mama

May 10, 2009

it’s mother’s day and my baby is blessed to have the mama she does.

it’s not just that she got mama’s good looks, or her dance moves, or artistic spirit (she can sometimes lay down and draw for an hour on her own), or intelligence ( she is counting and learning her second language

aza’s mama always finds attention to give, and dosn’t bother to mention that she has a half dozen or more deadlines in the air. she has done every bit of research humanly possible about how to best look after babies health, which of course means that she is always doing more. she is up all hours of the night to play and dance when baby has nightmares, she clues in the clueless papa to what he is missing and puts up with his sulkiness at not knowing it all, and her hugs and kisses are not only the best they are endless.

more than all though she has a mama who is teaching her every day to respect herself and be herself. already at two she gets asked her opinion all the time (not one of those hippy mama’s who dosn’t believe in saying no, but one who respects baby’s “nos”), and her mama is planning out a life that makes her a partner and looking at her writing and art through the lense of accountability to her and to her perception as she grows up..she is commited to taking care of herself so that she will be there for baby and to being herself so that baby will grow with that same freedom. and she constantly opens the space around her for others to do the same, becuse she believes that our spiritual discipline is radical love.

baby is blessed to have the mama she does

on your second birthday

April 19, 2009

so i was halfway done with this letter and the browser crashed on me. you turned two today baby, and i wanted to write something. i know it is just as likely that these internetz and blogs will have gone away by the time you are really reading as that any scrap of paper that i write on will fail to survive our adventures, but maybe?

you probably know that we really belive that you chose us twice. concieved in the same moon tweo years in a row. thank you, of course choosing mama was just plain smart.

i love living and traveling with you. it’s amazing all the things yopu have changed, and the things you haven’t that everyone was sure you would. we didn’t settle down and settle in, you made travelling better. we didn’t get respectable and stable, we got a little pirate to adventure with.

and i am amused and pissed when folks tell me in the street that you can’t be my kid because you look egyptian, and i was amused and pissed in mexico when they stopped me to tell me that you were not mine because you were mexican. yes, you pass well in those cursed/ blessed places that are the crossraods and mixing grounds of humanity, because you are from one. you are the kid of a waspy northerner and a southern black woman from the us. and we love each other through the bullshit that our histories carry, and the beauty. and we love each other through our own strengths and weeknesses. and we love you more.

so when you stop every kid yopu pass in the street to start a dance party i beem, and your mama is no end of proud when you sit and write letters to her while you sing your abc’s and then deliver them to her half asleep in the morning.

i worry sometimes about the faith i am passing to you. in my earlier daydreams my kid would be baptized by now and instead i wonder at times if i should claim my baptism, but i’ll support you as you find your way. i will be thrilled if you found the beauty and power in christianity to live as fully you fully looving and struggling. and i will be thrilled if you pass it by to find your own way to strength and connection. in the meantime we will wander churches and light candles together, but duck out before the preaching. i will keep teaching you to call mary in all her incarnations mama, and you will keep pointing to the icons of jesus in her lap and calling him aza. why not you come from bethlehem too and are chosen of god/dess.

it’s scary that i have regrets already as a papa. the times i have been too wrapped in my own head to be as tuned in as i should are not a few, and at least one of them hurt you bad. all praise tht your leg healed well and that contrary to the church-lady curses you don’t walk with a limp.

mostly baby, figure out you, and mama and i have your back. and if something about who we tell you you are dosn’t fit, tell us and we’ll knock it off and tell the world that you are who you say you are.

in the morning when you wake up and crawl into bed asking for juice and deciding what highlighter tattoos you will sport for the day, i will be my cranky morning self, and so glad that you are the one bringing that craziness into my world.

two years down and still kickin’ ass. aza

the road to hell…

April 19, 2009

some thoughts brought to the fore by the post we don’t need another anti-racism 101, including the comments by belledame222 and by kathy at restructure where there are excerpts of the post and comments. to be noted, kathy spoke about the sacrament of reconciliation in response to the same topic, but bnot haviong been raised catholic, my experience is different, proddy bastard here.

matthew 5:27-8 you have heard that it was said: do not commit adultery. but i tell you this anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has in fact already committed adultery with her in his heart.

this passage is clearly problematic for i’ts sexism, women are objects to be lusted over. if you doubt later in the same sermon when he talks about divorce jesus again assumes that the man will be the one who decides and acts.

not  the point of this post but should be acknowledged at the start. what i want to write about is how it has functioned to create a morality based in intentions that fosters dishonesty.

on face value jesus’ saying requires that even if no physical harm was done if there was desire to harm it is wrong. this falls in line with the overall thrust of the sermon, which gives a stricter interpretation of his jewish tradition contrary to a running theme in christian anti-semitism that judiasm was all strict and mean til jesus taught about grace

in the christian culture that i was formed in it has come to mean that the intent is what matters and if there was no desire to do harm then there is no fault for the actual impact and you can get off with a lame assed i’m sorry you took it that way apology to damage done.

i would tie back to  lens of privilege that i wrote about earlier. dominating culture will interpret everything in a way that allows it to hold onto it’s power.

this shift to intent is all over the place in the sayings that i learned to interpret the world through. i didn’t mean it that way. only god can judge a persons heart {which is what really matters}, i’m sure they had the best intentions….

of course all these excuses are used to enforce power. the government, church, police, teachers… are always doing their best. we, white midwestern christian folk, have the best of intentions. but if someone starts to upset us, or we step out of line and beginn to question, well that is trying to cause troubke, being cynical, or paraniod. and again it is the intent that matters. even if the uncomfortable statement/act was undeniably true the fact that it was “trying to make trouble/coflict” makes it immoral.

the shift to intentions is perfect for policing heirarchy because whoever has already claimed the power to speak for others gets to decide the intentions and thus the culpability of everyone in a situation. and if it is within your grasp to be the dominator all you must do to grab it is have the best intentions, or convince everyone that you do, or make everyone who is not convinced shut up.

if in the process you lose the ability to be honest about what your aims are even to yourself… welcome to the road to hell

arrogance in the mirror

April 14, 2009

at a party over the weekend we were having a conversation with an atheist friend about the meaning of the hijab in egypt.

he said something that stuck in my head and has been spinning since. something that i know i have said similar to in the past,but just struck me as wrong hearing from someone elses mouth.

he was talking about the way that some egyptian women wear the hijab with very form-fitting clothing and how it struck him as odd because the Quranic justification for the hijab is an admonition to modesty. and then something about these women no understanding their own religion.

wow, so we as outsiders can decide what the point oof  islamic teachings and practicces is really about? mighty white boy of us. he should have been slapped for saying it, i should have been for listening. non-muslim men having a discussion about what the roots of  vislual expression for muslim women should be.throughout my life my understanding of my own religion has evolved and fit better and worse into various orthodoxies of what christianity is “really” about, and i have been pissed when people have told me that i didn’t have the right to define what faith meant for me even as i wondered if i should continue to claim christianiy. and now, not for the first time , i participate in a discussion about what another’s religion “really” teaches.

have mercy.  apologies to all, and a promise you will define what your faith really teaches and means to you

<!– @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } –>

I’m still getting invites to jion the tristan anderson solidarity gorup on facebook. no not interested, assume he was is a decent fellow and know that focussing on dead white folks is counterproductive and harmful. palestine is supposed to be more important now because another white boy is dying there, people will care more about israeli crimes? nope and nope. links to palestinian news sites in english  since the 13th when he was injured, looky looky. more palestinians injured each day in assaults by israeli soldiers and settlers. i didn’t get a facebook invite on behalf of any of them.

but wait white boy is the hook that will catch the all important white people bait right. no again. if you cared before you will care now. if you thought palestinians were terrorists before you will think he is a traitor or a dupe, if you thought it was all too complicated you’ll think he was foolish for getting involved. if you are a white solidarity activist you will be affirmed, you too can be a martyr.

i remember being in palestine when rachel was murdered. there was a spike in new activists, they were scary. you are not the person i want to hae my back if you are excited by the idea of martyrdom.

in the meantime shame shame ism. twitter page at 5pm cairo time had 20 tweets up 7 were about tristan or the anniversary of rachel corries death. because what needs to be done to break the occupation is call attention to the white, american solidarity activists and how important they are and how shamefull it is that they were injured/ killed.

check the other stories. the attacks aagainst unarmed civilians go on. they don’t get picked up and they should, but elevating the white activist won’t cure that(the dying white saviour is the colonizer’s religion) they still haen’t been picked up and tristan’s story is fresh. most of the violence is the israeli theft of palestinian land and livelihood and freedom of movement and culture. oh and wait a minute there is a ciultural festival in bethlehem and new rounds of dialogue betweent the political factions and like here the women and children are mostly missing from the story because they bleed in private most of the time so they don’t lead. do we need to find ways to get the stories told and even more so to get people to give a shit. YES but lets find something better than solidarity with the solidarity actiists in solidarity with pallestine. that is too many steps removed and the center is off.

many thanks, hahbib for our conversation last night and many others before that triggered this post. these are definitelly understandings that i’ve worked out with you except where i just imbibed you brilliance straight

not a sacrifice

February 25, 2009

don’t think that it’s a sacrifice or act like it’s special that i spend time with my kid. and don’t dare act like my partner is a bad mom because she lets me.

yes i do mornings and bedtime. that means i have taken two of the sweetest times of the day. yes sometimes i resent getting up early. you think that mama doesn’t sometimes resent having to do all of her writing in the middle of the night to get blocks of time for a creative process? when she is already prone to insomnia?

we make the arrangements that seem to work best for our little pirate crew. i hope that you do too. that however you choose to constitute a family you work together to make it work

habibti has spelled out clearly what all mama’s know. they start behind and can never really live up to the good momma. not staying home with the kid, or not going out to work, not whatever. it’s always what more the mama could do. us papas start off as good papas as long as we decide to be involved in our kids lives and not beat them. we build credit from there.

habibti… no one will do better by the little pirate than you. goddess bless for your patience and love for the both of us. for fighting for a world that she can grow in and sharing every last thing with her. and no one sees you take her in the middle of the night and sing twinkle, twinkle.. until she goes back to sleep while she trys to rip off your glasses because papa is just not doing it tonight. and no one sees you for the millionth time stop in the middle of that article you are working on and dance around the room with baby when if it were me i would just want to shout for her trying to dance on my keyboard again.

habibti spelled it out to me clearest, but my mama told me the same in other ways. always, even though she would do, did do everything for her boys, she always worried that folks would figure out how she wasn’t doing enough  and would let her know lest she think that she was a good mama.  june cleaver, come down from the screen and coaching little league. not good enough. i can watch how she still worries if she is good enough.  well mama you are.

and i would guess that every other mama knows what it is like to love with your whole world and get sideways looks like it’s not enough. oh but if papa lifts a finger he’s a saint.

well i’m not. i like to think that i am working against patriarchy, but every man i know in my generation is trying to be an involved father. and some are heartbroken because they can’t afford it the market and the sexism say that they have to work overtime all the time because they need the money and no one will pay mama what she is worth. and with the conservative religious background i got a lot of them believe they ought to be striving to be the patriarch, not to smash the role. but we all know that kids are precious and we want in. and it doesn’t hurt that we get mad credit for playing with baby, which is the best part of the day anyway.

and there are how many single mom’s out there proving we are superflous anyway? and there are how many endless possibilities of how to make a family and raise a kid with love and support other than the mama and papa nuclear family if we would just get the hell out of the way and let people do it.

it’s not a sacrifice. i’m blessed and thanks for the compliments all, but more to the mama who lets me be involved and you all should recognize that that is a sacrifice, for her. everything that i do that could conceivably be a mama role will at some moment be alluded to let her know she’s not doing it. and when i fuck it up (say when i dropped baby and broke her leg at 2 mos) she’ll get more dirty looks than i do for giving me the opportunity, because we all know men are inept with kids and she should have kept an eye on us.

so… blessings to everyone who cares for babies. and thanks to all the mama’s who will let a boy be a papa and not just a sperm donor when you aren’t under any obligation to.

thoughts

February 11, 2009

a handful of thoughts that keep germinating, but i have not been able to pull together fully. hoping that getting them out will allow me to let them grow instead of being trapped inside and bouncing in circles

-spirituality is about connecting to power that transcends the self. people who are spiritually connected put that power to use in ways that are liberatory/ oppressive/ both at the same time.

-religions are attempts to organize people around shared experience of connection to transcendant power, or the promise of that experience. because of this they are fertile ground for oppressive/ dominating movements and for liberatory/ community creating movements

-powerful spiritual events and symbols become the sites of struggle between opressive and liberatory meanings as people and religious groupd contend for who will harness their power and for what. because of this they often serve opposing functions (e.g. guadalupe who is both a con of the catholic church to dominate indigenous culture and the trojan horse by which idigenous culture flourishes in catholicism)

-i think that the goal of the spiritual life is to sift and chose those ways of connecting and interpretations of connection to power that provide for our own and others liberation and for forging mutual connections, while uprooting methods and interpretations that lead to dominance and breaking of mutual relations.

-listening to praise songs in church throughout the fall i have had the intuition that we are at least to some extent trying to create the god/dess we are praising. that maybe this/ these ultimate source(s) of creative power needs our help to take shape and part of our co creation is the responsibility we have in shaping our divinity.

-i feel like the best gamble to make spiritually is that god wants to be just and she will empower push us to liberation and community if we will cooperate

<!– @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } H3 { margin-bottom: 0.08in } A:link { so-language: zxx } –>

here is another article (also posted below) that gives some self definition to progressive christianity. notice that it gives as three of the four primary sources white, american and european theological movements. also i would love to be corrected but to the best of my knowledge all of the primary theologians associated with the movements are men, though in the case of the evangelicals certainly not all the activists. i pray that this is a mistake on my part that just shows the depth to which my own theological education has been skewed.

liberation theologies are also seen as a necessary source, but all lumped into one. It is made clear that christianity is to be transformed by these voices, but that transformation is again framed as service to “the least of these”. it seems that progressive christianity is supposed to be the realm of those inheritors of the previously mentioned (white, male dominated) traditions who are now willing to listen to “the previously voiceless people” and take on/co-opt? their insights. missing, at least in this article, is a clear recognition that all of these liberation forms of christianity are critiques of traditional/ white male theology. without that recognition it remains possible for progressive christianity to be focused on white men and congratulate itself on evolving and learning from the majority of the world that has been/ is oppressed by white, christian men.

i would like to see a recognition of the reality that christianity has been a powerfully oppressive force and that many forms of it still are. i feel like the 8 points in the previous post came a bit closer in the recognition of privilege, but did so in a way that centered those people who have privilege to renounce. as i try to imagine a christianity that i would want to claim, it would center the destruction of domination systems “casting down the mighty from their thrones and lifting up the lowly” while recognizing that depending on our personal histories, identities and social locations we all have different roles in that process. different places in the struggle and different ways that we need to cooperate in our own lifting up and casting down.

September 4, 2006
By Dr. Delwin Brown
Dean Emeritus, Pacific School of Religion

Our Progressive Christian Heritage

Progressive Christianity today is not a single party line; it is a family of perspectives and practices that seek to be faithful to Christ. It is diverse because it draws from a variety of Christian expressions rooted in the biblical witness.

Progressive Christianity draws from the witness of evangelical Christians in the middle of the 19th century. These first American evangelicals were on the front lines of the movements to abolish slavery, to give women the right to vote, to mitigate poverty and overcome sharp class divisions. What can we take from their example?

  • They understood that their progressive, even revolutionary, stances were required of them as Christians. They were not progressives who also happened to be Christians. They were progressives because they were Christians, in order to be faithful to the gospel.

  • Their pursuit of justice was a spiritual discipline. Their efforts were not dependent on the likelihood of success. They were not based on calculations; they sprang from the conviction that Jesus came to overcome socially and culturally created injustices.

  • They were united in Christian spirit rather than Christian beliefs. They understood that Christians could disagree on matters of theology and still be united in service to God and neighbor.

Progressive Christianity also draws from the witness of the liberal Christian movement around the turn of the 20th century. The liberals welcomed progress as a gift of God. They supported the advance of the physical sciences and democratic practices. They led in the analysis and critique of structural injustices in society. They were intellectuals and reformers. What should we honor in their example?

  • They took seriously the doctrine of the incarnation, the Christian claim that God is in and with this world, so they, too, made their home in the world without reserve.

  • They saw sin and salvation to be structural as well as personal. For them, sinful relations had to be addressed through collective action and public policy as well as through personal spiritual discipline.

  • They believed that Christian faith requires, not repetition of the past, but the obligation to re-think the meaning of discipleship in each age.

Progressive Christianity learns from the neo-orthodox Christians of the mid-20th century who openly opposed the equation of Christian faith with the political ideology of the Third Reich. They insisted on the distinctiveness of Christian identity. What can we take from them?

  • They proclaimed the otherness of the incarnate God. They insisted that God is always with us, but God is never reducible to our cultural practices, our political convictions, even to our religious beliefs.

  • They understood the centrality of Christ as the source of Christian identity. The Bible is the primary source for knowing God’s revelation in Christ, but that revelation is Christ, not the Bible. From modern knowledge we have much to learn and nothing to fear, but our best knowledge does not displace the Christ of the biblical witness.

  • Being Christian means being something in particular, so the purpose of Christian community is to explore, develop, and sustain Christian identity through preaching, liturgy, and education.

Finally, progressive Christianity must hear and be transformed by the manifold witnesses of the liberation forms of Christian faith that emerged in the last part of the 20th century and continue with force today. These include the voices of the racial/ethnic communities, the feminists and womanists, those who have suffered from colonialism, the poor and other previously voiceless people, and indeed the silent cries of the earth itself! From them, to be authentic, progressive Christianity must learn that:

  • God is on the side of the powerless, human and non-human. God loves all equally, but to overcome injustice God joins with those who are its victims. Those who would follow God in Christ are called to serve “the least of these” among us.

  • The search for truth must be undertaken in the company of the powerless. Wisdom and virtue is to be found in all people, in all classes, in all races and ethnic groups. But the persistent habit of humanity is to demean and ignore what the “least ones” have to say, their insights into the gospel, their voices as vehicles of judgment and grace.

  • Salvation, in the biblical view, is the promise for all dimensions of human life and for all creation. To be sure, salvation is the promise for individuals, too, but as St. Paul insists, salvation is also for “the entire creation”–as unbelievable as it seems, for individuals, communities, and even the earth.

Progressive Christianity draws from each of these traditions in its distinctiveness. But it must share, too, the one belief that adherents of these traditions held in common, namely, their Christian hope. They believed that a radically better day is possible, by God’s grace and through human faithfulness, and so they each sought, in their own ways, to serve its coming.

i’ve been reading a bit recently about how “progressive
christians” define themselves. partly trying to figure out if i
am one, partly looking for the roots of why the christian social
justice organizations that i hae worked for have been so self
congratulatory in their work and white in their makeup.

the center for progressive christianity has 8 points that they
give as defining progressive christianity.  my first reaction
looking at them is that they are quite close to my approach to
keeping the faith and at the same time are clearly articulated
assuming that progressive christianity is a white/ privileged
movement.

the 8 points:

By calling ourselves progressive,
we mean we are Christians who…

1.Have
found an approach to God through the life and teachings of Jesus.

2.
Recognize the faithfulness of other people who have other names for
the way to God’s realm, and acknowledge that their ways are true for
them, as our ways are true for us.

3.
Understand the sharing of bread and wine in Jesus’s name to be a
representation of an ancient vision of God’s feast for all peoples

4.Invite
all people to participate in our community and worship life without
insisting that they become like us in order to be acceptable
(including but not limited to):

believers
and agnostics,
conventional Christians and questioning
skeptics,
women and men,
those of all sexual orientations and
gender identities,
those of all races and cultures,
those of
all classes and abilities,
those who hope for a better world and
those who have lost hope

5.
Know that the way we behave toward one another and toward other
people is the fullest expression of what we believe.

6.
Find more grace in the search for understanding than we do in
dogmatic certainty – more value in questioning than in absolutes.

7.
Form ourselves into communities dedicated to equipping one another
for the work we feel called to do: striving for peace and justice
among all people, protecting and restoring the integrity of all God’s
creation, and bringing hope to those Jesus called the least of his
sisters and brothers

8.
Recognize that being followers of Jesus is costly, and entails
selfless love, conscientious resistance to evil, and renunciation of
privilege.

it
is points 4, 7, and 8 that i am thinking of specifically when i say
that these are articulated in a way that assume and centers whiteness
and privilege.

4
talks about inviting all, but without insisting that they will be
like us. whenever there is an us, even if you don’t have to become
like it, that us is the center and others may be invited but they
will always be others. From the work I have done in progressive
christian organizations i would say that the center is: white, upper
middle class to wealthy (possibly downwardly mobile), peace movement
liberal, middle aged, college educated, mainline protestant.

7
progressive christians are the ones who bring hope to the least of
these, not themselves the least of these. i fear that matthew 25 may
have been one of jesus’ most unfortunate teachings at least as i have
seen it play out in the lives of white, liberal christians (an
accusation, but also a confession), who are always serving people who
are less than themselves.

8
centers privilege by centering it’s renunciation. it is true that
everyone is privileged
in some ways and oppressed in others,
but centering how you deal with privilege means centering people for
whom privilege is a primary experience of life. means maintaining the
margins and center of the wider culture.  went to the link to the
study guide for this point hoping that it would be expanded in a way
that the resistance to evil took precedence and muted this focus on
the privileged. certainly if a struggle for justice and against evil
was central, could be a sidenote that just received overemphasis here
. unfortunately giving up the idea that we are special becomes the
meaning of this point, which is not even a good definition of privilege.

i do think that a central task for christians is to deal with and let go of christian privilege, but to assume that all christians share a primary experience of privilege in their other identities

i do appreciate how these eight points are very concerned with focusing christian identity in action for justice and the questions and process of questioning instead of acceptance of a set of doctrinal assertions.

PERSECUTION FANTASIES

February 2, 2009

A function of privilege that christians seem to be particularly good at enacting is imagining that when our dominance is challenged even the tiniest bit we cry persecution and pretend that christians are an oppressed people.

The christian anti-defamation commission (cadc) is one organization that is setup to protect christians from these terrible wrongs. This video makes clear comparisons between what the cadc calls “the top ten instances of christian bashing in america, 2008” and actual oppression in the form of gay-bashing.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started