Several years ago at Christmas my husband bought me one of those desk things that answers your questions, checks facts, monitors your Blink outside cameras and keeps you from having to look up anything ever again. He misplaced it so it wasn’t under our tree but the thought was appreciated. It would have been a really swell gift and addition to my office.
The following Christmas a relative gave my husband a similar device as a gift, he loved it and he replaced the original one he’d bought me and lost. Shortly after THAT Christmas my husband found the original he’d bought for me but misplaced so we suddenly had three of the devices … manufactured by the two most popular companies. It was too late to return any of them so my husband installed two in my office … one on my desk and one on an end table … from different manufacturers. If I didn’t get a satisfactory answer from one, I could ask the other.
Both devices were very polite. If I said, “THANK YOU” at the end of an inquiry both responded with, “You’re welcome” or “I’m glad you found this information helpful.” If I got lonesome I could ask one or both of the devices a question. And one even told me jokes when I said, “Tell me a joke” … very corny jokes … but nobody is perfect, not even a question-answering desk device of artificial intelligence.
Over the course of a couple years ownership it became apparent that one device (I’m purposely NOT mentioning manufacturer because it isn’t really relative to the story) most often had a satisfactory answer while the other did not. It was no inconvenience at all because I was owner of two resource devices and a computer to back up any answer I wasn’t satisfied with. But it DID raise a question about the intellect of the less knowledgeable device and where the information actually originated. BUT … it was fairly insignificant and I didn’t pursue it.
So recently there was a story on the local news about a person charged with ‘sexual battery.’ My husband was in my office when the story was reported on the NEWS at Six and asked exactly what the definition of ‘battery’ was … specifically ‘sexual battery’ as in this case. I told him to ask my two office companions, Alexa and Google (alphabetical order and not necessarily in order of intelligence) … and so he did.
The dependable device reported exactly what ‘sexual battery’ is and included specific references including state laws, codes and specific cases.
The device with less dependable answers responded, “I don’t have an answer for that. I don’t know how it is made.”
So now I’m wondering where the actual INTELLECT comes from behind these devices … who programs them? … how do the doggone things actually work? … is there really a little old grandma or grandpa from Duluth sitting there answering these questions to the best of their ability, telling corny jokes, making minimum wage so as not to interfere with Social Security benefits, keeping him or her just two steps away from being a Walmart greeter but giving him or her something productive and kind of fun to do???
If it’s really just two supposedly wise computers managing the whole question and answer thing AND monitoring our outside Blink cameras I’d suggest one of them needs a tune-up or at the very least a battery change. NOT a ‘sexual battery,’ though. That might be too confusing …

