"Update" button displays on the Edited local beatmaps of the Mapper themselves

[rvneXe]

Type

Game behaviour

Bug description

Hi. I know this might not be required atp, since we're moving to Song Select V2, but anyways,

if the current beatmap in the client doesn't match with the remote (server) one, the UI will display an update button on the tile of that beatmap.
When YOU are the mapper and you've edited the beatmap for a reason, the Update button looks a bit useless/annoying. Like I randomly clicked on that and my changes were gone😂😂 (fortunately, it was a minor change)

My Solutions

1. Check if the user is the mapper?

if the current user is the mapper, then don't display the Update button.

2. Don't display the Update button if there's no new update

if the user has edited the beatmap, and it has changed to a Local beatmap, then ignore any current mismatches with the server, but display it if any new version is available which wasn't at the time that user edited. (like keeping an un-edited version to judge based on that)

3. "Rollback" / "Discard" button instead, with a confirmation dialog

like the same thing as we currently have, but if it's a local edit by the user, display a different text and icon and display a confirmation dialog that "any changes will be lost" with that hold to confirm thingy.
also can do like solution 2, display Update if a new version is available.

Screenshots or videos

No response

Version

2025.605.1

Logs

[bdach]

Like I randomly clicked on that and my changes were gone😂😂

and then "randomly" held down the button on the confirmation dialog to discard your changes for however many seconds it takes to activate it, right?

[rvneXe]

Update button doesn't require a confirmation.
You click, it starts updating.

[rvneXe]

and this is how collaborators behave the community, right?

[bdach]

Update button doesn't require a confirmation. You click, it starts updating.

Screen.Recording.2025-06-06.at.18.11.16.mov

now I will give you benefit of doubt and say that maybe you've found some specific set of circumstances where the confirmation isn't required.

in that case I will require specific information as to how to get to this set of circumstances. you know, like a list of steps how to make that happen. or details like your client.realm database, for instance.

not sweeping generalisations about what the game definitely is or is not doing like usual from you.

and this is how collaborators behave the community, right?

remind me again, are you not the person that yells at me in issue threads, that pings me out of nowhere with passive aggressive remarks about how you "get to practice your maths" because I don't drop everything for one specific feature you specifically want, or call my understanding of written text worse than "the weakest gpt models"?