Results for
distinctiveness
Famous but not distinctive: ANIMAL FARM and 1984 failed as trade marks because they were successful as books
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Saturday, June 13, 2026
Rating:
5
EUIPO receives first sound mark application to protect against digital replicas and deepfakes
Reviewed by
Eleonora Rosati
on
Sunday, May 17, 2026
Rating:
5
Cheese, holes and weak distinctiveness: the General Court revisits Formula One Licensing v OHIM
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Tuesday, January 06, 2026
Rating:
5
EUIPO Grand Board refuses registration of ‘GEORGE ORWELL’ as a trade mark for inter alia books
Reviewed by
Eleonora Rosati
on
Friday, December 26, 2025
Rating:
5
[Guest Post] A sound decision: short jingle can be registered as a trade mark, says EU General Court
Reviewed by
Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Friday, September 19, 2025
Rating:
5
Can trade mark law help protect one’s privacy (and stop the spread of embarrassing WhatsApp audio messages)?
Reviewed by
Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Rating:
5
General Court denies protection for OMV abstract colour combination trade mark – despite INTA’s and MARQUES’ intervention
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Thursday, July 03, 2025
Rating:
5
Glaxo’s colour trade mark for inhalers invalidated
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Rating:
5
An imaginative sign for smart houses qualifies for EU trade mark registration
Reviewed by
Söğüt Atilla-Aydın
on
Tuesday, May 06, 2025
Rating:
5
EUIPO rules in favour of Mercedes-Benz in radiator grille EUTM appeal (R 2316/2024-1)
Reviewed by
Alessandro Cerri
on
Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Rating:
5
Mercedes’s off-road vehicle illustration insufficiently distinctive for EU trade mark registration
Reviewed by
Söğüt Atilla-Aydın
on
Monday, April 14, 2025
Rating:
5
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by
Asude Sena Moya
on
Wednesday, February 26, 2025
Rating:
5
Red flags and red lines – Important, but not protectable as position marks
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Monday, February 24, 2025
Rating:
5
General Court: Trade marks for virtual goods and services to be assessed like trade marks for the real goods and services
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Monday, December 30, 2024
Rating:
5
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by
Asude Sena Moya
on
Wednesday, December 18, 2024
Rating:
5
EUIPO’s Board of Appeal: Motion mark for an opening window lacks distinctiveness and only shows a technical process
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Monday, December 16, 2024
Rating:
5
Challenging Nestlé’s fitness for trade mark: Can belated evidence lead to invalidation?
Reviewed by
Söğüt Atilla-Aydın
on
Saturday, December 07, 2024
Rating:
5
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by
Asude Sena Moya
on
Tuesday, December 03, 2024
Rating:
5
General Court: ‘Russian Warship, GO F**K YOURSELF’ non-distinctive
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Monday, December 02, 2024
Rating:
5