Improve security FAQ section on PDFs and JavaScript.

Add a sentence about the lack of ambient authority over a domain.

Change-Id: I9fae25c1cafc9f2cb506325a0099e9a2f3f97e5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4096647
Commit-Queue: Tom Sepez <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Taylor <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1082594}
diff --git a/docs/security/faq.md b/docs/security/faq.md
index af93f95..dddcccf 100644
--- a/docs/security/faq.md
+++ b/docs/security/faq.md
@@ -382,8 +382,9 @@
 
 No. PDF files have the ability to run JavaScript, usually to facilitate field
 validation during form fill-out. Note that the set of bindings provided to
-the PDF are more limited than those provided by the DOM to HTML documents (e.g.
-no document.cookie).
+the PDF are more limited than those provided by the DOM to HTML documents, nor
+do PDFs get any ambient authority based upon the domain from which they are
+served (e.g. no document.cookie).
 
 <a name="TOC-Are-PDF-files-static-content-in-Chromium-"></a>
 ### Are PDF files static content in Chromium?