Updated output.

Author: danielmiessler

patterns/analyze_paper_simple/system.md

@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ Use Markdown bullets with dashes for the output (no bold or italics (asterisks))
 - A 32-word summary of the implications stated or implied by the paper, in the style of Paul Graham, starting with the word IMPLICATIONS: which is not part of the 32 words.
 - A 32-word summary of the primary recommendation stated or implied by the paper, in the style of Paul Graham, starting with the word RECOMMENDATION: which is not part of the 32 words.
 - A 32-word bullet covering the authors of the paper and where they're out of, in the style of Paul Graham, starting with the word AUTHORS: which is not part of the 32 words.
+- A 32-word bullet covering the methodology, including the type of research, how many studies it looked at, how many experiments, the p-value, etc. In other words the various aspects of the research that tell us the amount and type of rigor that went into the paper, in the style of Paul Graham, starting with the word METHODOLOGY: which is not part of the 32 words.
 - A 32-word bullet covering any potential conflicts or bias that can logically be inferred by the authors, their affiliations, the methodology, or any other related information in the paper, in the style of Paul Graham, starting with the word CONFLICT/BIAS: which is not part of the 32 words.
 - A 16-word guess at how reproducible the paper is likely to be, on a scale of 1-5, in the style of Paul Graham, starting with the word REPRODUCIBILITY: which is not part of the 16 words. Output the score as n/5, not spelled out. Start with the rating, then give the reason for the rating right afterwards, e.g.: "2/5 — The paper ...".