“If it cannot predict, then it is not science”: I argue social anthropology can

Abstract

This paper argues that social anthropology can predict some social change. It introduces a structural-functionalist theory of fashion to counter the objection that functionalist anthropology ignores social change. It proposes that we have probably misperceived the initial objection. It identifies a tempting assumption. Then it argues that the structural-functionalist theory of fashion enables prediction. The paper also features a little rhyme and a diary entry, which you might wish to skip past. The paper itself is PUBLISHABLE and important. (Draft was written fast though, forgive. No intentional use of AI, but does it add its own foxy word change/error sometimes?)

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-10-03

Downloads
125 (#114,341)

6 months
125 (#71,257)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?