[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/4] linux-headers: Update to current kvm/next
|
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/4] linux-headers: Update to current kvm/next |
|
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jun 2024 17:58:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.38.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) |
On Mon, Jun 03 2024, Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>
>
> Also brings in an linux-headers/linux/vhost.h fix from v6.9-rc4.
>
> Co-developed-by: Michael Roth <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> ---
> linux-headers/asm-loongarch/kvm.h | 4 +++
> linux-headers/asm-riscv/kvm.h | 1 +
> linux-headers/asm-x86/kvm.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> linux-headers/linux/vhost.h | 15 ++++-----
> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hm, I'm not sure updating to kvm/next is a good idea ("current kvm/next"
does not mean anything without a commit hash anyway.) I think we should
only update to something that's in Linus' tree already... how stable is
kvm/next?
[PATCH 4/4] update-linux-headers: import linux/kvm_para.h header, Paolo Bonzini, 2024/06/03
Re: [PATCH 0/4] update-linux-headers: prepare for updating to 6.9+ and for SNP patches, Cornelia Huck, 2024/06/04