Imputation in the Reformation Creeds

What I’m going to do in this post is merely post quotations from the great Reformation creeds on imputation, to show not only what it is, but that it is the main part of the Reformation doctrine of justification.

Formula of Concord art. 3, affirmation II:

We believe, therefore, teach, and confess that this very thing is our righteousness before God, namely, that God remits to us our sins of mere grace, without any respect of our works, going before, present, or following, or of our worthiness or merit. For he bestows and imputes to us the righteousness of the obedience of Christ; for the sake of that righteousness we are received by God into favor and accounted righteous.

Second Helvetic Confession, chapter 15, section 3:

For Christ took upon himself and bare the sins of the world, and did satisfy the justice of God. God, therefore, is merciful unto our sins for Christ alone, that suffered and rose again, and does not impute them unto us. But he imputes the justice (Latin justitiam) of Christ unto us for out own; so that now we are not only cleansed from sin, and purged, and holy, but also endued with the righteousness of Christ; yea, and acquitted from sin, death, and condemnation (2 Cor. 5:19-21); finally, we are righteous, and heirs of eternal life. To speak properly, then, it is God alone that justifieth us, and that only or Christ, by not imputing unto us our sins, but imputing Christ’s righteousness unto us (Romans 4:23-25).

French Confession of 1559, article 18:

We believe that all our justification rests upon the remission of our sins, in which also is our only blessedness, as saith the Psalmist (Psalm 32:2). We therefore reject all other means of justification before God, and without claiming any virtue or merit, we rest simply in the obedience of Jesus Christ, which is imputed to us as much to blot out all our sins as to make us find grace and favor in the sight of God.

Belgic Confession, article 22:

Therefore, we justly say with Paul, that we are justified by faith alone, or by faith without works. However, to speak more clearly, we do not mean that faith itself justifies us, for it is only an instrument with which we embrace Christ our Righteousness. But Jesus Christ, imputing to us all his merits, and so many holy works, which he hath done for us and in our stead, is our Righteousness.

Heidelberg Catechism, question 60

“Without my deserving it at all, out of sheer grace, God grants and credits (older translations have “imputes”) to me the perfect satisfaction, righteousness, and holiness of Christ, as if I had never sinned nor been a sinner, as if I had been as perfectly obedient as Christ was obedient for me.”

Irish Articles, 1615, “Of Justification and Faith, section 34”:

We are accounted righteous before God only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, applied by faith, and not for out own works or merits. And this righteousness, which we so receive of God’s mercy and Christ’s merits, embraced by faith, is taken, accepted, and allowed of God, for our perfect and full justification.

Westminster Confession of Faith, chapter 11, section 1:

Those whom God effectually calleth he also freely justifieth; not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous: not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God.

Gisbertus Voetius’s Selectarum Disputationum

Four of the five volumes of the Latin Selectarum Disputationum may be downloaded for free. If you know Latin, Voetius is the best undiscovered Reformed author in the world. It is a fascimile, but still quite readable, and easier by far than, say, Caryl’s sermons on Job. This would be a great reason to learn Latin, as well. HT: Wes White

Another great resource for Reformed authors is http://www.books.google.com/   It really is amazing what they have. I have downloaded Du Moulin, Davenant, Ames, Lightfoot, Vitringa, Melanchthon, and Fairbairn.
1. Go to http://gallica.bnf.fr/

2. Click on recherche.

3. Under Mots du titre, type in “disputationum.”

4. Under the fourth result, click on “consulter la notice”

5. Click on pars 1.

6. Click on telecharger

7. Click on “ok” at the bottom of the screen

8. After the document is ready, there will be a clickable phrase “en cliquant ici” in blue in the middle of the page. *Right-click* on that phrase, and “save target as” whatever and wherever you want to save it. Repeat instructions 5-8 for the other parts. (go back from the pop-up window to do so).

By Faith Alone, part 6

The fourth article is by C. FitzSimons Allison, entitled “The Foundational Term for Christian Salvation,” subtitled “Imputation.” That says quite a bit just in the title, as I’m sure you’ll recognize. The quotation from Hooker is worth the price of admission:

The righteousness, wherewith we shall be clothed in the world to come, is both perfect and inherent. That whereby here we are justified is perfect, but not inherent. That whereby we are sanctified, inherent, but not perfect.

It doesn’t get much better or succinct in describing justification. We are all in Allison’s debt merely for resurrecting this quote. Allison goes on to note that herein lies the difference with Rome: “The Council of Trent is in explicit difference, holding that the righteousness by which we are justified is inherent, infused, perfect, and ours” (pg. 100). Hooker’s view, however, was by no means unique to Anglican thinkers: he mentions Cranmer, Herbert, Donne, Andrewes, Davenant, and all of Classical Anglicanism into the middle of the seventeenth century (presumably ending with the expulsion of the Puritans from their pulpits in 1642). Of course, Allison’s point in bringing up the Anglican view is to show how far N.T. Wright, and Anglican, has departed from the 39 Articles (pg. 101). Allison, therefore, also takes aim at the Anglican/Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC), which didn’t even mention justification, the point which Hooker called “the grand question.” It is premature, to say the least, to entitle such an ecumenical document “The Final Report,” as they have done.

What follows this is a very interesting discussion of the Roman Catholic psychology of Tridentine justification, as it plays out in pastoral ministry. For Roman Catholics, it is better to remain ignorant of one’s sins, since then it is possible to avoid mortal sin entirely. A premium is thus put on “keeping material guilt unconscious” (pg. 107). The cash value of imputation can be seen when compared to the alternative: “The replacement of ‘infusion’ for ‘imputation’ must lower the definition of sin to a manageable level or none would be in a state of grace.” This sentence deserves to be the subject of deep meditation. Dwell on it for awhile, folks. Let its truth seep into your soul. What follows further from this replacement is that pastors will encourage their parishioners to sweep sins under the rug of ignorance, so that they are not really major sins. They remain venial unless consciously done. This makes pastors complicit in their parishioners’ sins.

One further point of extreme importance can be gleaned from this excellent article, and that is a splendid one-sentence explanation of why imputation is falling into disfavor: “we live in an age bereft of the sense of God’s justice, transcendence, and awesomeness” (pg. 110). If we regained even a hint of God’s transcending holiness, we would fly with full speed to the doctrine of imputation (that is, we would trust in Christ and His merits), knowing that only Christ’s righteousness, active and passive, can possibly cover us from the wrath of Almighty God. Niebuhr said (Allison quotes him), “In the beginning God created us in his own image and ever since we have attempted to return the compliment” (pg. 111). We must beware of letting culture dictate the direction of our theology. Imputation must remain front and center in justification, or we are lost.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started