women having been disappearing from Edmonton since 1984 and they’re just now starting to look for them?  Hell in a handbag.  And hey women, look out for those “needy attention-seeker” guys with inflated senses of their own importance … that should eliminate a few guys anyways.  (Sorry decent guys)

Madonnas and Whores

Sex trade and trafficking in Australia:

IT WAS probably one of the more mixed audiences that Australia’s seven High Court judges have had. Up the back sat a quiet Filipino nun in a habit and veil, interested to see what this nation’s highest court made of issues surrounding the people she works with in her homeland: women trafficked for sex.

In the front row, taking meticulous notes of the complex proceedings, sat sex-worker representative Elena Jeffreys. Her hair was dyed lime-green and coin-gold; she wore a leopard-print coat and fake-croc platform shoes over blue ankle socks; and her top had purple words running down the sleeves – rentboy, slag, slut, harlot, hooker

Welcome to the landmark legal case of the Queen against Wei Tang. This case will decide how Australia legally defines slavery and “possession” of one person by another. It will decide how Australian anti-slavery laws in the 21st century should respond to the nimble evolution of human wickedness into new forms of human exploitation.

Jeffreys, president of the Scarlet Alliance (the Australian Sex Workers Association), says that whatever the outcome, this case will not be the whole answer: “Migrant sex workers deserve labor rights in Australia so that trafficking doesn’t occur.”

It all began in a brothel in Brunswick Street, Fitzroy, where the licensed owner, a Chinese immigrant named Wei Tang, had five Thai women working for her as prostitutes. They arrived in 2002 and 2003 on visas that were fraudulently obtained and worked for her under conditions that prosecutors would later allege amounted to slavery. The women had all worked in the Thai sex industry and knew they were to work as prostitutes here. Four of the women were “purchased” from Thai recruiters for about $20,000 each (one woman was bought from a “Sydney owner”).

Upon arrival in Australia, they had little if any money or English and knew no one. They were told they were “contract girls” who owed a “debt” of between $40,000 and $45,000 that they had to work off (a figure much higher than they had been led to expect). This would involve providing sexual services for no payment for up to 900 men. They were housed in bedrooms in which they slept up to four at a time on mattresses on the floor. Their passports and return tickets were taken from them and locked away and their freedom of movement was restricted. They worked 10-to-12-hour shifts six nights a week.

This is a four page article and well worth a look.  But I note that journalist Karen Kassin falls prey to the classic madonna/whore dichotomy when writing of women and sex – nuns and prostitutes, as she mentions.  The article is   here