Why metaphors make good insults: perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics

Philosophical Studies 174 (1):47-64 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Metaphors are powerful communicative tools because they produce ”framing effects’. These effects are especially palpable when the metaphor is an insult that denigrates the hearer or someone he cares about. In such cases, just comprehending the metaphor produces a kind of ”complicity’ that cannot easily be undone by denying the speaker’s claim. Several theorists have taken this to show that metaphors are engaged in a different line of work from ordinary communication. Against this, I argue that metaphorical insults are rhetorically powerful because they combine perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics in the service of speech acts with assertoric force.

Author's Profile

Elisabeth Camp
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-05

Downloads
645 (#70,804)

6 months
152 (#61,148)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?