Category Archives: Current Events

Doubt and being in the flow

Posted in Current Events, Personal, Spiritual Journey, Uncategorized by

For the Centers for Spiritual Living the month of May’s topic has been Divine Doubt and Reverend Theresa Fieberts has given some thought provoking talks. She asked us to consider “doubt” in our lives and where we stand, etc. which has had me pondering where doubt lives in the space of greater calm and equilibrium in which I’ve been living.

So much of my life before the spiritual path — and in its first years — was spent not just in doubt, but questioning every decision to the point of massive angst. So when Rev Theresa asked us to think about doubt I realized it works really differently now.

While doubt is still present, it arrives less often — and is really more likely to happen if I’m really tired and my head starts spinning about something like whether I’m going to have granola or a bagel for breakfast. Big expenditures are probably the main place where doubt takes over and, because it’s a huge multi-generational family habit, I’m finding that one hard to shake.

But most of the time, as I progress ever more into “living in the flow”, when I realize I’m letting doubt take over, I stop, take a breath and tune in. The more I turn the decision over to the higher self/inner voice the more likely a very strong answer falls in place. About as often as not the answer presents a choice I wasn’t even considering.

I’m especially loving how well it works in a lot of small places. My mind often decides on a plan full of “shoulds” for the day. Some part of me drags about the plan. I tune in and a different plan which at the least changes the order of mine, at most presents an alternate set of things to do, is announced. Following the inner plan leads to a day in which more things get done while I feel more relaxed at the end.

Doubt now is more… quiet. When I can stay mindful enough to notice its presence and tune in for the answer I know comes from higher consciousness, it’s easy to move from doubt to a place of certainty about the next step.

Overall I’ve also moved into a space where I feel a general calm about larger issues. I follow what’s happening in politics and government and do all I can to be sure I’m helping wherever possible to make sure the authoritarians don’t win but I’m rarely caught up in feeling panicked because for quite a while I’ve had a deep sense we’re just watching the last throes of resistance to the times of love and compassion toward which we’re moving.

Even “tanks bottom” warnings, while leading me to prep, don’t have me in constant worry, just aware of possibilities and set to ride out the possible downward spiral. Such a change from the reaction I’d once have had to the studies on the looming tanks bottom impact.

It’s been fun as I hit this moment of recognizing how very far my spiritual journey has brought me to add in thoughts about doubt in my life and how it’s changed.

Our society’s grind culture consciousness

Posted in Change the World, Current Events, Opinion, Uncategorized by

Over the last couple of years I’ve pondered grind culture in several posts. The more I look at it the more I see how very many ways a combo of the corporate grind culture thinking promoted by CEOs and rich people plus Puritanical beliefs about wealth equaling being right with God and poverty equaling lazy and wrong with God are buried deep in our national consciousness.

It’s one of the few places where people on both sides of the political divide hold multiple judgments about others. There’s some difference about one side being willing to help people anyway and one side preferring to leave the sick and poor to die. But both talk about whether people are “deserving” or not and make life coach-style statements about hard work being rewarded and pulling bootstraps, etc.

Once I started seeing it, it began jumping out at me from everywhere. This stuff is SO embedded in our psyches. Having worked a lot of years on clearing all sorts of old beliefs dictating my behavior from childhood, I know it’s hard to let go of those ingrained habits of thinking/behaving. And since the whole country can’t go through the kinds of deep therapeutic release work that help individuals, I’ll admit I don’t have an answer for how we do it. I just know that as we try to overturn the power of billionaires and CEOs we need to address the grind culture they love to impose.

Some examples of how it appears in many aspects of life:

The “Work Ethic”

Our society worships the work ethic and quotes by the hundreds are constantly cited, discussing how hard work and diligence will bring rewards:

  • I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it-Thomas Jefferson
  • Great things come from hard work and perseverance. No Excuses – Kobe Bryant
  • I never took a day off in my 20’s, not one – Bill Gates
  • No one understands and appreciates the American Dream of hard work leading to material rewards better than a non-American – Anthony Bourdain
  • Successful people are not gifted; they just work hard, then succeed on purpose-G.K. Neilson

No account is taken in any of these “encouraging” quotes of the multi ways in which society is organized to make it impossible for more than a few to just work hard and automatically achieve the life they want.

Practices like redlining, racism in general, and not enough support from laws all combine to make it close to impossible for POC to get ahead. They get paid less, are often denied loans & mortgages, etc. But the hard work “ethic” says anyone who hasn’t become financially successful is lazy and undeserving. It’s a horrible catch-22 and applies in many ways also to all women.

The same catch extends on to most people who started off poor. Of course everyone has examples of people who did work hard and lived well but those examples are the exception. The system is simply not built to have everyone make a great living, buy a house, etc. with hard work.

The biggest obstacle comes from rich people and the corporate culture that propagandizes about hard work, etc. They purposely don’t pay living wages for full time work, fail to give decent benefits, try to get people to work as contractors instead of employees so the corporation has NO requirements of benefits or paying into social security, etc.

The rich set it up to suit their greed and then shout “Lazy” at all the people working full time — sometimes with another job as well — but not being paid enough to live comfortably. It’s wage theft and the work ethic b.s. is just made up as an excuse to treat people badly and blame the harm on the victims.

The “Deserving Poor” Myth

Dating back to Victorian times (at least) there is a myth that there are some “deserving” poor people who are disabled or too old to work but everyone else who’s poor is “undeserving” because being poor only happens if you’re lazy and not a good person. Two big problems with those are assumptions are largely ignored, even by “liberals”: (1) a huge number of people are poor because greedy employers/companies want them to work full time or more while not being paid a living wage and (2) a disturbing assumption there’s such a thing as a human who doesn’t deserve to eat and have a roof over their head.

Like all grind culture, the common sayings regarding poverty and being deserving or not are promoted by rich people to divert blame and hostility to poor people instead of everyone realizing the rich people are the ones who create the problems and keep people poor.

For more on deserving poor see https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/worldpoverty/chpt/deserving-poor and https://sites.psu.edu/aspsy/2020/12/01/the-deserving-vs-the-undeserving-poor-how-do-we-deem-whos-worthy/

In America, Grind Culture Breathing

In America (can’t speak for other countries) most people are taught to breathe incorrectly. The natural rhythm of breathing is to inhale deeply into the abs and then allow the air to fill us up slowly moving up to the clavicle then to exhale beginning at the top and slowly letting the air move out till the abs are emptied. Ideally both inhalation and exhalation should be about the same length. I see holding the abs tight and breathing so tension is created as an outgrowth of a general attitude of grinding and making everything hard.

In this country people are taught to keep their abs sucked in which means they breathe only at the top. And no emphasis is made on paying attention to keeping the two parts even in length. The incorrect breathing habit is stressful for the body and can contribute to feelings of fatigue. Perpetual stress like that can also weaken the immune system.

Some people also develop habits of holding their breath every time something is disturbing until their regular breathing pattern includes not breathing for short spells. This contributes to being tense and uneasy.

The habit of doing the opposite of what’s healthy in breathing extends into a lot of exercise. In yoga we learn the natural breathing pattern in movement is to inhale as you open up or make a move requiring strength and to exhale as you fold or stretch into a move. In gym-type exercise and physical therapy, etc. they teach the opposite. So the majority of instructions about breathing in U.S. “fitness” is to do the opposite of what’s natural and healthy for the body.

Healthy, Relaxed, Rested

In a culture where rich people rule and it suits them to keep everyone else underpaid, overworked, constantly tired and/or sick, etc. it’s a revolutionary act to choose a path where you rest as much as needed, stay calm and peaceful and keep yourself in a good state of health.

Viva la revolution!

A look at impeachment & the 25th Amendment

Posted in Current Events, Politics, Uncategorized by

There’s a lot of talk these days about invoking the 25th Amendment and or Impeachment of the President. Some people seem to be confusing the two. And most of the talk doesn’t seem to be looking at the actual numbers required.

With the caveat I never practiced Constitutional Law so my knowledge is a combo of the classes in law school and a LOT of reading and looking up legal opinions in the last 10 years, I think I understand enough about this to explain it.

25th Amendment

The portion of the amendment people want to invoke is section 4:

“Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President. Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.”

Assuming the current Cabinet would never invoke this amendment, let’s look at the possibilities via Congress. Congress can create a body to look into whether the President is able to continue and endow it with the power to declare him unfit. It would take a majority and I’m doubtful about the current Congress. But let’s assume after November the Democrats can muster a simple majority to create this body.

The President can then declare he actually is able to continue his duties. At this point the amendment requires 2/3 of the House and 2/3 of the Senate to override him.

For the House, 2/3 means 290 have to vote to override him. Democrats would have to pick up 77 seats in November to be able to do that themselves. If they have anything less than 290 seats it means they have to convince some Republicans to grow a spine and vote with them.

For the Senate, 2/3 means 67 have to vote to override him. Again, highly unlikely at the moment that 20 Republicans would develop a moral compass and vote with the Democrats. If Democrats pick up the highest possible number of seats in November they’d have 60 seats. So they’d still have to convince 7 Republicans to stop their allegiance to the 🍊thing and Project 2025.

IMO neither scenario is at all likely but I’m willing to be convinced by someone who has data to back up an argument that it’s do-able.

Impeachment

People often seem to forget impeachment is just stage one of getting rid of a President. Impeachment has the fairly simple requirement of a simple majority of the House voting to impeach. Right now unless some Republicans reverse course to actually vote out of concern for their constituents, even a simple majority is unlikely though faintly possible. But let’s assume after November this part is easy.

To actually get rid of the President the process has to get through stage 2, which is the trial by the Senate and two-thirds of the Senate must vote in favor of convicting in order to remove the President. Two-thirds is 67. As noted above, Democrats don’t have close to that right now and the most they can get up to in November is 60. Whether it happens now or later, unless a bunch of Republicans finally stand up to the Project 2025 crowd and/or go against the President, the numbers simply are not there to achievement impeachment.

See: Impeachment

25th Amendment Section 4

For real change break the power of the rich!

Posted in Change the World, Collective Consciousness, Current Events, Environmental, Opinion, People Power, Politics by

As many of us are, I’m following current politics anxiously and often. Having been a “leftist” for 50 years, I’m really happy to see a new generation finally getting how much we need big changes. I’m also glad to at last see some understanding of the role of the rich in creating most of our woes. But I’m also uneasy because I don’t see much understanding that a simple change of administration is not an ultimate answer. Too much power has always been held outside of government by the rich and major corporations. Without breaking their power, we’re doomed to be always caught in their greedy machinations.

I’m not sure why it’s so hard to get that to sink in. In part, I think most activists want quick changes and, as they quickly subsided after some victories on Viet Nam, the environment and various rights in the 70’s, the current crop seem impatient for a quick shift that then absolves them from the need to participate. I started trying to get my hippie activist friends in the 70’s to understand the import of research I was doing on the Council on Foreign Relations (think east coast power elite) and their vast inroads into government positions and policy. They didn’t want to hear it.

In the 90’s I tried to talk to my politically-inclined friends about how we vote with our $$ and the importance of bringing down the power of bad-acting corporations (pretty much all…) and again was met with shrugs of impatience. In more recent years I’ve been pushing progressives to organize around the need to bring down the oligarchs. A few people are getting it but I’m not seeing enough.

There are 3 basic parts I see where we can start breaking up the power of the oligarchs and global corporate bullies. First, boycott, boycott, boycott, And the first thing to understand about boycotting is it doesn’t take a large percentage to influence the behavior of corporations. Studies have shown a boycott by 5% can influence a policy change. The complicated part is getting together lists of all the companies owned by the worst oligarchs and all the companies with the worst policies on labor, environment, etc. And then organizing for as many people as possible to boycott all the ones they can.

For instance, someone who lives in a small town with only Walmart as a choice can’t reasonably be asked to boycott Walmart but they can put the Buycott App on their phone and boycott as many products from bad actor companies as possible when shopping there. And sometimes you’ll find dilemmas like Whole Foods being own by Amazon but donating Democratic and, for instance, making one of the highest environmentally ranked toilet papers on the market. It takes people plugging in as much as they can where they can. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/advocacy/direct-action/organize-boycott/main

Another big issue with boycotts is the lack of alternative products and businesses. I’ve written before of the world-wide and growing local co-op movement , which I think holds a lot of promise. We need more co-ops, more small manufacturing, etc. to provide people with alternatives to buying from the greedy pigs.

Another arena where I see possibilities of fomenting change re big corporations follows the brilliant plan carried out by environmentalists with Chevron and Exxon. A concerted campaign of buying shares, recruiting shareholder activists and using voting rights garnered them a seat on each board (since defeated at Exxon). Maybe activists could coordinate the various angles required to elect more Board members to lots more companies. A long shot, but it sure would be helpful if we could create some change from within those companies.

All of this requires some really long-term planning and finding ways to encourage people to boycott, etc. for longer periods than they’re usually willing to do. Which requires enough liberals, progressives, etc to really understand how crucial it is to break the power of the rich that we can stay organized and carrying on the work.

****

I’ve written more extensively about all of this in the past and there’s a whole list of posts, most of which contain a lot of links to more info, at the bottom of this post: Boomers, Revolution, Politics

Stop the DOJ timeline bs

Posted in Current Events, Opinion, Uncategorized by

I’ve been following the January 6 investigations all along, noting things that maybe I know more about because of the law degree, but seeing pretty clear info out there telling us the DOJ was exploring J6 via grand jury at least as early as January 2022, months before the House committee began its hearings and much more info showing a consistent, ongoing probe.

Bear in mind that the Constitution requires indictments be brought by grand jury and the law requires the prosecutors to conduct the grand jury process in secret. The only way we ever know about these proceedings is witnesses — who are asked to be silent, but not required to do so under law — sometimes leak.

So I thought I’d put together some of the timeline I’ve noted along the way:

January 15, 2022 DOJ was seeking seditious conspiracy charges, indicating their plan to move upward through the ranks reached the point of identifying participants in conspiracy. Given the RICO style investigation, I deduce the evidence to reach the leaders who’ve been convicted of seditious conspiracy thus far came from the prosecutions of the J6 participants — see info on them here.

March 30, 2022 Someone leaked that for two months (i.e. beginning early February or late January 2022) DOJ had been subpoenaing officials around Trump to the grand jury. Mind you, a prosecutor doesn’t start a grand jury before they’ve gathered a significant amount of evidence, so if the grand jury was operating in January 2022, DOJ had been gathering evidence for some months prior to that. Again, note all of this was happening months before the House committee began airing hearings.

March 31, 2022 News of DOJ pursuit of those who organized and planned the Ellipse rally on January 6 breaks and also of subpoenas issued on the fake electors scheme

September 1, 2022 Two high level White House lawyers were subpoenaed and this article reveals a number of subpoenas were issued “in recent MONTHS” which means DOJ was also collecting evidence throughout the House committee hearings. I otherwise like Adam Schiff, but am really disappointed that he has continually lied about this. Also note, the article disingenuously mentions these as the highest level of people subpoenaed at that point — since the grand jury is conducted in secrecy, they’re the highest level the media knew about, but they couldn’t have known whether the list being offered was complete. See also.

September 23, 2022 Info on more subpoenas, including a reference to subpoenas issued in winter 2022 to Trump allies re planning Jan 6.

November 18, 2022 Jack Smith appointed special counsel. Note that all of the subpoenas and grand jury activities noted above happened BEFORE the special counsel appointment. He took charge of the DOJ staff who’d already been working on the case, starting with all the evidence already gathered. See here. Jack Smith DID NOT start over; the case did not “finally begin” with the special counsel.

DOJ had been actively pursuing evidence through all of 2022 and probably began something like summer of 2021.

I’m not sure why the media keeps conveniently forgetting their own reporting on the various stages of grand jury proceedings leaked by witnesses. Nor why they act as if they have no familiarity with either the Constitutional grand jury requirement or the law requiring secrecy by grand jurors, prosecutors, etc. But the misinformation that keeps flowing from these blindspots in reporting is damaging. It needs to stop.

When it comes to evidence gathering by the DOJ, it is always happening via a grand jury and silence signifies nothing except that prosecutors are obeying the law that forbids them to speak of the proceedings. The fact that the media or Adam Schiff know nothing about what they’re doing is meaningless given the requirement of secrecy.

I look at the timeline and see the DOJ working diligently on this case long before the popular view gives them credit for starting it. I’m following that DOJ is also running cases on anti-abortion laws in various states, on hate crimes in various states, on vote suppression in multiple states–and that’s all besides all of the normal caseload of federal crimes the DOJ prosecutes.

Looks to me like they’re doing the job. If you want a conviction to follow the indictment you’re so anxious for, let them take the time they need to gather all the evidence they need to get a guilty verdict.

SCOTUS: stop being surprised, accept who they are

Posted in Change the World, Current Events, Opinion, Uncategorized by

As SCOTUS in particular and Repug leaders in general continue to promulgate hateful, backsliding, white supremacist policies and programs, Democrats and the media continually express their amazement at how out of step with the opinions of most Americans the right-wingers are. I’m so tired of this b.s. disingenuousness.

They’ve been showing us who they are at least since Reagan’s time. And like smug, patriarchal, rich white supremacists throughout U.S. history, they don’t give a flying f**k what the majority of Americans think or want. They don’t give a sh*t if their policies kill millions of people. As long as it’s not them or their loved ones, the lives of us peons are completely expendable to them.

Their arrogant assumption is that their fake version of Christianity and their ridiculous “trickledown” economics theory provide the right rules and regulations for the rest of us and that they, the smart and favored-by-god wealthy class are the ones who should dictate what the rest of us can and can’t do.

They don’t care that every study ever done on trickledown economics proved it doesn’t work. As long as the money is flowing upward and they’ve forced everyone to live by their rules they could care less about the impact on the rest of the populace.

Many of the policies they’ve implemented and are planning to implement will cause large swaths of the population to die. Their assumption is the ones most affected will be POC/Democrats and killing people to stop them from voting is A-OK with them. Don’t kid yourself about the level of malevolence these people have toward the majority of people.

It’s way beyond time to stop with the pretense of surprise and shock that there are people who would do such things and start doing the level of plotting and planning they have done for years. Their plots have brought us to the brink of the end of democracy and “go vote” is NOT A PLAN FOR STOPPING THEM.

I’ve been saying for several years that we need to figure out both an effective campaign of counterpropaganda and, most important, how to deliver it with maximum impact. The military does it in war zones and brainwashed people in other places have been re-educated; it needs to happen here.

I’ve also been saying for decades that our real votes are with our dollars. The real power in our country is wielded by corporations and their owners. Too many politicians on both sides are owned by various corporate interests to assume that major change can ever be implemented just by changing some elected officials.

They get their power by using money to buy politicians and judges and they get that money because we buy their stuff. It’s beyond time to organize major boycotts of all the global corporations. And before you start screaming that it’s not possible for everyone to boycott everything: it only takes 5% participation to start influencing a corporation to change some policies.

Clearly it would take more than that to really break their power but not anywhere close to all. But we need to organize so as many people as possible are boycotting every company they can; that also means all of us will be buying some stuff from bad actor companies because we currently have no other choices.

Which leads to another of my suggestions. A co-op movement has been quietly growing around the world. (see post for many links to info on co-ops) They’ve been active long enough for studies to have been done and they’ve been shown to be profitable, to pay employees better, offer better benefits, etc. But we need a lot more of them to provide alternative goods. In the meantime, if you can afford to buy local, in every instance where you can, purchase from small local businesses.

Activists in the environmental arena have figured out how to create an activist hedgefund and use shareholder votes to put activists on the boards of major corporations. See Exxon and Chevron. So far it hasn’t been enough to move the needle on climate change-related policies but infiltrating boards is a strong idea for trying to create change.

Many are also finally noting it’s beyond time to organize the same way the right has to get people elected at all the local levels, from school and water boards to city councils to state legislature reps. Running for a local seat or helping with local election campaign are ways to help. If, like me, you can’t get out readily, find organizations like the Poor People’s Campaign who offer phone banking and text banking opportunities. PPC’s text banking to get out the vote is SO well organized and easy to do.

Seriously, stop with the “can you believe it” commentary and figure out how to do something. These people are soulless, hateful despots and there are no depths to which they will not go to get what they want, which is an authoritarian theocracy. And it’s up to us to stop them.

Covid Gratitude 2

Posted in Current Events, Personal, Uncategorized by

 

Full Pantry

I was never a cook who kept a pantry stocked for possible long term cooking.  Had an assortment of staples I’d keep on hand, usually enough to make one recipe of each.  And I’ve always tended to cook kind of elaborate dishes in big quantities. So I’d make a list of what I needed for that particular meal and get exactly what I needed.

In recent years, shopping, like most things, has been pretty hit or miss as my energy goes up and down. So when the pandemic hit and advice began circulating about stocking up for a couple of months worth, I quickly realized we were way behind the curve.

It became an interesting challenge, given all the panic buying, to get well stocked. I’ve been keeping lists going on three different grocery sites, checking in often to see who has what and which place on a given day seems likely to provide a fair portion of the list. But slowly built a store.

But, not having thought in terms of being that well stocked, I kept realizing more things that should have been on my list. And then that I didn’t really get enough of others. Slogging through order after order in which a number of things didn’t show up, I finally got us to a place of well-enough stocked to feel comfortable.  Not hoarding piles, just enough.

Quite a learning curve. While I can’t say I appreciated every moment of it, I am grateful for attaining a better sense of how to keep a well stocked pantry. That includes gratitude for a series of really good articles by various chefs in WaPo with their suggestions of items for a well-stocked pantry (some of which admittedly left me blinking and going, “Geez, wtf would I do with that stuff??? 🙂 ). Especially grateful for discerning what allows me to make which selection of things.

I’m so much more tuned in to shopping not just for the meal I plan to make tomorrow but for being prepared to cook from on-hand supplies.  Feeling glad to have acquired this skill. And I have to say, probably wouldn’t have happened without Covid-19.

People Power: Climate, Our Part and the Elephants in the Room

Posted in Change the World, Current Events, Environmental, Uncategorized by

As the talk about climate change escalates I keep glancing at plans, suggestions, demands, etc. and making mental notes about what massive change would really entail.  The main things I keep seeing are (1) we the ordinary people have a much bigger role to play than most “change” advocates seem to acknowledge and (2) the massive shift we need will have much greater consequences to the world economy than is generally being discussed.

First, I see a world in which governments for the most part are broken.  Corruption and ties to big money have so infiltrated governments everywhere, I find it odd so many environmental advocates are still calling for governments to do something.  Really, what on earth about how they operate leads anyone to believe they would?

Until we can make sweeping changes in who is elected — keeping corporate money out of the electoral process altogether — democratic governments are not going to pass laws that hamstring global corporations.  And even if we can elect politicians with no such ties, let’s be realistic.  If global corporations are reined in to the necessary degree, massive economic issues, including widespread layoffs and falling profits will result.  No elected politician wants to preside over such a potentially cataclysmic shift.

I’m not saying the process doesn’t also need help from government, but because they’re unlikely to change so radically in the short time frame we need, I think it is going to be regular people working locally along with municipal and maybe state or provincial governments that will create the faster changes we need.

Politicians who discuss “the Green New Deal” or climate change more globally are by and large stepping around the issues of failing corporations and falling GNPs.  They don’t want to say out loud what the real impact of making radical change may have. The youth who are striking often seem to me to be a little naive when it comes to understanding the likely results of the degree of revolutionary change they demand — as did the “radical revolutionaries” of the Viet Nam era; the one sticking point that kept me slightly apart.  I’m not saying they’re wrong that we need it, but I also see you have to face this issue as a probable outcome.

I’m seeing a lot of movement toward more local solutions.  As I’ve mentioned, the world wide co-op movement is very heartening.  It’s been going on long enough I’m seeing studies showing they’re making profits, employing a lot of people and paying them better, etc.  They also allow women and people of color to get a fair shake.

Clearly there are already people who see this is the way to go.  I just think we need a wider-spread consciousness about the need to quickly form local co-ops (or similar) for everything from banking to manufacturing to farming to housing, etc. See previous post for more on co-ops.

What I don’t see is enough individuals advocating on how much WE have to change.  The U.S. is the worst as far as over-consuming.  Our citizens need to step it up more than most pundits are telling them and quit the constant buying.  The assumption that women need a 150 square foot closet and more than enough clothes to fill it needs to stop.  Buying a new computer or cell phone every time a small change in technology comes out needs to stop.  Driving gas-guzzling SUVs needs to stop.  Buying food you don’t need and throwing it away needs to stop.

In my lifetime we’ve moved from a society in which many families had one car and men formed carpools at work so wives and children had the car some days and not others to a society in which every body in the family has at least one vehicle.  We should be demanding expanded public transportation and driving fewer cars instead of more.

No one — especially no politician — wants to tell people they MUST dramatically change their lifestyles especially regarding consuming habits.  Generally speaking the population is resistant to being told big changes must be made .  But this time we have to be agents of change.  Part of that change is also to remake governments to serve the people, but till we do, we’re the best hope we have.

And if we all really start cutting back as much as we must, sales fall, profits decrease, corporations downsize and lay people off, etc.  Some will go out of business.  We should also be using consumer boycotts to express our wrath at their destructive practices and the same consequences are likely.

We need to have a plethora of local opportunities ready to hire displaced workers.  Some places are working on plans where the shift to more sustainable plans and programs includes many new jobs.  We’re talking about a shifting of business and jobs on a scale never seen by the world.

We need to shift to a Thrive Economy instead of one that always grows bigger:

It’s time for us to be poring through Project Drawdown to see which solutions we could support with funding, which solutions we could work on in groups or alone, whether new ideas can be spun from the many offered there.
Paul Hawken_edited
Government as it is constituted right now isn’t going to accomplish this for us.  It’s up to us.  What can we do to shift the mentality from grow to thrive?  How can we start businesses and co-ops operating to thrive while being sustainable?  What are WE going o do to save the world?

People Power: Going local with water

Posted in Current Events, Environmental, Politics, Uncategorized by

The Kentucky River by Halls at the River, photographer Leigh Gaitskill copyright 2019

Environmental impacts on water have been of interest to me since the late sixties, when big water issues near me on the Great Lakes were in the news.  In recent years I’ve been following with great concern the conversation about clean water becoming scarce around the world.  Then when crisis hit my home town of Flint, Michigan, alarm bells started sounding.

Since Flint, there are increasing numbers of cities with lead problems popping up and eerily little media attention to the issue.  I’m pretty aware of a number of cases because I do a lot of poking around in environmental issues, but you’d have to be really looking to realize how widespread the issue of lead in water due to old pipes is.

Among those who are more aware of the water problem, there’s often a call for federal action  It’s another place where I think local plans from communities coming together may provide more and better answers  Given the many problems besides old pipes that are coming to a head about even having sources of clean water, I don’t think a giant plan to put in new pipes is our best answer.

Looking at Flint

For Flint, there’s an immediate problem of organizing enough drinking water for the populace.  There are a couple of passionate folks I’ve encountered on Twitter who are raising money for bottled water — Lance Cooper @escapedmatrix and Mari Copeny @LittleMissFlint; check them out and donate if you can.  But I can see the problem requires a bigger solution and something more sustainable.

I’ve been looking at rainwater collection as an interim possibility.  First, the technology already exists for both collecting and purifying it and it’s widely available.  Second, it would help them keep an ongoing supply of water.  Third, if you could throw holding tanks into the deal and a give-away of good-sized re-usable jugs, with a number of centers (probably churches and/or community centers), people could collect decent amounts of water as needed.  Not a permanent solution as rain fall is too unreliable, but possibly helpful while a better answer is sought.

It’s a poor community and this would cost a lot more than a fundraiser can garner.  The City of Flint is broke (thanks so much General Motors for abandoning the town).  So I’ve been looking at the Charles Stuart Mott Foundation, which happens to be located in Flint.  In fact, Flint is one of the foundation’s missions and they also have an Environmental mission, so I can see a grant proposal that ties these two arenas together.

Not every state allows rain water collection so not an answer for some places, but Michigan doesn’t have a law in place that prevents it.  I’ll be exploring some other technologies and potential drawbacks below.

A second phase would involve something like water purification systems for homes in the area.  Possibly the right person or group could get a company that makes them to give a break or make a donation and a grant could cover the remaining cost and installation.  Below I also look at a few other up and coming technologies for supplying water without using current sources or pipes.  Mari has started a fundraiser to buy purifiers.

I don’t have connections in the area any more (and was too young to have this kind when I lived there), so don’t know community groups who could put in a grant proposal, and I am not an expert at writing a winning grant proposal, so I’m hoping there are people who DO know who can step up.

Foundation support will likely not be the answer as the problem grows more widespread, but Mott is not alone in offering grants for communities and/or for environmental projects so the towns with immediate issues could potentially use grants to help create local supplies of water.

For an excellent analysis of the issues for Flint and why the community should take charge: Flint Water Crisis: The Importance of Building a Grassroots Environmental Justice Infrastructure

Keep It Local

Throughout this series I’ve been advocating a shift to local forums for everything from jobs to manufacturing to governance.  While many who are looking at the growing water crisis and demanding federal action on large scale infrastructure, I’m not so sure the feds are our best hope nor that simply replicating the current water supply system is our best long-term answer.

Given the scale of climate change, I think the current water crisis is a perfect moment to think in terms of sustainable answers.  And the means and methods of sustainability are going to vary widely with locale given differences in climate, water sources, etc.  As I continue explore the growing co-op movement around the world, I’m thinking that local and, in the case of large cities, sometimes neighborhood, co-ops dealing with water may do a better job.  At the least, local governments are better situated to work on the specific needs and possibilities of their communities.

In Texas, for instance, after the big drought of 2011, a number of cities instituted serious changes in how they collect water and their chosen means were very much suited to the local climate and how water is available.  See Six Alternative Water Sources for Texas.  See also: Alternative Water Sources: Supply Side Solutions for Green Buildings for discussions of a number of solutions being used in cities scattered around the U.S.

 Community Groups

Poor neighborhoods are particularly under-served when it comes to safe water and in some areas strong community advocacy groups have been instrumental in getting things done.  If your town or area is having trouble about water and you don’t have such a group, I highly recommend that you look into some of the already-existing ones and create a group that suits your issues.

I’ve read a few things about a group in L.A. which advocates for south L.A., where Black and immigrant residents are disproportionately harmed by environmental issues.  Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education’s (SCOPE) work for social, economic and environmental justice is impressive.  Other groups to explore:  Detroit, West Harlem Environmental Action, Deep South Center for Environmental Justice partners with various communities around the South to promote environmental justice.

Sustainable Water Sources

There is so much info, I can’t provide an exhaustive list but there are a couple of promising avenues to discuss and then I have a lot of links to articles discussing various alternatives to draining all the rivers and lakes, etc.  One thing I’m finding I want to emphasize is potential environmental impacts if some of these things are done on a large scale.

A number of inventors have created devices using solar to create water by drawing water from the air.  Sounds great if you’re talking about one or a few.  But I can’t imagine there’s not an environmental impact down the road if you put thousands and thousands in place, sucking all the moisture out of the air.  So far I’m striking out at finding any environmental impact studies on them at all.

Rain water collection systems are not legal in every state.  Particularly in places with water supply problems, rain water run off is part of the water eco system and states have outlawed it, claiming the state owns that water.  Michigan at the moment has a big supply of water so has not outlawed it, but as water becomes more scarce everywhere I can see potential for multitudes of rain water collection systems also causing detrimental environmental impacts.  Right now they’re available but not that common and it seems like a good solution but I’d like to know if there’s a tipping point where collecting rain would become more of a hazard than a help.

There are also a variety of desalinization devices, including solar, many already in operation in places where it’s suitable.  Again I’ve not seen an environmental impact assessment regarding widespread drawing on salt water sources and taking out the salt.  Seems like another spot with an eventual tipping point from help to harm.

There are other innovations coming along all the time for creating potable water so it’s worth snooping around on the web every now and then to see what’s new.

More info

The latest issue of the alumnae magazine from my Alma mater, Northwestern University, had a really good article about water and efforts being made by various professors in various departments to find solutions.  Solutions for Troubled Waters.

The whole article is worth reading but I particularly noted a couple of resources.  Chemistry professor Will Dichtel has a company offering some of the solutions, from home purifiers to waste management and more, CycloPure.

The director of the Environmental Advocacy Center of the law school’s legal clinic was highlighted and I was interested to note that the Advocacy Center offers help to communities in many places, not just Chicago, so a good potential resource in the U.S.- and apparently they’re working on becoming international.  Their solutions are not just legal, but include help in solving problems, sometimes in conjunction with other NU departments, so a good resource to know about.

The EPA also has a grants program that offers up to $30,000 to community organizations working on environmental justice issues.  Seems like a great place for people in a town like Flint or Newark to propose a program to help with the water crisis.  Environmental Justice Small Grants Program

And some miscellaneous articles on water issues:

The People Power posts:

 

In the news: sifting through facts

Posted in Change the World, Current Events, Uncategorized by

For a while now, as I’ve mentioned, I’ve been pretty excited about a vague path I see for myself which brings together my legal and political background with my long spiritual journey.  And part of that, since “fake news” became a massive problem, has involved a LOT of fact checking.

Between the history major, research when I worked on my PhD and loads of legal research, I have a lot of research experience and I’ve learned to navigate more easily since the internet makes a lot of those tools available without having to go to a library and stand around at the card catalog.

Recently it occurred to me that some of the stuff I’ve been doing might be useful to other folks trying to navigate the world of fact and fiction in the news.  Not suggesting other people don’t know how, just not everyone does and not everyone is aware of all the resources I am.

First up is figuring out which media outlets and fact checkers are trustworthy.  I separate media bias as an issue from media reporting falsified info.  These days you can search the name of a newspaper or website and “Is it legit?” and there are some pretty good sites that come up. Politifact has a good list but it’s old.

Media Bias Fact Check is pretty good but I have found some places that haven’t been updated to reflect a change of ownership that has impacted both bias and veracity (Patheos, for instance, has changed hands so the middle of the road and wide representation in writers has changed to purely evangelical and a biased point of view; no info on truth or fiction).

I’ve memorized some places that come up often for me that don’t measure up when checked, so I automatically am skeptical of anything from Occupy Democrats or Breitbart, to name two.  Fake news and truth stretching happens on both sides, so it’s good to be vigilant whatever your persuasion.

Some of the venerated places like the New York Times or Washington Post  (CNN, CBS, NBC, et al) generally do a pretty good job, but they do have a big liberal bias and sometimes present more of the info that supports the bias.  However, I don’t find they actually make anything up and one nice thing about the better news outlets is they often give you info on sources.

It’s easy to do some fact checking because they often reference studies made by Homeland Security or the Department of State, etc. and I have tracked down enough studies to see if the news story accurately reflected it to feel confident they report real info and are not making stuff up.

Fox, on the other hand, not only makes stuff up but rarely provides a serious study or report — or indeed any evidence at all — so they make it a little harder.  But generally if something is in the news you can use a search engine and some key words from the story to track down whether there is any supporting evidence for their claims. I’ve researched enough of their stories to feel confident they routinely make up news and ignore studies, facts, etc.

I know many on the right have vilified Snopes and Politifact, but I’ve researched facts on both sides of many issues and I find they’re just as willing to debunk Democrats and liberals as the GOP and conservatives.  To the extent I’ve followed some of their source trails, I’ve found both do a good job of fact checking and I trust their results.

All these sources are the ways to get an easy fix.  But if you really feel unsure about what’s true, there are a few places you can go.  As mentioned, there are often studies cited that were carried out by departments of government and use statistics they collect.

For instance, you can look at lots of data collected by the State Department, Homeland Security, the DEA and various state and federal law enforcement agencies to find the following info about the flow of drugs, immigrants in general, and immigrants from Central America and Mexico in particular:

  1. more drugs come in from Canada than Mexico
  2. most drugs enter through ports, not across southern border
  3. immigrants actually commit far fewer crimes than citizens
  4. there are more illegal immigrants who came in on legal visas and stayed after the visa expired than there are immigrants who came across any border illegally
  5. the largest number of those illegally here on expired visas are from Canada

You get the idea.  A huge amount of stuff being floated by the President, the GOP and Fox news is a complete fabrication and there are facts you can check.  There are many topics for which the government collects data and prepares studies, so you can often go straight to the source to find out what’s true.

Another source on line is to check on bills at government sites.  At the federal level the Congressional Record has every bill that’s been proposed and you can follow the stages of it and find out who voted which way.  At the state level, every state I’ve looked in on (by no means all) has had an on line government site where you can track bills and votes.

To find out about court cases, you can order a transcript on line but you have to pay.  If you just want to track proceedings and the basics of what happened, you can get a lot of info on line.  Just look up the court, i.e. federal district court or local county court or a state supreme court, etc. and somewhere in their tabs you’ll find info on court cases.

Most major universities have lots of grants to do studies and publish loads of material on every subject.  When you run a search to find data on many issues, look for studies by, say, Stanford or Northwestern or the University of Michigan, for example, and read some of their research.  Multitudes of studies are available on line for free.  Even universities have crackpots, so you might also do a check on the professor(s) who ran the research 🙂

Those are enough basics you should be able to negotiate sorting fact from fiction in most cases.  Hope it helps.

Separating Church & State Honors Our Ancestors

Posted in Current Events, Opinion, Politics, Uncategorized by

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

U.S. Constitution, First Amendment, Establishment and Free Exercise clauses

For some time I’ve been observing a growing trend among some Christians (mostly evangelical) to want to end the separation of church and state mandated by the Constitution and make every one conform to Christian values and participate in Christian practices.  They say they love America but their stance is so adverse to the foundation stones of our nation, it’s hard to imagine they even know our history.

I’ve been particularly thinking about it in light of my genealogy research and the many ancestors who came here to get away from religious persecution.  My 10x great grandfather, William Brewster, was a Puritan Separatist and his religious views first forced him to flee England for Holland.  He later managed to return to England long enough to board the Mayflower and come to the Plymouth Colony.

He was one of multitudes of Puritans who fled England because their religious beliefs were outlawed.  They braved the hazardous voyage across the ocean and came to the new world in the hope of finding freedom to worship as they chose.

On my mother’s side I’ve long since lost count of the number of Scottish Presbyterians — they’re all over the tree on both sides of her family.  Some broke off from the Presbyterian Church in Scotland and came here to establish their version of Presbyterianism.  Others, after accepting land in Ireland for some years, wound up fleeing to America when England began persecuting Presbyterians for their failure to follow Anglican law.

Presbyterians weren’t particularly welcome here either as the established religions along the coast disapproved of their beliefs.  They gave the Scots land at what were then the frontiers, in order to let them serve as buffers against the Native tribes.  In other words they were expendable.  Presbyterian ministers were rare in those parts, so many became Baptists.

These are just some of the stories of religious persecution that led many of our early citizens to the Colonies.  The Founding Fathers were well aware of the persecution that had hounded so many out of their homes and across an ocean.  There is also a great deal of evidence many of them were aware of other religions, such as Hinduism, Islam, etc.  So when they established free exercise of religion and forbade the establishment of a state religion, they were specifically safeguarding people from the kind of persecution so many had endured and, by their explicit failure to name Christianity or any denomination thereof, they extended that freedom to all religions.

Ironically many of those who are trying to force everyone to conform to their religious beliefs, to bring Christian prayers back into schools and make Muslim and Jewish and Hindu children participate, are descendants of the persecuted Christians who arrived in a new land seeking freedom to worship as they chose.

Every time I see one of these calls for the State to violate the First Amendment and participate in promoting evangelical Christian beliefs, I feel my ancestors have been dishonored.  That their suffering has been forgotten.  “Separation of church and state” were Jefferson’s words, describing the meaning of the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses, a separation created to make sure such persecution would not be repeated.

This wall between state and church was built to ensure all people freedom to pursue their religious beliefs without interference from the government.  Every call to take down that wall is an assault on one of the great foundation stones of the United States of America and shows either ignorance of or contempt for one of the most important lynch pins of our democracy; one which is central to its greatness.

Let’s not forget why so many of the original settlers came here.  Honor their pursuit of religious freedom by honoring religious freedom.