
Hello, everybody, and welcome back to Quote, Unquote!
One of the biggest parts of my exposition and composition (language arts in normal-people-speak) subject is writing essays. This year, we are studying Shakespeare, and oh boy is it a wild ride.
Anyway, one of the plays we just studied was Julius Caesar, and I got into it. Like, into it. I seriously loved the play. It was so good. And because I also love The Hunger Games, I noticed a lot of similarities between the two works.
So for my Julius Caesar essay, I wrote a comparison between the protagonist Brutus in the play and the protagonist of The Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen. My former director suggested that I post it on my blog, so…here it is! (Mrs. Arndt, if you’re reading this, thank you for the post idea.)
Be warned! Spoilers for both Julius Caesar and the Hunger Games series abound! So if you have not read one or either of them and you would like to, I do recommend not reading this post. I try to keep most of my book reviews spoiler-free, but in this in-depth analysis, it can’t be avoided.
Enjoy!
Naïve Leaders
When one decides to overthrow an entire corrupt government system, be it a dystopian society in the distant future or a soon-to-be dictator in the distant past, one must be ready for the consequences that come with this rebellion. Katniss Everdeen, protagonist of Suzanne Collins’ well-known The Hunger Games trilogy, and Brutus, protagonist of William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, both attempted an enormous rebellion. While they were both more or less successful, their personal losses were devastating enough to make it a Pyrrhic victory, and their naïveté meant that these losses were much more acute than if a normal person had been leading their respective rebellions.
A common symbol in both of these works of literature is that of family. Both Brutus and Katniss’ families play a part, however insignificant, in these books. To Katniss, family is her most important thing. After her father dies in the mines, her mother sinks into deep depression. When Katniss is about to leave to participate in the Hunger Games, she shouts at her mother not to leave again, and in her voice is “all the fear [she] felt at [her mother’s] abandonment” (Collins, The Hunger Games 35). If Katniss lost her family, she would be destroyed. Meanwhile, Brutus neglects his only family, his beloved wife Portia, for his cause. He is so wrapped up in his plot to kill Caesar and the hullabaloo that follows that his wife commits suicide, “[i]mpatient of [his] absence” (Shakespeare 4.3.174). Brutus valued his cause over his family so much that he would not stay with her and give her the help she needed. While family is a symbol in both The Hunger Games and Julius Caesar, the two main characters have wildly different stances on it.
Both Katniss and Brutus are figureheads of a rebellion. In The Hunger Games, Katniss and her merry band of rebels are fighting against the injustice of the Capitol suppressing the districts. In Julius Caesar, Brutus leads the plot to kill Caesar, ending him with his famous final words, “Et tu, Brutè” (Shakespeare 3.1.85)? However, though they are both figureheads, they do not make their own plans for their rebellions. Katniss is not mentally sound enough to be able to lead her country to victory—she is merely a symbol. Her mockingjay that inspires the rebels is used on everything, even “baked into bread” (Collins, Catching Fire 139). Her plot is masterminded by someone else—namely, President Coin, the corrupt leader of District 13. Meanwhile, Brutus could invent his own schemes if he wanted to, but he makes some fatal mistakes and therefore lets Cassius do the orchestrating. Though they are leaders and seen as the most important people behind their plans, there are several others working in the background.
Perhaps the most important and shocking trait of these two characters, though, is their startlingly similar naïveté. For such important leaders as these, one might think that they would be mature and ready to take on such responsibilities. Katniss’ naïveté can be explained, as she is only seventeen years old and already suffering immense losses, but she is still severely mentally ill and should not be leading a rebellion in the first place. She acknowledges in Mockingjay that it is “impossible to be the Mockingjay” (Collins 162). She is clearly not old enough or strong enough to lead a rebellion against an entire country. However, Brutus has no excuse. He was likely in middle age, which means that his brain had had ample time to develop. Given this, he still made fatal mistakes, such as allowing Antony to have the last word at Caesar’s funeral. Antony turns the crowd against Brutus using several logical fallacies, telling them over and over again that “Brutus was an honorable man” (Shakespeare 3.2.96) but clearly meaning the opposite. By allowing Antony to publicly turn against him, it weakened his spirit and his public support so much that he eventually ran upon his own sword, meeting the same end as his neglected wife—death by suicide. Brutus’s naïveté meant a much bloodier and more devastating end than Katniss’s, but neither of them should have been able to lead a rebellion as far as they did, given their lack of mental stability and maturity.
Given these similarities and differences, Katniss and Brutus are similar to the point where it is fair to say that they should not be in charge of as much as they are. Their families are both detrimental to their cause in extreme ways, and they are both naïve enough that even if they were the masterminds of their own plots, they should not be—in fact, they should not be in charge of a rebellion at all. A rebellion takes mental and emotional maturity. If one decides to lead a rebellion, one would do well to ensure that they are properly equipped and emotionally ready for such an enormous task.
Works Cited
Collins, Suzanne. Catching Fire. Scholastic Press, 2009.
—. The Hunger Games. Scholastic Press, 2008.
—. Mockingjay. Scholastic Press, 2010.Shakespeare, William.
Julius Caesar. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. The Folger Shakespeare Library, 2011.
—
Well, I hope you enjoyed! Have you read either or both of these works? What other similarities have you noticed?
Thank you so much for reading, and I’ll see you next Wednesday!















