Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2511.23041

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2511.23041 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Nov 2025]

Title:Social Perceptions of English Spelling Variation on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of Human and LLM Responses

Authors:Dong Nguyen, Laura Rosseel
View a PDF of the paper titled Social Perceptions of English Spelling Variation on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of Human and LLM Responses, by Dong Nguyen and Laura Rosseel
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Spelling variation (e.g. funnnn vs. fun) can influence the social perception of texts and their writers: we often have various associations with different forms of writing (is the text informal? does the writer seem young?). In this study, we focus on the social perception of spelling variation in online writing in English and study to what extent this perception is aligned between humans and large language models (LLMs). Building on sociolinguistic methodology, we compare LLM and human ratings on three key social attributes of spelling variation (formality, carefulness, age). We find generally strong correlations in the ratings between humans and LLMs. However, notable differences emerge when we analyze the distribution of ratings and when comparing between different types of spelling variation.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2511.23041 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2511.23041v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.23041
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Dong Nguyen [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:06:18 UTC (316 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Social Perceptions of English Spelling Variation on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of Human and LLM Responses, by Dong Nguyen and Laura Rosseel
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-11
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status