thought experiments at the edge of conceptual breakdown

In Barry Stocker & Michael Mack, The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Literature. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 581-600 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, I first provide an historical introduction on what a thought experiment is by citing various popular examples from science and philosophy. I then propose that we should identify a simple thought experiment with a story/question pair that aims at testing a certain hypothesis whose question must be generalizable to a scientific or a philosophical question. Next I discuss the controversy concerning the divergence between our “intuitions” in answering such questions depending on our culture and how this has recently given rise to “experimental philosophy”. I then take up complex thought experiments. I argue that a thought experiment may have “negative heuristics” as it may help us reveal how our concepts may break down when applied to areas outside their ordinary domain.

Author's Profile

Ilhan Inan
Koc University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-27

Downloads
718 (#62,605)

6 months
130 (#70,311)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?