Truth!

Truth, is Disgusting!

In the modern world, truth—once considered a virtue—has increasingly become uncomfortable, unwelcome, and even repulsive. People often claim to value honesty, yet react with hostility when confronted with realities that challenge their beliefs, emotions, or social image. Truth today is not rejected because it is false, but because it is inconvenient. In this sense, truth has become “disgusting” to many, not in its nature, but in how it disrupts carefully maintained illusions.

This discomfort with truth feeds directly into the widespread hypocrisy that defines much of society. We publicly preach morality, loyalty, tolerance, and justice, while privately practicing contradiction. Social media and public discourse are filled with performances of virtue rather than genuine ethical commitment. People often defend ideals not because they believe in them deeply, but because those ideals offer social acceptance and protection from criticism. As a result, hypocrisy is no longer an exception; it has become the operating mode of society.

Prejudice further deepens this crisis. Topics such as love, sex, nation, and religion—areas that require empathy and openness—are instead governed by rigid judgments. Love is controlled by social approval, sex by shame, nation by blind loyalty, and religion by inherited fear. Individuals are often condemned not for harming others, but for deviating from socially approved norms. These prejudices limit honest dialogue and prevent people from understanding one another as complex human beings.

One visible outcome of this moral confusion is the increasing number of fake relationships. Many connections today are built on convenience, status, fear of loneliness, or social validation rather than emotional depth. Relationships are maintained for appearance rather than authenticity. Commitment is simulated, affection is conditional, and honesty is sacrificed to avoid discomfort. As a result, relationships may survive publicly while collapsing privately.

Tolerance within relationships—especially marital relationships—has also declined. Instead of patience, communication, and mutual growth, many partnerships are marked by ego, control, and unrealistic expectations. Small disagreements escalate quickly, and forgiveness is replaced by blame. Rather than understanding differences, partners often seek dominance or emotional escape, weakening the very foundation of long-term commitment.

At the same time, society’s willingness to explore the depth of issues and search for truth is steadily reducing. Quick opinions replace thoughtful inquiry. Headlines replace understanding. People prefer answers that confirm what they already believe rather than questions that challenge them. The pursuit of truth requires effort, humility, and discomfort—qualities increasingly avoided in a culture that values speed, certainty, and emotional safety.

One of the most damaging consequences of this environment is the unhealthy attitude toward sex. Although sex is a natural biological function, it remains surrounded by denial, shame, and contradiction. Society simultaneously commercializes sex and condemns open discussion about it. This refusal to accept sexuality as normal contributes to widespread sexual frustration, repression, and psychological imbalance. When healthy expression and education are suppressed, perversion and distorted behaviors often emerge in their place.

In conclusion, the crisis we face is not merely social, but deeply human. A society that fears truth, practices hypocrisy, nurtures prejudice, and avoids honest self-examination cannot sustain genuine relationships or emotional well-being. Only by restoring honesty, tolerance, curiosity, and acceptance—especially around uncomfortable truths—can individuals and societies move toward authenticity and psychological health. The challenge is not to change the world overnight, but to begin by facing truth without fear.

Dr. Nelson Kattikat Joseph

Paradox of Truth

The Paradox of Truth: When Two Opposites Can Both Be Right

by Dr. Nelson Kattikat

We are taught from a young age to think in binaries: right or wrong, yes or no, true or false. This framework is the bedrock of simple logic. The statement “Water boils at 100°C at sea level” is correct. Its opposite, “Water does not boil at 100°C at sea level,” is definitively false. This is the clean, predictable world of facts.

But as we journey deeper into the nature of reality—through science, philosophy, and the sheer experience of being human—we encounter a more fascinating and complex landscape. Here, we find that the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.

This idea, famously articulated by the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Niels Bohr, suggests that the deepest layers of reality are not black and white, but are built on a foundation of paradox. Profound truths don’t cancel each other out; they coexist, complement, and complete one another.

Science, often seen as the realm of absolute answers, is actually where this principle shines brightest. It reveals that our universe operates on a logic that embraces contradiction.

  1. Wave-Particle Duality: The quintessential example. For centuries, physicists debated: is light a wave or a stream of particles? The answer, bafflingly, is both.
    · Truth A: Light is a wave. (Demonstrated by interference patterns).
    · Truth B: Light is a particle (a photon). (Demonstrated by the photoelectric effect). These are seemingly opposite descriptions, yet both are undeniably true. They are not a problem to be solved but two essential sides of the same coin, with Bohr’s principle of complementarity explaining that which model we use depends on the context of the question we’re asking.
  2. The Relativity of Truth: The laws of physics themselves are context-dependent.
    · Truth A: Newton’s laws of motion are true. (They perfectly predict the path of a baseball, the orbit of a moon, and the stress on a bridge in our everyday, low-speed world).
    · Truth B: Einstein’s theory of relativity shows Newton’s laws are incomplete. (At speeds approaching light, or in immense gravitational fields, Newton’s model breaks down and Einstein’s must take over). Newtonian physics isn’t “false”; it’s a profoundly true and useful subset of a broader, more profound truth. They coexist in different domains of applicability.
  3. Determinism vs. Randomness: Our very understanding of causality is split.
    · Truth A: The universe is deterministic. (From the predictable motion of planets to the ticking of a clock, large-scale systems follow strict cause-and-effect).
    · Truth B: The universe is fundamentally probabilistic. (At the quantum level, we can only speak of probabilities; exact outcomes are seemingly random). This isn’t a flaw in our knowledge; it appears to be a feature of reality. Both truths—the clockwork and the cloud—coexist at different scales.

There are certain areas in the Human Experience, where Profound Truths Collide.

This principle mentioned above regarding truth is not confined to the lab. It is woven into the very fabric of our lives and philosophies, offering a more compassionate lens through which to view our contradictions.

On Mind

Truth A:Mind is conscious
Truth B:Mind is unconscious
( only one by third of mind is conscious, two by third is unconscious, a model of mind by Sigmund Freud)

· On Love:
· Truth A: To love is to possess a profound connection, to feel that another person is “mine,” a part of my world.
· Truth B: To love truly is to grant absolute freedom, to cherish the other person for who they are, entirely independent of you. It is to say, “You are not mine.” These two feelings—of possession and liberation—are opposites, yet both are profound truths of deep love. Denying one diminishes the experience.
· On Success and Failure:
· Truth A: Life is about the destination. (We set goals, strive for achievements, and measure progress by outcomes. This gives us direction and purpose).
· Truth B: Life is about the journey. (The true value is in the growth, learning, and experiences along the way, regardless of the outcome. A “failure” can teach more than an easy success). These two philosophies tug at us constantly. Embracing both allows us to pursue ambitions with passion while finding meaning in every step, softening the blow of setbacks.
· On Identity (The Self vs. The Collective):
· Truth A: You are a unique, self-contained individual. Your thoughts, experiences, and choices are your own. You must forge your own path and assert your individuality.
· Truth B: You are an interconnected part of a vast whole. You are shaped by your family, culture, and society. Your existence is defined by your relationships to others. We are not just individuals, nor are we just cogs in a machine. We are both, simultaneously. A life well-lived acknowledges both these profound truths: celebrating individuality while nurturing community.

What this Wisdom of the Paradox gives us or
What are we to do with this concept? It is not a call to abandon logic or embrace nonsense. Rather, it is an invitation to adopt a more flexible, sophisticated, nuanced view of the world.

· It Fosters Intellectual Humility: Recognizing that a contrary view might also contain a profound truth checks our arrogance and opens us to dialogue and learning. We become less likely to dismiss others and more likely to ask, “What context makes their truth valid?”
· It Eases the Burden of Inner Conflict: We often struggle with inner contradictions: “I am strong, yet I feel weak,” or “I enjoy being social, yet I crave solitude.” Bohr’s insight frees us from this conflict. It reminds us that we can embody many truths at once. Strength and vulnerability, extroversion and introversion—all can be real, depending on time and context. Together, they form the wholeness of the human experience.

The same understanding helps us view others with greater acceptance. People too carry contradictions: same person can be sometimes arrogant, sometimes humble; sometimes loving, sometimes distant; sometimes kind, sometimes harsh. These shifts don’t make them false—they make them human.

· It is the Key to Deeper Understanding: The deepest mysteries—of consciousness, the universe, and our place in it—may not be unlocked by a single key, but by two seemingly opposite keys used together.

The next time you encounter a stark contradiction, in the world or within yourself, pause. Before choosing one side and dismissing the other, consider the possibility that you are not looking at a simple right and wrong. You may be standing before two profound truths, waiting to be held together. For it is in the tension of opposites that we often find the deepest harmony.