
On 19 January this year my friend ST sent me an SMS. It began:
What was your tastiest fish takeaway?
I was flummoxed for a moment, then I realised that he was referring to the closing-down sale the previous December of Fish Fine Music, described in Limelight as the “last remaining classical music specialist shop in the country.”
I hadn’t been helping to keep Fish in business. Fish had been at its present address since 2006 and I had never darkened its doors there until the final days.
That’s not so much because I’d made any switch to streaming or YouTube (other than occasionally, to look something up) but because I’d basically stopped acquiring recorded music at all. I’ve lived off my memory, the radio, the Con library, the relatively few CDs I already had and, most of all, live music.
I ditched my sizeable and space-consuming vinyl collection (much acquired in a burst of acquisitiveness from the now defunct second-hand store, Ashwoods, in my early twenties) a bit under 10 years ago. I do regret that but they took up an enormous amount of space and I was hardly ever playing them.
All the same, no one can resist a bargain and this was probably my last chance to buy a CD in a proper music shop ever. So I went. In the end, twice.
It seemed that all the usual suspects had come out of the woodwork, some actually known to me and others known by sight or brief conversation from concert proximity.
The above photo features a well-known Sydney piano identity (to coin a phrase: “well-known Sydney racing identify” was once the standard descriptor in the SMH for George Freeman. I don’t suggest anything similar about the WKSPI.) She left with a large bag well filled – you can see it in the picture on the counter just past her handbag. Good on her! The staff offered to help her carry it away but she managed on her own.
Before I went, ST, who is an inveterate list-maker, pressed me for a list of representative choral/orchestral works which he could look for to establish this part of his notional/aspirational “collection.”
In the end ST paid no heed to the list he’d asked me for. In truth there must be a reason why didn’t have such recordings already and his taste was not about to change to fill the “gap.”
Even though choral/orchestral music is not really so much my thing these days, it is I who, as a by-product of making a search on ST’s behalf, ended up with 6 CDs extracted at a bargain price from a dismantled Erato Box Set of sacred music: Vivaldi, The First Homicide (that’s Cain and Abel); Bach, Christmas Oratorio; and Mendelssohn Paulus.
I haven’t yet really got into the Vivaldi – it feels a bit generic. I have really enjoyed the Bach but that was no surprise. It was the Mendelssohn which was the ear-opener.
Paulus is the story of St Paul, starting with the stoning of St Stephen, traversing his conversion on the road to Damascus (of course!), and taking the story up to his embarkation at Ephesus, with a brief anticipation of his ultimate martyrdom to round the story out (Libretto here).
I read somewhere that Paulus was based on Mendelssohn’s study of Handel and Bach. To me Bach looms much larger, probably because chorales are interpolated, including Wachet auf! which also receives a quite beautiful treatment in the overture. Apparently the chorale-ish stuff was the bit that didn’t go down so well when Mendelssohn later took St Paul to England – they didn’t yet have any background in this. Hence Elijah, which has since eclipsed Paulus, especially in the Anglophone world. Paulus only started to have a revival internationally from the 1980s.
I’ve really enjoyed listening to Paulus and right now I’d say I prefer it to Elijah. It has the virtue of being shorter. My preference may abate once the novelty wears off.
The late Charles Rosen famously dubbed Mendelssohn the inventor of [musical] religious kitsch. Rosen’s chapter on Mendelssohn in his book The Romantic Generation (not quite so influential as its predecessor, The Classical Style) opens with a reference to Schumann’s paired review in 1837 of Paulus and Meyerbeer’s Les Huguenots, described by Schumann as the “two most important compositions of the day.” Rosen writes: “the comparison of the two composers was developed in the most vivid terms, and created a scandal.”
What scandal, exactly? Rosen tactfuly passes over this. I plan to make this question the subject of a further post.