... | ... |
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ A list is returned containing: |
29 | 29 |
} |
30 | 30 |
\description{ |
31 | 31 |
\code{ggplot2_intersectPlot} function generates and plots the list of |
32 |
-differentially expressed (DE) genes that are commonly found in all |
|
32 |
+differentially expressed (DE) genes that are found in all |
|
33 | 33 |
combinations at any particular replicate level. Often in small-scale |
34 | 34 |
RNA-seq experiments, the inclusion or exclusion of any paricular sample can |
35 | 35 |
result in a very different list of DE genes. To reduce the influence of any |
... | ... |
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ been found. |
47 | 47 |
} |
48 | 48 |
\examples{ |
49 | 49 |
# load edgeR deg object generated by erssa_edger using example dataset |
50 |
-# example dataset containing 1000 genes, 4 replicates and 10 comb. per rep. |
|
50 |
+# example dataset containing 1000 genes, 4 replicates and 5 comb. per rep. |
|
51 | 51 |
# level |
52 | 52 |
data(deg.partial, package = "ERSSA") |
53 | 53 |
|
... | ... |
@@ -4,13 +4,15 @@ |
4 | 4 |
\alias{ggplot2_intersectPlot} |
5 | 5 |
\title{Plot number of DE genes that is common across combinations} |
6 | 6 |
\usage{ |
7 |
-ggplot2_intersectPlot(deg = NULL, path = ".") |
|
7 |
+ggplot2_intersectPlot(deg = NULL, path = ".", save_plot = TRUE) |
|
8 | 8 |
} |
9 | 9 |
\arguments{ |
10 | 10 |
\item{deg}{The list of DE genes generated by one of ERSSA::DE_*.R scripts.} |
11 | 11 |
|
12 | 12 |
\item{path}{Path to which the plot will be saved. Default to current working |
13 | 13 |
directory.} |
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+\item{save_plot}{Boolean. Whether to save plot to drive. Default to TRUE.} |
|
14 | 16 |
} |
15 | 17 |
\value{ |
16 | 18 |
A list is returned containing: |
... | ... |
@@ -18,7 +20,8 @@ A list is returned containing: |
18 | 20 |
\item{gg_object} {the ggplot2 object, which can then be further |
19 | 21 |
customized.} |
20 | 22 |
\item{intersect.dataframe} {the tidy table version used for plotting.} |
21 |
- \item{deg_dataframe} {the tidy table version of DEG numbers for plotting mean.} |
|
23 |
+ \item{deg_dataframe} {the tidy table version of DEG numbers for |
|
24 |
+ plotting mean.} |
|
22 | 25 |
\item{intersect_genes} {list of vectors containing DE genes with vector |
23 | 26 |
name indicating the associated replicate level.} |
24 | 27 |
\item{full_num_DEG} {The number of DE genes with all samples included.} |
... | ... |
@@ -29,7 +32,7 @@ A list is returned containing: |
29 | 32 |
differentially expressed (DE) genes that are commonly found in all |
30 | 33 |
combinations at any particular replicate level. Often in small-scale |
31 | 34 |
RNA-seq experiments, the inclusion or exclusion of any paricular sample can |
32 |
-result in a highly different list of DE genes. To reduce the influence of any |
|
35 |
+result in a very different list of DE genes. To reduce the influence of any |
|
33 | 36 |
particular sample in the entire dataset analysis, it may be desirable to |
34 | 37 |
identify the list of DE genes that are enriched regardless of any specific |
35 | 38 |
sample(s) inclusion. This approach may be most useful analyzing the list of |
... | ... |
@@ -41,16 +44,6 @@ Similar to how increasing number of detected DE genes can be found with more |
41 | 44 |
biological replicates, the list of common DE genes is expected to increase |
42 | 45 |
with more replicates. This eventually levels off as majority of DE genes have |
43 | 46 |
been found. |
44 |
- |
|
45 |
-Another similar analytical approach is to repeat DE analysis with all |
|
46 |
-combinations of samples with one sample left out. In typical datasets with |
|
47 |
-equal number of samples in both conditions, this approach will include one |
|
48 |
-additional sample in the comparison, potentially leading to improvement in |
|
49 |
-detection. However, the number of possible combinations with this approach |
|
50 |
-will be less than the ones possible with ERSSA. As a result, the identified |
|
51 |
-common gene list may not be as robust as the one identified with ERSSA. |
|
52 |
-Regardless, in practice, both approaches are likely to generate comparable |
|
53 |
-DE gene lists. |
|
54 | 47 |
} |
55 | 48 |
\examples{ |
56 | 49 |
# load edgeR deg object generated by erssa_edger using example dataset |
Former-commit-id: b10c8d25c2b974168c3bc853c86279d7b3d93300
... | ... |
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ A list is returned containing: |
18 | 18 |
\item{gg_object} {the ggplot2 object, which can then be further |
19 | 19 |
customized.} |
20 | 20 |
\item{intersect.dataframe} {the tidy table version used for plotting.} |
21 |
+ \item{deg_dataframe} {the tidy table version of DEG numbers for plotting mean.} |
|
21 | 22 |
\item{intersect_genes} {list of vectors containing DE genes with vector |
22 | 23 |
name indicating the associated replicate level.} |
23 | 24 |
\item{full_num_DEG} {The number of DE genes with all samples included.} |
Former-commit-id: cecec5ad83061d3075992c4610080ef9b93fc418
... | ... |
@@ -52,12 +52,17 @@ Regardless, in practice, both approaches are likely to generate comparable |
52 | 52 |
DE gene lists. |
53 | 53 |
} |
54 | 54 |
\examples{ |
55 |
-#load edgeR deg object generated by erssa_edger using example dataset |
|
56 |
-#test dataset with 1000 genes, 4 replicates and 20 comb. per rep. level |
|
55 |
+# load edgeR deg object generated by erssa_edger using example dataset |
|
56 |
+# example dataset containing 1000 genes, 4 replicates and 10 comb. per rep. |
|
57 |
+# level |
|
57 | 58 |
data(deg.partial, package = "ERSSA") |
58 | 59 |
|
59 | 60 |
gg_intersect = ggplot2_intersectPlot(deg.partial) |
60 | 61 |
|
62 |
+} |
|
63 |
+\references{ |
|
64 |
+H. Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. |
|
65 |
+Springer-Verlag New York, 2009. |
|
61 | 66 |
} |
62 | 67 |
\author{ |
63 | 68 |
Zixuan Shao, \email{[email protected]} |
Former-commit-id: 6608ba93deb81c2fc26a1597505512c09d0e8c64
... | ... |
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ DE gene lists. |
53 | 53 |
} |
54 | 54 |
\examples{ |
55 | 55 |
#load edgeR deg object generated by erssa_edger using example dataset |
56 |
-#only 5000 genes and 4 replicates tested to speed up runtime |
|
56 |
+#test dataset with 1000 genes, 4 replicates and 20 comb. per rep. level |
|
57 | 57 |
data(deg.partial, package = "ERSSA") |
58 | 58 |
|
59 | 59 |
gg_intersect = ggplot2_intersectPlot(deg.partial) |
Former-commit-id: 24bcc08ceecbd7a204bafc18c016b00b90e68c3b
1 | 1 |
new file mode 100644 |
... | ... |
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ |
1 |
+% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand |
|
2 |
+% Please edit documentation in R/plot_intersectPlot.R |
|
3 |
+\name{ggplot2_intersectPlot} |
|
4 |
+\alias{ggplot2_intersectPlot} |
|
5 |
+\title{Plot number of DE genes that is common across combinations} |
|
6 |
+\usage{ |
|
7 |
+ggplot2_intersectPlot(deg = NULL, path = ".") |
|
8 |
+} |
|
9 |
+\arguments{ |
|
10 |
+\item{deg}{The list of DE genes generated by one of ERSSA::DE_*.R scripts.} |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+\item{path}{Path to which the plot will be saved. Default to current working |
|
13 |
+directory.} |
|
14 |
+} |
|
15 |
+\value{ |
|
16 |
+A list is returned containing: |
|
17 |
+ \itemize{ |
|
18 |
+ \item{gg_object} {the ggplot2 object, which can then be further |
|
19 |
+ customized.} |
|
20 |
+ \item{intersect.dataframe} {the tidy table version used for plotting.} |
|
21 |
+ \item{intersect_genes} {list of vectors containing DE genes with vector |
|
22 |
+ name indicating the associated replicate level.} |
|
23 |
+ \item{full_num_DEG} {The number of DE genes with all samples included.} |
|
24 |
+} |
|
25 |
+} |
|
26 |
+\description{ |
|
27 |
+\code{ggplot2_intersectPlot} function generates and plots the list of |
|
28 |
+differentially expressed (DE) genes that are commonly found in all |
|
29 |
+combinations at any particular replicate level. Often in small-scale |
|
30 |
+RNA-seq experiments, the inclusion or exclusion of any paricular sample can |
|
31 |
+result in a highly different list of DE genes. To reduce the influence of any |
|
32 |
+particular sample in the entire dataset analysis, it may be desirable to |
|
33 |
+identify the list of DE genes that are enriched regardless of any specific |
|
34 |
+sample(s) inclusion. This approach may be most useful analyzing the list of |
|
35 |
+common DE genes at the greatest possible replicate to take advantage of the |
|
36 |
+robust feature as well as employing typically the longest list of DE genes. |
|
37 |
+} |
|
38 |
+\details{ |
|
39 |
+Similar to how increasing number of detected DE genes can be found with more |
|
40 |
+biological replicates, the list of common DE genes is expected to increase |
|
41 |
+with more replicates. This eventually levels off as majority of DE genes have |
|
42 |
+been found. |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+Another similar analytical approach is to repeat DE analysis with all |
|
45 |
+combinations of samples with one sample left out. In typical datasets with |
|
46 |
+equal number of samples in both conditions, this approach will include one |
|
47 |
+additional sample in the comparison, potentially leading to improvement in |
|
48 |
+detection. However, the number of possible combinations with this approach |
|
49 |
+will be less than the ones possible with ERSSA. As a result, the identified |
|
50 |
+common gene list may not be as robust as the one identified with ERSSA. |
|
51 |
+Regardless, in practice, both approaches are likely to generate comparable |
|
52 |
+DE gene lists. |
|
53 |
+} |
|
54 |
+\examples{ |
|
55 |
+#load edgeR deg object generated by erssa_edger using example dataset |
|
56 |
+#only 5000 genes and 4 replicates tested to speed up runtime |
|
57 |
+data(deg.partial, package = "ERSSA") |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+gg_intersect = ggplot2_intersectPlot(deg.partial) |
|
60 |
+ |
|
61 |
+} |
|
62 |
+\author{ |
|
63 |
+Zixuan Shao, \email{[email protected]} |
|
64 |
+} |