Abstract

In “International Recognition of Palestine and the Risk of a West Bank ‘Frontier’” (published in the Europe-based online journal, "E-International Relations" in October 2025), sociologist and political scientist James Ron warns that recent diplomatic recognition of a Palestinian state—by more than 150 countries, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Portugal, and the United Kingdom—could, under specific scenarios, unintentionally heighten the danger of large-scale violence in the West Bank. Drawing on his comparative research on state violence in Serbia and Israel (Frontiers and Ghettos, University of California Press, 2003), Ron argues that when states lose uncontested control over adjacent territories without the protection of robust international peacekeeping forces, they may transform those newly independent regions into lawless frontiers characterized by ethnic cleansing and unrestrained force. The essay cautions that if the West Bank were legally detached from Israel without durable international security guarantees, it could mirror Gaza’s tragic trajectory—an area externalized from Israel’s legal and moral responsibility and subjected to frontier-style warfare. Using cases from Bosnia, the Sandžak, Lebanon, and Gaza, Ron demonstrates how sovereignty, geography, and legal jurisdiction shape the intensity of violence. This analysis speaks to scholars and policymakers concerned with international law, state sovereignty, human-rights protection, and conflict prevention. It underscores a central lesson from comparative political violence: recognition without protection can turn liberation into catastrophe.