Modern Monarchs

Modern Monarchs

By Dr. Nelson Kattikat

In the past, the world was ruled by kings and monarchs. We’ve all heard of Alexander the Great, the queens of royal families, the King of Saudi Arabia, the Tsars of Russia, and the monarchs of France. These rulers held immense power. For centuries, they suppressed democracy and ruled with an iron fist, often killing those who dared to oppose them.

At that time, hardly anyone believed it was possible to escape their autocratic control. But over time, human consciousness evolved. The ideas of freedom and equality began to spread. Movements like the French Revolution sparked a shift toward democracy. We learned that, through public awareness and collective will, even the most deeply rooted systems of oppression could be challenged and changed.

I bring up these kings to draw a parallel with today’s powerful weapon lobbies and arms manufacturers. These large corporations, run by wealthy businessmen, are the modern-day kings. In countries like the United States—considered a beacon of development—there are still tragic mass shootings, even in schools.

We know that American weapon manufacturers export arms across the globe. In places like Afghanistan, tribal communities with no technological capacity to build weapons are somehow using AK-47s against foreign forces. In Africa, people struggling without basic needs like food, water, or education are fighting each other with modern firearms—tools they could never produce themselves. Where are these weapons coming from?

In every modern war, we see new weapons—more advanced, more destructive. War itself has evolved; it’s no longer just conflict—it’s become a tool for exerting power. From the Ukraine–Russia war to the Israel–Iran conflict, we must ask: Who is supplying the weapons?

We all recognize that it’s time to stop this cycle of violence and war. Weapons have become a menace to global society. But who will stop the production of arms? Do we really expect the massive defense companies to stop simply because their products cause death and destruction?

Just like we did with the monarchs of the past, we must raise public awareness. Public education, coordinated activism, and creative policy (e.g., incentivised divestment) are crucial to counter these “modern kings” and transform weapon-centric economies toward peace and human development.
Back then, we stripped kings of their unchecked power, offered them symbolic roles, and gave them ‘pensions’ by modern government system. Similarly, maybe it’s time we offer a kind of ‘pension’ to the arms industry—an incentive for the owners and their future generations to live comfortably without manufacturing weapons. We must transition toward a world of peace, cooperation, and shared progress without weapons of mal motivated companies 🙏.

(🔫 The Hidden Monarchs:

  1. Global Scale & Economic Profile

Metric 2023 Data

Worldwide military expenditure $2.44 trillion
Total revenue of top 100 arms companies $632 billion (4.2% increase YOY)
Top 25 companies’ arms sales $445 billion (+3.6% from 2022)
Global arms industry valuation ~$475 billion
Analysis:
This concentration shows that a small number of corporations dominate revenues and influence—akin to modern monarchs.

  1. Major Players: The New “Kings”

Top arms manufacturers by 2023 arms revenue (SIPRI figures):

  1. Lockheed Martin — $60.8 B (90% from defense)
  2. RTX Corporation — $40.7 B
  3. Northrop Grumman — $35.6 B
  4. Boeing — $31.1 B
  5. General Dynamics — $30.2 B

Other significant names include BAE Systems, Rostec (Russia), Norinco & CASIC (China), L3Harris, Airbus, Leonardo .

Lockheed Martin develops F‑35s, Patriots, missiles, satellites .

General Dynamics supplies tanks, submarines, combat vehicles, and tech services .

  1. Export Power & Geopolitical Reach

The U.S. accounts for ~43% of global arms exports (past 5 years); France is second (~10%) .

U.S. defense companies amassed $317 B, a 2.5% rise on 2022 .

Between 2020–2024, U.S. exports grew ~20%, largely due to Ukraine conflict .)

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16xhHryYd8

Israel versus Iran

Israel–Iran Conflict: The World on the Brink of an Explosion?

By Dr. Nelson Kattikat ✍🏼

The long-standing hostility between Israel and Iran has escalated beyond regional rivalry, emerging as a formidable threat to global peace. Tensions fueled by nuclear ambitions, military buildups, religious divides, and geopolitical maneuvering have transformed what was once a bilateral dispute into an international crisis with far-reaching implications.

🔥 How Capable Is Iran of Resisting Israel?

Iran possesses significant military capabilities and is regarded as one of the strongest powers in the Middle East. According to current defense assessments:

Revolutionary Guards (IRGC): A highly trained force, prepared not only for counterterrorism but also for national defense.

Advanced Arsenal: Includes a vast stockpile of ballistic missiles, long-range drones, and suspected nuclear-capable warheads.

Cyber Warfare: Capabilities to target critical Israeli civilian and infrastructure systems.

However, Israel’s technological superiority—demonstrated through systems like the Iron Dome, Arrow missile defense, satellite-guided weapons, and AI-powered surveillance—gives it a substantial edge. While Iran may be able to withstand initial strikes, it is unlikely to sustain a prolonged direct conflict.

As such, Iran is more inclined toward an asymmetric strategy, relying on proxy forces like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza to destabilize Israel indirectly.

🇺🇸 U.S. Position: Intervention or Restraint?

America’s stance remains nuanced, balancing strategic deterrence with diplomatic caution. While Israel’s security is a non-negotiable priority for Washington:

Direct U.S. involvement is unlikely unless Iran initiates a clear and immediate threat.

If Iran enriches uranium to weapons-grade levels (90%), the U.S. may conduct surgical strikes.

Violations of IAEA guidelines, attacks on U.S. interests, or direct aggression toward Israel could trigger American military response.

However, due to the political and economic cost of war, the U.S. continues to emphasize diplomatic engagement and containment over escalation.

🇷🇺🇨🇳 Russia & China: Indirect Support, Strategic Interests

Both Russia and China maintain close ties with Iran but are unlikely to become directly involved militarily. Instead, they offer strategic and diplomatic backing:

Russia has utilized Iranian Shahed drones in the Ukraine conflict, showcasing growing defense cooperation.

China remains Iran’s key economic partner—particularly in oil trade and financial systems—while backing Iran diplomatically through platforms like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

Neither country seeks a regional war, but both may counterbalance Western pressure on Iran at international forums, including the United Nations.

🇮🇳 India’s Position: Strategic Balance and Autonomy

India walks a careful diplomatic tightrope, guided by its principle of Strategic Autonomy:

With Israel: India maintains strong defense and technology partnerships—especially in drone systems, cybersecurity, and missile defense.

With Iran: India imports oil and has invested in infrastructure projects like the Chabahar Port, a key link to Central Asia.

India urges peaceful resolution, adheres to international law, and generally avoids taking sides, instead promoting dialogue and stability.

🇪🇺 European Union: Diplomatic Pressure and Conditional Engagement

The EU remains committed to non-proliferation and regional peace through diplomacy:

Strong supporters of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal.

Nations like Germany, France, and the U.K. have criticized Iran’s nuclear ambitions but align with U.S. strategic objectives.

The EU pursues diplomatic pressure, sanctions, and negotiations to prevent escalation and keep Iran within international compliance.

🌍 World War III? A Disturbing Yet Distant Threat

Although an all-out global conflict is not imminent, the ripple effects of a regional war could be devastating:

Closure of the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt up to 30% of global oil shipments, triggering an energy crisis.

Cyberattacks could paralyze infrastructure in Europe, the Gulf, and the U.S..

Proxy wars may flare across Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, destabilizing the Middle East.

Global oil prices could skyrocket, straining economies already under inflationary pressure.

Despite these risks, most global powers are likely to resist escalation, recognizing that such a war would result in collective economic and humanitarian losses.

🕊️ Final Word: Peace Has a Price

The Israel–Iran conflict places the world dangerously close to a tipping point. Only through credible, just, and proactive international mediation can a broader war be prevented. Failing that, we risk descending into a new era of violent uncertainty—one that could engulf far more than the immediate players involved.

– Dr. Nelson Kattikat