public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org from June 2013 by date

Friday, 28 June 2013

• AW: Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Felix Sasaki
• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Arle Lommel
• AW: Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Felix Sasaki
• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Arle Lommel
• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Felix Sasaki
• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Arle Lommel
• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Felix Sasaki

Saturday, 29 June 2013

• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Dave Lewis

Friday, 28 June 2013

• [All subscribers to public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org and public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org] no need for cross posting Felix Sasaki
• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Arle Lommel

Saturday, 29 June 2013

• Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question Dave Lewis

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

• ITS 2.0 specification-related question on rules and rule parameteres Renat Bikmatov
• RE: Update to MQM documentation and one question Lieske, Christian

Monday, 24 June 2013

• ITS 2.0 localization quality types page Felix Sasaki
• Update to MQM documentation and one question Arle Lommel

Thursday, 20 June 2013

• Implementation document from Tilde Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

• RE: notes for FEISGILTT discussions Yves Savourel
• Re: notes for FEISGILTT discussions Felix Sasaki

Monday, 17 June 2013

• RE: Solution via standoff markup ? (Re: Markup for quality) Yves Savourel
• Re: Solution via standoff markup ? (Re: Markup for quality) Arle Lommel
• Re: Solution via standoff markup ? (Re: Markup for quality) Aljoscha Burchardt

Sunday, 16 June 2013

• Solution via standoff markup ? (Re: Markup for quality) Felix Sasaki

Thursday, 13 June 2013

• Re: Markup for quality Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 11 June 2013

• Re: Markup for quality Arle Lommel

Monday, 10 June 2013

• Re: Markup for quality Felix Sasaki
• Re: Markup for quality Jörg Schütz
• Re: Markup for quality Jirka Kosek
• Re: Markup for quality Phil Ritchie
• Re: Markup for quality Arle Lommel
• Re: Markup for quality Phil Ritchie
• Markup for quality Arle Lommel
• Re: Potential for synergies on the implementation and "data" level: MQM and ITS 2.0 Aljoscha Burchardt

Friday, 7 June 2013

• Re: Potential for synergies on the implementation and "data" level: MQM and ITS 2.0 Phil Ritchie
• Potential for synergies on the implementation and "data" level: MQM and ITS 2.0 Felix Sasaki

Last message date: Friday, 28 June 2013 17:45:58 UTC