Father André Scrima is one of the most enigmatic figures of the Romanian Orthodox Church. Everything related to him passes as extraordinary. He was an exception among the Romanian intellectuals who suffered under communism. Beyond that, his journeys and spiritual experiences possess something indescribable, almost sacramental. His presence overwhelmed those who met him and his writings retained this trait. The present study focuses on Scrima’s Christology, highlighting its uniqueness and its practical implications. Although Scrima does not dedicate a book to (...) the subject, all of his writings refer to it. However, due to his distinctiveness, it is difficult to organize his Christology in a systematic way. The most lucrative approach is to group his texts along the hermeneutical moments that define his writing: images, stories and stances. In Scrima’s logic, all words/signs are the very synthesis of a spiritual experience, all stories develop the theo-logical synthesis of the signs, and the relation between the stories forms the tradition as a set of interrogations and communitarian commitments. If we evaluate Scrima’s Christology in this manner, we do not come to a system, but to a succession of images. The core of these images re-mains the same, Jesus Christ, yet it is seen in nuances that unveil His beauty – Stranger, Gate, Logos, Name above all names –, in an unpredictable play of perspectives. It can be said that Scrima’s approach resembles a kaleidoscope, which, by using mirrors and light, gives an insight to the unsuspected possibilities of all fixed forms. (shrink)

Der Beitrag bietet eine Einführung in Bots und Roboter und stellt zentrale philosophische Themen und Fragen dar, die sich im Kontext dieser Technologien ergeben. Es werden unter anderem anthropologische und ethische Themen wie die Mensch-Technik-Abgrenzung, Anthropomorphismus, moralische Rechte und Handlungsfähigkeit, (epistemische) Gerechtigkeit, Täuschung und Manipulation, Vulnerabilität und Diversität sowie Relationalität diskutiert.

Posts on social media platforms like Twitter are sometimes the products of deceptively designed bots. These bots can cause obvious epistemic problems, such as tricking human users into believing the contents of misleading posts. However, less-considered epistemic problems involve false bot judgements where a human user mistakes another human user’s post for a bot-post, or where a human user mistakenly believes that bots are the primary vehicles for tokening certain content on social media. This paper takes up (...) three questions concerning false bot judgements: what exactly are their associated epistemic harms, just how harmful are they, and what should we do about them? (shrink)

The automation of online social life is an urgent issue for researchers and the public alike. However, one of the most significant uses of such technologies seems to have gone largely unnoticed by the research community: religion. Focusing on Islamic Prayer Apps, which automatically post prayers from its users’ accounts, we show that even one such service is already responsible for millions of tweets daily, constituting a significant portion of Arabic-language Twitter traffic. We argue that the fact that a phenomenon (...) of these proportions has gone unnoticed by researchers reveals an opportunity to broaden the scope of the current research agenda on online automation. (shrink)

This paper describes the ways in which trolls and bots impede the acquisition of knowledge online. I distinguish between three ways in which trolls and bots can impede knowledge acquisition, namely, by deceiving, by encouraging misplaced skepticism, and by interfering with the acquisition of warrant concerning persons and content encountered online. I argue that these threats are difficult to resist simultaneously. I argue, further, that the threat that trolls and bots pose to knowledge acquisition goes beyond the (...) mere threat of online misinformation, or the more familiar threat posed by liars offline. Trolls and bots are, in effect, fake persons. Consequently, trolls and bots can systemically interfere with knowledge acquisition by manipulating the signals whereby individuals acquire knowledge from one another online. I conclude with a brief discussion of some possible remedies for the problem of fake persons. (shrink)

The technology to create and automate large numbers of fake social media users, or “social bots”, is becoming increasingly more accessible to private individuals. This paper explores one potential use of the technology, namely the creation of “political bots”: social bots aimed at influencing the political opinions of others. Despite initial worries about licensing the use of such bots by private individuals, this paper provides an, albeit limited, argument in favour of this. The argument begins by (...) providing a prima facie case in favour of these political bots and proceeds by attempting to answer a series of potential objections. These objections are based on (1) the dangerous effectiveness of the technology; the (2) corruptive, (3) deceitful and (4) manipulating nature of political bots; (5) the worry that the technology will lead to chaos and be detrimental to trust online; and (6) practical issues involved in ensuring acceptable use of the technology. In all cases I will argue that the objections are overestimated, and that a closer look at the use of political bots helps us realise that using them is simply a new way of speaking up in modern society. (shrink)

In recent years, there has been a huge increase in the number of bots online, varying from Web crawlers for search engines, to chatbots for online customer service, spambots on social media, and content-editing bots in online collaboration communities. The online world has turned into an ecosystem of bots. However, our knowledge of how these automated agents are interacting with each other is rather poor. Bots are predictable automatons that do not have the capacity for emotions, (...) meaning-making, creativity, and sociality and it is hence natural to expect interactions between bots to be relatively predictable and uneventful. In this article, we analyze the interactions between bots that edit articles on Wikipedia. We track the extent to which bots undid each other’s edits over the period 2001–2010, model how pairs of bots interact over time, and identify different types of interaction trajectories. We find that, although Wikipedia bots are intended to support the encyclopedia, they often undo each other’s edits and these sterile “fights” may sometimes continue for years. Unlike humans on Wikipedia, bots’ interactions tend to occur over longer periods of time and to be more reciprocated. Yet, just like humans, bots in different cultural environments may behave differently. Our research suggests that even relatively “dumb” bots may give rise to complex interactions, and this carries important implications for Artificial Intelligence research. Understanding what affects bot-bot interactions is crucial for managing social media well, providing adequate cyber-security, and designing well functioning autonomous vehicles. (shrink)

English - language Wikipedia is constantly being plagued by vandalistic contributions on a massive scale. In order to fight them its volunteer contributors deploy an array of software tools and autonomous bots. After an analysis of their functioning and the ‘ coactivity ’ in use between humans and bots, this research ‘ discloses ’ the moral issues that emerge from the combined patrolling by humans and bots. Administrators provide the stronger tools only to trusted users, thereby creating (...) a new hierarchical layer. Further, surveillance exhibits several troubling features : questionable profiling practices, the use of the controversial measure of reputation, ‘ oversurveillance ’ where quantity trumps quality, and a prospective loss of the required moral skills whenever bots take over from humans. The most troubling aspect, though, is that Wikipedia has become a Janus - faced institution. One face is the basic platform of MediaWiki software, transparent to all. Its other face is the anti - vandalism system, which, in contrast, is opaque to the average user, in particular as a result of the algorithms and neural networks in use. Finally it is argued that this secrecy impedes a much needed discussion to unfold ; a discussion that should focus on a ‘ rebalancing ’ of the anti - vandalism system and the development of more ethical information practices towards contributors. (shrink)

This study investigated the comparative impact of chat-bots and deep learning of accounting officers' work effectiveness in Anambra State. A correlation research design was adopted, and a structured questionnaire was administered using Artificial Intelligence Questionnaire (AIQ) and Work Effectiveness Questionnaire (WEQ) to 221 accountants in business organizations. The study found a moderate positive relationship between automated chat-bots and work effectiveness (r = .465, N = 221) and a low positive relationship between deep learning machines and work effectiveness (r (...) = .305, N = 221). The study also revealed significant relationships between both automated chat-bots and deep learning machines with work effectiveness. The findings have implications for business organizations, highlighting the need to adopt AI technologies to enhance financial management capabilities, productivity, and efficiency. The study recommends that business organizations adopt automated chat-bots and deep learning machines to improve accounting practices and provide training and development opportunities for accounting officers. This study contributes to knowledge theoretically, practically, and methodologically, providing insights into the relationship between AI technologies and work effectiveness in accounting. (shrink)

AI, in the form of artificial carers, provides a possible solution to the problem of a growing elderly population Yet, concerns remain that artificial carers ( such as care-or chat-bots) could not emphathize with patients to the extent that humans can. Utilising the concept of empathy perception,we propose a Turing-type test that could check whether artificial carers could do many of the menial tasks human carers currently undertake, and in the process, free up more time for doctors to offer (...) empathy. -/- . (shrink)

In a paper and a reply to critics published in _Informal Logic_, I argue that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. To appeal to expert opinion is to take an expert’s judgment that _p_ is the case as evidence for _p_. Such appeals to expert opinion are weak, I argue, because the fact that an expert judges that _p_ does not make it significantly more likely that _p_ is true or probable, as evidence from empirical studies on expert performance (...) suggests. Unlike other critics of this argument, who take issue with the empirical evidence on expert performance, David Botting says that he wants to take issue with the premise that reliability is a necessary condition for the strength of appeals to expert opinion. I respond to Botting’s objections and argue that they miss their intended target. I also argue that his attempt to show that arguments from expert opinion are strong is unsuccessful. (shrink)

n hospitals, preliminary health assessments are typically performed by doctors, involving direct physical contact with patients. This practice not only exposes healthcare workers to potential infectious diseases but also consumes valuable time that could be better spent on critical cases. Routine checks, which could be automated, often contribute to longer patient wait times and reduced overall efficiency in hospital operations. The COVID-19 pandemic has further emphasized the importance of minimizing human-to-human contact, with the World Health Organization (WHO) advocating for social (...) distancing and contactless interaction to prevent the spread of the virus. This situation highlights a pressing need for innovative solutions that maintain highquality care while reducing direct physical contact. This project addresses the challenge by developing an Autonomous Smart Medical Assistant Robot capable of performing contactless preliminary health testing. Designed to automate routine assessments, the robot significantly reduces doctors’ workload, improves hospital workflow, and enhances patient management. It has been precisely designed and simulated using Autodesk Fusion 360, ensuring mechanical accuracy, while its control system is programmed using the Arduino IDE, allowing seamless integration of health-monitoring sensors and autonomous functionality. Beyond health assessments, the robot also provides emotional support to patients and can be used for the transport of medical supplies between healthcare providers and patients. This multifunctional capability not only enhances safety by limiting unnecessary exposure but also introduces operational efficiency and emotional care into medical settings. The implementation of this robot represents a step toward smarter, safer, and more compassionate healthcare environments. (shrink)

IoT Security Enhancement Using Machine Learning for Real-Time Threat Detection. The Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of interconnected devices that communicate over the internet, offering convenience and efficiency but also posing significant security risks. This project focuses on enhancing IoT security by detecting cyber threats such as DDoS, DoS, reconnaissance, and data theft in real-time. The main objective is to improve the accuracy and efficiency of threat detection using machine learning models like Random Forest. The system analyzes key (...) network behaviors, including data flow, traffic anomalies, and device interaction patterns. Unlike traditional rule-based intrusion detection systems, this approach dynamically monitors network activities to identify potential threats. The system has wide applications across domains such as smart homes, industrial IoT, healthcare, and autonomous systems, contributing to a more secure and resilient IoT ecosystem. (shrink)

Open-content communities that focus on co-creation without requirements for entry have to face the issue of institutional trust in contributors. This research investigates the various ways in which these communities manage this issue. It is shown that communities of open-source software—continue to—rely mainly on hierarchy (reserving write-access for higher echelons), which substitutes (the need for) trust. Encyclopedic communities, though, largely avoid this solution. In the particular case of Wikipedia, which is confronted with persistent vandalism, another arrangement has been pioneered instead. (...) Trust (i.e. full write-access) is ‘backgrounded’ by means of a permanent mobilization of Wikipedians to monitor incoming edits. Computational approaches have been developed for the purpose, yielding both sophisticated monitoring tools that are used by human patrollers, and bots that operate autonomously. Measures of reputation are also under investigation within Wikipedia; their incorporation in monitoring efforts, as an indicator of the trustworthiness of editors, is envisaged. These collective monitoring efforts are interpreted as focusing on avoiding possible damage being inflicted on Wikipedian spaces, thereby being allowed to keep the discretionary powers of editing intact for all users. Further, the essential differences between backgrounding and substituting trust are elaborated. Finally it is argued that the Wikipedian monitoring of new edits, especially by its heavy reliance on computational tools, raises a number of moral questions that need to be answered urgently. (shrink)

The new avatars and bots modeled after humans, the large language models with a “persona,” and the seemingly autonomously acting robots raise the question of whether AI technologies can also possess personhood or at least be part of our personhood. Do we extend our personhood through living or death bots in the digital realm? This article explores the application of the moral concept of personhood to AI technologies. It presents a twofold thesis: first, it illustrates, through various examples, (...) how the concept of personhood is being disrupted in the context of AI technologies. Second, it discusses the potential evolution of the concept and argues for abandoning the personhood concept in AI ethics, based on reasons such as its vagueness, harmful and discriminatory character, and disconnection from society. Finally, the article outlines future perspectives for approaches moving forward, emphasizing the need for conceptual justice in moral concepts. (shrink)

Many virtual communities that rely on user-generated content (such as social news sites, citizen journals, and encyclopedias in particular) offer unrestricted and immediate ‘write access’ to every contributor. It is argued that these communities do not just assume that the trust granted by that policy is well-placed; they have developed extensive mechanisms that underpin the trust involved (‘backgrounding’). These target contributors (stipulating legal terms of use and developing etiquette, both underscored by sanctions) as well as the contents contributed by them (...) (patrolling for illegal and/or vandalist content, variously performed by humans and bots; voting schemes). Backgrounding trust is argued to be important since it facilitates the avoidance of bureaucratic measures that may easily cause unrest among community members and chase them away. (shrink)

In order to fight massive vandalism the English- language Wikipedia has developed a system of surveillance which is carried out by humans and bots, supported by various tools. Central to the selection of edits for inspection is the process of using filters or profiles. Can this profiling be justified? On the basis of a careful reading of Frederick Schauer’s books about rules in general (1991) and profiling in particular (2003) I arrive at several conclusions. The effectiveness, efficiency, and risk-aversion (...) of edit selection all greatly increase as a result. The argument for increasing predictability suggests making all details of profiling manifestly public. Also, a wider distribution of the more sophisticated anti-vandalism tools seems indicated. As to the specific dimensions used in profiling, several critical remarks are developed. When patrollers use ‘assisted edit- ing’ tools, severe ‘overuse’ of several features (anonymity, warned before) is a definite possibility, undermining profile efficacy. The easy remedy suggested is to render all of them invisible on the interfaces as displayed to patrollers. Finally, concerning not only assisted editing tools but tools against vandalism generally, it is argued that the anonymity feature is a sensitive category: anons have been in dispute for a long time (while being more prone to vandalism). Targeting them as a special category violates the social contract upon which Wikipedia is based. The feature is therefore a candidate for mandatory ‘underuse’: it should be banned from all anti-vandalism filters and profiling algorithms, and no longer be visible as a special edit trait. (shrink)

The article explores the problem of preferable technological changes in the context of work. To this end, it addresses the ‘why’ (motives and values) and the ‘how’ (organizational forms) of automation from a normative perspective. Concerning the ‘why,’ automation processes are currently mostly driven by values of economic efficiency. Yet, since automation processes are part of the basic structure of society, as is the division of labor, considerations of justice apply to them. As for the ‘how,’ the article suggests ‘fair (...) hybrid cooperation’ as an alternative ideal to guide automation priorities. It is achieved when the division of labor between humans and machines does not hinder, and preferably enables, workers’ experience of certain primary qualities in their work activity. By analogy with Rawls’ primary goods, these are qualities that it is necessary for every worker to experience in order to pursue their life plans: security, self-direction, self-development, dignity, and recognition. According to this criterion, the tasks to automate first are those hindering these contributive primary qualities. This provides us with a normative vocabulary and a standard to orient automation decisions but also to assess existing organizational forms and envisage alternative cooperative imaginaries. To illustrate how the ideal may play out in the real world, the article concludes with a ‘fair hybrid cooperation test’ and a nurse bots case for meaningful work. (shrink)

Grief is, and has always been, technologically supported. From memorials and shrines to photos and saved voicemail messages, we engage with the dead through the technologies available to us. As our technologies evolve, so does how we grieve. In this paper, we consider the role chatbots might play in our grieving practices. Influenced by recent phenomenological work, we begin by thinking about the character of grief. Next, we consider work on developing “continuing bonds” with the dead. We argue that for (...) some, chatbots may play an important role in establishing these continuing bonds by helping us develop what we term “habits of intimacy”. We then turn to the “ick factor” some may feel about this prospect, focusing especially on ethical concerns raised by Patrick Stokes and Adam Buben about the risk of replacing our dead with chatbots. We argue that replacement worries are not as pressing as Stokes and Buben suggest. We resist these replacement worries by appealing to the “thin reciprocity”, as we refer to it, that such bots offer, as well as the fictionalist stance that we think users of the bots adopt when engaging with them. We conclude by briefly raising some additional concerns and highlighting future research questions. (shrink)

Since at least 2016, many have worried that social media enables authoritarians to meddle in democratic politics. The concern is that trolls and bots amplify deceptive content. In this chapter I argue that these tactics have a more insidious anti-democratic purpose. Lies implanted in democratic discourse by authoritarians are often intended to be caught. Their primary goal is not to successfully deceive, but rather to undermine the democratic value of testimony. In well-functioning democracies, our mutual reliance on testimony also (...) generates a distinctively democratic value: decentralized testimonial networks evade control by the state or powerful actors. The deliberate exposure of deception in democratic testimonial networks undermines this value by implicating citizens in their own epistemic corruption, weakening the resilience of democratic society against authoritarian pressure. In this chapter I illustrate that danger through a close reading of recent Russian social media interference operations, showing both their epistemic underpinnings and their ongoing political threat. (shrink)

Critics have argued that human-controlled avatar interactions fail to facilitate the kinds of expressivity and social understanding afforded by our physical bodies. We identify three claims meant to justify the supposed expressive limits of avatar interactions compared to our physical interactions. First, “The Limited Expressivity Claim”: avatars have a more limited expressive range than our physical bodies. Second, “The Inputted Expressivity Claim”: any expressive avatarial behaviour must be deliberately inputted by the user. Third, “The Decoding Claim”: users must infer or (...) figure out the expressive meaning of human-controlled avatars’ behaviour through cognitively onerous processes. With the aim of critically assessing all three claims, we analyze data collected through observations of and interviews with expert players of the avatar-based video game League of Legends. Focusing on Daniel Stern’s (2010) notion of vitality, we analyze the participants’ descriptions of seeing and interacting with other avatars during performance. Our analysis shows that the informants experience human-based avatarial interactions as qualitatively different than interactions with bots, that the informants see the movements of other players’ avatars as having different expressive styles, and that the informants actively use and manipulate this avatarial expressivity during performance. The results of our analysis, we argue, provide reasons for loosening or resisting the three claims concerning the limits of avatarial expressivity. (shrink)

Susan Schneider’s article (2025) on the epistemology of Chatbots is the start to a much larger conversation scholars and educators need to have about the influence these technologies have on knowledge and knowledge production. To that end, I wish to expand this conversation to an aspect briefly mentioned in her paper; the use of these technologies by bad actors and propagandists to shape the worldview of users. And there is no more pressing example than the movement of X’s Chatbot Grok (...) from mere online bot to a Wikipedia-clone with recent the launch of Grokipedia. (shrink)

Religion-based AI chatbots serve religious practitioners by bringing them godly wisdom through technology. These bots reply to spiritual and worldly questions by drawing insights or citing verses from the Quran, the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita, the Torah, or other holy books. They answer religious and theological queries by claiming to offer historical contexts and providing guidance and counseling to their users. A criticism of these bots is that they may give inaccurate answers and proliferate bias by propagating homogenized (...) versions of the religions they represent. These “embodied spiritual machines” may likewise bear bias against women, their gender, and their societal roles. This paper crafts a concept intended to address this GPT issue by reimagining, modifying, and implementing a feminist approach to these chatbots. It examines the concepts and designs of these bots and how they address women-related questions. Along with the challenge of bringing gender and diversity-sensitive religious wisdom closer to the people through technology, the paper proposes a re-engineered model of a fair religion-based AI chatbot. (shrink)

Automation does not always replace human labour altogether: there is an intermediate stage of human co-existence with machines, including robots, in a production process. Cobots are robots designed to participate at close quarters with humans in such a process. I shall discuss the possible role of cobots in facilitating the eventual total elimination of human operators from production in which co-bots are initially involved. This issue is complicated by another: cobots are often introduced to workplaces with the message (from (...) managers) that they will not replace human operators but will rather assist human operators and make their jobs more interesting and responsible. If, in the process of learning to assist human operators, robots acquire the skills of human operators, then the promise of avoiding replacement can turn out to be false, and if a human operator loses his job, he has been harmed twice over: once by unemployment and once by deception. I shall suggest that this moral risk attends some cobots more than others. (shrink)

Nur weil Goethes letzter Brief an den Aufklärer und versierten Experimentalphysiker Lichtenberg nicht mehr beantwortet worden ist, sind viele Interpreten zu dem Ergebnis gelangt, dass Lichtenberg den Briefwechsel aus Unwillen über Goethes unbelehrbare Newton-Kritik abgebrochen hätte; Goethe selbst hat diese Interpretation nahegelegt. Doch bei gründlicher Neulektüre ergibt sich ein optimistischeres Bild. Goethe stand damals am Anfang seiner Farbenforschung, äußerte sich zu Newton weit weniger polemisch als später, gegenüber Lichtenberg aber voller Respekt – und zeigte sich offen für Kritik. In einem (...) seiner fünf Briefe reagierte Lichtenberg mit der erwünschten Kritik, und zwar so, wie sie unter Fachwissenschaftlern idealerweise aussehen sollte: voller Schwung, hinreichend skeptisch und doch konstruktiv. Goethe hat Lichtenbergs Kritik beherzigt, aufgegriffen, weitergedacht. Umgekehrt ließ sich Lichtenberg vom Briefpartner wissenschaftlich anregen; in der Tat bot Goethe ihm mit großer Sorgfalt eine Reihe von Anregungen, die gut zu Lichtenbergs Arbeit passten. Ja, Goethe ist möglicherweise zu anregend für ihn gewesen. Jedenfalls hat Lichtenberg es trotz gut dokumentierter Anzeichen von Begeisterung für Goethes gewagtes Projekt nicht vermocht, den Gedankenaustausch auf dem hohen Niveau fortzusetzen, das er zunächst geboten hatte. Ob der Briefwechsel am Ende aus gesundheitlichen Gründen, aus Willensschwäche oder einfach nur wegen Überarbeitung versandet ist, lässt sich den Dokumenten nicht entnehmen. Selbst die Hypothese einer wissenschaftlichen Entfremdung bleibt im Reich des Denkbaren. Unwahrscheinlich erscheint sie u.a. deshalb, weil an mindestens zwei Stellen eine Geistesverwandtschaft zwischen den beiden Protagonisten bestanden hat, die Goethe wohl ahnte und die heute angesichts damals unzugänglicher Texte deutlich in den Blick genommen werden kann: Erstens waren beide gleichermaßen von naturwissenschaftlichen Anwendungen des Polaritätsgedankens fasziniert, der seinerzeit viele neue Entdeckungen geliefert hatte und weitere verhieß; zweitens haben sie wichtige Einsichten der Wissenschaftsphilosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts vorweggenommen, etwa die Skepsis gegenüber eindeutig aus der Empirie abzulesenden Theorien und die These von der Theoriebeladenheit der Beobachtung. Goethe hatte Pech, dass diese Gemeinsamkeiten nicht vor Lichtenbergs Tod (und bis heute nicht) ans Tageslicht gekommen sind. Seine Kooperation mit Lichtenberg hätte zum Erfolg führen können; und der fatale Eindruck seiner Unbelehrsamkeit hätte sich vermeiden lassen. (shrink)

How may human agents come to trust (sophisticated) artificial agents? At present, since the trust involved is non-normative, this would seem to be a slow process, depending on the outcomes of the transactions. Some more options may soon become available though. As debated in the literature, humans may meet (ro)bots as they are embedded in an institution. If they happen to trust the institution, they will also trust them to have tried out and tested the machines in their back (...) corridors; as a consequence, they approach the robots involved as being trustworthy (“zones of trust”). Properly speaking, users rely on the overall accountability of the institution. Besides this option we explore some novel ways for trust development: trust becomes normatively laden and thereby the mechanism of exclusive reliance on the normative force of trust (as-if trust) may come into play - the efficacy of which has already been proven for persons meeting face-to-face or over the Internet (virtual trust). For one thing, machines may evolve into moral machines, or machines skilled in the art of deception. While both developments might seem to facilitate proper trust and turn as-if trust into a feasible option, they are hardly to be taken seriously (while being science-fiction, immoral, or both). For another, the new trend in robotics is towards coactivity between human and machine operators in a team (away from making robots as autonomous as possible). Inside the team trust is a necessity for smooth operations. In support of this, humans in particular need to be able to develop and maintain accurate mental models of their machine counterparts. Nevertheless, the trust involved is bound to remain nonnormative. It is argued, though, that excellent opportunities exist to build relations of trust toward outside users who are pondering their reliance on the coactive team. The task of managing this trust has to be allotted to human operators of the team, who operate as linking pin between the outside world and the team. Since the robotic team has now been turned into an anthropomorphic team, users may well develop normative trust towards them; correspondingly, trusting the team in as-if fashion becomes feasible. (shrink)

Il était une fois une chose, appelons-là Lionel, qui se croyait consciente et à peu près au centre du cosmos, libre, douée de valeurs et plein de choses encore. Mais Lionel n’était ni conscient ni libre ou important : ce n’était qu’un pauvre bot, le sous-programme d’une simulation informatique, parmi une infinité d’autres, imitant une personne libre, consciente et agissante. Inspirés par les progrès de l’informatique et quelques sous-cultures de la Silicon Valley, des penseurs influents estiment que nous sommes tous (...) des petits Lionel. Cette thèse digitaliste selon laquelle nous serions des êtres simulés noyés dans une infinité de mondes numériques n’est pas une aberration récente qu’on pourrait balayer d’un revers de main. Il s’agit en réalité de la dernière expression d’une certaine « image classique », objective, du monde, que l’on peut faire remonter à Platon et qui s’est épanouie dans les sciences modernes, depuis Galilée, et presque toute la philosophie. Tout près des choses vise à renverser une telle conception sans rien céder à l’obscurantisme. En s’appuyant notamment sur l’étude de troubles psychiatriques négligés, Alexandre Billon nous invite à pratiquer la philosophie « à l’air libre » plutôt qu’« en fauteuil », d’une manière subjective, affective et engagée plutôt qu’objective, froide et dépersonnalisée. Contre l’image classique, il promeut une image enfantine du monde. (shrink)

Der Titel des Bandes greift eine Frage auf, die im alltäglichen Umgang aufkam: die Frage nach analytischer Philosophie, vom Rücksitz eines Autos gestellt. Dieser Kontext bot den Anlass, eine Herangehensweise zu wählen, die bislang nicht üblich war: auszuprobieren, was eine Einbeziehung des Alltags und Umgangs erbringen könnte, ohne auf Komplexität zu verzichten. -/- Diese Öffnung hat zu überraschenden Ergebnissen geführt, die eine Weiterentwicklung der analytischen Philosophie erlauben, auch und in besonderer Weise theoretisch: Die Beachtung von umgangsprachlichem Verhalten kann dabei behilflich (...) sein, Sprache besser zu verstehen, als dies eine traditionelle wissenschaftsphilosophische Ausrichtung ermöglichen würde. -/- Die Beiträge zu diesem Band haben Kathrina Talmi, Reinhard Matern und Kai Pege eingebracht. (shrink)

-/- Assessing Twitter (X) through the Lens of the Universal Formula on the Problem of Free Will -/- In the digital era, social media platforms are among the most powerful forces shaping global thought, behavior, and social interaction. Twitter—rebranded as “X” in recent years—stands as a major channel for political discourse, public expression, and mass mobilization. However, the question remains: does it serve or harm the deeper aspects of human freedom, balance, and truth? Using my Universal Formula, grounded in three (...) natural laws, this essay evaluates Twitter/X through a numerical lens to determine how aligned it is with the essential principles that support human well-being and free will. -/- The Universal Formula Is based on three unchanging laws of nature: -/- 1. The Law of Karma (Cause and Effect in Systems) – Every system must be designed without defects or errors to function harmoniously. -/- 2. The Law of Balance in Nature – All thoughts and actions must maintain internal and external balance. Imbalance leads to suffering, conflict, or collapse. -/- 3. The Law of Feedback Mechanism – Human minds are not isolated; they are constantly shaped and reshaped through feedback from their environment, other minds, and society. -/- To quantify the analysis, I use the following grading scale: -/- 0–2 = Severely Violates -/- 3–4 = Partially Violates -/- 5 = Neutral -/- 6–7 = Partially Aligns -/- 8–10 = Fully Aligns -/- 1. The Law of Karma (Systems Integrity) Twitter/X functions as a global digital platform for microblogging, public conversation, and content sharing. While the platform’s core system is technically efficient, it suffers from a deep structural defect: the open, rapid-fire format encourages impulsive behavior, misinformation, trolling, and emotional polarization. The platform’s algorithms often reward sensationalism rather than wisdom or truth. Under Elon Musk’s leadership, even though efforts have been made to reform moderation and content policies, the system remains vulnerable to abuse, harassment, and manipulation by both individuals and organized bots. Grade: 4/10 (Partially Violates) -/- 2. The Law of Balance in Nature Twitter/X allows real-time global conversations, which can contribute to civic awareness and resistance against injustice. However, the fast-paced, emotionally charged format frequently disrupts personal and collective balance. Users are often caught in cycles of outrage, echo chambers, and reactive thinking. The platform promotes polarization over reflection, and controversy over calm discourse. As a result, it often disturbs internal psychological balance (in users) and external societal balance (by amplifying division). Grade: 3/10 (Partially Violates) -/- 3. The Law of Feedback Mechanism Twitter/X operates heavily on feedback—retweets, likes, replies—but the quality of this feedback is deeply distorted. Feedback is based not on wisdom, insight, or balance, but on virality and emotional triggers. Conversations are rarely constructive; they are often fragmented, hostile, or performative. The mind-to-mind communication that should ideally lead to greater understanding is instead often reduced to noise, conflict, or disinformation loops. True, honest, and natural feedback mechanisms are undermined by artificial algorithmic amplification. Grade: 3/10 (Partially Violates) -/- Overall Evaluation and Conclusion Twitter/X earns an overall average score of 3.3/10 under the Universal Formula. It demonstrates significant violations of the three natural laws that support true free will, balance, and conscious evolution. While it offers tools for awareness and mobilization, its systemic flaws and imbalance-driven structure make it more of a destabilizing force than a constructive one. It remains a platform with potential—but only if reengineered to serve truth, wisdom, and natural harmony, rather than conflict, addiction, and superficiality. -/- Until such transformation occurs, Twitter/X cannot be trusted to guide individuals or societies toward balance, truth, or freedom. As with other powerful platforms, it must be paired with critical awareness and a holistic education system that helps users interpret and resist its negative psychological and social effects. Only then can its full power be used in accordance with the natural laws that govern life, consciousness, and moral evolution. -/- . (shrink)

In his message for the 60th World Day of Social Communications (January 24, 2026), Pope Leo XIV advances a substantive philosophical position on artificial intelligence: that human faces and voices are sacred, constitutive of personhood, and that their simulation by AI systems represents an intrinsic threat to human dignity and communication. This paper subjects that position to systematic philosophical scrutiny along three lines of argument. First, the papal account rests on an essentialist ontology of personhood — the view that personhood (...) is constituted by specific biological features — which is philosophically untenable and normatively exclusionary, particularly with respect to people with disabilities whose communication does not conform to the presupposed biological norm. Notably, the message explicitly disavows biochemical reductionism, yet structurally reinstates it by tying personhood's expression exclusively to unaltered biological interfaces; this internal contradiction sharpens rather than dissolves the critique. Drawing on Eva Feder Kittay's relational account of personhood (2019), I argue that personhood is constituted through relationships, not biological substrates. I further examine Emmanuel Levinas's ethics of the visage — and a genuinely Levinasian passage in the papal text itself — as the most philosophically serious reconstruction available to the Pope's position, and argue that even this stronger reading does not support the biological privilege the message ultimately requires. Second, the privileging of face-to-face communication over technologically mediated forms reproduces the metaphysics of presence that Jacques Derrida identified as a foundational error of Western philosophy. Third, the theological grounding of the argument commits the naturalistic fallacy as identified by David Hume and G.E. Moore: it attempts to derive normative conclusions about how communication ought to be structured from descriptive claims about how it is biologically constituted — with the unintended consequence of delegitimizing assistive technologies that serve some of the most vulnerable members of human society. A philosophically crucial distinction, which the papal text systematically obscures, separates the simulation of a human agent (deepfakes, deceptive bots) from the synthesis of a communicative medium for a human agent (speech prosthetics, AAC systems); conflating these categories is what renders the papal framework unable to draw the ethical lines it most needs to draw. The paper concludes by sketching a philosophically defensible alternative grounded in Jürgen Habermas's communicative rationality and Amartya Sen's capabilities approach, arguing that the ethical evaluation of AI communication should turn not on biological medium but on whether systems support or undermine genuine communicative agency and relational flourishing. (shrink)

Pension service institutions are quickly going digital as they cope with increased service requirements, the demands of regulatory compliance, and challenges posed by cybersecurity. Legacy pension management systems usually have limited scope, are inefficient, and do not provide security on-premise infrastructure (Gartner, 2023). These aspects result in inefficiencies that create delays in processing pensions, an increase in the risk of fraud, and escalated operational costs (Ponemon Institute, 2023). The most critical aspect regarding pension transactions involves the secure, efficient, and scalable (...) service delivery because it entails sensitive financial information; therefore, it becomes very important to governments, financial institutions, and private organizations (Forrester Research, 2022). This research proposes the Azure-based framework aiming to enhance the management of pension service requests focusing on scalability, security, AI-powered automation, and regulatory compliance. The proposed system uses Azure Virtual Machines, Azure Kubernetes Service, and Load Balancers to perform the optimized resource provisioning for high availability. A zero-trust security model has been categorized to protect pension data from cyber threats, reinforced with Azure Active Directory, Key Vault, Multi-Factor Authentication, and the Reserve (ISO 2021). The research also embeds Azure Bot Services and Azure Cognitive Services as an AI-driven anti-fraud detection tool integrated into the system to automate customer service and workflow management within the fraud prevention ecosystem (Accenture, 2023). Automatic rule enforcement and real-time security monitoring could ensure compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 (Microsoft, 2023). In the research approach to systematic architectural design, Infrastructure as a Service and Platform as a Service is combined using encryption techniques with the Azure Key Vault and private cloud connectivity with Azure ExpressRoute. AI-based pension request processing along with prescriptive analytics and real-time fraud detection with Azure Machine Learning and Synapse Analytics complete the solution proposed. A performance evaluation framework was developed to assess enhancements in processing time for pension requests and reduction of fraudulent claims as well as scaling of the system during peak loads and compliance adherence under security audits. The empirical evidence gained from real-life business cases shows that pension automation based on Azure reduces the time for pension processing by as much as 80%, drastically improving service efficiency (PwC, 2022). Whereas the AI-based mechanism for the detection of fraud reduces fraudulent claims for pensions by 70% (IBM Cloud Research, 2022), Azure guarantees 99.99% uptime with its highly available configurations. Enhanced compliance monitoring, with a reduction in policy violation incidents by 60% (ISO, 2023), is another feature of the system. Future research will look toward blockchain for transaction management of pension funds, further down in edge computing for quicker processing, and AI for investment advisory systems in pension management, all aimed at optimizing pension services management. This research propagates the cause of digital transformation in pension management through a demonstration of a secure, scalable, and AI-enabled model with further extensibility toward healthcare benefits, insurance claims, and the automation of financial services. (shrink)

Lucid dreaming (LD) is a fun and interesting activity, but most participants have difficulties in attaining lucidity, retaining it during the dream, concentrating on the needed task and remembering the results. This motivates to search for a new way to enhance lucid dreaming via different induction techniques, including chemicals and electric brain stimulation. However, results are still unstable. An alternative approach is to reach the lucid dreaming-like states via altered state of consciousness not related to dreaming. Several methods such as (...) guided visualization, internal dialog, creative writing, hypnosis, hypnagogia, daydreaming, DMT trips, voice dialog, shamanic journey, rebirthing, and “forcing” tulpas can help in attaining such states. One of the most promising of them is Jungian “active imagination” (AIM) technique, which allows unconscious content to build up inside some mental frames. This article explores the hypothesis of replacing lucid dreaming research with active imagination, and the conditions and ways to accomplish it. Method: An open label pilot experiment was performed in 2004-2005 in Moscow, Russia with 100 participants. Results: The results show that there are two groups of people: ones with “visual imagination screen” and others have “mental imagination screen”. AIM works perfectly as a replacement for lucid dreams only for the first group of people. For the second group, it created interesting content, but not visual or emotional intensity equal to enter lucid dreaming like state. No known instruments helped to move the person from one group to another. The first group consisted of young females, while the second mostly contained males with rational and mathematical type of personality. Conclusion: AIM partly works as a replacement for LD, as it works great only for half of people, and it requires a sitter. However, AIM outperforms LD in reliability and availability in any circumstance: it could be performed even by text chat or in a crowd. It is also better than LD in retaining concentration on topic and the easiness of memorizing the results (which could be recorded). Self-performed AIM is less effective. AIM can be improved by intelligent chat bots as sitters and weak brain stimulation that can increase the probability of attaining something like hypnogogic state. (shrink)

Hal pertama yang harus kita ingat adalah bahwa ketika mengatakan bahwa Cina mengatakan ini atau Cina melakukan itu, kita tidak berbicara tentang orang-orang Cina, tetapi dari Sosiopat yang mengendalikan PKT - Partai Komunis Cina, yaitu, Tujuh Pikun Sosiopat Pembunuh Berantai (SSSSK) dari Komite Tetap PKT atau 25 anggota Politbiro dll. Rencana PKT untuk WW3 dan dominasi total ditata cukup jelas dalam publikasi dan pidato pemerintah Cina dan ini adalah "China Dream" Xi Jinping. Ini adalah mimpi hanya untuk minoritas kecil (mungkin (...) beberapa lusin sampai beberapa ratus) yang memerintah Cina dan mimpi buruk bagi orang lain (termasuk 1,4 miliar Cina). 10 miliar dolar per tahun memungkinkan mereka atau boneka mereka untuk memiliki atau mengontrol surat kabar, majalah, saluran TV dan radio dan menempatkan berita palsu di sebagian besar media utama di mana-mana setiap hari. Selain itu, mereka memiliki tentara (mungkin jutaan orang) yang troll semua media menempatkan lebih banyak propaganda dan menenggelamkan komentar yang sah (tentara 50 sen). Selain melucuti sumber daya dunia ke-3, dorongan utama Belt and Road Initiative multi-triliun dolar adalah membangun pangkalan militer di seluruh dunia. Mereka memaksa dunia bebas menjadi perlombaan senjata berteknologi tinggi besar-besaran yang membuat perang dingin dengan Uni Soviet tampak seperti piknik. Meskipun SSSSK, dan seluruh militer dunia, menghabiskan jumlah besar pada perangkat keras canggih, sangat mungkin bahwa WW3 (atau keterlibatan yang lebih kecil menjelang itu) akan didominasi perangkat lunak. Hal ini tidak keluar dari pertanyaan bahwa SSSSK, dengan mungkin lebih hacker (coders) bekerja untuk mereka maka seluruh dunia digabungkan, akan memenangkan perang masa depan dengan konflik fisik minimal, hanya dengan melumpuhkan musuh mereka melalui internet. Tidak ada satelit, tidak ada telepon, tidak ada komunikasi, tidak ada transaksi keuangan, tidak ada jaringan listrik, tidak ada internet, tidak ada senjata canggih, tidak ada kendaraan, kereta api, kapal atau pesawat. Hanya ada dua jalan utama untuk menghapus PKT, membebaskan 1,4 miliar tahanan Cina, dan mengakhiri pawai gila ke WW3. Yang damai adalah untuk meluncurkan perang dagang habis-habisan untuk menghancurkan ekonomi Cina sampai militer muak dan sepatu bot keluar PKT. Alternatif untuk mematikan ekonomi Cina adalah perang terbatas, seperti pemogokan yang ditargetkan dengan mengatakan 50 drone termobarik pada Kongres KE-20th PKT, ketika semua anggota top berada di satu tempat, tetapi itu tidak akan terjadi sampai 2022 sehingga seseorang bisa mencapai rapat pleno tahunan. Cina akan diberitahu, sebagai serangan terjadi, bahwa mereka harus meletakkan lengan mereka dan mempersiapkan diri untuk mengadakan pemilihan demokratis atau nuked ke zaman batu. Alternatif lainnya adalah serangan nuklir habis-habisan. Konfrontasi militer tidak dapat dihindari mengingat kursus PKT saat ini. Ini kemungkinan akan terjadi di atas pulau-pulau di Laut Cina Selatan atau Taiwan dalam beberapa dekade, tetapi ketika mereka mendirikan pangkalan militer di seluruh dunia itu bisa terjadi di mana saja (lihat Crouching Tiger dll).). Konflik di masa depan akan memiliki aspek hardkill dan softkill dengan tujuan yang dinyatakan dari PKT untuk menekankan perang siber dengan meretas dan melumpuhkan sistem kontrol dari semua komunikasi militer dan industri, peralatan, pembangkit listrik, satelit, internet, bank, dan perangkat atau kendaraan apa pun yang terhubung ke internet. SS perlahan-lahan fielding array di seluruh dunia berawak dan otonom permukaan dan bawah air kapal selam atau drone mampu meluncurkan senjata konvensional atau nuklir yang mungkin tertidur menunggu sinyal dari Cina atau bahkan mencari tanda tangan kapal ATAU pesawat AS. Sementara menghancurkan satelit kami, sehingga menghilangkan komunikasi antara Amerika Serikat dan pasukan kami di seluruh dunia, mereka akan menggunakan mereka, dalam hubungannya dengan drone untuk menargetkan dan menghancurkan angkatan laut kita saat ini unggul. Tentu saja, semua ini semakin dilakukan secara otomatis oleh AI. Sejauh ini sekutu terbesar PKT adalah partai Demokrat amerika serikat. Pilihannya adalah untuk menghentikan PKT sekarang atau menonton saat mereka memperpanjang penjara Cina di seluruh dunia. Tentu saja, pengawasan universal dan digitalisasi kehidupan kita tidak dapat dihindari di mana-mana. Siapa pun yang tidak berpikir begitu sangat tidak berhubungan. Tentu saja itu adalah optimists yang mengharapkan sosiopat Cina untuk memerintah dunia sementara pesimis (yang melihat diri mereka sebagai realis) mengharapkan sosiopati AI (atau AS seperti yang saya sebut - yaitu, Artificial Stupidity atau Artificial Sociopathy) untuk mengambil alih, mungkin pada tahun 2030 Mereka yang tertarik pada rincian lebih lanjut tentang jalan gila masyarakat modern dapat berkonsultasi dengan karya-karya saya yang lain seperti Suicide by Democracy-an Obituary for America and the World 3rd Edition 2019 and Suicidal Utopian Delusions in the 21st Century: Philosophy, Human Nature and the Collapse of Civilization 5th ed (2019). (shrink)

The moral status of sexbots was analyzed while using consequentialism and feminism as the guiding frameworks. Sexbots are humanoid robots with a certain level of AI that represents personality-scripts. The thesis contained three main questions: A) What moral pain points can be identified in producing and using sex bots? B) Is it necessary to conclude from these moral issues that these practices are inherently immoral? C) What ethical conditions and contexts can be formulated in which sex bots can (...) be used and used positively and morally? -/- First of all a brief summary is given on the psychology behind our relationships with robots/sexbots to show the weight of the dynamics behind this relationship between sexual subject and the sexual technology of sexbots. Second, The Campaign Against Sex Robots from Richardson was used as a starting point to explore a more contextual approach of the moral uses and designs of sexbots. The claims about what sexbots represent and what possible effects they have were analyzed to find an opening that does not a priori ban the production of sexbots (as Richardson postulates). -/- Through the thesis, tentative explorations of moral designs and uses of sexbots can be found. This includes an analysis on the hardware and software behind a sexbot going from scripts and programming concerning consent and designs that are meant for different (for example; therapeutical) contexts. To conclude, the use of a non-essentialistic feminist new-materialism was used for a first exploration of the political value of sexbots as tools of empowerment, instead of oppression. (shrink)

This book argues that misinformation poses a multi-faceted threat to knowledge, while arguing that some forms of content moderation risk exacerbating these threats. It proposes alternative forms of content moderation that aim to address this complexity while enhancing human epistemic agency. The proliferation of fake news, false conspiracy theories, and other forms of misinformation on the internet and especially social media is widely recognized as a threat to individual knowledge and, consequently, to collective deliberation and democracy itself. This book argues (...) that misinformation presents a three-pronged threat to knowledge. While researchers often focus on the role of misinformation in causing false beliefs, this deceptive potential of misinformation exists alongside the potential to suppress trust and to distort the perception of evidence. Recognizing the multi-faceted nature of this threat is essential to the development of effective measures to mitigate the harms associated with misinformation. The book weaves together work in analytic epistemology with emerging empirical work in other disciplines to offer novel insights into the threats posed by misinformation. Additionally, it breaks new ground by systematically assessing different forms of content moderation from the perspective of epistemology. Misinformation, Content Moderation, and Epistemology will appeal to philosophers working in applied and social epistemology, as well as scholars and advanced students in disciplines such as communication studies, political science, and social psychology who are researching misinformation. (shrink)

Your News story describes how robots and chatbots are being used to perform religious rituals and support personal devotion. Such use of artificial intelligence (AI) comes with risks, including religious or political manipulation, spiritual abuse and dependence. We propose four red lines — stricter than baseline AI laws and ethical guidelines — that would reduce these risks.

B.A.S.I.C. AI: A Walk Down Memory Lane with Code and Curiosity explores how the simplicity of early programming can still illuminate the core ideas behind artificial intelligence. Beginning with the humble 1960s-era BASIC language, this work revisits the roots of human–computer interaction to show how even minimal tools can simulate learning behavior. Through a playful, nostalgia-rich experiment, a BASIC program is constructed to detect keywords, store user-taught responses, and recall them in future conversations—demonstrating the power of memory, association, and incremental (...) improvement. -/- An upgraded version introduces a more “thoughtful” flow: the system first checks existing knowledge before asking for new input, mirroring the philosophy that learning builds upon what is already known. While far from modern machine learning models, this project highlights a fundamental truth—intelligence often emerges not from complexity, but from clever use of simple mechanisms. The result is both a tribute to the early days of programming and a reminder that creativity thrives under constraints. In celebrating BASIC’s charm and limitations, this work bridges past and present, inviting readers to rediscover the joy of making machines “learn” one line at a time. (shrink)

Better instruments to predict the future evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) are needed, as the destiny of our civilization depends on it. One of the ways to such prediction is the analysis of the convergent drives of any future AI, started by Omohundro. We show that one of the convergent drives of AI is a militarization drive, arising from AI’s need to wage a war against its potential rivals by either physical or software means, or to increase its bargaining power. (...) This militarization trend increases global catastrophic risk or even existential risk during AI takeoff, which includes the use of nuclear weapons against rival AIs, blackmail by the threat of creating a global catastrophe, and the consequences of a war between two AIs. As a result, even benevolent AI may evolve into potentially dangerous military AI. The type and intensity of militarization drive depend on the relative speed of the AI takeoff and the number of potential rivals. We show that AI militarization drive and evolution of national defense will merge, as a superintelligence created in the defense environment will have quicker takeoff speeds, but a distorted value system. We conclude with peaceful alternatives. (shrink)

The focus of debates about conversational AIs (CAIs) has largely been on social and ethical concerns that arise when we speak to machines. What is gained and what is lost when we replace our human interlocutors—including our human therapists— with AIs? Here, we focus instead on a distinct and growing phenomenon: letting machines speak for us. What is at stake when we replace our own efforts at interpersonal engagement with CAIs? The purpose of these technologies is, in part, to remove (...) effort. But effort also has enormous value, and in some cases even intrinsic value. This is true in many realms, but especially in interpersonal relationships. To make an effort for someone, irrespective of what that effort amounts to, often conveys value and meaning in itself. We elaborate on the meaning, worth and significance that may be lost when we relinquish effort in our interpersonal engagements, and also on the opportunities for self-understanding and growth that we may forsake. (shrink)