Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Peter Mayhew’

Star Wars:  Return of the Jedi” (1983) — movie review
Today’s review is for the sci-fi / fantasy adventure “Star Wars:  Return of the Jedi”, directed by Richard Marquand and starring Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker, the now-confident Jedi Knight trying to save his father and defeat the Empire;  Harrison Ford as Han Solo, the carbonite-freed smuggler whose loyalty and sarcasm are still intact;  Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia Organa, the rebel leader whose courage and compassion anchor the group;  Billy Dee Williams as Lando Calrissian, the smooth-talking gambler turned general;  Ian McDiarmid as Emperor Palpatine, the manipulative Sith master pulling the strings;  David Prowse (body) and James Earl Jones (voice) as Darth Vader, the fallen father struggling between darkness and the last spark of Anakin;  Anthony Daniels as C-3PO, Kenny Baker as R2-D2, Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, and a host of puppeteers bringing Jabba’s palace and the Ewoks to life.  This is the third film in the original trilogy and the conclusion of Luke’s arc with Vader and the Emperor.
Background:  I don’t remember if I ever saw this film in theaters during its original run but I have watched it many times since:  TV, VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, and streaming.  Released in 1983, “Star Wars:  Return of the Jedi” was a massive box-office success and received four Academy Award nominations (including Best Original Score and Best Sound) and won a Special Achievement Award for visual effects.  Historically, it’s the capstone of the original trilogy:  the film that resolves the Skywalker family story, completes the fall of the Empire (for a while), and cemented “Star Wars” as a cultural phenomenon.  It’s also notable for its groundbreaking creature work (Jabba’s palace), large-scale space battles, and the emotional father-son confrontation that remains one of the franchise’s most iconic moments.
Plot:  The story begins with Luke, Leia, Lando, Chewbacca, and the droids executing a multi‑step plan to rescue Han Solo from Jabba the Hutt.  After a tense standoff and a desert skiff battle, the group escapes and regroups with the Rebel Alliance.  The Empire is constructing a second Death Star, larger and more dangerous, and the Rebels plan a desperate assault.  Luke returns to Dagobah to complete his training, only to learn from Yoda and Obi-Wan’s spirit that Vader is indeed his father — and that he must confront him.  The Rebels launch a ground mission on Endor to disable the shield generator, where they encounter the Ewoks, who eventually join the fight.  Meanwhile, Luke surrenders to Vader, hoping to reach the good still inside him.  The Emperor tries to turn Luke to the dark side, provoking him into a light-saber duel with Vader.  Luke refuses to kill his father, and when the Emperor attacks him, Vader finally turns back to the light, destroys the Emperor, and is mortally wounded.  The Death Star is destroyed, the shield falls, the Rebels win, and the film ends with celebrations across the galaxy and Luke saying goodbye to his father.
So, is this movie any good?  How’s the acting?  The filming / FX?  Any problems?  And, did I enjoy the film?  Short answers:  Yes;  solid to excellent;  groundbreaking for its time;  a few;  absolutely.
Any good?  Yes.  “Star Wars:  Return of the Jedi” is a satisfying conclusion to the original trilogy.  It balances action, character moments, and emotional payoff.  The Luke‑Vader‑Emperor story-line is the heart of the film and still works beautifully.  The pacing is generally strong, the stakes feel real, and the movie delivers both spectacle and closure.  It’s not perfect, but the core story lands exactly where it needs to.
Acting:  Mark Hamill gives his best performance of the trilogy:  calm, focused, and carrying the weight of Luke’s choices.  Ford slips back into Han’s charm and sarcasm, even if the script gives him a bit less to do.  Carrie Fisher is strong as Leia, especially in the Endor scenes where her leadership and compassion shine.  Billy Dee Williams brings energy and confidence to Lando.  Ian McDiarmid is excellent as the Emperor — creepy, manipulative, and theatrical in just the right way.  And Vader’s performance (body and voice) remains iconic.  The supporting cast does what they need to do, and the creature performers deserve a lot of credit for bringing Jabba’s palace to life.
Filming / FX:  For 1983, the effects were groundbreaking.  The space battle over Endor is still one of the best in the series — fast, chaotic, and visually impressive.  The practical effects in Jabba’s palace are detailed and memorable.  The speeder bike chase is fun and holds up surprisingly well.  The sets, costumes, and puppetry all contribute to a lived-in universe.  Some effects show their age, but most of the film still looks good.  The score (John Williams) is excellent, especially the Emperor’s theme and the final duel.
Problems:  A few.  The Ewoks are divisive — cute, yes, but it’s hard to believe they could defeat armored storm-troopers with sticks and rocks.  The middle section on Endor slows down the pacing.  Han’s character feels underwritten compared to the first two films.  Some of Jabba’s palace scenes go on a bit long.  And the second Death Star plot is basically a repeat of the first film’s structure.  None of these issues ruin the movie, but they’re noticeable on re‑watch.
Did I enjoy the film?  Absolutely.  The emotional payoff with Luke and Vader still hits.  The action scenes are fun, the characters are familiar and likable, and the film wraps up the original trilogy in a satisfying way.  It’s entertaining, nostalgic, and (IMHO) still one of the better “Star Wars” films.
Final Recommendation:  Very highly recommended.  “Star Wars:  Return of the Jedi” is a culturally significant, visually impressive, and emotionally resonant conclusion to the original trilogy.  With its Academy Award recognition, iconic moments, and lasting influence, it remains a must-see for anyone interested in this franchise, sci-fi, fantasy, or classic adventure storytelling.  Watch it for the Luke-Vader-Emperor arc, the space battle, and the sense of closure that still works more than forty years later.  A great ending to a great trilogy.
.
Click here (24 April) to see the posts of prior years.  I started this blog in late 2009.  Daily posting began in late January 2011.  Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.

Read Full Post »

Star Wars:  A New Hope” (1977) — movie review
Today’s review is for the space-fantasy adventure:  “Star Wars:  A New Hope”, written and directed by George Lucas and starring Mark Hamill as Luke Skywalker, the restless farm kid who wants more than moisture farming;  Harrison Ford as Han Solo, the smuggler who pretends not to care but always does;  Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia Organa, the rebel leader who’s braver and sharper than anyone expects;  and Alec Guinness as Obi-Wan Kenobi, the old hermit with a past he only hints at;  Peter Cushing as Grand Moff Tarkin, the cold, precise commander of the Death Star;  Anthony Daniels as C-3PO and Kenny Baker as R2-D2, the droids who end up carrying half the plot on their metal backs;   David Prowse (body) and James Earl Jones (voice) as Darth Vader, the black-armored enforcer whose presence fills every room;  and Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, Han’s co-pilot and loyal friend.  The film blends adventure, myth, humor, and old-school serial energy into something that still feels fresh almost fifty years later.  I really think of this movie as a cultural blend of hero-epic / Sci-Fi Western / good-guy vs bad-guy / sensei-student / serial movie which helps explain the cross-societal acceptance.
Background:  I’ve seen this movie well over a couple of dozen times:  in theaters, on VHS, on DVD, on Blu-ray, and on streaming.  Perhaps only of interest to me, I never saw this film in its original theater release as I was in the Army and stationed in West Germany at the time.  I did see it in a theater when it was re-released for a short theater run prior to the release of the sequel.  This film was released in 1977 and “Star Wars:  A New Hope” was a cultural earthquake.  It received ten Academy Award nominations and won six competitive Oscars — including Best Editing, Best Score (John Williams), Best Art Direction, Best Costume Design, Best Sound, and Best Visual Effects — plus a Special Achievement Award for sound effects.  It was also nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Supporting Actor (Guinness).  Historically, it’s one of the most influential films ever made:  it changed how movies were marketed, how blockbusters were built, and how special effects were created.  It also launched a franchise that’s still going strong decades later.  Whether you love the sequels, prequels, or spin-offs, it all starts here.
Plot:  The story begins with a rebel ship fleeing a massive Imperial Star Destroyer.  Princess Leia hides stolen Death Star plans in R2‑D2 before being captured by Darth Vader.  The droids escape to Tatooine, where they’re found by Luke Skywalker, a young moisture farmer who feels trapped on his uncle’s homestead.  When R2 runs off to find Obi-Wan Kenobi, Luke follows and learns about the Force, the Jedi, and his father’s past.  After storm-troopers kill Luke’s aunt and uncle, he joins Obi-Wan on a mission to deliver the plans to the Rebellion.  They hire Han Solo and Chewbacca, fly to Alderaan (which has been destroyed), and get pulled into the Death Star.  Luke, Han, and Chewie rescue Leia;  Obi-Wan confronts Vader;  and the group escapes with the plans.  The film ends with the Rebel assault on the Death Star, where Luke (guided by the Force) fires the shot that destroys the station (remade in “Top Gun:  Maverick“).  It’s a simple story told with energy, heart, and a sense of wonder that still works.
So, is this movie any good?  How’s the acting?  The filming / FX?  Any problems?  And, did I enjoy the film?  Short answers:  Yes;  solid and iconic;  groundbreaking for its time;  a few;  absolutely.
Any good?  Yes!  “Star Wars:  A New Hope” is one of those rare films that feels timeless.  It’s straightforward, earnest, and built around classic good-vs-evil storytelling.  The pacing is brisk, the characters are memorable, and the world feels lived-in without needing long explanations.  The movie’s charm comes from how confidently it mixes genres:  western, samurai film, WWII dogfights, fairy tale — and still feels like its own thing.  It’s not complicated, but it doesn’t need to be.  It’s fun, it’s adventurous, and it still works.
Acting:  The acting is so-so, but still better than people sometimes remember.  Hamill gives Luke the right mix of innocence and determination.  Ford steals scenes with his dry humor and easy charisma.  Fisher is sharp, commanding, and never plays Leia as a damsel.  Guinness brings gravitas that helps sell the whole “Jedi” idea.  The supporting cast (especially Cushing and the droids) adds texture and personality.  Vader, with Jones’ voice and Prowse’s physical presence, remains one of the great screen villains.  Nobody is doing Shakespeare here, but everyone fits their role.
Filming / FX:  For 1977, the effects were revolutionary.  The model work, motion-control photography, and sound design created a universe that felt huge.  The ships, the cantina creatures, the Death Star interiors — all of it still looks good.  Williams’ score is one of the greatest ever written and carries half the emotional weight.  Some shots show their age, but most of the film holds up remarkably well.  The editing keeps the action clear, and the final trench run is still one of the best sequences in sci-fi cinema.  I watched the film this time on DVD and the CGI generated scenes, particularly the added Solo confrontation with Jaba the Hutt is just poorly done by modern standards.  Solo is clearly superimposed over “something” which isn’t there.  But even though there are multiple FX issues, throughout the film, they don’t really distract from your (my) memories of the film or its enjoyment of those memories.  I’m not sure if a modern adult, seeing the film for the first time would agree without having the emotional baggage.
Problems:  A few.  Most of the “science” in the Sci-Fi is just wrong.  The early Tatooine scenes run a bit long.  The Storm-troopers’ aim is famously terrible.  And the movie’s simplicity (which is part of its current charm) means some characters don’t get much depth.  But none of these issues really hurt the film.  They’re more quirks than real problems.  By today’s standards, this would be a moderate to terrible “B” movie, but it’s difficult to separate this film from its time and place in history / American society.
Did I enjoy the film?  Absolutely.  This is one of those movies that still makes us feel like kids.  The adventure, the music, the characters — it all works.  Even after multiple viewings, the Death Star battle still gets my heart rate up.  The film is fun, sincere, and (like most great hero-epic / westerns) endlessly re-watchable.  It’s not trying to be profound;  it’s trying to be exciting and entertaining, and it succeeds handsomely!
Final Recommendation:  Very Highly Recommended to MUST see. “Star Wars:  A New Hope” is a landmark of modern cinema — historically significant for its Academy Awards, its technical breakthroughs, and its cultural impact.  It’s also just a fun (not great) movie.  If you’ve somehow never seen it, you should.  And if you have, it’s always worth revisiting to remember why this galaxy far, far away became such a big part of our own.
.
Click here (21 April) to see the posts of prior years.  I started this blog in late 2009.  Daily posting began in late January 2011.  Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.

Read Full Post »

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started