Book Review: Sweeney Todd and the String of Pearls by Yuri Rasovsky


Author: Yuri Rasovsky
Title: Sweeney Todd and the String of Pearls: An Audio Melodrama in Three Despicable Acts (Dramatized)
Narrator: Robert Dean, Martin Jarvis, Moira Quirk, Simon Templeman, Phil Proctor, Rosalind Ayres, W. Morgan Sheppard
Publication Info: Blackstone Audio, Inc. (2007) [based on the serial published in 1846–47]
Summary/Review:

This excellent full cast audio drama adapts the classic penny dreadful The String of Pearls.  The story involves Sweeney Todd, a barber with elaborate contraptions for murdering his customers for their valuables and Mrs. Lovett who uses the victims’ flesh for her popular meat pies.  It’s as gory as you might imagine (more so if you have assumptions about Victorian sensibilities) and the cast perform it with relish. 

Rating: ****

Movie Review: Weapons (2025)


Title: Weapons
Release Date: August 8, 2025
Director: Zach Cregger
Production Company:  New Line Cinema | Subconscious | Vertigo Entertainment | BoulderLight Pictures
Main Cast:

  • Josh Brolin as Archer Graff
  • Julia Garner as Justine Gandy
  • Alden Ehrenreich as Paul Morgan
  • Austin Abrams as James
  • Cary Christopher as Alex Lilly
  • Toby Huss as Ed Locke
  • Benedict Wong as Marcus Miller
  • Amy Madigan as Gladys
  • Sara Paxton as Erica
  • Justin Long as Gary
  • June Diane Raphael as Donna Morgan
  • Whitmer Thomas as Alex’s father
  • Callie Schuttera as Alex’s mother
  • Luke Speakman as Matthew Graff
  • Clayton Farris as Terry Miller
  • Scarlett Sher as the child narrator

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

When all but one child from the same class mysteriously vanish on the same night at exactly the same time, a community is left questioning who or what is behind their disappearance.

My Thoughts:

I’ve been meaning to see Weapons since it came out last summer and was informed to go into it cold.  But honestly, I’m not even sure I could writer a summary that would spoil this movie because it keeps going into so many unexpected directions.  The basic premise is that 17 children – all from the same third grade class – all leave their homes in the middle of the night and disappear.

From the promotion of the movie, I expected that the movie would be about the teacher of that class trying to find out what happened to the children, but instead the movie defies the conventions of horror films while telling a more complex story.  It’s divided into chapters, each offering the perspective of a different character:

  • Justine – the teacher who is targeted by paranoid parents and has a drinking problem
  • Archer – a parent who is grieving over the loss of his son and one of Justine’s tormentors
  • Paul – a cop who has a relationship with Justine and tries to arrest James
  • James – a homeless man with a substance abuse problem who steals to pay for his drugs
  • Marcus – the sympathetic principal of the elementary school
  • Alex – a shy child who is the only member of Justine’s class who does not go missing

These stories overlap, sometimes showing alternate perspectives, and with the different narratives coming together in a satisfying way.  While the movie starts off as a psychological horror with jump scares, I was not at all prepared for how horrifically gory it gets in the final third, so be warned if gore and violence trouble you.  Also defying expectations is that this movie can be extremely funny, especially at the worst parts. Finally, Amy Madigan in appears in this movie as one of the most terrifying villains in horror movie history and should receive all the awards for her performance.

Rating: ****

Movie Review: Fréwaka (2025)


Title: Fréwaka
Release Date: April 25, 2025
Director: Aislinn Clarke
Production Company: Screen Ireland | Cine4 | DoubleBand Films | Wildcard Distribution
Main Cast:

  • Bríd Ní Neachtain as Peig
  • Clare Monnelly as Shoo
  • Aleksandra Bystrzhitskaya as Mila

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

Care worker Shoo, who is haunted by a personal tragedy, is sent to a remote village to care for an agoraphobic woman, who fears both her neighbours and the Na Sídhe – sinister folkloric entities she believes abducted her decades before.

My Thoughts:

This Irish language film explores grief and intergenerational trauma through folk horror.  The movie begins in 1973 when a bride named Peig disappears on her wedding night.  In the next scene in present day Dublin, a woman commits suicide, her decaying body found weeks afterward.  The deceased woman’s daughter, Siubhán or “Shoo,” arrives to clean out her mother’s flat with the help of Mila, her Ukrainian wife-to-be.  When given a home care worker assignment that requires an Irish language speaker in a remote village, Shoo leaves the very pregnant Mila behind to finish the clean-up.

Shoo’s client is the elderly Peig, who is resistant to anyone entering her house and follows superstitions by placing objects around the doors and windows.  Against all odds, Shoo and Peig begin to bond, and Peig reveals that she was abducted by supernatural beings she only refers to as “them.”  As the days pass, Shoo begins to believe that Peig’s fears are real.

This is not a movie that explains a lot of things and it’s ambiguity keeps one on their toes. If the movie is about Shoo encountering supernatural forces or Shoo having a mental breakdown are equally valid interpretations.  Thematically, this is a movie that is very much a story of Ireland in the present day despite its folk horror trappings.  When Peig describes the place to where she was abducted she uses imagery that hearkens to the Great Hunger, the Troubles, the Magdalene laundries, and sexual abuse in the Catholic Church.  As James Joyce’s character Stephen Dedalus stated “History is the nightmare from which I’m trying to awake,” and the true horror of this film is the weight of the trauma of Irish history, especially for women.

Rating: ****

TV Review: Stranger Things (2025)


TitleStranger Things
Release Dates: 2025
Season: 5
Number of Episodes: 8

MILD SPOILERS IN THE SUMMARY/REVIEW BELOW THE TRAILER

Summary/Review:

Ten years ago, Stranger Things debuted and it was one of the great seasons of television in the streaming age. It was a pastiche on 1980s horror and thriller movies but also an original story of multiple generations in small-town America coming together to face a supernatural threat.  The young cast of the show quickly became stars while veteran actors had a career revival.  Subsequent seasons of the show were hit and miss, but interesting enough to keep me interested in the ongoing plot while being charmed by the talent of the actors bringing their characters to life.

And so the final season, much like Return of the Jedi, doesn’t have to be perfect as long as it allows us to see how these characters changed and grow so their able to finally overcome evil and have a happy ending.  And this season, for the most part achieves this.  It begins close to two years after the end of Season 4 when an “earthquake” ruptured Hawkins, Indiana.  The town has been placed under quarantine (relatable) and military occupation (very relatable).  Our core group of characters have made Hawkins’ radio station there home base, where Robin has taken over as DJ.

As the season begins, they’ve been conducting crawls – stowing away on military excursions into the upside down – in order to find and kill Vecna (a.k.a Hendy Creel).  Meanwhile, the military is now lead by Dr. Kay (Linda Hamilton, who in the time this was set was starring in the TV fantasy series Beauty and the Beast) is intent on capturing El to use her to create more children who can be weapons.  And Vecna has a plan to to abduct 12 children whose energy he will use to destroy the world, starting with Mike and Nancy’s little sister Holly Wheeler.

The early episodes are a bit wobbly.  There’s a lot of dialogue that’s just exposition.  Also, because Holly is essentially a new character (played wonderfully by Nell Fisher) a lot of time is spent establishing at the expense of the main characters.  In fact the whole season has to deal with juggling with so many characters.  Some of the more interesting side characters don’t get much to do (Erica, Mr. Clarke, Kali).  On the other, the show’s most annoying character, Murray, while not as prominent as in the previous two seasons still gets more screen time than he deserves.

I did not like that our core group have effectively become a heavily-armed militia which seems like a lot for ordinary people.  I also thought the mystery of the Upside Down was more interesting when it was ineffable, before the revelation of Vecna as a monster who threatens our heroes with pithy sayings.  Of course, these are 80s references respectively to Rambo and Freddy Krueger, and it could have been a lot worse.

The show improves as the season goes along and there are several great moments.  These include Holly joining with Max in “Henry’s mind” and becoming a leader on her own as well as Will’s discovery of the powers he got from Vecna (which is nicely tied in with his coming out story).  The final episode allows each of the characters to contribute to their ultimate victory in a satisfying way. The epilogue of the story jumps forward 18 months where we see how things turn out for each of the major characters.  This could be self-indulgent, but after spending five seasons with these characters it feels deserved.  The show ends perfectly by coming full circle with a final game of Dungeons & Dragons.

Previous posts:

Movie Review: Frankenstein (2025)


Title: Frankenstein
Release Date: October 17, 2025
Director: Guillermo del Toro
Production Company:  Double Dare You | Demilo Films | Bluegrass 7
Main Cast:

  • Oscar Isaac as Baron Victor Frankenstein
    • Christian Convery as young Victor
  • Jacob Elordi as the Creature
  • Mia Goth as:
    • Lady Elizabeth Harlander
    • Baroness Claire Frankenstein
  • Felix Kammerer as William Frankenstein
  • David Bradley as the Blind Man
  • Lars Mikkelsen as Captain Anderson
  • Charles Dance as Baron Leopold Frankenstein
  • Christoph Waltz as Henrich Harlanders
  • Kyle Gatehouse as the Young Hunter
  • Lauren Collins as Alma
  • Sofia Galasso as Anna-Maria
  • Ralph Ineson as Professor Krempe
  • Burn Gorman as an executioner

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

Dr. Victor Frankenstein, a brilliant but egotistical scientist, brings a creature to life in a monstrous experiment that ultimately leads to the undoing of both the creator and his tragic creation.

My Thoughts:

Guillermo del Toro love his monsters so it seems inevitable that he would tackle the ur-monster story of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein.  The movie is more faithful to the novel than other film adaptations although there are still many significant differences (and it’s been so long since I read the book that I can’t tell how much it differs).  Del Toro’s visual style stands out in this adaptation that embraces the gothic feel of the story.  The movie is not not at all subtle in its symbolism – a character even addresses Victor Frankenstein to his face as “the real monster” – so I kind of had to accept that del Toro was going for a clear melodrama and morality tale.

One of the strong points of the movie is that it is split into Victor’s story and the creature’s story, showing their differing perspectives.  Jacob Elordi’s performance as the creature as excellent, his movement resembling a large child exploring the child.  I also enjoyed Mia Goth as Elizabeth who is depicted as a woman who defies the expectations of her time with her curiosity and compassion for the creature.  The cast also includes a lot of familiar British character actors such as David Bradley as the Blind Man and Charles Dance as Victor’s strict father.  Burn Gorman and Ralph Ineson also appear in small parts.

While it’s not a perfect adaptation of Shelley’s classic novel, it is an enjoyable to see del Toro’s interpretation.

Rating: ***1/2

Book Review: Black Flame by Gretchen Felker-Martin


Author: Gretchen Felker-Martin
Title: Black Flame
Narrator: Dana Aronowitz
Publication Info: MacMillan Audio, 2025
Summary/Review:

I feel bad about reviewing this book since I don’t think I quite “get” what happened in this book.  What I can tell you is that it is psychological and body horror set in New York City in the 1980s set around the protagonist Ellen Kramer.  Ellen is a film archivist tasked with restoring The Baroness, a queer and sexually-explicit movie made in Germany’s Weimar Republic that was long believed to have been destroyed by the Nazis.

While working on the film, Ellen begins experiences the characters and scenarios of the movie in her real life, with the tension being whether she’s delusional or experiencing the supernatural.  But the horrors in this book go beyond the occult to the horrors of reality – the psychological damage Ellen suffers from her abusive family, sexual violence, and the Holocaust.  But through the restoration of the film, Ellen begins to transform as well revealing deeply repressed sexuality and gender identity.  Again, I can’t really say if I totally figured out everything that happened in this book, but I can say that it’s unlike any work of fiction I’ve ever read before.

Recommended books:
Rating:

365 Movies in 365 Days: In Order Not to Be Here (2002)


This year I’m trying to watch one movie every day of the year, with the provision that the movie be no longer than 36.5 minutes long. I’ll be selecting movies randomly from this list that’s already way too long, but I still welcome suggestions for short films.

Title: In Order Not to Be Here
Release Date: November 10, 2002
Director: Deborah Stratman
Production Company: Pythagoras Film
Main Cast:

  • Joaquin De La Puente – Running Man

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

A night flight through hysteria and police surveillance in suburban America.

My Thoughts:

Tension builds with the sequencing of shots of the seemingly mundane.  Much of this film is static shots of late night settings in suburban America, the ambient sounds of buzzing electric lights and passing cars sounding absurdly loud.  This is sandwiched between scenes of (actual or recreated?) police videos using thermal imaging.  The line between liminal spaces and the surveillance state has never been so terrifying.

Rating: ***1/2

Halloween Horror Movie Review: Ghostwatch (1992)


Title: Ghostwatch
Release Date: October 31, 1992
Director: Stephen Volk
Production Company: BBC
Main Cast:

  • Michael Parkinson- Presenter
  • Sarah Greene – Reporter
  • Gillian Bevan – Dr Lin Pascoe
  • Brid Brennan – Pamela Early
  • Mike Smith – Phone-In Presenter
  • Craig Charles – Interviewer
  • Michelle Wesson – Suzanne Early
  • Cherisse Wesson – Kim Early
  • Chris Miller – Cameraman
  • Mike Aiton – Sound Recordist
  • Mark Lewis (Alan Demescu
  • Colin Stinton (Dr Emilio Silvestri

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

For Halloween 1992, the BBC decides to broadcast an investigation into the supernatural, hosted by TV chat-show legend Michael Parkinson. Parky (assisted by Mike Smith, Sarah Greene & Craig Charles) and a camera crew attempt to discover the truth behind the most haunted house in Britain. This ground-breaking live television experiment does not go as planned, however.

My Thoughts:

The effect of this movie is probably diminished compared to watching it when it aired on the BBC on Halloween night in 1991.  That being said, I expect claims that people were traumatized because they thought it was real are exaggerated in the same way as “The War of the Worlds” radio broadcast.  Nevertheless, the movie is presented as a live TV broadcast featuring familiar BBC personalities playing themselves, such as presenter Michael Parkinson and Red Dwarf star Craig Charles doing jokey interviews.  The investigation of a supposedly haunted house and a polteirgeist who may be tormenting two young girls is a slow burn, with things not getting really weird and spooky until about the final 20 minutes.  There’s a bit of nostalgia seeing the “lo-fi” broadcast style of that era which feels so different from the reality TV template that has become so common in the 21st century.

Rating:  ***

Halloween Horror Movie Review: The Curse of Frankenstein (1957)


Title: The Curse of Frankenstein
Release Date: May 2, 1957
Director: Terence Fisher
Production Company: Hammer Film Productions
Main Cast:

  • Peter Cushing as Baron Victor Frankenstein
    • Melvyn Hayes as Young Victor
  • Hazel Court as Elizabeth Lavenza
    • Sally Walsh as Young Elizabeth
  • Robert Urquhart as Paul Krempe
  • Christopher Lee as the Creature
  • Valerie Gaunt as Justine Moritz
  • Paul Hardtmuth as Professor Bernstein
  • Noel Hood as Aunt Sophia Lavenza
  • Fred Johnson as Grandpa
  • Claude Kingston as Little Boy
  • Alex Gallier as Priest
  • Michael Mulcaster as Warder
  • Andrew Leigh as Burgomaster
  • Ann Blake as Wife
  • Middleton Woods as Lecturer
  • Raymond Ray as Uncle

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

Baron Victor Frankenstein has discovered life’s secret and unleashed a blood-curdling chain of events resulting from his creation: a cursed creature with a horrid face — and a tendency to kill.

My Thoughts:

The Hammer Film take on Frankenstein feels more true to the Mary Shelley original than some other interpretations.  The focus here is clearly on Baron Frankenstein, the man, rather than monster.  His obsession with creating life and callous indifference to others is told through his relationship with his childhood tutor and friend Paul Krempe, who tries to be the conscience for Frankenstein.  The acting is very good although the argument gets repetitive.  The movies production design, sets, and bold colors are also terrific.  Also, young Peter Cushing is rather handsome.  Actually, everyone in this movie is pretty hot, if that’s your thing.

Rating: ***1/2

Halloween Horror Movie Review: Tigers Are Not Afraid (2017)


Title: Tigers Are Not Afraid
Release Date: November 2, 2017
Director: Issa López
Production Company:Peligrosa | Filmadora | Nacional Videocine
Main Cast:

  • Paola Lara as Estrella
  • Juan Ramón López as El Shine
  • Ianis Guerrero as Caco
  • Rodrigo Cortés as Pop
  • Hanssel Casillas as Tucsi
  • Nery Arredondo as Maxwell “Morrito” Vázquez
  • Tenoch Huerta as El Chino
  • Cuauhlti Jiménez as Jerry
  • Mauricio Osorio as Tio
  • Mónica del Carmen as Estrella’s teacher
  • Benny Emmanuel as Brayan
  • Viviana Amaya as Estrella’s mother

Synopsis (via Letterboxd):

A dark fairy tale about a gang of five children trying to survive the horrific violence of the cartels and the ghosts created every day by the drug war.

My Thoughts:

This bleak film is set in Mexico where the drug wars and human trafficking have left orphaned children behind on the city streets.  Estrella, a girl around 12-years-old, comes home from school to find her mother missing.  Growing hungry she finds a group of boys, some of whom are very young, lead by Shine.  They are reluctant to admit a girl to their group but Estrella persists and proves her value.  Soon the children find that not only are they struggling to survive without protective adults, but that the local crime boss is after them.  Horrible violence and tragedy ensue.  The sensitive portrayal of children in extraordinary situations blended with horror and fantasy elements reminds me of Pan’s Labyrinth (Guillermo del Toro is a fan).  But the real horror is that children throughout the world live like this every day.

Rating: ****