Archive for November, 2024

Bad Day for a Wedding

November 18, 2024

I’ve written before that digital communication dealt a blow to conventional thriller writing. The example I used was the murder mystery set in a remote location – in the nineteenth century the villain could just cut the phone lines and plunge the other characters into isolation. These days broadband is everywhere, so the characters could easily call for help. (The art of comedy is still reeling from this as well – if you rewatch classic sitcoms like Frasier or Friends you will notice how much of the story hinges on landlines and answering machines. The gods of laughter must have wept at the passing of the analogue age.)

The wedding that is the centrepiece of Beautiful People takes place in high summer on the Falmouth coast with a beach theme. But, because the bride and groom are public figures, they have signed an exclusive magazine deal for the wedding photos – meaning no one else, guests or staff, are allowed to take photos. ‘Hence,’ the invitation stipulates, ‘we will be politely requesting that phones are handed over on arrival.’

No smartphones. And suddenly the sunlit hotel feels like the craggy castle with its line down. 

Beautiful People has a great deal of darkness even before we get to the wedding. The protagonist Victoria ‘Vix’ Fisher has been running all her life – first from a traumatic small town family background, then from a rape suffered during her first year at a London university, following which she fled to France. Twenty five years later, Vix is living in Marseille and is making some kind of living as an artist. Her work gets noticed by film star Ingrid Olsson who commissions Vix to paint her portrait and then to unveil it at the Falmouth wedding… to a man Vix knew in London. By this circuitous route Vix is drawn back into the wealthy milieu she had known at university. 

The prospect of meeting people you knew years ago is always potentially apprehensive, and Amanda Jennings splices Vix’s unwilling journey to the wedding with flashbacks to her gradual entry into the long ago posh student scene. In both time frames Vix starts out reluctant. She was initially shy in London, conscious of being a working class northern student outshone by the trust fund boarding-school crowd. Some of Vix’s contemporaries are nice people, others are sociopaths. As Vix grows used to her new surroundings, she becomes more designing and amoral. She too has the power to dazzle. She too is one of the beautiful people.

The campus scenery and student drama in Jennings’s novel rings true. The interpersonal crosscurrents of Vix’s nineties youth are thrown into relief by her rage and trauma and it’s horrifying to watch her life fall apart. At her most vjvid Vix is like Liberty in the Delacroix painting, trampling corpses. Jennings’s little touches such as the lucky white pebble and Coco’s parallel beach friend are particularly deft.

Like many young people the 1990s version of Vix has a fixed idea of what the world is like. Vix made a living in the 2000s drawing caricatures on the tourist strip, and has a habit of seeing new people in terms of how she would caricature them, what features to draw out, forehead or nose or lips or eyes.

But Jennings does not caricature. The novel is not a simple story of the working class hero teaching the prep-school boys a lesson. It’s about truly getting to know people and that good and evil can cross currents of class. That is why the happy ending felt so earned and so deserved. And why the sinister parts of the novel felt so unexpected and scary. I found the reveal of the guest list’s ultimate villain to be a complete surprise. 

The Night Watch

November 6, 2024

It seems natural that election results have to be watched all night. It’s in the night that you can feel the world turning, moving from one potential reality to the next. It could be that’s why I always stay up on every election night… also these days to prove to myself that I still can. 

The American election is becoming scary and difficult. I’ve got the BBC on and also The Bulwark live stream and you can see people groping for the old talking point explanations as they did in 2016. 

What is more important is what the world will look like under a second Trump presidency – a second ‘autocratic attempt’ as Masha Gessen called it. A second shot in which Trump and his advisers will bear very much in mind the mistakes of the first term. There’s not going to be any independent voices on staff like Mark Milley or James Mattis or even a Mike Pence. No one to stop Trump pulling out of NATO or sending in the army to shoot college protestors.

Everyone thinks they’ve got a stake in the American election and in this one they have more reason to believe that. It is not just the Americans who will be targeted by their new government, though that’s certainly reason enough to care. A second Trump presidency could see Ukraine’s brave fight choked off and their country parcelled up and fed to the Russians. If America itself throws off liberal democracy and pivots to say Orban-style authoritarianism, that’s going to change the world in ways we don’t understand and won’t want. What the Chiefs of Staff call ‘the democratic rules based order’ could shake, even dissolve entirely.

Let’s go back to the talking points. It will be the fault of liberals. It will be legitimate concerns or economic insecurity or immigrants or woke culture. Or something. Or anything. But I come back to what Jonathan V Last said in the Bulwark stream: ‘We need to grapple with what our fellow Americans want.’

Why would significant numbers of Americans want to throw away a booming economy and their proud democracy? For a man who tried to overthrow the Constitution last time he lost, and whose campaign made no secret of his nastiness and mental unfitness?

In his incomparable book Our Own Worst Enemy, Tom Nichols explained the corrosive impact that occurs when voters fail  to keep themselves informed or to take democracy seriously. Politicians have checks and balances – voters too have a civic responsibility to use their votes wisely and support democratic institutions. I’ve certainly come across tons of people who would love to live under a dictatorship because they think of that as a way to enter some favoured interest group, or to get the state to go after their enemies. Submission to a strongman has a peculiar and widespread psychological appeal. So does the idea of socially engineering a lost country. There are people out there who live in comfort and privilege but would still remake the world to satisfy some nagging fear inside them that their lives are inauthentic. It could be that the intermittent populist convulsions over the last decade are just things thrown up by boredom and egotism of late consumerist societies. And in this particular case, nobody could say they didn’t know.

Or I am just projecting across the Atlantic. Other people are a mystery.

A lot of us will be feeling this sense of scary dislocation and I wonder if this is a consequence of growing up in a privileged age where you do not have to worry much about politics. I try and imagine what it was like for Europeans under the wars and invasions and repressions of the twentieth century. The world turns. I have to believe it will turn towards morning.


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started