Death Star | Kevin Barrett's Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Death Star’

The End Of The Beginning

Posted in General Comments, Movie Review, Movies, Reviews, tagged Anakin Skywalker, Anthony Daniels, Billy Dee Williams, C-3PO, Carrie Fisher, Chewbacca, Dagobah, Darth Vader, David Prowse, Death Star, Emperor Palpatine, Endor, Ewoks, General Comments, Han Solo, Harrison Ford, Ian McDiarmid, Jabba the Hutt, James Earl Jones, Jedi Knight, John Williams, Kenny Baker, Lando Calrissian, Light-Saber, Luke Skywalker, Mark Hamill, Movie Reviews, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Peter Mayhew, Princess Leia Organa, R2‑D2, Rebel Alliance, Reviews, Richard Marquand, Sith Master, Skywalker Family, Special Achievement Award (Oscar), Speeder Bikes, Star Wars: Return of the Jedi (1983) — movie review, The Empire, Very Highly Recommended Movie, Yoda on April 24, 2026| Leave a Comment »

“Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” (1983) — movie review
Today’s review is for the sci-fi / fantasy adventure “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi”, directed by Richard Marquand and starring Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker, the now-confident Jedi Knight trying to save his father and defeat the Empire; Harrison Ford as Han Solo, the carbonite-freed smuggler whose loyalty and sarcasm are still intact; Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia Organa, the rebel leader whose courage and compassion anchor the group; Billy Dee Williams as Lando Calrissian, the smooth-talking gambler turned general; Ian McDiarmid as Emperor Palpatine, the manipulative Sith master pulling the strings; David Prowse (body) and James Earl Jones (voice) as Darth Vader, the fallen father struggling between darkness and the last spark of Anakin; Anthony Daniels as C-3PO, Kenny Baker as R2-D2, Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, and a host of puppeteers bringing Jabba’s palace and the Ewoks to life. This is the third film in the original trilogy and the conclusion of Luke’s arc with Vader and the Emperor.

Background: I don’t remember if I ever saw this film in theaters during its original run but I have watched it many times since: TV, VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, and streaming. Released in 1983, “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” was a massive box-office success and received four Academy Award nominations (including Best Original Score and Best Sound) and won a Special Achievement Award for visual effects. Historically, it’s the capstone of the original trilogy: the film that resolves the Skywalker family story, completes the fall of the Empire (for a while), and cemented “Star Wars” as a cultural phenomenon. It’s also notable for its groundbreaking creature work (Jabba’s palace), large-scale space battles, and the emotional father-son confrontation that remains one of the franchise’s most iconic moments.

Plot: The story begins with Luke, Leia, Lando, Chewbacca, and the droids executing a multi‑step plan to rescue Han Solo from Jabba the Hutt. After a tense standoff and a desert skiff battle, the group escapes and regroups with the Rebel Alliance. The Empire is constructing a second Death Star, larger and more dangerous, and the Rebels plan a desperate assault. Luke returns to Dagobah to complete his training, only to learn from Yoda and Obi-Wan’s spirit that Vader is indeed his father — and that he must confront him. The Rebels launch a ground mission on Endor to disable the shield generator, where they encounter the Ewoks, who eventually join the fight. Meanwhile, Luke surrenders to Vader, hoping to reach the good still inside him. The Emperor tries to turn Luke to the dark side, provoking him into a light-saber duel with Vader. Luke refuses to kill his father, and when the Emperor attacks him, Vader finally turns back to the light, destroys the Emperor, and is mortally wounded. The Death Star is destroyed, the shield falls, the Rebels win, and the film ends with celebrations across the galaxy and Luke saying goodbye to his father.

So, is this movie any good? How’s the acting? The filming / FX? Any problems? And, did I enjoy the film? Short answers: Yes; solid to excellent; groundbreaking for its time; a few; absolutely.

Any good? Yes. “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” is a satisfying conclusion to the original trilogy. It balances action, character moments, and emotional payoff. The Luke‑Vader‑Emperor story-line is the heart of the film and still works beautifully. The pacing is generally strong, the stakes feel real, and the movie delivers both spectacle and closure. It’s not perfect, but the core story lands exactly where it needs to.

Acting: Mark Hamill gives his best performance of the trilogy: calm, focused, and carrying the weight of Luke’s choices. Ford slips back into Han’s charm and sarcasm, even if the script gives him a bit less to do. Carrie Fisher is strong as Leia, especially in the Endor scenes where her leadership and compassion shine. Billy Dee Williams brings energy and confidence to Lando. Ian McDiarmid is excellent as the Emperor — creepy, manipulative, and theatrical in just the right way. And Vader’s performance (body and voice) remains iconic. The supporting cast does what they need to do, and the creature performers deserve a lot of credit for bringing Jabba’s palace to life.

Filming / FX: For 1983, the effects were groundbreaking. The space battle over Endor is still one of the best in the series — fast, chaotic, and visually impressive. The practical effects in Jabba’s palace are detailed and memorable. The speeder bike chase is fun and holds up surprisingly well. The sets, costumes, and puppetry all contribute to a lived-in universe. Some effects show their age, but most of the film still looks good. The score (John Williams) is excellent, especially the Emperor’s theme and the final duel.

Problems: A few. The Ewoks are divisive — cute, yes, but it’s hard to believe they could defeat armored storm-troopers with sticks and rocks. The middle section on Endor slows down the pacing. Han’s character feels underwritten compared to the first two films. Some of Jabba’s palace scenes go on a bit long. And the second Death Star plot is basically a repeat of the first film’s structure. None of these issues ruin the movie, but they’re noticeable on re‑watch.

Did I enjoy the film? Absolutely. The emotional payoff with Luke and Vader still hits. The action scenes are fun, the characters are familiar and likable, and the film wraps up the original trilogy in a satisfying way. It’s entertaining, nostalgic, and (IMHO) still one of the better “Star Wars” films.

Final Recommendation: Very highly recommended. “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” is a culturally significant, visually impressive, and emotionally resonant conclusion to the original trilogy. With its Academy Award recognition, iconic moments, and lasting influence, it remains a must-see for anyone interested in this franchise, sci-fi, fantasy, or classic adventure storytelling. Watch it for the Luke-Vader-Emperor arc, the space battle, and the sense of closure that still works more than forty years later. A great ending to a great trilogy.

.
Click here (24 April) to see the posts of prior years. I started this blog in late 2009. Daily posting began in late January 2011. Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.

Read Full Post »

Never Tell Me The Odds…

Posted in General Comments, Movie Review, Movies, Reviews, tagged "The Force", Alec Guinness, Best Sound Oscar, Best Visual Effects Oscar, Billy Dee Williams, C-3PO, Carbonite, Carrie Fisher, Chewbacca, Cloud City, Dagobah, Darth Vader, David Prowse, Death Star, Frank Oz, General Comments, George Lucas, Han Solo, Harrison Ford, Highly Recommended Movie, Hollywood, Hoth, Irvin Kershner, James Earl Jones, Jedi Knights, Jedi Master, Lando Calrissian, Luke Skywalker, Mark Hamill, Movie Reviews, Princess Leia Organa, R2‑D2, Reviews, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back (1980) — movie review, The Empire, Yoda on April 22, 2026| Leave a Comment »

“Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back” (1980) — movie review
Today’s review is for the sci-fi / fantasy adventure “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back”, directed by Irvin Kershner and starring Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker, the young Jedi-in-training trying to understand his destiny; Harrison Ford as Han Solo, the sarcastic smuggler whose bravado hides a growing sense of responsibility; Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia Organa, the Rebel leader balancing duty, grief, and a complicated attraction to Han; Billy Dee Williams as Lando Calrissian, the charming administrator of Cloud City with divided loyalties; and David Prowse (body) and James Earl Jones (voice) as Darth Vader, the relentless enforcer of the Empire whose pursuit of Luke drives the story; Anthony Daniels as C-3PO, Kenny Baker as R2-D2, Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, and Frank Oz as Yoda, the ancient Jedi Master who becomes Luke’s teacher. This is the second film released in the original trilogy and widely considered the strongest of the series.

Background: I first saw this film in theaters during its original run in 1980. I was in my mid-20s, and like most people my age, I had found the first “Star Wars” (1977) entertaining. Unfortunately, I was a resolute “Trekkie“, NOT a “Star Wars” fan, so I had a natural predisposition to look for faults in this and the original film. “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back” was one of the earliest movies I remember where the sequel wasn’t just “more of the same” — it was darker, deeper, and (IMHO) better for the story, the acting and (particularly) the FX. Released in 1980, the film received multiple Academy Award nominations and won two competitive Oscars (Best Sound and Best Visual Effects), plus a Special Achievement Award for sound effects editing. Historically, it is considered one of the most influential sequels ever made. It is one of the rare follow-up that expands the universe, deepens the characters, and raises the emotional stakes. It also contains one of the most famous plot twists in movie history, which has been referenced, parodied, and analyzed for over forty years.

Plot: The story picks up after the destruction of the Death Star. The Rebel Alliance is hiding on the ice planet Hoth, where Luke, Han, Leia, and the rest of the resistance team are trying to regroup. Vader is obsessed with finding Luke and sends probes across the galaxy. After a major Imperial assault, the Rebels scatter: Han, Leia, Chewbacca, and C-3PO flee in the Millennium Falcon, while Luke heads to the swamp world of Dagobah to train with Yoda. Han and Leia’s relationship grows under pressure, but they are eventually captured and taken to Cloud City, where Lando is forced into a deal with Vader. Luke senses his friends are in danger and abandons his training to confront Vader. The film builds toward the now-iconic duel between Luke and Vader, where Luke learns a devastating truth about his parentage. The movie ends on a cliffhanger: Han is frozen in carbonite and taken away, Luke is injured and shaken, and the Rebels regroup to plan their next move.

So, is this movie any good? How’s the acting? The filming / FX? Any problems? And, did I enjoy the film? Short answers: Yes; strong across the board; excellent for its time; a few; absolutely.

Any good? Yes. Even to this day, “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back” is one of the rare sequels that surpasses the original (not that THAT is saying much). The story is more mature, the stakes feel higher, and the characters grow cinematically in meaningful ways. The tone is darker, but it is not grim. It’s simply more serious about the consequences of war, loyalty, and destiny. The pacing is steady, the emotional beats mostly land, and the ending (unresolved as it is) is really just a teaser for part three of the trilogy. This is the film that turned “Star Wars” from a fun space adventure film into a true Sci-Fi film saga (with more promised).

Acting: Hamill gives a much improved performance than in the original trilogy film. Luke is still young and impulsive, but you can see him wrestling with responsibility and the weight of becoming a Jedi. Ford is also better as Han — more funny, brave, and vulnerable in ways the first film barely hinted at. Fisher brings strength and intelligence to Leia, and her chemistry with Ford is much better here than in the first movie, (but IMHO still lacking). Billy Dee Williams adds charm and style as Lando. Frank Oz’s performance as Yoda deserves special mention — he brings humor, wisdom, and emotional depth to a character who could easily have been silly. Vader remains one of cinema’s great villains, and James Earl Jones’ voice work is iconic.

Filming / FX: The effects still hold up remarkably well for a film made in 1980. The stop-motion walkers on Hoth, the asteroid field chase, the Cloud City design, and the light-saber duel are all memorable. The practical sets (especially Dagobah) look realistic and atmospheric. The sound design is excellent, and John Williams’ score is (again) one of his best, introducing the “Imperial March,” which became Vader’s signature theme. The film’s look is darker and more textured than the first movie, and it fits the story perfectly.

Problems: A ton. The pacing in the middle is slow, particularly during some of the Dagobah training scenes. C-3PO’s comic relief unnecessarily / frequently undercuts the tension. The Han-Leia romance, while more effective overall than in the original is never really believable to me. IMHO Fisher never develops romantic chemistry with either Hamill or Ford. And the ending (while iconic) is not a “complete” story, which may bother viewers who prefer tidy resolutions. My main problem with the film (and the series) is the poor science and the multiple continuity errors. And, this second installment has FAR more of both than in the first. None of these issues seriously hurt the film, to the point of making it unwatchable, but they are as noticeable on re-watch as they were the first time I saw the film.

Did I enjoy the film? Absolutely. “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back” is one of those movies (and the whole trilogy for that matter) that is still re-watchable with age. The characters feel more real, the stakes feel more personal, and the emotional moments still land. The action scenes are exciting, the quieter scenes are thoughtful, and the overall story is better. Even knowing the twist, the film still works because it’s about more than the reveal — it’s about Luke’s journey, Han and Leia’s relationship, and the growing threat of the Empire.

Final Recommendation: Highly recommended for its cultural impact. “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back” is widely regarded as one of the greatest sequels ever made, and for good reason. With its Academy Awards, its historical significance, and its lasting cultural impact, it stands as the emotional and narrative backbone of the original trilogy. Watch it for the character development, the iconic moments, the excellent effects (for their time), and the way it deepens the entire “Star Wars” universe. If you enjoy sci-fi, adventure, or classic Hollywood storytelling, this film is worth a viewing.

.
Click here (22 April) to see the posts of prior years. I started this blog in late 2009. Daily posting began in late January 2011. Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.

Read Full Post »

A Long Time Ago…

Posted in General Comments, Movie Review, Movies, Reviews, tagged "The Force", Alderaan, Alec Guinness, Anthony Daniels, Best Art Direction Oscar, Best Costume Design Oscar, Best Editing Oscar, Best Picture Nomination, Best Score Oscar, Best Sound Oscar, Best Visual Effects Oscar, Blu-ray Disc, C-3PO, Carrie Fisher, Chewbacca, Darth Vader, David Prowse, Death Star, DVD, General Comments, George Lucas, Grand Moff Tarkin, Han Solo, Harrison Ford, Imperial Star Destroyer, Jaba the Hutt, James Earl Jones, Jedi Knights, Kenny Baker, Luke Skywalker, Mark Hamill, Movie Reviews, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Peter Cushing, Peter Mayhew, Princess Leia Organa, R2‑D2, Reviews, Shakespeare, Star Wars: A New Hope (1977) — movie review, Tatooine, The Rebellion, Top Gun: Maverick, Very Highly to Must See Movie Recommendation, VHS, West Germany on April 21, 2026| Leave a Comment »

“Star Wars: A New Hope” (1977) — movie review
Today’s review is for the space-fantasy adventure: “Star Wars: A New Hope”, written and directed by George Lucas and starring Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker, the restless farm kid who wants more than moisture farming; Harrison Ford as Han Solo, the smuggler who pretends not to care but always does; Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia Organa, the rebel leader who’s braver and sharper than anyone expects; and Alec Guinness as Obi-Wan Kenobi, the old hermit with a past he only hints at; Peter Cushing as Grand Moff Tarkin, the cold, precise commander of the Death Star; Anthony Daniels as C-3PO and Kenny Baker as R2-D2, the droids who end up carrying half the plot on their metal backs; David Prowse (body) and James Earl Jones (voice) as Darth Vader, the black-armored enforcer whose presence fills every room; and Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, Han’s co-pilot and loyal friend. The film blends adventure, myth, humor, and old-school serial energy into something that still feels fresh almost fifty years later. I really think of this movie as a cultural blend of hero-epic / Sci-Fi Western / good-guy vs bad-guy / sensei-student / serial movie which helps explain the cross-societal acceptance.

Background: I’ve seen this movie well over a couple of dozen times: in theaters, on VHS, on DVD, on Blu-ray, and on streaming. Perhaps only of interest to me, I never saw this film in its original theater release as I was in the Army and stationed in West Germany at the time. I did see it in a theater when it was re-released for a short theater run prior to the release of the sequel. This film was released in 1977 and “Star Wars: A New Hope” was a cultural earthquake. It received ten Academy Award nominations and won six competitive Oscars — including Best Editing, Best Score (John Williams), Best Art Direction, Best Costume Design, Best Sound, and Best Visual Effects — plus a Special Achievement Award for sound effects. It was also nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Supporting Actor (Guinness). Historically, it’s one of the most influential films ever made: it changed how movies were marketed, how blockbusters were built, and how special effects were created. It also launched a franchise that’s still going strong decades later. Whether you love the sequels, prequels, or spin-offs, it all starts here.

Plot: The story begins with a rebel ship fleeing a massive Imperial Star Destroyer. Princess Leia hides stolen Death Star plans in R2‑D2 before being captured by Darth Vader. The droids escape to Tatooine, where they’re found by Luke Skywalker, a young moisture farmer who feels trapped on his uncle’s homestead. When R2 runs off to find Obi-Wan Kenobi, Luke follows and learns about the Force, the Jedi, and his father’s past. After storm-troopers kill Luke’s aunt and uncle, he joins Obi-Wan on a mission to deliver the plans to the Rebellion. They hire Han Solo and Chewbacca, fly to Alderaan (which has been destroyed), and get pulled into the Death Star. Luke, Han, and Chewie rescue Leia; Obi-Wan confronts Vader; and the group escapes with the plans. The film ends with the Rebel assault on the Death Star, where Luke (guided by the Force) fires the shot that destroys the station (remade in “Top Gun: Maverick“). It’s a simple story told with energy, heart, and a sense of wonder that still works.

So, is this movie any good? How’s the acting? The filming / FX? Any problems? And, did I enjoy the film? Short answers: Yes; solid and iconic; groundbreaking for its time; a few; absolutely.

Any good? Yes! “Star Wars: A New Hope” is one of those rare films that feels timeless. It’s straightforward, earnest, and built around classic good-vs-evil storytelling. The pacing is brisk, the characters are memorable, and the world feels lived-in without needing long explanations. The movie’s charm comes from how confidently it mixes genres: western, samurai film, WWII dogfights, fairy tale — and still feels like its own thing. It’s not complicated, but it doesn’t need to be. It’s fun, it’s adventurous, and it still works.

Acting: The acting is so-so, but still better than people sometimes remember. Hamill gives Luke the right mix of innocence and determination. Ford steals scenes with his dry humor and easy charisma. Fisher is sharp, commanding, and never plays Leia as a damsel. Guinness brings gravitas that helps sell the whole “Jedi” idea. The supporting cast (especially Cushing and the droids) adds texture and personality. Vader, with Jones’ voice and Prowse’s physical presence, remains one of the great screen villains. Nobody is doing Shakespeare here, but everyone fits their role.

Filming / FX: For 1977, the effects were revolutionary. The model work, motion-control photography, and sound design created a universe that felt huge. The ships, the cantina creatures, the Death Star interiors — all of it still looks good. Williams’ score is one of the greatest ever written and carries half the emotional weight. Some shots show their age, but most of the film holds up remarkably well. The editing keeps the action clear, and the final trench run is still one of the best sequences in sci-fi cinema. I watched the film this time on DVD and the CGI generated scenes, particularly the added Solo confrontation with Jaba the Hutt is just poorly done by modern standards. Solo is clearly superimposed over “something” which isn’t there. But even though there are multiple FX issues, throughout the film, they don’t really distract from your (my) memories of the film or its enjoyment of those memories. I’m not sure if a modern adult, seeing the film for the first time would agree without having the emotional baggage.

Problems: A few. Most of the “science” in the Sci-Fi is just wrong. The early Tatooine scenes run a bit long. The Storm-troopers’ aim is famously terrible. And the movie’s simplicity (which is part of its current charm) means some characters don’t get much depth. But none of these issues really hurt the film. They’re more quirks than real problems. By today’s standards, this would be a moderate to terrible “B” movie, but it’s difficult to separate this film from its time and place in history / American society.

Did I enjoy the film? Absolutely. This is one of those movies that still makes us feel like kids. The adventure, the music, the characters — it all works. Even after multiple viewings, the Death Star battle still gets my heart rate up. The film is fun, sincere, and (like most great hero-epic / westerns) endlessly re-watchable. It’s not trying to be profound; it’s trying to be exciting and entertaining, and it succeeds handsomely!

Final Recommendation: Very Highly Recommended to MUST see. “Star Wars: A New Hope” is a landmark of modern cinema — historically significant for its Academy Awards, its technical breakthroughs, and its cultural impact. It’s also just a fun (not great) movie. If you’ve somehow never seen it, you should. And if you have, it’s always worth revisiting to remember why this galaxy far, far away became such a big part of our own.

.
Click here (21 April) to see the posts of prior years. I started this blog in late 2009. Daily posting began in late January 2011. Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.