Posts Tagged ‘Problem’

h1

Zombie MathZ 1: ZOMBIE Olympics

October 4, 2025

Slow ZOMBIE vs ZOMBIE Hampster

A RATE is a comparison between two different measurements. 

It is a special type of ratio where the units are not the same, such as cost (price per item), speed (distance per time) or rotations per minute (RPM), which is used to measure spin in ice skating and rotation rate pedalling on a bike.

h1

Australians are the biggest Gamblers in the World

September 19, 2024

Australians are the biggest Gamblers in the World,

Helen Sullivan, The Observer, 8 SEPT 2024

The reason…. Slot Machines or as we call them here in Oz, Poker MachineS or simply:

The Pokies.

As for Slot Machines maths:

Welcome to a lose lose date with the Pokies

 Australia is home to a fifth of the world’s slot machines

According to Tom Vanderbilt in The Guardian ( Slot machines: a lose lose situation, 8 JUN 2013)

Once seen as a harmless diversion, hi-tech slot machines now bring in more money than casinos – and their players become addicted three times faster than other gamblers.

 Here’s how the math works:

slot machine 2

In Australia pokie machines must return between

85%

and

90%

of money gambled.

But here is the catch. If you start out with $300 that means, surely, you’ll go home with$270 in your pocket less some for the big payouts.

WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!

According to ex-gambler Tom Cummings you’ll probably go home with

NOTHING!

WHY?

In his article, Poker machine maths, (ABC, The Drum, 27 MAY 2011) it is not unusual for someone to start with $300 but put $3,000 into the  machine over 4 – 5 hours. 

They put their winnings back into the machine over and over.

Here’s the sting.

According to the poker machine, $3,000 was gambled, and $300  was kept (by the slot machine). That means that the machine paid out $2,700… which is the 90 per cent return.

But the player ends up with $ZERO!

IT’S ALL GONE BACK INTO THE MACHINE.

That’s one pension cheque gone for the week.

Warren Buffett has called

gambling in general a 

“tax on stupidity”

pickpocket

or a way of fleecing those who don’t do the maths.

h1

How MATH proves that Shakespeare is Your Ancestor!

February 20, 2024

You have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents, ETC, ETC

The no. of ancestors you have per generation follows an EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION:

Here are the numbers going back 50 generations or 1,000 years.

When you plot YOUR NO. ANCESTORS over a POPULATION OF THE WORLD GRAPH there is a problem. 

Population of the World DATA HERE

If you look at the graph (above) you will see that the No. YOUR ANCESTORS equalled the POPULATION OF THE WORLD about 500 years or 25 Generations ago.

You are related to everyone who was alive 500 years ago. Some of your ancestors inlcude:

Of course, EVERYONE else has these ancestors too.

If you go back 50 generations you have more ANCESTORS than the entire POPULATION OF THE WORLD.

Why?

Anthropologists say that there was a lot of IN BREEDING especially when humans lived in small tribes and the world population was small.

So way back every one of our family trees has members popping up all over the place. So we had far fewer ancestors than the math suggests.

h1

How random is a random NUMBER GENERATOR? The problem with the iPod, iPad & iPhone Shuffle

April 18, 2023

Here is an example of Gambler’s Fallacy, but for non-gamblers. 

We see – in this case – hear a pattern and then attribute meaning to this pattern  – It’s a conspiracy!!!! – when there is no pattern and no meaning!!!!! So Apple found when designing their iPod shuffle feature later on the iPad and iPhone. 

“When Apple first introduced the shuffle feature on its iPods, the shuffle was truly random; each song was equally likely to be picked than any other. However, the randomness didn’t appear random, since some songs were occasionally repeated, and customers concluded that the feature contained some secret patterns and preferences. As a result, Apple was forced to revise the algorithm. ‘We made it less random to make it feel more random,’ said Steve Jobs, the CEO of Apple’  

p68 The Decisive Moment How the Brain Makes Up Its Mind Jonah Lehrer (Text Publishing 2009)

Try it. Pick 12 songs to make your playlist.

USE The Random Number Spinning Wheel HERE

Keep in mind that writing a program for a RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR is difficult as all programs are based on some pattern. Click the Spinning Wheel link above and  spin the wheel 12 times.

What happened? Did you get too many repeats like the iPod Shuffle customers who complained?

h1

When Area Calcs mean Big Bucks

August 25, 2022

Bank Notes returned to RBA data.

RBA grids for damaged notes.

h1

What’s the Maths Curriculum got to do with it? WHEN Maths is, like, soooo BORING!!!!!

February 22, 2022

Australia is reviewing its Maths Curriculum.

Sides are taken. Arguments are rife. See the excellent article by Donna LuCracking the formula: how should Australia be teaching maths under the national curriculum?, The Guardian,13 FEB, 2022)

Should teachers teach? Or students explore problems? (Called Cognitive Activation in academe!)

Why not, both? Then add outdoor maths (below) plus defronting the classroom sometimes and try some maths selfies for homework. More ideas here

It doesn’t matter what’s written in the curriculum, the biggest problem in maths for students is

BOREDOM.

Here, to tackle boredom are:

41 Maths things to do before you’re 12


Mathspig outdoor play quote

mathspig outdoor-play-app

A growing body of research shows us that outdoor play leads to better physical and mental health, has positive effects on cognitive function and learning, and reduces the incidence of behavioural problems.” Maria Zotti, Nature Play, SA.

Peter Dunstan, Principal Kilkenny PS, SA, writes in SAPPA magazine, Primary Focus, that outdoor play fosters “wonderment, independence and freedom” as well as “social skills, imagination, creativity and problem solving”.

Inspired by SAPPA and NaturePlay,  Mathspig has produced her own outdoorsy maths list:

 Mathspig 41 maths things 1Mathspig 41 maths things 2mathspig 41 maths things 3

Mathspig 41 maths things 4mathspig 41 maths things 5

References:

7. Robin Hood Give us your best shot.

9. You can measure the volume of your lungs by blowing one breath into a balloon and pushing it into a full bucket of water. Measure the overflow.

15: Outdoor Maths: Times Tables

21. Light intensity links. Here and here.

25.  Sound Volume Measurement

36. Killer heels that really kill.

h1

NATHAN CHEN wins Gold but Figure Skating Scores can be BAD MATH

February 10, 2022

Nathan Chen, 22, USA, wins GOLD in the Men’s Figure skating with 5 brilliant, soaring quadruple jumps executed to perfection to Elton John’s “Goodbye Yellow Brick Road” and “Rocket Man.”

Nathan Chen’s Winning Performance on You tube HERE.

According to the fab NBC video, Mathletes,  nine Figure Skating judges score competitors for the complexity of each element (eg. Triple axel or triple spin jump) and the quality of the performance producing a score out of ten.

Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir(Above) GOLD Medal performance at Pyeongchang 2018 here.

Kailani Craine, Australia

figure skating score 9 judges nbclearn

This is a typical figure skating score card for one competitor.

The final score, however, is based  on the average for only 5 of these scores. Two are eliminated by random selection (Red Brackets). Then the top and bottom scores are removed and the remaining five scores averaged.

Screen grab NBC Mathletes

Screen grab NBC Mathletes

……………………………………………………

Now consider the IDENTICAL SCORE CARDS

of Skater A & B:

figure skating score A

Skater A:

Four scores are removed. Two by the random selector (in brackets) and then the top and bottom scores (with line drawn through them)

7.00 + 7.00 + 7.00 + 6.75 + 7.00

……………………………………..

=  34.75/ 5 = 6.95

figure skating score B

Skater B:

Four scores are removed. Two by the random selector (in brackets) and then the top and bottom scores (with line drawn through them). But this time the random selector eliminates two low scores.

The average:

7.00 + 7.25 + 7.00 + 7.00 + 7.00

……………………………………..

=  35.25/ 5 = 7.05

Same score cards but Skater B gets a higher average score than Skater A.

Skater A is, in fact, beaten by a random number selector!!!!

h1

That Crazy Little Thing Called ZERO

July 4, 2018

Siri, what’s zero divided by zero?

Problems with Dividing by Zero

– Numberphile

Matthew Parker is an Australian stand-up comedian, author, YouTube personality and maths communicator.

Edible Zero. Really!

 

h1

Amazing Maths Clock

March 17, 2018

Albert Digital Mathematical clocks are fascinating.

You calculate the time using +, -, x and ÷ . Such fun and ideal for the math classroom.

Mathspig found the Albert Mathematical clock at the Horsham International Hotel (below).

More info on the Albert Digital Clock here.

You can set the level of difficulty. You get 1 minute to work out the answer and that’s long enough.

h1

Winter Olympics: Bad Math of Figure Skating Scores

February 22, 2018

According to the fab NBC video, Mathletes,  nine Figure Skating judges score competitors for the complexity of each element (eg. Triple axel or triple spin jump) and the quality of the performance producing a score out of ten.

Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir win GOLD at Pyeong Chang 2018

                                   Kailani Craine, Australia

figure skating score 9 judges nbclearn

This is a typical figure skating score card for one competitor.

The final score, however, is based  on the average for only 5 of these scores. Two are eliminated by random selection (Red Brackets). Then the top and bottom scores are removed and the remaining five scores averaged.

Screen grab NBC Mathletes

Screen grab NBC Mathletes

……………………………………………………

Now consider the IDENTICAL SCORE CARDS

of Skater A & B:

figure skating score A

Skater A:

Four scores are removed. Two by the random selector (in brackets) and then the top and bottom scores (with line drawn through them)

7.00 + 7.00 + 7.00 + 6.75 + 7.00

……………………………………..

=  34.75/ 5 = 6.95

figure skating score B

Skater B:

Four scores are removed. Two by the random selector (in brackets) and then the top and bottom scores (with line drawn through them). But this time the random selector eliminates two low scores.

The average:

7.00 + 7.25 + 7.00 + 7.00 + 7.00

……………………………………..

=  35.25/ 5 = 7.05

Same score cards but Skater B gets a higher average score than Skater A.

Skater A is, in fact, beaten by a random number selector!!!!