Michael Knowles and the trans-widow

 

[VIDEO] Knowles interviews Tracy Shannon who was married to a man who had issues with cross-dressing and eventually opted to transition to become a woman. This interview is very shocking.

How the husband (who essentially became the wife) conducted himself around his children. And I got to say he cross-dressed, transition to be a woman, and even subjected his children to his various partners other than his wife was definitely a very toxic situation.

And the wife, it seems she was shamed into accepting her husband's gender transition. A counselor (who according to Ms. Shannon now advocated for the gender transition of children) basically called her "close-minded" because she had an issue with her husband's transition. In her words whatever life they had the husband effectively threw it all away for their gender transition.

I find this a very sad story. Now the description talks about transgender ideology and I don't know if this is about that. My hot take on this was this was a troubled man who allowed his transition to ruin his relationship with his wife and children.

Scamala: Kamala Harris Unmasked with Ben Shapiro - Episode 1

 

[VIDEO] Watching this documentary from Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire causes me to really dislike Kamala Harris. It did its job, discussing her rise to prominence from the girlfriend of a California political kingmaker to an assistant prosecutor to an elected prosecutor to the office of California Attorney General to the US Senate and then the Vice-Presidency.

She seemed to have "failed up" as opposed to floundering and fading into obscurity. Was it being a woman? Was it her biracial heritage being both Jamaican Black and Southeast Indian? Was it just plain luck that got her where she is now.

And some of her efforts to insure that she could get elected. Her strategy in California probably could be described as cynical. She was willing to seem tough on crime for her own success, however,  what if she only followed the soft on crime dictates of the people who helped her get to the dance.

And then let's not forget her best soundbites against the man she serves with in Americas top offices the President & Vice-President. In a debate in 2020 she tried to use the race card, and again it's cynical because we learn that she lived in Canada and likely wasn't subjected to the racial issues of America.

Of course add to that her awkwardness and her disingenuousness. To be fair, if I've gone that high up it wouldn't be inconceivable that there would be some awkwardness on my end. As a politician however Vice-President Harris is terrible and you know what as far as past VPs go she really fits right in.

Other than recent VPs, how many do you remember from history? Other than her own historical footnotes - as the first woman & first woman of color as Vice-President - will anyone really remember VP Harris?

ABL: Two Twitter execs QUIT over the 'What is a Woman' documentary?

 

[VIDEO] I mentioned this on Friday and indeed Elon Musk put this documentary on his page. Although the owner of Tesla & Space X bought Twitter last fall, there are elements within his company that could still cause some problems. And interesting still this is even after massive layoffs at the social network.

What is a Woman is a great documentary which takes aim at the radical gender ideology that it seems is being spread to minors. There were two clips that were of scrutiny.

Trans cover model of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition

 

[VIDEO] Kim Petras is on the currently a cover model for the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. Petras is known for being on stage at the Grammy's in a hellish themed set with Sam Smith. Petras is also known for being a transgendered artist.

Born a boy Petras had a sex-change at 16 and I do understand is originally from Germany. So Petras is a current cover model with Megan Fox and the 81-year-old Martha Stewart. And making Petras a swimsuit model as a transwoman is proving to be controversial.

As we're learning with Bud Light we see companies trying for woke points doing campaigns that really go against the target demographic of their customers. Men who drink Bud Light don't want to see a man masquerading as a woman. And men don't want to see a man in a swimsuit of an issue that is known for showing young beautiful women.

It's in the news currently that Adidas has a man modeling a Pride 2023 women's swimsuit. I mean really? A man modeling a piece of attire that is designed for women?

As you see Lauren Chen of The Blaze argue, what is it with essentially replacing women with men? 

Candace Owens: Something changes in Dylan Mulvaney

 

[VIDEO] I just had to share this and while Candace Owens talks about a number of topics in this over 9 min. video the focus should really be on this character Dylan Mulvaney (the clip starts about 4:44). My conclusion about him is that he's just an over the top person who wants attention. And the opinion of myself and others out there is that we should just ignore him and he just needs to talk to a therapist.

If you've never heard of him he's well known for his series on TikTok about his journey through girlhood. He had declared himself trans and from all the clips of him out there, while he presents himself as a female he's never seemed to have referred to himself as a woman. And even as Candace alluded to he's always referred to himself as a girl.

There are clips of him out there as a man doing over the top stuff, it circulated recently that he was a contestant on The Price is Right as man being very goofy. It causes me to believe he just likes attention. And more recently he was at the center of the Bud Light brand being boycotted primarily by conservative consumers because the now on leave VP used Mulvaney's status as an influencer to promote the brand.

Well in a recent video as Candace notes, the tone of Mulvaney has changed. 

Oh wait I'm sorry I misgendered him. Oh well so does Candace Owens....

Anyway Mulvaney seems human here. What would he be without the make-up and how he chooses to present himself? Perhaps there's a shift going on here and to be de-humanized well perhaps there is some real anger at Mulvaney's behavior.

My stance again is that people can do with their lives as they want, I'll put Mulvaney in that category. He's free to do what he wants as long as it doesn't harm others. Women ought to be offended at his over the top portrayal of "being a girl". I would still say he needs to talk to someone and Candace Owens is right he's not a girl and he would never be a girl. That's not de-humanizing that's the truth.

Though I would still say with this post aside that until he gets whatever therapy he needs, he shouldn't get anymore attention than he already has so far.

Timcast IRL: Bud Light VP REPLACED annouces VP taking leave of absence

 

[VIDEO] And again there is a certain invidual named in this video whom I will not give anymore attention to and merely believe this person needs serious help in his need for attention. And sadly he was the lightning rod for the controversy involving the VP at Anheuser-Busch named Alisa Heinerscheid.

You know the brand of Bud Light and the company that produces the beer has been taking a beating for most of the past month due to their association with individual who shall not be named here. And in a podcast Heinerscheid had only exposed her mentality as far as the advertising produced for the brand and approved by her. 

Now this person who shall not be named was proven to be a lightning rod because they identify as trans and for the consumers of Bud Light or any other beverages produced by Anheuser-Busch this proved to be a tipping point which you see Tim Pool and others discuss. And Heinerscheid's attitude towards this merely shows how she views the customers. She views them as very fratty with out of touch humor. As a result we hear about how Bud Lights sales have been dropping.

Also discussed in this video is there is no brand loyalty for light beer such as Bud Light. I might add I'm not a beer drinker at all - no alcohol at all - and I might not be aware of various marketing campaigns by other companies. Especially as it might relate to the idea of pride.

So what's the difference between marketing towards pride - well LGBTQ+1 pride at least - vs the individual who seeks attention at any costs that shall not be named here? What if what that person represents individually is just so obnoxious and disliked that perhaps Bud Light's customers just couldn't support this? That Anheuser-Busch was very willing to use that individual as an influencer to help promote their brand?

Could this be a tipping point in this new cultural war? Also consider another thing another tipping point in this cultural war is allow biological men who identify as female are being allowed to play sports with and against biological women?

Tucker Carlson: Transgenderism is America's fastest-growing religion

 

[VIDEO] I wanted to share this video from last nite's edition of Tucker Carlson Tonight.

Tucker considers those groups who support trans rights as the most dangerous extreme group in America. As you see in his monologue - the above video is quite glitchy to be honest so be aware if you want to watch - they have taken over churches, they're in gov't, and you might even say they're even in women's sports.

A question that Tucker Carlson seeks to answer is what is America's new religion. It's no longer Christianity, as you might see above some churches have even been co-opted by the "fringe". Some churches would pray for the victims, however. in the clip above you see one Christian minister refer to the Nashville mass shooter as a martyr or perhaps a victim themselves.

Now, let me state my position I believe people have the right to live their lives they see fit. A man wants to be a woman, I have to let them do them. I'm still trying to figure out what my life is, I don't have time nor the ability to tell others how to figure out their own.

But then this cultism mob-like thing that you will get a hint about in the video above. If you question them then they not only harass you, they also assault you. Basically you can't really challenge who they want to will themselves to be, I think that's a dangerous thing. Worst still amongst that group - I'm really not trying to paint a group of people with a broad brush - are mentally ill people who think it's OK to harm others as that person in Nashville had done that's even more dangerous.

Dangerous enough to call the group that harassed Riley Gaines - a former college athlete who has spoken out against biological men who identify as women competing in sports against biological women - the most dangerous extremist group in America.

How does one threaten truth?

 

[VIDEO] Matt Walsh is interviewed by Zuby on YouTube. Walsh as you know did a documentary earlier this year entitled What is a Woman? The discuss the danger radical gender ideology and it's not just the assault on children - that is weak parents that allow or even want children to transition to another gender - it's the assault against the truth.

I would say this is a philosophical discussion that goes a bit over my head, however, what is one truth many generations of people held men are men and women are women. Radical gender ideology holds that you are what you feel.

I can say I feel like a Vulcan and try to mind meld with people, of course, on this world Vulcans were created in a fictional entertainment franchise. They're not real and I could probably get a fat lip for my invasion of someone's personal space.

So basically from radical gender ideology, truth becomes what you want it to be. It can be anything you think it is. Truth becomes children can consent to make irreparable changes to their bodies with weak parents who will allow it. Truth becomes women lose their identities and privacy. Perhaps the loss of truth becomes the loss of right & wrong.

Matt Walsh: Trans YouTuber Responds To What Is A Woman Trailer

[VIDEO] This past summer I viewed Matt Walsh's documentary What is a Woman? The video above well the documentary hadn't premiered online at DailyWire.com when this video was uploaded in late May 2022. I have seen the documentary which is a shocking look at this idea of radical gender ideology and that gender is a social construct and the efforts to transition children & adolescents to another gender.

What Walsh takes a look at is a reaction to a trailer for his soon to premier documentary and as you see his goal is "cancel" them. The person in question is trans and they seem to have an issue with the concept of Walsh's documentary. So as Walsh and a "transman" with regret is denounced as a transphobe, an African tribe for their own cultural sensibilities seems to get a pass (perhaps she doesn't want to be cancelled for racism.

Now I mention a "transman" with regret here. The "transman" is one Scott Newgent who as a woman was very beautiful, however, at 42 she went into transition. Now she looks like a typical middle-aged white male, however, you can tell by the inflections of his voice and by his displays of emotion that you can sense something feminine there. He realizes that going into such a vulnerable point in his life caused him to arrive at the point of no return. He realizes that all the procedures to turn her into a middle aged man might one day end his life where he shows scars from a skin graft used to create for him male genitalia.

Yeah that's a transphobe....you know one thing learned in the documentary is that puberty blockers are also used to chemically castrate sex offenders. However, what I'm learning more and more about this issue is that there is a human tragedy going on.

My perception is that this is being pushed more and more into the mainstream and worst still it's being pushed on far more vulnerable people than Scott Newgent. The vulnerable includes children and adolescents who may not have a concept entirely of what it means to be "trans" and worse still becoming trans includes medical treatment. It means hormones and it means surgeries - surgeries that unfortunately are irreversible so there's no coming back from that once it's done. And it's totally horrible to do that to vulnerable people in their childhood & adolescent who are still developing mentally and physically.

I suppose all I can add to this is that, we need to question this. It's not transphobic to ask questions about the mental and health effects of medically transitioning human beings to another gender. We have to question if it's even healthy.

With this said I do believe everyone has the right to live their lives as they see fit. I'd have to say Scott Newgent at 42 years old knew what she was getting herself into and now regrets that decision and knew he was vulnerable going through it. If she made that decision to go through that medical transition she made that choice, what we must have an issue with is allowing at the very least a very vulnerable adolescent to make the same life altering decision. Newgent is now actively trying to help parents keep their children from going through what he had and knowing that they shouldn't be allowed to make that decision.

RELATED: Glenn Beck: De-Transitioner Exposes Dark World of 'Gender-Affirming Care'

Shapiro reacts to 'Is 5 years old too young to medically transition?'

 

[VIDEO] Ben Shapiro reacts to a video by Ami Horowitz where he passes around a petition to people on a university campus in California (probably) with regards to a five-year-old child wanting to transition to another gender and her very wonderful parents are preventing that. Unfortunately there are a lot of people willing to sign that petition and not protect the child from some decisions that are irreversible.

Also that man in the end the only one seen with common sense and peep the woman who tells Horowitz that if he's on campus during a pandemic (I assume this was taped this year 2022) he should be wearing a mask. Lady he's outside and if you want to go there he should be socially distanced, yet....anyway. Some people's thought process. 🤷

Anyway this is in line with that interview of de-transitioner Chloe Cole who spoke with Glenn Beck recently.

Glenn Beck: De-Transitioner Exposes Dark World of 'Gender-Affirming Care'

 

[VIDEO] "Gender-affirming care" does sound a bit nicer than the discussion being have currently with people like Glenn Beck. Transgender, puberty blockers, mastectomy, castration, hormones, to be honest to hear all of those things as far as someone transitioning to another gender makes me a bit uncomfortable.

I've had to conclude that while I might say there isn't much I can do about an adult wanting to do all of these procedures to change their gender. For the most part I would say they know what they're getting themselves into. Still I would say I have far more things going on in my life than to worry about an adult and their own issues as far as their gender identity.

However, for Chloe Cole at the young age of 15 she had no idea what she signed up for when it came to "gender-affirming care". She now knows if she was lucky enough to have a child she can never chest breastfeed. Because she took hormones and puberty blockers she might be concerned about giving birth to children in the future, and it seems this young lady isn't yet 20. She realized on some level she has gone a bit too far, however, time will tell if she's gone past the point of no return. She realizes she should never have gone through this at such a young age.

It seems going through this transition causes more issues, especially mental health issues that it's suppose to solve. Also weak parents seem to be OK with this and sadly if a parent actively opposes their children transition they could lose custody of their children as a result and that means someone else makes that decision for that child. Someone else would "affirm" the child's new gender and approve these irreversible procedures.

The question we should ask is, why is there a push to transition children as young as 6 years old to another gender? If someone that young has no concept of the "transition" all some adult whether a parent or any other authority figure have done is set that person up for a future with a diminished quality of life.

ABL: Stacey Abrams Black men agenda

 

[VIDEO] You can read it for yourself here. What did I see with Anthony Brian Logan here, not a whole lot of stuff that could be directed towards the Black male voter. A lot of economic promises, an end to "poverty-based criminal penalties" (hmm I suppose that's the point of the SAFE-T act here in Illinois), of course education policies which includes "over-disciplining" of Black children.

So ABL might state that a lot of these bullet points are vague or even how does this apply to Black males. Could some of this be more aimed at Black women?

And of course the big question asked by ABL, will this cause Black men to vote for her and defeat incumbent GA Gov. Brian Kemp?

Timcast IRL: Feminism can only exist in a secure society

 

[VIDEO] Interesting discussion if I believe some of these conspiracy theories and see what's going on in the news those who want to mess with the world's food supply and fall in with the green new dal take for granted the society we have today. If this only causes a "less secure society" then what did these progressives create. 

Another part of the title I stole for this post from Tim Pool's podcast: "loss of luxuries WILL mean death of leftism". Be careful what you wish for abolish prisons, defund police, or even encourage certain forms of vagrancy.....

Matt Walsh asks Maasai tribe "What is a Woman?"

 

[VIDEO] I recently saw What is a Woman via Daily Wire. It's a very interesting documentary exploring the "gender ideology". These people from Africa gives the most simple answer which is strangely complicated question for many of us in the west what is a woman?

Basically a mother gives birth to babies, the question isn't that complicated that's what a woman is. A woman is an adult human female who gives birth to babies. An adult human female's body is designed for that purpose yet ask an American and they got to think about it. Basically we've arrived at the point that basically being a woman is cosplay.

I think I'll have more thoughts on this later, however, this whole ideology as evolved to the point that now we must affirm a person who identifies as some type of animal. We meet someone who identifies as a wolf.

Please don't let Star Trek get so woke that someone identifies as an alien species. People can't be so lost that they don't even want to identify as human.

Glenn Beck: We’ve DESTROYED men in America

 

[VIDEO] Quite a few thoughts to express with this 17 min video.

Beck starts off talking about how men generally tell their sons how to treat women. Perhaps their mother, sister, girlfriend, wife, or perhaps just women in general. And then he asks has a woman ever taught her daughter how to treat a man?

In my life and as I've gotten older I found myself wondering how many women know how to relate to men. And especially acute if there is no man at home to teach young girls how to relate to men or boys.

Another point here is what is the difference between a man and a boy. A boy is petty and impulsive, but a man stands up for everyone's rights he's a true protector.

However, we now have a new question. What is a man? How does one define a man? Can a woman be a man? Or can a man be a woman?

You know I know I'm referencing a wrestling character but after watching this video time to go back to "head of the table" mode. I'd rather be a man at the gate to defend the village than a man who opts to lead from behind.

The Chicago Sky are the world WNBA champs

 

[VIDEO] Well I liken it to this, Chicago hasn't had a lot of good news since the pandemic and it's easy to latch on to these sporting accomplishments as a positive development. Especially as eyes are on the Windy City with a stand-off between the police union and the ever stubborn and quarrelsome Mayor of Chicago on a vax-mandate.

So the media in Chicago and even on the national news network such as ABC were overselling (yup I just used wrestling jargon) the accomplishment of Chicago's WNBA franchise. Nope the Sky isn't owned by anyone associated with the Chicago Bulls although they are an WNBA franchise subsidized by the NBA.

Either way I can view the WNBA as akin to say professional lacrosse or the Arena Football League. Those leagues exist and pay people who want to play professional sports but have been signed to leagues that aren't on the same level as MLB, NFL, NBA or NHL. The WNBA I think is a niche sport.

In this case, yeah we're taking about a gender based sports league. As you see from the clips in the above video there was a parade for the Sky and certainly they've earned it. They're not getting the same attention as the Cubs did 5 years ago granted they won their first world series in 108 years. Even the vlogger above said for the record dozens came to cheer on the Sky for their parade.

I could ask myself the question what type of theater is this? The debate that comes out of this is are the women players of the WNBA worth as much as their counterparts in the NBA? Perhaps one day they might be, however, in 2021 no they're not. It's not about their gender, there just isn't a lot of interest and they have to find a way to change that.

Besides it took a few years for MLB, NFL, NBA, and the NHL to become big time leagues in their own right. Otherwise perhaps they'd have to compete with professional lacrosse or arena football.

Shapiro: The Dems' very serious Kamala problem

 

[VIDEO] The other day I was going on and on about the Vice President's hideous selfie image cookies. They were faceless and it seemed as if whatever icing that was used was running down from her hair. It was just ugly and those cookies were distributed to the press on her trip to central America.

With this said, she's had a rough few days as Ben Shapiro opines. VP Harris is the first woman to hold that office and she's also the first of south Asian and Black descent. One could say identity politics is why she's in this position after basically failing in the 2020 Democrat presidential primaries. I also hear she isn't really liked by Biden's people or even Biden himself, however, whoever was around Biden convinced him to make Kamala Harris his running mate.

So either way if heaven forbid Biden isn't able to complete his one term as president - and it doesnt seem to be going that great right now - then Harris might get it. And if you believe the analysis of right-wing pundits like Shapiro she's just not good at this. When friendly journalist Lester Holt tried to press her on whether or not she went to the border she just started giggling. Perhaps because she already knew she wasn't telling the truth when she repeated she's going to the border. She's the border czar after all and she won't go to the border and won't answer a friendly journalist.

In spite of her "historic" achievement as the first woman and woman of color to be Vice President, if she does become President which seems to be the hope of a certain segment of the electorate I get the feeling she won't be able to do much. Who's her base? Where will her political support come from?

Race or gender aside I just don't think she'll effective if she gets into the "big boy" chair. The way things are going the giggling, the fakeness, the public will see right through her.

Where Have All the Black Men Gone?

I'd say we need the Black men now more than ever. We need them to be productive and we need them as part of our families. Via Governing

The single biggest driver behind the absence of many black men is mass incarceration. A few academics have held up ratios of black men to women as a proxy for incarceration. Despite recent declines in prison populations, disparities remain massive. African-American males are imprisoned in state and federal facilities at six times the rate of white men, and about 25 times that of black women, according to figures from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Black men, underrepresented in the overwhelming majority of neighborhoods, are instead heavily concentrated in relatively few places, and those tend to be home to prisons. We identified 79 such Census tracts with more than twice as many black men as women.

Black men are further subject to high mortality. Homicides drive up rates, along with higher risks of dying from diabetes, kidney disease and sepsis than other men. In all, the latest average life expectancy at birth for black men, 71.5 years as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, trails the expectancy for white men by nearly five years and for black women by more than six years.

But mortality and incarceration rates alone don’t explain why so many black men seem to be missing in communities. Alford Young, a sociology professor at the University of Michigan, notes that they frequently lack permanent addresses. Women, particularly those with children, are likely to obtain support services, and thus to get counted, while black men are not and may become homeless. Young also says a subset prefers to be mobile and undocumented, mostly stemming from fears of law enforcement. “It’s really a challenge with official counts to make sense of where black men are,” he says.

The ramifications of all this are far-reaching. Partners and families of the “missing men” face a host of negative social and economic consequences, such as a shortage of income and assets. Huge numbers of women have ties to incarcerated family members: One in every 2.5 black women has a family member in prison, more than three times the number for white women, according to a Scholars Strategy Network report. For children, research suggests growing up with an incarcerated parent increases the likelihood of learning disabilities, behavioral problems and other challenges.

But the consequences of all this extend beyond families. The absence of adult males means fewer constructive relationships for local children and fewer resources for communities in general. “It’s not simply large numbers of men not being present around their children or their partners,” Young says, “but what it means in a community context to be invisible.”

Another subject I'd like to tackle more are subjects that are important to Black men.

BTW, it brings to mind a piece in 2017 where Black men were considered the "white people of Black people". If Black men are missing in our communities is there really "Black male privilege"?

Check out this odd exchange between Areva Martin & David Webb...

[VIDEO] Of all places, I found out about this via the Washington Post or as Mark Dice refers to them "Washington Compost".

A CNN analyst called out a Fox News contributor for his white privilege. He’s black. https://t.co/vB4nqxJtHi

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) January 16, 2019

CNN legal analyst Areva Martin thought she was talking to a white man Tuesday while appearing as a guest on David Webb’s SiriusXM radio show.

When Webb, a Fox Nation host and frequent Fox News contributor, said he considered his qualifications more important than his skin color when applying to media jobs, Martin accused him of exercising white privilege.

But there was a problem with that, as Webb quickly pointed out:

“Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should’ve been better prepped,” he responded. “I’m black.”

I had assumed this was on TV, but this was on radio. Then again you can hear the exchange from the Dice video about.

And be careful Mr. David Webb you could be accused of being the "white people of Black people". :P

Mark Dice: Guess what they're upset about now

[VIDEO] Mark Dice portrays the absurdity of feminists complaining about today's toys for children. And it illustrates one main thing to me, why not let kids be kids. I think today's adults and perhaps in some cases parents are subjecting their kids to some very unfortunate social engineering.

Why not let boys be into what we could call boys toys. And why not let me girls be into what we could call girls toys.

I go back to my childhood I was into Lego, toy cars (remember Micro Machines), buses, or even model trains. I also had some sports toys such as a Fisher-Price toy golf set which once I discovered hockey quickly became hockey sticks.

Either way instead of complaining about what toys are marketed towards, let the kids decide what they want to play with. Why feel the need to engineer what the kids into to fit an agenda that gender is a social construct? Could it be fear that the children will prove the adults wrong that perhaps gender isn't a social construct?