Skip to content
Trump’s draft executive order

Trump revives unpopular Ted Cruz plan to punish states that impose AI laws

Cruz plan to block broadband funding lost 99-1, but now it’s back—in Trump form.

Jon Brodkin | 108
Ted Cruz speaks on stage in front of a podium, with Donald Trump standing behind him and smiling.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Donald Trump during Turning Point's annual AmericaFest 2024 in Phoenix on December 22, 2024. Credit: Getty Images | Josh Edelson
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Donald Trump during Turning Point's annual AmericaFest 2024 in Phoenix on December 22, 2024. Credit: Getty Images | Josh Edelson
Story text

President Trump is considering an executive order that would require the federal government to file lawsuits against states with AI laws, and prevent states with AI laws from obtaining broadband funding.

The draft order, “Eliminating State Law Obstruction of National AI Policy,” would order the attorney general to “establish an AI Litigation Task Force whose sole responsibility shall be to challenge State AI laws, including on grounds that such laws unconstitutionally regulate interstate commerce, are preempted by existing Federal regulations, or are otherwise unlawful in the Attorney General’s judgment.”

The draft order says the Trump administration “will act to ensure that there is a minimally burdensome national standard—not 50 discordant State ones.” It specifically names laws enacted by California and Colorado and directs the Secretary of Commerce to evaluate whether other laws should be challenged.

“That evaluation of State AI laws shall, at a minimum, identify laws that require AI models to alter their truthful outputs, or that may compel AI developers or deployers to disclose or report information in a manner that would violate the First Amendment or any other provision of the Constitution,” the draft order says.

The draft executive order was published by Transformer, an AI news site, and previously reported on yesterday by The Information.

Rejected Ted Cruz plan back in Trump form

The draft order brings back an idea proposed months ago by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who wanted to shut states with AI laws out of the US government’s $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. Facing opposition from both Republicans and Democrats, Cruz softened his proposal, but it still lost in a 99-1 vote after Cruz himself gave up and voted against his own plan.

Trump’s draft order apparently would apply to about half of the funding available from the $42 billion program, which was created to deploy broadband to homes and businesses without modern access. The Trump administration previously threw out Biden-era plans to distribute the money and required states to rewrite their grant proposals with lower-cost alternatives.

Because of the Trump overhaul of BEAD, it’s projected that only about half of the $42 billion allocated by Congress in 2021 will be spent on deploying broadband. What will happen to the other half is undetermined. It could be deposited into the US Treasury, used for other broadband-related purposes like providing Wi-Fi and Internet-capable devices to US residents, or for overhauling municipal permitting systems.

Trump’s draft executive order would partially answer the question of how the other half will be spent. It would direct the Commerce Department to issue a policy notice specifying the conditions under which states may receive a share of the remaining money.

“That Policy Notice must provide that States with AI laws identified pursuant to section 4 of this order are ineligible for non-deployment funds, to the maximum extent allowed by Federal law,” the draft executive order says. “The Policy Notice must also describe how a fragmented State regulatory landscape for AI threatens to undermine BEAD-funded deployments, the growth of AI applications reliant on high-speed networks, and BEAD’s mission of delivering universal, high-speed connectivity.”

Non-broadband grants also threatened

Funding restrictions could extend beyond broadband because the order would direct federal agencies “to assess their discretionary grant programs and determine whether agencies may condition such grants on States… not enacting an AI law that conflicts with the policy of this order.”

The draft order would also require the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Trade Commission to take action against state AI laws. The FCC chairman would be directed to “initiate a proceeding to determine whether to adopt a Federal reporting and disclosure standard for AI models that preempts conflicting State laws.”

The FTC chairman would be required to issue a policy statement detailing “circumstances under which State laws that require alterations to the truthful outputs of AI models are preempted by the FTC Act’s prohibition on engaging in deceptive acts or practices affecting commerce.”

When Cruz proposed a moratorium restricting state AI regulation in mid-2025, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) helped lead the fight against it. “Until Congress passes federally preemptive legislation like the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework, we can’t block states from making laws that protect their citizens,” Blackburn said at the time.

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) also spoke out against the Cruz plan, saying it would preempt “good state consumer protection laws” related to robocalls, deepfakes, and autonomous vehicles.

Trump wants Congress to preempt state laws

Besides reviving the Cruz plan, Trump’s draft executive order seeks new legislation to preempt state laws. The order would direct Trump administration officials to “jointly prepare for my review a legislative recommendation establishing a uniform Federal regulatory framework for AI that preempts State AI laws that conflict with the policy set forth in this order.”

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) this week said a ban on state AI laws could be included in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Democrats are trying to keep the ban out of the bill.

“We have to allow states to take the lead because we’re not able to, so far in Washington, come up with appropriate legislation,” Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the ranking member on the Armed Services Committee, told Semafor.

In a Truth Social post on Tuesday, Trump claimed that states are “trying to embed DEI ideology into AI models.” Trump wrote, “We MUST have one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes. If we don’t, then China will easily catch us in the AI race. Put it in the NDAA, or pass a separate Bill, and nobody will ever be able to compete with America.”

Photo of Jon Brodkin
Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.
108 Comments