Sometimes I feel the need to make sense of our society’s drug policy. For a brief moment in the ’60s (or so I’ve heard, having not made my entrance into this world until 1970) there was a subculture of people experimenting with altered states of consciousness, often induced chemically. But besides that, we have all kinds of factions fighting against each other, none of them going anywhere except to hell in a handbasket: the “cool” drug counterculture, the illegal drug making/selling economy, the drug war economy, the poor souls fighting addiction, the puritan idealism that inevitably adopts a hypocritical position of condemning some chemicals utterly while accepting others without question, the pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, the tobacco industry, the alcohol industry, etc.
Okay, well, the legalized industries are doing fine. But we often excuse their products as harmless, though in the last few decades we have been leaning the other way with alcohol and tobacco.
But we still allow people, including children, to walk around souped up on caffeine and sugar and few of us recognize these effects as altered states. (I don’t know about you, but the most positive and productive I am all day is the hour or so when I’m flying on my morning caffeine fix.) We are only just beginning to see them as powerful. And our inevitable response seems to be to condemn them.
Are we capable of a more intelligent handling of the issue?
No matter where we stand on whatever drug issue, legal or otherwise, we all seem to be operating under the same common assumption: altered states are secretly fun, to some degree dangerous and always carry at least a small stigma of shamefulness. Even with coffee, aren’t we addicts all at least a little sheepish when admitting our fixation? Sobriety is held as the ultimate righteous state.
But might altered consciousness be something humans need? Is it ever beneficial? We might admire a Native American peyote ceremony for the soul searching and mystical insight it provides, but none of us is allowed to do it. How would someone’s reputation change in your eyes if you found out they’d done acid?
We allow, “I was just experimenting in college” and “I didn’t inhale.” We’ve gotten to where we allow people to be reformed users, like George W., for example.
But for someone to be a respected member of mainstream society who proves their worth on a daily basis and is also a known pot smoker? Nope.
We all have understandable fears based on anecdotal evidence of some type of chemical destroying someone we know and/or love. We may even decide to buck the present trend and be against alcohol consumption. But cars and motorcycles maim and kill lots of people, and isn’t that an altered state for a lot of people? The power, speed, independence, road rage, status symbol possession… Most of the time we drive in a fairly sober, utilitarian manner, but who among us doesn’t ever floor it or take that corner just a little faster than necessary? We definitely are not in our natural state, feet on the ground, head surrounded by sky. Our heavy metal boxes put us in a certain frame of mind.
But we would never dream of outlawing them.
Our tv watching puts us in an altered state, a passive, drooling spectatorship. How are the hours wasted and life energy atrophied away any different in front of the tube than passed out with painkillers?
Okay. Granted they are different. I’m just being dramatic in an attempt to make the point that we try to avoid sobriety in many different ways, some of them demonized as too dangerous and others labeled as simply “entertainment” or “transportation” or “java” some other moniker that makes them untouchable.
What would happen if we said, yes, we need to escape. Yes, grownups are going to be allowed to choose their method of altering with no legislating and then they will be held responsible for any consequences of their choices. The pluses and minuses of every method could be discussed freely. We could openly admit that lots of things we do everyday, even something so innocuous as having a drama queen fit, are forays out of our “right minds.” We could talk without shame about what we are looking for outside of our sobriety, about what we find there.
Or should we just continue to behave as though stone cold sobriety were the only way to be, ever. That there is no time or place for getting out of your head or your day to day perspective, unless perhaps you choose Zen meditation, prayer, yogic breathing. Newsflash — these things are seen as a little bit crazy, too. Innocuously so, but nevertheless.
I hope this article did not induce any sort of altering in the reader’s awareness of reality as they’ve always assumed it to be — any effects of change in point of view, feelings of lightheadedness or hallucinations were purely unintentional. Unless you go for that sort of thing. In which case, you’re welcome.
Comments on comments
I’ve been wanting to write this post for a long time. I don’t think the time will ever be right, but I’m tired of having it floating around in my head.
Figuring out how the comment function “should” work in this medium has been awkward at times. When I first started blogging, I would encounter blogs where leaving a comment met with a “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” I check back and the writer never approved it. A perfectly innocuous comment, agreeing with what the poster said. I take that as my signal never to return. Why do these people have their blog public?
Some writers are vigilant about commenting on everyone’s comments, and this is great. It makes it a real conversation, back and forth. But sometimes when I start to do this, it feels forced. Sometimes I know that a comment does not require a response. At the same time, I don’t want to make the commenter feel unheard or unappreciated. That is a dilemma I struggle with.
There is one blogger whose writing I admire for its humor and commentary on pop culture. I’ve left a couple of well-crafted comments, hoping maybe to strike up a conversation or let her know I like her work, and she has never responded, nor has she ever visited my site, according to the blog stats page. She doesn’t get many comments on her site, maybe a couple for a post on a good day, or else I would just make up the excuse that she is too busy and overwhelmed by her readership. Though I feel like a little kid standing in humble admiration, I continue to visit her page because it is worth it, even if she doesn’t have time for me. (At least she doesn’t moderate my comments into the cyber round file!)
Another blogger whose writing I very much enjoy brought up the desire for honesty in comments, an idea to which I myself subscribe. Respectful honesty: to me, I’ve always thought this is the goal of communication, right?
But now I think, maybe not always. Sometimes maybe it is good to have a place to come and just get support from people. This world tends toward the hostile, and sometimes even respectful honesty feels hostile when you’ve had enough strife in the rest of your day. Sometimes we just need people to relax with and not feel like we’re being criticized or picked apart every minute. This is definitely legitimate.
A recent foot-in-mouth comment of mine leads me to consider the nature of individual blogs, what their purposes are. I above all want to be respectful of people’s intended audience and atmosphere. I think the most disrespectful comment is the one that tries to tear the fabric of the blog without consideration of its nature.
Which leads inevitably to the question, what is the nature of my blog? I get the sense from people’s comments that they are inspired to think about the content, and sometimes have a good chuckle, when reading my posts. I confess I’ve never had a disruptive comment. Luck, I suppose, or lack of traffic! I don’t feel like I’ve clarified the purpose of my own blog in my mind, other than having a forum to express myself and see how people react to it, how they can add to it or spin the topic in a way I hadn’t thought of. I do really like the idea of making people laugh. I think this is a valuable objective. I want to cultivate my own sense of humor and learn not to stand in the way of others’.
Lately I’ve taken to commenting on some of the articles on the website of the local paper. Most of it is democrat/republican sniping, and I like to jump into the fray if I feel there is something worth addressing. I know the paper welcomes all comments so they can sell ads to advertisers, so there is no danger of disrespecting a certain atmosphere that someone has worked hard to create. As you can imagine if you are familiar with how I operate, I don’t launch personal attacks or try to ridicule anyone individually. But neither do I hold back much on what I really think.
But blogs are a different kind of public forum. I am so blown away by bloggers who open up themselves to the world and try to make honest, real connections. I am equally impressed with readers who take the time to digest and react in their own words to what the blogger has offered up for thought. I have always loved books and words, and I’ve always loved to sit around and chew over some issue or other with friends, but this experience on the internet combines both activities and takes them to a whole new level. It is amazing to be in a global conversation and I have not stopped being overwhelmed at how lucky I am to be participating in it. Really, it is unprecedented in the history of humans.
I look forward to many years of experimenting with this great exchange.
11 Comments
Filed under writing
Tagged as blogging, comments, forum, internet, society, writing