Posts Tagged ‘Government’

Free Lunch?

December 9, 2009

Thomas Sowell’s column produced this thought.

Many believe politicians can provide them with a free lunch, not realizing politicians are no miracle workers.  They’re more like tricksters.   Their greatest trick of all: conning you to believe that you didn’t pay for you lunch, when indeed you will pay a little from your next 30 lunches not only to cover the cost of your lunch today, but the politicians’ lunch as well.  By the time you’ve finishing paying for you lunch today, they’ve signed you up for another free lunch and you’re happy about it and you vote for them again.

James Madison

December 6, 2009

Our country has come a long way in the past 200 years.  But, the nature of man is very much the same.  Many political skirmishes are driven by the fundamental disagreement in the purpose of government.  I think it’s wise to understand why the men who had in writing the Constitution put those words to paper.  Over the past 100 years or so, the purpose and power of our government has diverged widely from their intentions.

Here’s something to remember of anyone who finds themselves putting a great deal of trust in anyone they vote for:

The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted.

Here’s the purpose of government, in 20 words:

The rights of persons, and the rights of property, are the objects, for the protection of which Government was instituted.

Thanks to this page of quotes at George Mason University.

On losing freedom:

I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.

And this isn’t a good thing…

If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one….

Remember, he’s considered the Father of the Constitution:

With respect to the two words “general welfare,” I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. If the words obtained so readily a place in the “Articles of Confederation,” and received so little notice in their admission into the present Constitution, and retained for so long a time a silent place in both, the fairest explanation is, that the words, in the alternative of meaning nothing or meaning everything, had the former meaning taken for granted.

If only:

[T]he powers of the federal government are enumerated; it can only operate in certain cases; it has legislative powers on defined and limited objects, beyond which it cannot extend its jurisdiction.

This is just a good one.

Philosophy is common sense with big words.

Mind Changer of the Week

November 21, 2009

The recent recommendation from the United States Preventive Services Task Force, a government-appointed group, to reduce breast cancer screenings seemed to get a few people thinking about whether government health care is such a good idea.

While the Left trips over itself to keep us from sliding down the slippery slope with editorials like this one in the NY Times (amazing that they can’t seem to so the same calming, let’s look at the facts and think about this demeanor with stuff from the Right), they may have trained the consumers of their propaganda media to well to react to headlines and ignore facts. 

For many people, the words that register are “government appointed group” and “scale back on breast cancer screenings” and they’re off to the races imagining a world where the government rations necessary treatments because of what appears to be b.s. opinions from so-called experts, a world where it’ll be the people vs. the government.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started