Table 2 Characteristics of the adapted cascade model for large scale deployment
Dimensions | Importance of the dimensions for effective deployment | Adapted cascade model characteristics | Addressing the following limitations of cascade models |
|---|---|---|---|
Expert trainers | Expert trainers often from another country which was found to hinder the effectiveness of cascade models in many contexts (Abeysena et al., 2016; Bett, 2016) | Ex-teachers from the region who conceived and piloted the curricular reform and pilot teacher-PD program | Adapting the teacher-PD to the local needs and culture |
Cascade models suffer from content dilution (Hayes, 2000; Wedell, 2005) which have beenfound to be directly linked with lower trainingquality (Bax, 2002; Demarle-Meusel et al., 2020; Dichaba & Mokhele, 2012; Fiske & Ladd, 2004) | Directly train all the teacher-trainers who will deploy the teacher-PD (limited cascade model depth) | Limiting content dilution and decline in training quality; promoting teacher-trainer self-efficacy | |
Teacher-trainers often struggle with the logistics involved in deploying the PD-program (Bett, 2016; Engelbrecht et al., 2007; Wedell, 2005) | Handle the logistics of the deployment | Reducing difficulties planning and managing the teacher-PD | |
Teacher trainers | Teachers are more willing to accept the PD program and pedagogical content when the trainers are teachers in the region who understand the regional context and have tested the content themselves (El-Hamamsy et al., 2021a) | Current teachers from the region | Adapting the teacher-PD to the local needs and culture; promoting legitimacy and credibility |
ibid. | Teachers from the level of schooling (ideally) | Aligning with teachers’ contexts and needs | |
Teacher-trainer motivation and retention has been found to be one important limitation of cascade models (Burr et al., 2006; Mormina & Pinder, 2018; Orfaly et al., 2005) | Motivated towards Digital Education and adult training | Promoting motivation and teacher-trainer retention | |
Teacher-trainer PD | Teacher-trainers need to be supported to transition to their new role which includes acquiring the required adult-training and contentspecific skills (Abeysena et al., 2016; Gilpin, 1997; Roesken-Winter et al., 2015) | Prolonged initial trainer-PD provided by the experts to acquire the required competences in terms of Digital Education and adult training | Providing sufficient training to acquire the new competences and adapt to their new role; promoting self-efficacy, legitimacy; limiting content dilution |
ibid. | Continuing trainer-PD and support by experts throughout the deployment | Providing sufficient support; promoting self-efficacy, legitimacy; limiting content dilution | |
Teacher-PD | Cascade models often suffer from a misalignment between the PD program and teachers’ context and needs which is why it is important to adapt the PD to local realities (Bett, 2016; Moulakdi & Bouchamma, 2020; Wedell, 2009) | Deploying the teacher-PD with pairs of teacher-trainers and having these go to the same schools to establish relationships with teachers in the field and ensuring that at least one in each pair is from the cycle | Aligning with teachers’ contextsand needs; aligning with PD best practices; providing sufficient support among each otherand to teachers; promoting self-efficacy |
ibid. | Having teacher-trainers collaborate with instructional coaches in the schools | Aligning with teachers’ contexts and needs; providing sufficient support to teacher-trainers | |
Insufficient support provided to teachers to help them implement the novel curriculum in the long term contributes to cascade models being ineffective (Robinson, 2002) | Having instructional coaches in schools to support teachers in the implementation of the novel discipline in the short and long term | Aligning with PD best practices; providing sufficient support teachers | |
Monitoring | Continuous monitoring of cascade model outputs should be implemented to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the resulting deployment PD program (Karalis, 2016) | Having action research as a core component to monitor the outcomes of the deployment | Aligning with PD best practices; validating the effectiveness of the intervention |
ibid. | Providing feedback to teachertrainers and experts to adapt the teacher-trainer PD and the teacher-PD program | Aligning with PD best practices; aligning with teachers’ contextsand needs | |
ibid. | Ensuring that teacher-trainers interact with researchers so that they understand the objectives, methodologies and engage in the process | Aligning with PD best practices; aligning with teachers’ contexts and needs |