Antonio Gramsci

Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) was an Italian Marxist philosopher, political theorist, journalist, and a founding member of the Italian Communist Party. He is considered one of the most important political thinkers of the twentieth century.

Early Life:

Gramsci was born in Sardinia, Italy, into a poor family. He won a scholarship to study at the University of Turin, where he became involved in socialist politics and workers’ movements. Turin was a major industrial center, and the experience of factory strikes and labor struggles strongly shaped his political ideas.

Political Activity:

In 1921, Gramsci helped found the Italian Communist Party. He later became one of its leaders and briefly served as a member of parliament. However, when Benito Mussolini consolidated fascist power, Gramsci was arrested in 1926. The prosecutor reportedly declared, “We must stop this brain from functioning.”

Prison Notebooks:

During his imprisonment (1926–1937), Gramsci wrote his famous Prison Notebooks. In these writings, he developed influential ideas about:

Hegemony – the idea that ruling classes maintain power not only through force, but through cultural influence, education, religion, media, and intellectual life.

Civil society – the importance of institutions outside the state in shaping political consent.

Organic intellectuals – thinkers who emerge from and represent particular social classes.

Because of prison censorship, he often wrote in coded or indirect language, which makes his work complex but intellectually rich.

His Core Idea:

Gramsci argued that power is not maintained only through force, but through culture, ideas, education, media, and institutions. According to him, the ruling class preserves dominance not merely through repression, but by shaping culture and common sense. This theory of cultural power—often compared to “soft power”—has been highly influential in political theory and cultural studies.

The Misattributed Quote:

The famous quote, “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters,”

is widely attributed to Gramsci. However, it is a poetic misattribution. While it captures modern anxiety, it oversimplifies and distorts his more complex theory of political and cultural power.

In reality, Gramsci described a period of political transition with the following Italian sentence: “In questo interregno si verificano i fenomeni morbosi più svariati.”

This translates as: “In this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.”

The key difference is clear:

He spoke of “morbid symptoms.”

He did not mention “monsters.”

The word interregnum refers to a gap between two political orders—when the old system is collapsing but the new one has not yet fully formed.

Contemporary Relevance

Today, many people use the “time of monsters” quote to describe the political climate during the era of Donald Trump. Trump’s right-wing nationalist “America First” sentiment has influenced political movements beyond the United States. In France, the National Rally (Rassemblement National) has gained significant electoral support. In Sweden, the Sweden Democrats have become a major political force. In Germany, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) has expanded its influence, particularly in eastern regions. In Italy, the Brothers of Italy has risen to national leadership.

Similar right-wing or nationalist parties have gained prominence in other European countries, such as Law and Justice (Poland), Fidesz (Hungary), and Vox (Spain).

Many observers argue that a broader political and cultural struggle, as a silent revolution is underway across Europe and the United States in response to these movements.

Corrado

Dr. Shepherd, when I met him, was with Corrodo, his jet-black German Shepherd. He smiled at me as usual. When I asked about his current activities, he told me he was working with the investigation team on Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance in Arizona. Corrodo was also being used as a search dog, one of four highly trained canines on the team.

With a hint of disappointment, Dr. Shepherd said, “Our boys could not find anything.” I asked him why the search dogs hadn’t been able to discover anything. He gave me two reasons:

  1. The criminal is such a professional that he knows about all possible forensic investigations and is careful to mask evidence.
  2. “Our boys aren’t smart enough,” he added with a wry smile.

I found both answers interesting, but I was particularly intrigued by his opinion related to Corrodo. At that moment, Corrodo was “reading” the newspaper. To a dog, a newspaper is an entire sensory world of the land. They don’t just see letters — they smell, taste, and feel information. Their world is predominantly shaped by smell and sound, with vision and taste coming later.

A dog’s sense of smell is 10,000–100,000 times more sensitive than a human’s. Dogs have up to 300 million olfactory receptors in their noses (humans have about 5 million). They can detect individual scents even when mixed together, such as a criminal hiding in a cluttered environment. Dogs “read” scents to detect not just what is present, but how long ago something occurred, who was there, and even the emotional states of humans and animals.

As I was recalling my knowledge about dogs, I watched Corrodo in his morning “newspaper reading.” He was smelling various things: remnants of carcasses, the scent of urine from other animals, and even hiding creatures like rabbits or rats. I wondered why such an alert dog, with at least four years of experience, could not find anything in such a high-profile case.

I asked, “Dr. Shepherd, could you tell me more about the crime?”.

Dr. Shepherd:

“The fatal shooting of Alex Jeffrey Pretti by U.S. federal officers in Minneapolis occurred on January 24, 2026. I was there with Corrodo. Even then, our dogs could not find anything, especially any evidence related to the question of who started the violence — ICE or Alex?

Eight days after the death of Alex Pretti, Nancy Guthrie was reported missing on February 1, 2026, after she was believed to have been taken from her home late on January 31 or February 1.

Evening of January 31 – February 1, 2026
Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of TV host Savannah Guthrie (NBC reporter and former White House correspondent, known as a strong Trump critic), attended family dinner at her home in Catalina Foothills, Arizona. She was last seen leaving the house or going inside her home after dinner.

Around the time of disappearance (Feb 1, evening)

Doorbell camera footage shows a masked individual wearing black gloves and a backpack approaching her front door.

The suspect appears to surveil the property, checking for anyone nearby.

Evidence suggests Nancy was forcibly removed from her home, as blood matching her DNA was found on the porch.

Shortly after the abduction

The suspect leaves the property, likely using a vehicle or escape route not fully identified.

Gloves are later found about 1.5 miles from the home, possibly dropped along the escape path.

Feb 2 – Feb 10, 2026

Authorities canvass the neighborhood and review security camera footage from nearby homes.

The FBI and Pima County Sheriff’s Department collect thousands of tips from the public.

Search teams investigate possible locations and routes in the Tucson area.

Feb 10, 2026

The FBI publicly releases video and photos of the masked suspect, including details of clothing and backpack, urging anyone with information to come forward.

Feb 11, 2026:

Black gloves are recovered about 1.5 miles from Nancy’s home.Only Gloves. And our boys could not find it on February 1st. Even our Drones!

Investigators collect the gloves for DNA and forensic testing, to see if they match the suspect.

Feb12 Raised a white Tent in front of the Nancy’s Front door, to asses the height of suspect.

After hearing all this from Dr. Shepherd, I asked if ICE had anything to do with Nancy’s disappearance — wondering if the authorities were trying to divert public attention. As we all know ICE portrayed the event as aftermath of violence of locals in Minnesota. And local Minnesota videos about Alex Pretti’s death showed something totally different from narratives of ICE.

Dr. Shepherd laughed. He said, “Half of the news in the world is created. Well, this is the era of A.I. — artificial intelligence.”

Corrodo was sniffing my boots!.

President’s Mental Status Examination

Mental Status examination of A President
By Dr. Nelsonkattikat

1. General Appearance and Behavior

Well-built, tall, well-nourished, appears middle-aged, with a distinctive hairstyle, tanned complexion, and formal attire, often preferring blue suits, white shirts, and red ties. Hygiene and self-care are adequate. His behavior is often characterized as confident, even to the point of a God complex, assertive, and at times combative. His body language includes strong hand gestures, especially pointing with his index finger, and an upright posture.

Psychomotor activity is increased.

Rapport can be established with difficulty, as he seems restless to questions, especially related to Musk and Putin.

2. Speech

Clear, coherent, and mostly relevant. He has a unique way of speaking, often using short, repetitive phrases and superlatives like “tremendous,” “the best,” “America first,” and similar expressions. There are instances of clang associations, along with silly jokes. His speech is direct, informal, fast, and sometimes with an intention to grab public attention, often controversial, with a tendency to make off-the-cuff remarks. His speech output is high, with medium to high volume, a distinctive melody, and prosody, often shifting between medium and high volumes as like ocean waves
Content: I am the elected President. Law makers, Judges  must obey me.Often uses,Phrases like “Fake news,” “Biden government’s fault,”…

3. Mood and Affect

His mood fluctuates between enthusiasm, anger, and defiance, depending on the context.Emotionally appears to be stable but occasionally superfluous. No empathy. It seems to be appropriate to situation , except during discussions with Zelensky. He often displays high energy and confidence in public settings but can show frustration or irritation when challenged.Unable to tolerate criticism. His affect tends to be congruent, expressive, with exaggerated facial expressions and gestures like a magician.

4. Thought

Always thinks like a businessman, profit-oriented. His thinking style seems to prioritize immediate results, focusing on personal success, self-image boosting, gaining leadership roles, or taking undue credit for gains made by other Presidents He often frames issues in binary terms (winners vs. losers, strong vs. weak). He believes nothing is impossible and sees himself as the savior of the world, especially America. He tends to prioritize his own interpretations of events, sometimes contrasting with mainstream perspectives.

5. Perception

He perceives himself as a strong leader and a “fighter” against perceived political adversaries and media bias.His perception of events and facts is sometimes questioned, as he has been known to promote conspiracy theories or challenge widely accepted information.
Perceptual abnormality:He has no hallucination.

6. Cognition (Higher Mental Functions)

President has demonstrated strategic thinking in business and politics, successfully branding himself and winning the presidency despite his political inexperience. He relies heavily on instincts and personal experience rather than detailed policy analysis. His decision-making style appears quick and reactive, rather than deeply analytical. Cognitive biases are noted on topics such as the Ukraine war, NATO, foreign policy, USAID, and immigrants.he seems to have colour blindness, with mexican boarder phobia.

7. Thought content? Grandiose

8. Insight

Social Insight:President demonstrates insight into media dynamics and public influence, effectively shaping narratives to such an extent of a lie that resonate with his base.However, at times, he shows excessive attachment to figures like Elon Musk and Putin. Detachment to Africa, Mexico.
Personal Insight: Poor. He lacks introspection.His self-perceptionof himself as a successful, historically significant person is ok but can sometimes appear grandiose.

9. Judgment

Personal Judgment:President’s personal judgment is often seen as bold, unfiltered, but grandiose, and driven by instincts rather than traditional political norms. Narcissistic tendencies are observed at times.

Social Judgment: His social judgment is reflected in his interactions with world leaders, the media, and public speeches, often polarizing opinions. Sometimes, it is grossly impaired. For example, he advised people to drink Lysol to kill the COVID-19 virus during the pandemic.

Test Judgmentand abstract thinking:When asked to him:
“Read following test situation and comment”:

A house on fire: “Ukraine is on fire. Strong leadership is needed. Zelensky better resign; otherwise, the country won’t exist.

A man lying on the road: “He must be an immigrant, deported immediately to his country. Better to be in shackles.”

A sealed, stamped, addressed envelope on the street: “Might suspect election fraud or that it’s from Putin, referencing past controversies.”
Judgment and abstract thinking,Rating: Impulsive/Controversial.Concrete.

10. Memory

Short-term memory: Good.

Long-term memory: Occasionally impaired.
President has made several statements over the years that he later contradicted or changed his stance on. Here are some notable examples:

1. COVID-19 and the Pandemic Response

Before: “It’s going to disappear. One day—it’s like a miracle—it will disappear.”

Later: “I always knew this was a real pandemic. I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic.”

2. Inflation

Before: “If I am the president, there will not be any inflation. Prices will come down.”

After becoming president: “There will be inflation in the first few months; prices may go up.”

3. Zelensky

Before: “Zelensky is honest, bold, and strong.”

Later: “Zelensky is like a salesman, weak.”

11.Abstract Thinking:

Similarities

Question: What do the following have in common?

Chair and desk?
  Answer:”I am stopping USAID. No more chairs and desks needed for Africans from American tax payers money.”

(expected answer: both are furniture )

– Apple and pear?
  Answer:”We have to export more apples, pears to Gaza. Both are good to make money.”

( expected answer, both are fruits, eatables)

-Poem and statue?
Answer:”I never read any poems. Poems are foolish creations by lazy people. I like statues, especially if they are mine.We dont need th French statue, anymore”

(expected answer, both are artistic work)

Proverb test

Question:What do people mean when they say…?

– “Don’t cry over spilled milk.”
  Answer: “Accept what has happened with Zelensky and Putin, I dont wait for Nobel Prize for peace.”

– “A rolling stone gathers no moss.”
  Answer: ‘Agreed, I am a rolling stone, but only under the legs of Biden’s chair.!”

– “When the cat’s away, the mice will play.”
  Answer:”I like that play. Now I am playing it with Musk, sometimes with Europe and with Putin.

– “Fake news.” 
  Answer: “What should I do!. Let me tell you: Last night, when my wife pulled the blanket, I shouted in my sleep, “Fake news!”😀

“Barking dogs, seldom bite”:Are you making fun of me?

Abstract thinking: poor.

Impression :?
You can comment

Donald Trump’s Leadership and the Ukraine Crisis: A Complex Scenario

by Dr. Nelsonkattikat

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has several notable qualities, one of which is his determination to follow through on decisions once they are made. However, in the current geopolitical climate, his ability to influence events as he once did seems diminished. Despite this, Trump has recently stepped forward with a proposal to end the ongoing war in Ukraine, a move that has been seen as both bold and constructive by some observers. The global community largely desires peace, and Trump’s initiative aligns with this sentiment. However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has not been receptive to Trump’s proposal, primarily due to the strong backing Zelenskyy receives from the European Union (EU). The EU, for its part, is unlikely to easily concede the diplomatic credit to Trump if the war were to end under his influence.

Zelenskyy appears to be calculating that even if the U.S. withdraws its support for Ukraine, the country can continue to move forward with the EU’s assistance. In response, Trump has issued a stark warning, stating that “if the war does not end, Ukraine as a nation may not survive.” This statement underscores the high stakes involved and the urgency of resolving the conflict.

Trump has previously argued that the war in Ukraine could have been avoided if President Joe Biden had taken a more cautious approach. This perspective resonates with many who believe that the current administration’s policies have exacerbated the situation. At the same time, Zelenskyy seems to recognize that alienating Trump could be counterproductive. This has led to accusations that Zelenskyy is engaging in diplomatic maneuvering and spreading a comment as misinformation to Trump is the reason behind Trump’s faulty decision .

The global order is undergoing significant shifts. There is a growing possibility that global leadership could transition from the United States to Europe, particularly under the influence of the U.K., France, and Germany. The emergence of a new world order led by these nations is a development worth watching closely. Additionally, how major powers like India,China and Russia respond to these changes will be critical in shaping the future geopolitical landscape.

In summary, while Trump’s efforts to end the Ukraine war are commendable, the complexities of international politics and the shifting dynamics of global power make the path to peace fraught with challenges. The world is watching closely to see how these developments unfold and what they mean for the future of international relations.