qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 11/19] backends/iommufd: Implement HostIOMMUDeviceClass::g


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/19] backends/iommufd: Implement HostIOMMUDeviceClass::get_cap() handler
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:04 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 6/3/24 13:32, Eric Auger wrote:


On 6/3/24 08:10, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <[email protected]>
---
  backends/iommufd.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/backends/iommufd.c b/backends/iommufd.c
index c7e969d6f7..f2f7a762a0 100644
--- a/backends/iommufd.c
+++ b/backends/iommufd.c
@@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ bool iommufd_backend_get_device_info(IOMMUFDBackend *be, 
uint32_t devid,
      return true;
  }
+static int hiod_iommufd_get_cap(HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, int cap, Error **errp)
+{
+    HostIOMMUDeviceCaps *caps = &hiod->caps;
+
+    switch (cap) {
+    case HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_CAP_IOMMU_TYPE:
+        return caps->type;
+    case HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_CAP_AW_BITS:
+        return caps->aw_bits;
+    default:
+        error_setg(errp, "Not support get cap %x", cap);
can't you add details about the faulting HostIOMMUDevice by tracing the
devid for instance?

yes.

I would rephrase the error message into No support for capability 0x%x

I was going to propose "Unsupported capability ..."


Thanks,

C.




Eric
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+}
+
+static void hiod_iommufd_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
+{
+    HostIOMMUDeviceClass *hioc = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
+
+    hioc->get_cap = hiod_iommufd_get_cap;
+};
+
  static const TypeInfo types[] = {
      {
          .name = TYPE_IOMMUFD_BACKEND,
@@ -246,6 +268,7 @@ static const TypeInfo types[] = {
      }, {
          .name = TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD,
          .parent = TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE,
+        .class_init = hiod_iommufd_class_init,
          .abstract = true,
      }
  };





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]