Category Archives: money

A message from Michael Horovitz

This LOLcat, insopired by Gil Scott-Heron, is brought to you by the Baroque brother, Mr Dog.

You see, everything is influenced by everything else: this is what we mean by the mysterious word Zeitgeist. The ‘Zeitgeist’ is a powerful image, the ghost or spirit of the age – but if you applied a different image to the concept you might find something like this creepy satellite dish manned by cats; or a bag, into which is thrown everything that makes makes up a part of the web of influence. It operates along lines of place as well as those of time. The Zeitgeist is almost like a secret mirror world in which everything that’s granted a place is extra bright, colour-saturated and hyper-significant. We expend a lot of energy looking for Meaning, and that mirrorball world is where it resides.

One of the most delightful corners of the poetry world I occupy – and its mirror world – is the one occupied by the sixties Beat legend Michael Horovitz. (I refer you to my previous blog post in support of his bid for Oxford Professor of Poetry, which links to some other great material.) I say delightful, because this is a corner where the business of poetry is to give pleasure and delight, in the most serious or silly way possible – where the serious and silly intermingle, as they should. It’s the same part of the sack where Blake jumbles, and where Keats’ Nightingale warbles – unlikely as it might seem that the Horovitz Anglo-Saxophone (more like a kazoo, really) is in any way related to that bird. (But it is.)

Of course, I can talk about the Zeitgeist, but that sixties spirit isn’t really in it, is it. It’s all about getting ahead, getting your MFA, building your career as a Poet – what Horovitz calls the Enter-Prize culture – and of course, on the quotidian level, trying to  hang on to some kind of work, an income, a chance to be allowed to use your skills. We have no time to write poetry any more; we’re too busy establishing our brand on LinkedIn. It seems there’s no such thing now as the freedom just to exist.

Michael Horovitz is now in his 70s, existing, and still apparently (as Blake did) working harder than most people in their 30s: gigging, selling his books, playing his Anglo-Saxophone with an amazing verve and most unseasonable joy. He goes around the place with the openness and interest of a person less than half his age, the lack of pretension of a person who never heard of an MFA; he rests on no laurels; he claims no entitlements; and he is still deeper, smarter and funnier than just about everybody else.

He’s been sending versions of this message round to his mailing list for the past month or so, and I am now sharing it with you. If anyone has any ideas or can offer to help, please do share them. And if you’d like to be on his mailing list – the first part of this email was all about upcoming events and appearances – just email me, and I’ll make sure your details get forwarded.

Michael Horovitz writes:

I’m reluctantly appealing to any of you who might lead to my finding STORAGE &/or WORKSPACE, ideally within a few miles of Portobello Road, because all three of the local places I’ve been renting have this week given me notice to evacuate them within another two months maximum. (n.b,the beginning of July).

There is a mass of irreplaceable archive materials along with more than 50 years’ accumulated culturally invaluable items, including artworks by a number of remarkable artists, audio & visual recordings featuring both celebrated & unjustly neglected spoken word, song, musical & multimedic performers, and much else.

It has long been my hope to get quite a lot of these materials published/issued on CD/DVD – but unfortunately as the number of worthwhile tasks I’d like to fulfill increases daily, my capacities & resources to get them sorted decreases.

As well as any suggestions of low rental or even free premises to move these materials into, I would be equally grateful if any of you might lead to – or might yourselves consider – giving a hand or two on some of the daily biz of catching up on the most essential/dated of New Departures/Poetry Olympics jobs.

The most constant urgency, now that UK postal services have been so effectively dismantled by the seemingly unstoppable ruthless greed of The New Philistia, is for anyone who might have time to offer operating the iMac computer I blew impossible money on replacing its clapped-out predecessor with about a year ago.

I myself can’t wield the mouse or begin to understand webworlds at all, but would be unable to earn £1 a day were it not for the long-suffering helpmates who have been mega-generous over the years since cyberforces took over most official communications.

Courtesy of some much appreciated gastronomic patronage there is nearly always some pleasant food & drink at my abode, & also largeish quantities of some of the New Departures CD/print backlist, abundant supplies of which will be available to anyone who might visit with a view to auditioning for some part-time assistance (– there are many areas apart from computerland, including various kinds of shlepping, around which my dwindling powers could use reinforcements). Another possible bonus for anyone who likes playing table tennis would be that I’ve access to a spaciously installed table over the road foe selected hours on most days.

1 Comment

Filed under Keats, Life, money, poetry

This is the week that is

Cuts? Cuts? Ohmigod, not the CAKE!

And so begins the last week of work. Not mine, but an awful lot of people. I’m sure this is the last week of work for many of the 3-500,000 who wrecked their thighs walking at an unnaturally slow shuffle through London on Saturday – enjoying their last proper weekend by giving the Coalition the referendum they never asked for.

Of course, most of the weekend’s protesters probably still have their jobs – those who aren’t retired, that is. But some, like me, will be fighting to cling to temporary contracts in organisations where the simple need to get the work done is no longer a good enough justification for keeping someone on. Some will have taken reduced hours or massive pay cuts to keep in work. Some will have revised their ambitions from – well – ambition, downwards to where just keeping a roof over their heads is a major success.

The “squeezed middle,” according to our fearless (because too foolish to perceive disaster) leaders, begins well below the average income. In fact, if I remember correctly, it begins at something like £13,000 a year, an amount I can’t imagine having to try to live on. (Though I have in the past been paid so little I worried about accepting an invitation to a picnic.) And now the safety nets, the housing and other benefits that helped people survive on less than it costs to survive, are going to disappear. To say nothing of the NHS.

Well, anyway, this is the start of the final week of work for about 70 of my colleagues, as well as many others in other places. Everyone is being quite plucky, and some are even maintaining a very impressive appearance of actual cheerfulness. I shall be arriving at work with three bags of sweets, and the coconut macaroons one of the team loves, to see us through, and I have no doubt that others will do the same. It has been remarked already that the whole organisation has been awash in cake since the announcement in January, and I believe one of our number has committed to one of her huge, exciting blueberry cakes on Thursday. (Hmm… I think I will propose that we all bring something in, and have a Let Them Eat Cake Day – it feels more cheerful somehow than a Last Lunch, though we’ll probably have that, too. Call it lining our stomachs.)

In the meantime, we’ve got tons of actual stuff going on too, so it would have been a very busy week even without all this current affairs happening.

Then on Friday, after the massive leaving drinks, the survivors will stumble bleary-eyed into a half-empty office, and no doubt begin rifling through our colleagues’ abandoned desks, looting spare Sellotape, the good staplers and any folders that are actually A4 instead of foolscap. It will be like The Bed Sitting Room, only without the man on the bike. I remarked to a colleague recently that April 1st was going to be strange, and he said, “Not just strange for us – strange everywhere!” He’s right, of course. It’s going to be odd in the neighbourhoods, where people may be milling around a little bit dazed (and possibly hungover from the leaving drinks), having never seen the place on a weekday lunchtime before. You may notice them, if you’re in a neighbourhood scenario yourself during the day; some may even still be wearing suits.

Your correspondent here is pretty safe till June (though with a rent increase notice that takes me rent up to more than half my take-home pay). But between now and then there is going to be absolute masses of work to do (and even more retrenching; I have a feeling that not only handbags but also blueberries and sweets will be well off the agenda).

You know what this is, it’s democracy in action. It’s the Zeitgeist (or, as my brother helpfully points out, the spirit of the times). Just like when the people used to collect for the miners outside the supermarkets and everybody used to give them tinned ratatouille, thinking it might make a  nice change for them. We were HERE. We marched on London and didn’t even get a Fortnum’s hamper to show for it, and this will be one of those defining moments. Now where’s my cake slice?

6 Comments

Filed under money, politics

In which the UK’s public spending is cut by over 20%

Guys, sorry, it’s just going kind of from not-sublime to ridiculous at the moment. I’m in a state of shock over these cuts. Poetry shmoetry, when I get some words back I’ll write an editorial for Horizon Review like nothing you’ve ever seen – and it’s not about the goddamn arts funding, either. “Arts funding” is just a little last month, don’t you think? Except where it’s about jobs?

Johann Hari in the Independent:

When was the last time Britain’s public spending was slashed by more than 20 per cent? Not in my mother’s lifetime. Not even in my grandmother’s lifetime. No, it was in 1918, when a Conservative-Liberal coalition said the best response to a global economic crisis was to rapidly pay off this country’s debts. The result? Unemployment soared from 6 per cent to 19 per cent, and the country’s economy collapsed so severely that they lost all ability to pay their bills and the debt actually rose from 114 per cent to 180 per cent. “History doesn’t repeat itself,” Mark Twain said, “but it does rhyme.”

George Osborne has just gambled your future on an extreme economic theory that has failed whenever and wherever it has been tried. In the Great Depression, we learned some basic principles. When an economy falters, ordinary people – perfectly sensibly – cut back their spending and try to pay down their debts. This causes a further fall in demand, and makes the economy worse. If the government cuts back at the same time, then there is no demand at all, and the economy goes into freefall. That’s why virtually every country in the world reacted to the Great Crash of 2008 – caused entirely by deregulated bankers – by increasing spending, funded by temporary debt. Better a deficit we repay in the good times than an endless depression. The countries that stimulated hardest, like South Korea, came out of recession first.

People usually complain on budget day about a penny in the tax on alcohol or petrol. This time it isn’t some cuddly fellow with w beat-up briefcase. It’s two shiny men in yellow ties, lying through their teeth. Linda Grant, on Facebook this morning, alluded to how different this is to what we’re used to:

We’re all in this together: I wish one of the papers would do one of those things where you check your status – single, married, with kinds, retired, disabled, living in social housing, higher tax bracket, public servant, private sector – and show what you are losing. Because I have yet to find a single way in which I’m directly affected by this budget, not being poor, disabled or (yet) old. It’s massive con trick.

Apparently 85% of the deficit was caused by the bank bailout – which of course we knew, right. And of course we have to pay it all back. But surely the bankers should be paying a little more of it.

And there’s the Vodaphone business. For anyone who can’t be bothered to click, a £6bn tax bill, written off via a loophole – while their Director of Finance is advising Osborne on corporate tax.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers is predicting a million jobs lost.

Official estimate only [sic] 500,000.

Well, and so on and so on and so on… I’m not going to complain about a million enumerated ways in which the Baroque household will be affected by this; we’ve identified some of them, and suffice to say Mlle B in her first term of A Levels is not feeling very chirpy. Nor am I going to write some analytical thing or debate whether we needed to rein it in, etc. That’s boring.In any case I’ve had no time to keep up properly, just working at work and being in a complete fog.

I’ve had a splitting headache for 36 hours now, I missed Newsnight last night by falling asleep on the couch the minute I got upon it, and I just don’t think I can take being unemployed again. You could crib off the New Statesman if you want more information.

Aux armes, citoyens, and pass the Nurofen.

In other news, I’m guest blogging next week at Best American Poetry! Starting on Sunday. Just watch me.

6 Comments

Filed under money, politics, useless, what IS it with this lot??

the crash: life, the universe, the quangos and everything

I was going to do a Poet Files post about Victor Zamora, the Chilean miner who’s been writing poetry while trapped down in the mine.

Then I was going to do nothing because it’s been such an utterly shit couple of weeks, with nothing but work, work, lack of transport, more work, too few lunch breaks, the announcement that a quarter of all the quangos – that is, non-departmental government bodies – that is, the organisations funded by the government to carry out work to a government agenda – are being closed, merged, massively downsized – and a disorienting lack of close personal contact with anyone important to me. The key phrase is “focus on delivery.” In other words, shut up. Don’t do research, don’t advise on policy, don’t collect qualititative information, don’t think outside the box, don’t point out mistakes, don’t know more than we do. Don’t care, don’t want anything, don’t strive for goodness, just focus on delivery. Keep your head down.

Consumer Focus – formed only two years ago, partly of the National Consumer Council, where I worked – is being closed and its work merged with Citizens Advice, if you can imagine anything that stupid. Here is their CEO’s statement, which not only stands as a model of corporate communications but also vividly exposes the spirit of the whole sorry Bonfire:

‘Consumer Focus has achieved big wins for consumers in just two years – including a £70 million pound energy bill refund and cash ISA reforms saving over £15 million a year.  We’ve delivered our biggest results in the last few months but the biggest challenges for consumers are ahead, with major reforms to the energy, post and financial services markets.

I am immensely proud of what we have achieved.  Government has decided to transfer at least some of our functions to Citizens Advice and Citizens Advice Scotland.  The issue now is not who does the work but that the work is done well, at a time when consumers are facing difficult economic circumstances, especially those who are vulnerable and whom Parliament has given us a particular duty to protect.

What matters now, is that the transfer happens in a way that works in consumers’ interests. The expertise and knowledge that has enabled us to fight for consumers must not be lost.  Changes must not be at the expense of the public’s rights and needs – which organisations like Consumer Focus were created to protect.’

(I also note that one of the many places where I gave a great interview last spring for a slightly-too-junior job, and didn’t get it because they had an ex-head of international comms or something in the running too, is also being abolished. Sad about that: they do important work.)

But I read around a bit anyway, and was inspired by the story of Victor Zamora and the other miners, and had an idea for a post in mind which would be bigger and more ambitious than a Poet Files post. It was about poetry, survival and work. It would draw on the prevailing mood.

Then I looked in the mirror and saw how absolutely pale and shattered I look, and thought, “Who am I kidding?” Who am I to say what anything means or what it’s about? I don’t know anything. It sounds unworthy but the main thing I saw when those guys were rescued was how much their wives loved them. How wonderful that must be. I’m not down a mine but I have no idea if I’ll ever see my siblings or mother or cousins again. Though I suppose if I were trapped like them the rescue fund would have paid for someone to come…

That glorious rescue seems out of tenor with the moment. Maybe that’s why it looks like a miracle. Here in the UK, while Chile celebrates and is reborn in its collective identity, we are sitting here – 41% of us in our solitary homes – passively watching our services disappear, the whole post-war dream disappear. Sacked by a couple of visigoths in yellow ties. The most relevant story here this week is the utterly horrific one of Jimmy Mubenga, killed by his guards while being deported. An entire planeload of people heard him screaming for almost an hour and felt unable to do anything, even when he got more and more faint and kept saying “I can’t breathe.” The Big, Caring Society. Our world turns out to have been a very short blip.

And, unlike what these tea-party imbeciles and their ilk seem to think, you can’t just go back. We’re not in Dickens Days any more, there can be no such thing as “small government.” It’s a world economy, there are international infrastructures, complexities that require proper regulation, personal data is on servers everywhere, we don’t even know what intellectual property means any more. Every year the world population grows by three times New York City and no one knows how to deal with it. Well – we do, but the governments wont regulate and won’t make anyone do it.

And you can’t just go okay, now I invent Big Society! Cameron’s sheltered little nostalgia trip completely neglects the fact that, back in those Big Society Dickens Days, first of all women weren’t mostly working in full-time jobs, secondly families could live on one income, and thirdly lots of people starved, died of treatable illnesses and had generally awful lives.

The sector I work in is being demolished – and I’ve already done almost a year of unemployment, and it’s hard to be in any way sanguine about anything. No one has a permanent job anymore, everyone is on a contract. Those of us without any partner or other means of support – who will never inherit anything – who don’t even own our homes – who are going to be poor anyway when we’re old, which is disproportionately women – are at most risk. If I lost my job again I could very easily indeed lose my flat, or go into fast-escalating arrears and debt, out of which one would expect never to climb. They’re “reforming” the Housing Benefit, too, don’t you know.

The other day it was the Bonfire of the Quangos, and on Wednesday the government’s public spending review announcement will drop on our heads. That’s when we’ll find out that the government departments that are meant to be taking on all the functions of the axed NGPDs are simultaneously being stripped of the budget to do it. With the so-called reforms of the benefits service coming in, to force people to work, where are these jobs going to be? “Focus on delivery.” But we can’t ALL sweep the streets.

A friend of mine, who won’t countenance claiming benefits on any level – even though he now has a disability and could do so, even with the new “reforms” – had a rather brilliant exchange with a woman in his local Jobcentre Plus. She was criticising him for limiting the jobs he was looking for to the salary band he’s used to (not exorbitant!). He justified it, saying he needed a salary he could live on. She said, “I earn [some small amount] and I manage.”

He challenged this.

“Well,” she said, after admitting that she has a husband, who is also working for a pittance. “Of course we get working families’ tax allowance. And we get a bit of housing benefit too because it doesn’t cover the rent. And…” And, in short, the only way she was able to survive on what the government is paying her is by claiming benefits on top.

And meanwhile, downsizing one’s expenses is almost impossible because for every tiny little thing we are now on scary contracts – I tried last year. Phone bill, TV/internet/landline bill, utilities – all locked down. You could give up your TV and your ability to communicate with the outside world, but for anyone who relies on the internet or their phone to do their work that would of course be catastrophic. Talk about Big Society! The Big Companies have got us.

And meanwhile I know plenty of people who are carrying on just as if nothing was happening. Maybe they’re not reliant only on their own ability to support themselves.

University loan – forget student grants, we’ve already forgotten those – loans are going to be put on normal interest rates, is it? And fees raised to £7,000+ a year? It’s a shame to see my daughter just getting obsessed with the daily news, just as she starts her A Levels, only to follow the story about how she may not be able to go to university at all. But the recent graduates I know are mainly not able to get jobs.

My life savings were wiped out last year and the year before, even with my redundancy money – partly through my own stupidity, because I took my time at first and lived normally off the money. I was trying to regroup after a particularly damaging line-management situation at work and it never occurred to me that with my skills, experience and CV I wouldn’t get a new job equivalent to the one I’d lost. Plus, I had some challenging stuff going on at home, which cost me a lot of money (and attention) one way and another.

So Mlle B is working now in a local shop on both Saturdays AND Sundays, and although she thinks it is to take pressure off me and her dad and save up for her summer festivals and trip to Greece next year, I worry that it could turn into something much more grimly utilitarian. And what seemed like a lot of pocket money will simply turn into not-enough-for-uni.

My pay packet meanwhile is fully £500 a month less than it was two – or even five – years ago, and everything costs twice as much – so I’m hardly going to be salting away a fortune for her.

I am, in fact, literally worried sick. My stomach is still bad, the pills are running out, I have to go back to the doctor. I’m very tired: my demanding paid-&-unpaid work programme this year was only going to be achievable because I thought I was in a position to be able to expect a grain of support – moral, emotional, and in the form of someone else occasionally cooking dinner or being nice to me. Sometimes you just want to sit down in comfort, with someone there who vaguely cares. But instead I’m having to go sit in pubs and restaurants and poetry readings – some of which can be painfully interminable, and cost money I don’t feel I should spend, and require an hour on a bus to get home from – just for some company and to vary the 24/7 solitary commute between work-at-work and work-at-home. It is good to see your friends of course, and I love my friends, but it’s not the same, is it.

They say that he travels fastest who travels alone; some of us know that’s because he has to keep going or he’ll crash.

And now I am going to make some tea and put together more of the next resplendent issue of Horizon Review. You’ll see. It’ll be great.

12 Comments

Filed under Life, money, the end of the worr-uld, what IS it with this lot??

art and life

Sir Ian McKellen in Melbourne a few weeks ago, taking a break in rehearsals for Waiting for Godot, sitting on a bench behind the stage door, in costume, found a $1 coin tossed into his hat by a passerby, with the timeless words, “do you need some help, brother?”*

In London the relationship with tramps and beggars is complicated by their relentless ubiquity. You could easily spend £70 a week, even with a strict £1 cap, giving money to them. When I lived in Hackney Central there were at least ten regulars, plus others every day. There was a young Spanish guy I always gave money to and had a chat; he had been kind to my children when I was at a low ebb. I defended him vociferously one night when a smartly dressed, ostentatiously middle-class man began to abuse him, really nastily, outside that cesspit of humanity, Tesco in Morning Lane. He was always reading, and was also constantly in and out of hospital with what I later learned were needle injuries, of course. Subsidised by me.

I was taken in by some crack-addicted woman’s fake story one night on my way home, the tears, and gave her £5 (she was crying, she seemed nice, I wanted to be a nice person), only to see her comparing money with her friend, right as rain, two minutes later. It was annoying, and unnerving – a bit late in the day to be taken in! I felt betrayed, and unhappy for days. Once in my lunch hour I was put under a curse by a gypsy lavender-seller in James Street for not buying her lavender; that was in the 80s. (I’m not slating the Romani; no one told her to be a cartoon gypsy and put people under curses.)

Then there’s Big Issue fatigue, vendors on every street corner assuming that they have some moral right to your purchase of their magazine – which is not exactly unmissable journalism, is it. So you’re not really buying it, you’re just allowing them to give you something for your charity. And no one ever seems to think you might have bought it off someone else – that’s where the “selling” facade falls apart: you’re expected to give them the money and pretend you want their magazine. One guy even said to me: Well, you could buy another!” There’s a really in-your-face couple of them in the doorway of Whole Foods in Stoke Newington – you literally can’t get in, or past, without being accosted. (This particular fatigue is less brutal now we’re rid of the people who used to shove the free piece of rubbish London Lite in your face every ten feet… God I hated them. It’s a shame to tar The Big Issue with that brush but sometimes you just want to walk to the station, you know?)

People with blankets on their laps by the ATM, by the station exit, outside the supermarket. Places where they’ve got you cornered. Three guys in Old St Station the other night, as I went through it, every one of whom approached me. I had about £2. I snapped at one of them (I know: rudely, churlishly): “I’m not even working.” He said, “neither am I.” (But I’m not asking him for his money.) (And felt like rubbish all the way home.) And a woman wanting money “to get home.”

I remember years ago, when I was young and in New York
, a man came into a pizza place and started begging from table to
table. You couldn’t exactly say you had no money – but then I hadn’t,
it was my friend’s treat – I sat frozen in horror and embarrassment, unable to respond at all…
(NYC before Giuliani, I remember being chased along in midtown by a man
with no legs, on a skateboard sort of thing, with a sign saying “Viet
Nam Vet”.)

Maybe the strangest thing about tramps, beggars and “homeless people” is that no one ever talks about them. Taboo: we don’t discuss it in polite society, except as a policy issue,  or to tut it (“tut tut – so awful, isn’t it? Shall we try that bar over there?”). Why? Because no one wants to look mean. Or seem to piously brag. To expose themselves as a mug, or a prude, a skinflint or a pushover.

Someone I know was walking along with a friend, and they were approached by a beggar, and the man turned on him: “Look. My business is failing, I’m paying x amount in alimony, I’m putting two kids through school, I’m this, that, I owe this, that – why should I give you my money??

Ten times a day the rising tide, of anger – at them, for bald-faced asking you to give them your money; at yourself, for being pinched, sour, broke; at the world, for being such a shit place; at the government, because our cities are broken; then sadness – for them, for being like this, for it not being simple; then numbing brainweary shutdown. A daily gauntlet of human desperation, much of it (we’re told, we can’t imagine otherwise) self-induced (and Ms Baroque does not condone the use of drugs, which in turn support organised crime). But then, if someone hasn’t got the resources to do more than they’re doing – if someone is, after all, doing the best they can – is it their fault it isn’t more?

And the fear: what happens if one day it’s you?

Ian McKellen says: “The dollar coin is now lodged between two drawing pins on the board above my dressing room mirror. My lucky talisman.”

* I’m told there isn’t really a recession in Australia; but here in London that question, with its canonical use of the word “brother,” inevitably heightens the sense that we are, indeed, going through something like the Great Depression, and is even – in and of itself – a word of encouragement.

9 Comments

Filed under Hackney, important things, London, money, politics, the meaning of life