Scratched Letters

29 03 2012

Often one thinks that dry academic journals do not present any material for inspiration.  However, one just needs to realize that a story is behind every archaeological artifact uncovered.  Below is a devotion I gave to the Central Seminary faculty (7 February 2012) based on the article by Doron Ben-Ami and Yana Tchekhanovets, “The Lower City of Jerusalem on the Eve of Its Destruction, 70 C.E.:  A View from Hanyon Givati,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No. 364 (November 2011), 61-85. 

I don’t know the day and can only approximate the month, somewhere between May and August, but I know the year and the place.  The year was 70 C. E. and the place was the city of Jerusalem.   

In a row of stone buildings in the Lower City of Jerusalem, a group of hungry, confused, and scared Judeans huddled in a stone-vaulted storage cellar.  They had made desperate and last ditch preparations.  The main entry of their building of refuge was blocked off from the nearby street.  They had breached the walls between buildings creating escape routes so they could scurry mouse-like between buildings.  However, like mice, if they thought about it, and I am sure they did, they must have known they were trapped by a very powerful and predatory cat.  The Romans had them pinned in, that is, the soldiers of the 5th legion, the 10th, the 12th, and the 15th.  Each day the noise, confusion and rumors grew.  Because the siege had begun during Passover, thousands of additional hungry people were in the city.  Those who risked foraging for food often ended up nailed in hideous poses on crosses.  What was one to do? Sticks and stones against brass, iron, and spears?  Unlike the 1965 lyrics by Barry McGuire, this group of Judeans knew with certainty they were on “the eve of destruction.” 

As they hid in their underground bunker, however, someone within that group attempted one more act to keep at bay the forces of evil.  It is found in the form of a broken piece of pottery.  Roughly scratched upon it are a few Greek letters.  In the first row are double ΑΑ and ΒΒ and in the second row are the first six letters of the Greek alphabet, ΑΒΓΔΕΖ.  This type of inscription is called an abecedary inscription, and it served as an amulet.  It reflected the sacred and mystical power of the alphabet and the belief that letters could protect those who needed to escape from enemies.

Of course as archaeologists have illustrated from recent excavations, the abecedary inscription did not help.  Whatever may have happened to the occupants, the buildings were intentionally destroyed by the Roman legions as they poured their anger and fury into this particular section of Jerusalem.

This shard of hope, however, is a reminder of the power of the alphabet, words, and books.  For the ancients, especially the illiterate, these markings on paper, stone, or pottery, had a power that made them sacred and filled them with awe.  These markings could cause change. 

Paul the Apostle was well aware of the power of words; for this reason, he wrote letters.  His opponents, who suggested that he had a face only a mother could love and that he couldn’t talk his way out of a paper bag, even they grudgingly acknowledged his written words; his letters, were “weighty and strong” (2 Cor. 10:10).  And even though Paul’s rival in Corinth, Apollos, might have had great rhetorical skills and the chiseled face of a Hollywood star, we have none of his words to read and from which to draw inspiration.  The word written, preserved and transmitted is the word empowered. 

In class this semester, we are translating 1 John with its simple Greek and basic vocabulary. In the process of translating 1:4, I was reminded by the writer of the powerful emotions that simple words evoke:  “We are writing these things so that our joy may be complete.”  The written and the read mix together into a mutuality to produce the elixir of joy.

Always at this time of year, the beginning of the semester, I am struck by how sacred are the words we give to students.  We select books to read; we compose assignments; we ask them to compose papers; and we ask to articulate their reflections and thoughts.  In our teaching, where in world would we be without words?  I clipped a small epigram a long time ago and have either taped it to my door or tacked it to a bulletin board since I started teaching in 1987:  “A drop of ink may make a million think.” This thought is an optimistic one about the importance of our words. 

In Hebrew Scriptures is the brief summary description about young Samuel, who served as servant of the Lord and assistant to the old priest Eli in Shiloh.  As Samuel grew up it was said: “the LORD was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground” (1 Sam 3:19 NRSV).  It would be wonderful if like Samuel none of our words, written or spoken, fell to the ground.  But of course, as I am often reminded, volumes in our library are on the for sale shelve for $1;  my articles often lie within unopened and unread journals; and words spoken fly up like sparks out of a fire only to fizz out.  Often our words fall to the ground, crumbs to compost, or are left to mold. Sigh.

And yet, we still believe in words.  We are people of words, oral and written, and they have an indescribable and mystical power. Phillis Wheatley, the first African-American woman poet, the second woman poet published in American, wrote these words in her first poem:

“While an intrinsic ardor bids me write
the muse doth promise to assist my pen.”   (“To the University of Cambridge”)

In the midst of slavery, and isolation from all that she had known of her home in Africa, Phillis had inspiration to write.  And in that inspiration, she found liberation, if not of the body, at least of the mind and spirit.

 Our unknown author who feverously scratched those awkward Greek letters onto the pottery shard believed that the letters of the alphabet, the simple combination of strange markings, could change and transform life–save his life and the lives of others.  And maybe on our best days, so do we.





On the Road with Paul and John

10 10 2010

On the Road with Paul and John

Just some quick updates about our ongoing travel in Turkey.  Several places associated with Paul in Asia Minor have been on our itinerary for the last couple of days.  For example, we stopped at the archaeological excavations in the ancient city of Alexandria Troas.  According to the Acts account, this city is the one in which Paul had his vision of the man from Macedonia asking for help.  Because of the vision, Paul moved his mission activities to a new continent as he across the Aegean Sea (Acts 16:6) to Europe.  Below is an unearthed section of the road on which Paul would have travel into and out of Troas. 

We also visited Assos, a city in which Paul met coworkers (Acts 20:13-16) as they traveled by ship onto Mitylene.  The picture below is taken from the theater of Assos which shows the Aegean Sea in the background.

Our group has also traveled to Pergamum which is mentioned in Revelation 1:11 and 2:12-17.  In the letter John writes to this church, he commends the Christians for their ability to live “where Satan’s throne is” (2:13).  While many of the allusion in Revelation are difficult to understand with our separation from that period, John may have been referencing the great altar of Zeus in Pergamum.  The photograph below illustrates only the base of where the altar would have been. 

The original is now in the Berlin Museum.  Perhaps what is most impressive about Pergamum is the theater carved into the mountain side.  It is one of the most spectacular views in all the ancient world.  It is also steep and not for the faint of heart.





TURKEY OR BUST

4 10 2010

No I am not talking about over eating pumpkin pies, cranberries or turkey at Thanksgiving.  I want to inform the readers of this blog that over the next two weeks I will be periodically presenting travel highlights from the countries of Turkey and Greece.  I am leading a Central Baptist Theological Seminary study tour of eleven hardy individuals from October 6 to 18 in these two countries.  Depending on the reliability of internet connections, I hope to have brief posts at least every other day.

Both Turkey and Greece are countries which present unique opportunities to understand the background and geography related to the New Testament and early Christianity.  Most of the areas for our study will include sites related to Pauline Christianity and also Revelation.  Our itinerary will include places such as Istanbul, Pergamum, Smyrna (modern Izmir), Ephesus, Patmos,  Athens, Delphi, Corinth, and the islands of Rhodes, Santorini and Crete.

A quote attributed to St. Augustine states, “The World is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page.”  Our group will no doubt read many interesting chapters during these two weeks of travel.  These chapters will hopefully open up for us new ways to read the biblical stories and new ways to see other people and cultures.  As Mark Twain once wrote, “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts.  Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one’s lifetime” (The Innocents Abroad, vol. 2).  So our group of pilgrims will not be armchair interpreter’s of the world or the Bible, we will engage in the hands-on study of culture and context in the birth places of the New Testament and early Christianity.  I hope you can join us via this blog and share in the impressions we garner from our travels.





Noah’s Ark?: Sensationalism Sells and Smells

30 04 2010

The following blog is an adaptation of an earlier piece that I wrote for Review & Expositor.  It seems relevant with the advent of the “discovery” of Noah’s ark.  Phineas Taylor (P. T.) Barnum must be smiling.

Nothing generates buzz on blogs, in papers or over televisions like a new archaeological discovery.  The latest of these “discoveries” is Noah’s ark.  See the news story here:  Noah’s Ark.

These discoveries often make some claim to a biblical connection.  Take for example these eye-catching actual taglines from newspapers:  “Bombshell had Many Christians Wondering,” “Threatens Two Millenniums of Christian Doctrine,” and “Among the Greatest Finds from Christian Antiquity.” Who could resist wanting to know more? Often these “discoveries” are strategically announced around the same time that we are once again watching Charleston Heston transform from a loin-clothed muscled prince of Egypt into a robed and bearded messenger of God.

Media coverage of archaeological discoveries attempts to titillate the reader or listener.  And frequently, many in the general public are willing to be titillated.  Archaeological “discoveries” capture the imagination because they appear to either prove the Bible or disprove it.  Many Christians want tangible “proof” for their version of Christianity.  When spades are plunged into the soil of Israel, the Bible is scanned to find points of connection with any discovery.  Ironically, the New Testament is filled with narratives  emphasizing that faith is not linked to empirical, tangible proofs.  In the only beatitude in the Gospel of John, Jesus rebukes Thomas saying, “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe” (20:29). When archaeological proofs are needed for faith, a person is displaying an attitude little better than the leaders at Jesus’ crucifixion who set the standard for proof at “let him come down from the cross, and we will believe in him” (Matt 27:42).

Because not all archaeological discoveries make headlines, many individuals are unaware that discoveries are made almost every day at excavations. Place a spade in the right place, and one is almost guaranteed to turn up some object from antiquity, from coins to pottery shards.  While many of the objects uncovered may appear mundane, each is significant within a collective context.  However, when the media spotlight shines on a specific archaeological discovery, the right perspective and especially the right questions are helpful.  The wrong question is, “How does this prove (disprove) the Bible?”  The right question is, “What does this reveal about the world in which the Bible was written, read, and our ancestors in faith lived?”

So how should we approach an archaeological discovery hyped on the History or Discovery Channels, puffed in the papers, or virally exploding across the web?  What should one’s response be to the news that the tomb of Alexander the Great, Cleopatra, Mark Antony, James, Herod the Great, or Bullwinkle has been found?  The hermeneutic of suspicion is always a great initial tool to employ.  Or in more colloquial terms, use your nose.  See if you can smell the sour odor of sensationalism drifting from the “discovery.”

Headlines claiming “Greatest Discovery Ever,” “Bombshell,” The Truth About,” “Could Change History,” or “Incredible Find” should be taken with more than just a grain of salt, maybe a pound of salt.  Initial discoveries, when done by creditable professionals, are tentative and nuanced.  Hedging discoveries with words like “perhaps,” “it seems,” “possibly,” “more study,” will not capture the attention of readers, but responsible archaeologists present findings carefully in scholarly contexts and with measured caution.

Sniff to see if the discovery has the odor of misinterpretation and misrepresentation.  Once while I was working on an excavation in northern Israel, a senior member of the team staring at a rock wall we had unearthed asked, “What do those rocks tells us?” Before we could answer, he said, “Absolute nothing.  Rocks don’t talk.”  Interpretations are imposed upon the silent material cultural that archaeologists bring to light.  Often in the zeal to “prove” or “support” the Bible, the media, or over-enthused interpreters, will act as ventriloquists for silent rocks.

One simple example is the “cross” of Herculaneum.  In a relatively recent excavation of a house covered by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius (A.D. 70), a carbonized wooden cabinet was found.  Directly above the cabinet was a cross-shaped mark on a white painted wall.  The news spread that the earliest evidence of a Christian cross had been found in what appeared to be a Christian house. (This find would be extraordinary since crosses did not appear as a Christian symbol until the fourth century).  However, later evaluation showed the white “cross” was actually an imprint for hanging a chest on the wall.[1] Ancient wall brackets do not generate as much interest as crosses.

Does the smell of money waft from the discovery?  Headlines sell papers, flashy covers sells magazines, and graphic commercials sell viewership.  Archaeological discoveries can and have been manipulated by marketing ploys.  For example, on the Discovery Channel website, one can find a section called “The Lost Tomb of Jesus.”  Along with getting the video, one can buy a book called The Jesus Family Tomb:  The Discovery, the Investigation, and the Evidence that Could Change History.  With a title like that, they will sell lots of books.  It is interesting that the Foreword to the book is written by James Cameron, the Hollywood director of the movie Titanic.  Who knew that he was an expert on first-century Judean tombs?  Economics trumps thoughtful and reflective dissemination of archaeological discoveries.  One can note that the National Geographic needed to recover a $1 million dollar investment in the purchase of the Gnostic Gospel of Judas.  It did so by sensationalizing the Gospel’s discovery and its content.

Cars that get 200 miles to the gallon, making $100,000 a year by stuffing envelopes, getting a Ph.D. in two month, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. The same truth holds for archaeological discoveries.  With healthy skepticism, question the popular media when it pushes into the limelight “earth shattering” finds that will change our understanding of the Bible.  Thankfully archaeologists and their discoveries are helping to shape our view of the biblical world, but that shaping is more incremental, more measured, and more thoughtful.


[1] Jonathan L. Reed, The HarperCollins Visual Guide to the New Testament:  What Archaeology Reveals about the First Christians (New York:  HarperOne, 2007), 8.





The Ides of March: Caesar and Christ

15 03 2010

Today is the Ides of March.  On this day Julius Caesar (100-44 BCE) was assassinated by a group of conspirators, lead by Marcus Junius Brutus  (85-42 BCE), who felt as if the old Republic of Roman was crumbling and a new entity, a kingdom, was arising in its place with Julius Caesar as King/Tyrant.

Nowhere explicitly is Julius Caesar mentioned in the NT; however, the future Roman domination of Judea that characterizes the social context of the NT is a ripple effect from Caesar.  (One might also note the influence, perhaps, on the name of one centurion of the Augustan Cohort who is named Julius [Acts 27:1, 3]).

An exhibit at the British Museum is displaying the only known gold coin which commemorates this event. The coin was pierced in antiquity and perhaps worn as a talisman in order to celebration “liberation.”  Numerous silver coins commemorating this event are extant.  This coinage was minted by the conspirators who felt they were liberating Rome from a tyrant.  (Of course, Octavian [the future Caesar Augustus] and Marc Antony felt differently).  For the next several years Rome was involved in civil war.  This link to the Guardian details this particular gold coin and its background.





A Plog: Greece and Turkey Study Tour

4 03 2010

This is plug-blog today, that is, a plog.  It’s a new term (neologism) for a blog that specifically plugs or advertises.  Actually plog has several meanings according to Wikipedia, but none of these are specifically when a blog’s main point is a promotion or an announcement.  So, I will claim a new definition.

Over the last few years, several individuals have asked when Central Seminary was planning on a study tour of Greece and Turkey.  It has been several years since we sponsored one of these study trips.  The photograph below is from one of these previous trips.  You can see several participants enjoying a relaxing rest in an ancient restroom.

A Popular Social Gathering Spot in Ancient Ephesus

The good news is that Central has scheduled a study tour to Greece and Turkey for this fall on October 6-19, 2010. The fully itinerary can be accessed via this link:  Central Sem Turkey 10 bro.  Specific information about enrollment can be found at this link:  Greece and Turkey:  Central Sem Turkey 10 enr.  This study tour is open for all interested individuals.

The archaeological remains and the geographical contexts of the various cities provide very different points of reference for reading the New Testament.  Reading Revelation becomes more intimate having walked the beaches of the island of Patmos.





Of Shipwrecks and Coins

2 06 2009

The narrative of Paul’s shipwreck (Acts 27:1-28:16) is one of the outstanding stories in the New Testament. As is quite fitting, studies on this passage often turn to literary works in the ancient world for details related to sea travel and shipwrecks. Evidently these narratives were quite popular. And of course, there are the archaeological remains of shipwrecks; first-century shipwrecks dot the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea. I certainly would not have wanted to insure a ship in the first century.

One might also at least give a brief nod to a little considered source for shipwrecks in the ancient world and that is the iconography found on ancient Roman coins. Actually ship motifs were a popular reverse type found on many Roman imperial coins. Yet reverses related to shipwrecks are, of course, difficult to find. Actually the ability to correlate reverses on Roman coins with specific events is extremely difficult; unfortunately we have little knowledge what provoked most of the images on coin reverses.  However, one coin minted under Marcus Aurelius (121-180 C.E.) probably does reference a shipwreck, one that the emperor was luck to have survived. The coin below illustrates this event.

aurelius155 This coin is a dupondius.  The obverse is the laureate head right of Marcus Aurelius.  The inscription reads M ANTONINVS AVG GERM SARM TRP XXXI.  The reverse depicts a galley with four rowers sailing right.  The god Neptune is before them (in the coin Neptune has been decapitated because of the hole).  The inscription reads FELICITATI AVG P P.    The inscription would translate as something like “to the good luck of the Augustus, Father of the Country.”

The record of this shipwreck come from Historia Augustus (a late fourth-century document), “Life of Marcus,” chapter XXVII:  “After settling affairs in the East he came to Athens and had himself initiated into the Eleusinian Mysteries . . . . Afterwards, when returning to Italy by ship, he encountered a violent storm on the way.  Then, upon reaching Italy by way of Brundisium, he donned the toga, and bade his troops do likewise . . . . When he reached Rome he triumphed . . . Presently he appointed Commodus his colleague in the tribunician power, bestowed largess upon the people, and celebrated marvelous games . . . ”

The event of the shipwreck must have happened around the fall of 176 C.E. when the Emperor was returning from the east.  These coins were probably minted around the end of 176 and may have been presented as good-luck presents on 1 January 177.  The holed nature of this coin may indicate that it was used as a good luck charm, maybe by someone who was a frequent traveler via the Mediterranean Sea.  Perhaps it was holed by a servant or soldier who was on board this galley and survived.

This coin is a tangible example of the precarious nature of sea travel, even for those at the top  of the hierarchy of power.  The Emperor credited his salvation from a near disaster by the hands of the gods Neptune and Felicitas.  Paul in his own shipwreck owed his salvation to an intervention and revelation from God:   “For this very night there stood by me an angel of the God to whom I belong and whom I worship, and he said, ‘Do not be afraid, Paul; you must stand before Caesar; and lo, God has granted you all those who sail with you'” (Acts 27:23-24).

One last interesting reference to gods in relationship to Paul’s shipwreck is that the ship that eventually conveyed Paul to Italy was “a ship of Alexandria with the Twin Brothers as figure-head” (Acts 28:11b).  The Twin Brothers are Castor and Pollux and are often called the Dioscuri.  These two gods were  a frequent motif on Roman coins.  The denarius below from the Roman Republic (46 B.C.E.) illustrates an example of the Dioscuri.

image01004





Critique

10 04 2008

I am always interested in how NT background works utilize numismatic evidence.  Frequently the material culture represented by numismatics is given only a few pages; these pages are typically devoted to the various denominations in circulation and where coin references are found in the NT.  Most information is minimal.  A case in point is found in James S. Jeffers’ book The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era:  Exploring the Background of Early Christianity (Eerdmans, 1999).  This book has many good qualities, but the information related to ancient numismatics is wrong several times within the short coinage section (pp. 149-154).  Here are a few examples.  On page 149 Jeffers writes, “He [Herod the Great] was the first Jewish ruler to use the Greek language on his coins, instead of Hebrew, and the first to put a date on his coins.”  Actually the first Jewish ruler to use Greek on his coins was Alexander Jannaeus (Yehonatan) 103-76 BCE.  See the reverse and observe of the coin below.

This is a bronze prutah.  On the obverse is an anchor with the Greek inscription “of King Alexander.”

On the reverse is a star with eight rays surrounded by a stylized diadem.  The Hebrew inscription reads “Yehonatan the King.”

This bilingual coin is a perfect example of the hellenistic influence in Judea.  Perhaps there are examples today of coinage in which two languages are present.  In a very concrete way, the coins of Jannaeus demonstrate how cultures clash and synthesize.

Here is another wrong statement from Jeffers:  “But his son Herod Philip, ruling the largely Gentile area of Ituraea and Trachonitis, put on his coins the image of the emperor on one side and the Jewish temple on the other” (p. 150).  It is true that Herod Philip did utilize the portrait of Roman emperors on his coins (specifically Augustus and Tiberius).  This acknowledgement and nod to the imperial family makes good sense for a patron-client society in which Philip is clearly a client beholding to imperial largess.  What may be most remarkable is that Herod Philip is the first Judean to place his image on a coin.  The last part of Jeffers statement is incorrect.  Philip did not place the “Jewish temple” on his coinage.  Rather, Philip placed a Roman temple on his coins.  It was a temple that he had constructed in the capital city (and mint city) of Caesarea Philippi (Panias).  The coin below is bronze and has a portrait of Tiberius on the obverse and the Roman temple on the reverse.  The lettering between the temple columns indicate that this coin was minted around 33/34 CE

Coins can serve a much more important function in NT background studies than just how much they were worth and what they could buy.  When approached from the four core social institutions of kinship, politics, religion, and economics, they help provide a window into the ideological perspective of at least some of individuals populating the ancient world and the pages of the Bible.  

 





The Symbol of Palms

16 03 2008

Since this is Palm Sunday, I thought it might be appropriate to illustrate via numismatics the powerful symbol of palms in the ancient world.

Of course Palm Sunday is a bit of a misnomer since the use of palms to greet Jesus is only specifically mentioned in the Gospel of John (12:12-19).  In Matt 21:1-9 the crowds greet Jesus with garments and “branches from the trees” (v. 8).  Mark’s account in 11:1-10 records also the reference to garments and adds “leafy branches which they had cut from the fields” (v. 8).  Luke, 19:28-40, omits any reference to branches and only notes the use of garments. 

The numismatic evidence points to the frequent use of a palm branch (lulav) (singular), palm branches (plural) or a palm tree as referencing  the land of Judea.  Interestingly, this symbol was used on coins minted by Romans (prefects and victorious Emperors), Judean client kings, and also Judean rebel leaders.  While these groups would hardly agree on any other issue, they all acknowledged the palm as a fixed symbol for the land and people of Judea.  Just a few numismatic examples of this symbol are below.

tn_valerius-gratus.jpg

Bronze prutah, minted by Valerius Gratus (15-26 C.E.) under Tiberius

tn_antonius-felix.jpg

Bronze prutah, minted by Antonius Felix (52-59 C.E.) under Claudius

tn_herod-antipas.jpg

Bronze, full denomination, minted under Herod Antipas, (4 B.C.E to 40 C.E.)

tn_agrippa-ii.jpg

Bronze, minted by Agrippa the II (55 to 95 C.E.) during the reign of Domitian

tn_titus-capta.jpg

Silver denarius, minted under Titus (79-81 C.E.).  This coin is placed in the Judaea Capta series.  It illustrates Rome’s victory in the Judean War of 66-70 C.E.

tn_bar-kochba.jpg

Middle Bronze with the seven branched date palm.  Minted during the Bar Kochba rebellion (132-135 C.E.)

While the palm was a dominant symbol for the land and people of Judea, it was also used in other contexts.  There are earlier usages of the palm during the time of the Roman Republic as illustrated below with a coin minted by the moneyer L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi.  The coin has a rider waving a palm branch while riding a horse.

tn_000235.jpg

The palm branch was also used later on Roman coins.  The coin below was minted by Constantine I (the Great).  On the reverse is a palm surrounded by legionary standards.

tn_contantine-great.jpg

Frequently in Roman usage, the palm is associated with particular goddesses, especially victory, Nike.





Numismatics and Looting

1 02 2008

An important issue related to numismatics and the study of the New Testament is about integrity in the use of sources. There has been an ongoing discussion, often quite heated, between archaeologists and hobbyists related to numismatics. It ultimately revolves around the procuring of coins for hobbyists and how this can destroy the original provenance of the coins. The looting of sites and dispersion of coin hoards can cause the loss of valuable insights into social, cultural and historical backgrounds. It is a crime against history and knowledge to loot, whether looting personally or being the receiver of looted goods. Does one want to eat fruit from a rotting tree? On the other hand, what is one to do with all the millions of coins in private collectors’ hands today (coins that now have no original provenance)? The following blog post by Nathan Elkins is well written and provides many of the bones of contention: “Archaeologist Don’t Care about Ancient Coins?” There are  also some other links within this blog that contribute to an ongoing discussion.








Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started