Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Big Whiskey’

Unforgiven” (1992) – movie review
Today’s review is for the (violent) Western:  “Unforgiven” (1992), starring Clint Eastwood as William Munny (a retired gunslinger turned hog farmer, widowed and haunted), Gene Hackman as Sheriff “Little Bill” Daggett (a brutal lawman with a fondness for carpentry), Morgan Freeman as Ned Logan (Munny’s old partner, coaxed into one last ride), Richard Harris as English Bob (a traveling gunslinger with a flair for self-mythology), Jaimz Woolvett as The Schofield Kid (a nearsighted braggart desperate to prove himself), Frances Fisher as Strawberry Alice (the brothel’s matron and moral center), and Anna Levine as Delilah Fitzgerald (the prostitute whose assault sets the story in motion).
Background:  This is my first time viewing this film – LONG after its Oscar sweep.  (LoL – 30 years plus.)  I’m not against Western’s or Eastwood, it’s just this film came out while I was transitioning to live in England and I just never got around to watching it back in the day.  After that, it just fell off of my radar.
Plot:  A prostitute is disfigured by a drunken cowboy in the town of Big Whiskey, Wyoming.  The local sheriff, Little Bill, refuses to punish the men beyond a few ponies as restitution.  Outraged, the women pool their money to offer a bounty for the cowboys’ death.  Enter William Munny — once a feared killer, now a widowed farmer struggling with pigs and parenthood.  He’s drawn back into violence by the promise of money and the goading of the Schofield Kid.  Munny recruits his old partner Ned, and together they ride toward a reckoning.  What follows is a slow, grim unraveling of myth, morality, and mortality.
So, is this movie any good?  The acting?  The filming / FX?  Any problems?  And, did I enjoy the film?  Short answers:  Yes;  excellent;  stark and effective;  several (mostly philosophical);  yes.
Any Good:  Yes — “Unforgiven” is an interesting re-mythology of the typical American Western where the good guys are good and the bad-guys are bad.  It strips the Western of its romanticism and replaces it with regret, ambiguity, and consequence.  There are no heroes here — only men trying to survive their reputations.  The film challenges the viewer to reconsider what justice looks like when everyone is compromised.  The film won four Academy Awards, including: Best Picture, Best Director (Clint Eastwood), Best Supporting Actor (Gene Hackman), and Best Film Editing.
Acting:  Eastwood is restrained and haunted (typecast) — his Munny is a man who’s done terrible things and knows it. Hackman’s Little Bill is terrifying in his casual cruelty, especially when he’s smiling (typecast).  Freeman’s Ned adds warmth and conscience (typecast), though his fate is a reminder that good intentions don’t guarantee survival.  Harris’s English Bob is a walking contradiction — charming, cowardly, and ultimately pathetic.  Woolvett’s Kid is all bravado until the killing starts.  The supporting cast is solid, but this is Eastwood’s film — both in front of and behind the camera.
Filming / FX:  The cinematography is muted — dust, dusk, and shadows.  The town of Big Whiskey feels like a place where hope goes to die (shades of “Man with no name“).  The violence is sudden and ugly, never stylized.  There are no flashy special effects — just atmosphere and tension.  The film’s visual is “Western”, but more dirty than scenic.
Problems:  Several.  The film expects us to root for Munny, even as he becomes the killer he once was.  It analyzes the myth of the noble gunslinger, but still ends with a blood-soaked climax that feels like catharsis for both Munny and for the viewer.
Did I Enjoy the Film:  Yes.  You root for Munny, even as you (sometimes) recoil (but expect) from what he does.  That’s the film’s genius — and its danger.  It’s not just a Western;  it’s trying to be a eulogy for the Western.  It doesn’t succeed…
Final Recommendation:  Strong recommendation.  “Unforgiven” is worth viewing for anyone interested in the evolution of the Western myth, the psychology of violence, and the power of cinema to challenge its own typecasted stories of “classic” good-guys versus bad-guys.  This film is rated “R” for violence.
.
Click here (13 October) to see the posts of prior years.  I started this blog in late 2009.  Daily posting began in late January 2011.  Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.

Read Full Post »

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started