2021 Media Shipments
|
Exabytes |
Revenue |
$/GB |
| Flash | 598 | $68.6B | $0.115 |
| Hard Disk | 1418 | $28.0B | $0.020 |
| LTO Tape | 59.2 | $0.51B | $0.003 |
I summed up my big picture view of archival media eight years ago in
Archival Media: Not a Good Business. Whatever your choice of technology, the economics are brutal. This is a version of the table in that post, updated to 2021 and again based upon
IBM data. Note that archival media shiped 4% as many bytes as hard disk and generated 1.8% or the revenue. It remains a tiny market.
I have written several times about Microsoft Research's
Project Silica, most recently in last year's
Archival Storage:
I'm skeptical of "commoditizing the technology". Archival systems are a niche in the IT market, and one on which companies are loath to spend money. Realistically, there aren't going to be a vast number of Silica write heads. The only customers for systems like Silica are the large cloud providers, who will be reluctant to commit their archives to technology owned by a competitor. Unless a mass-market application for femtosecond lasers emerges, the scope for cost reduction is limited.
But the more I think about this technology, which is still in the lab, the more I think it probably has the best chance of impacting the market among all the rival archival storage technologies. Not great, but better than its competitors:
I followed this with a list of eight major reasons for my opinion.
Below the fold an update on the project and an assessment.