Artificial intelligence has arrived. In the online world it is already a part of everyday life, sitting invisibly behind a wide range of search engines and online commerce sites. It offers huge potential to enable more efficient and effective business and government but the use of artificial intelligence brings with it important questions about governance, accountability and ethics. Realising the full potential of artificial intelligence and avoiding possible adverse consequences requires societies to find satisfactory answers to these questions. This (...) report sets out some possible approaches, and describes some of the ways government is already engaging with these issues. (shrink)

Laws of nature are sometimes said to govern their instances. Spelling out what governance is, however, is an important task that has only recently received sustained philosophical attention. In the first part of this paper, I argue against the two prominent reductive views of governance—modal views and grounding views. Ruling out the promising candidates for reduction supports the claim that governance is sui generis. In the second part of this paper, I argue that governance is subject (...) to a contingency requirement. Laws govern their instances only if those instances are metaphysically contingent. I end by defending the resulting account of governance from two potential objections. (shrink)

This paper argues that attempts to apply Alasdair MacIntyre’s positive moral theory to business ethics are problematic, due to the cognitive closure of MacIntyre’s concept of a practice. I begin by outlining the notion of a practice, before turning to Moore’s attempt to provide a MacIntyrean account of corporate governance. I argue that Moore’s attempt is mismatched with MacIntyre’s account of moral education. Because the notion of practices resists general application I go on to argue that a negative application, (...) which focuses on regulation, is more plausible. Large-scale regulation, usually thought antithetical to MacIntyre’s advocacy of small-scale politics, has the potential to facilitate practice-based work and reveals that MacIntyre’s own work can be used against his pessimism about the modern order. Furthermore, the conception of regulation I defend can show us how management is more amenable to ethical understanding than MacIntyre’s work is often taken to imply. (shrink)

It’s often claimed that the laws of nature govern what the world is like, but it’s not clear what governing amounts to. One natural thought is to spell out the notion of governing in terms of grounding. In this paper I propose a way to do so that provides us with a fine-grained picture of governing. This fine-grained picture yields a number of benefits. First, it allows us to distinguish between different kinds of governing. In particular, it provides us with (...) the means to distinguish between constraining and producing kinds of governing. Second, it helps us assess several recent objections to characterizing governing in terms of grounding: it allows us to see that most of these objections only apply to certain kinds of governing, and that even then there are ways to mitigate these worries. Third, it allows us to assess the relative merits of different kinds of governing. And in particular, it allows us to see some reasons to prefer constraining governing over producing governing. (shrink)

Background Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed support, and examine national differences on this measure through a quantitative survey of OP policy informedness and preferences in seven European countries. -/- Methods Between 2017–2019, we conducted a convenience sample survey of students (n = 2006) (...) in Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Slovenia (SI) and Spain (ES), asking participants about their donation preferences, as well as their beliefs and views about the policy in place. From these measures, we computed indices of informedness, policy support, and fulfilment of unexpressed preferences, which we compared across countries and consent systems. -/- Results Our study introduces a tool for analyzing policy governance in the context of OP. Wide variation in policy awareness was observed: Most respondents in DK, DE, AT and BE correctly identified the policy in place, while those in SI, GR and ES did not. Respondents in opt-out countries (AT, BE, ES and GR) tended to support the policy in place (with one exception, i.e., SI), whereas those in opt-in countries (DE and DK) overwhelmingly opposed it. These results reveal stark differences in governance quality across countries and consent policies: We found a preponderance of informed opposition in opt-in countries and a general tendency towards support–either informed or uninformed–in opt-out countries. We also found informed divergence in opt-in countries and a tendency for convergence–either informed or uninformed–among opt-out countries. -/- Conclusion Our study offers a novel tool for analyzing governance quality and illustrates, in the context of OP, how the strengths and weaknesses of different policy implementations can be estimated and compared using quantitative survey data. (shrink)

This research paper explores effective governance strategies aimed at ensuring consistency and compliance within Business Rules Management Systems (BRMS). As organizations increasingly rely on BRMS to streamline decision-making processes, the need for robust governance becomes paramount. The abstract delves into the challenges posed by evolving business environments and complex regulatory landscapes, emphasizing the significance of maintaining rule consistency and compliance. The paper investigates diverse governance models and their applicability in promoting adherence to business rules across organizational units. (...) Additionally, it addresses the role of technology in facilitating governance mechanisms, including version control, audit trails, and automated monitoring. The study contributes valuable insights to both academia and practitioners by offering a nuanced understanding of governance strategies crucial for fostering reliability, uniformity, and compliance within BRMS. (shrink)

The Great Divide in metaphysical debates about laws of nature is between Humeans, who think that laws merely describe the distribution of matter, and non-Humeans, who think that laws govern it. The metaphysics can place demands on the proper formulations of physical theories. It is sometimes assumed that the governing view requires a fundamental / intrinsic direction of time: to govern, laws must be dynamical, producing later states of the world from earlier ones, in accord with the fundamental direction of (...) time in the universe. In this paper, we propose a minimal primitivism about laws of nature (MinP) according to which there is no such requirement. On our view, laws govern by constraining the physical possibilities. Our view captures the essence of the governing view without taking on extraneous commitments about the direction of time or dynamic production. Moreover, as a version of primitivism, our view requires no reduction / analysis of laws in terms of universals, powers, or dispositions. Our view accommodates several potential candidates for fundamental laws, including the principle of least action, the Past Hypothesis, the Einstein equation of general relativity, and even controversial examples found in the Wheeler-Feynman theory of electrodynamics and retrocausal theories of quantum mechanics. By understanding governing as constraining, non-Humeans who accept MinP have the same freedom to contemplate a wide variety of candidate fundamental laws as Humeans do. (shrink)

Recently, Ioannidis, Livanios, and Psillos (2021) have argued that powers and laws play different explanatory roles, and both are needed to explain the regularities in a metaphyiscally robust fashion. They argue that existing governing laws and powers views are fatally flawed and lack the resources to offer a satisfactory explanation of the regularities. They develop a hybrid theory, which they call the Dualist Model (DM), in which both powers and governing laws play a distinctive explanatory role. They claim that such (...) a dualist view combines all the virtues, and shares none of the vices, of standard non-Humean theories. In this paper I examine the Dualist Model, and assess whether such a hybrid position is indeed preferable. I will argue that the theory does not fare better than canonical powers nor governing laws views –– at least, with regard to the desiderata set out by Ioannidis, Psillos, and Livanios themselves. On the contrary, I will argue that DM inherits all the problems that they attribute to classic powers and governing laws views. -/- . (shrink)

The fields of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and participatory foresight seek to establish, and to include publics within, anticipatory governance mechanisms. While scenario-based methods can bring to the publics’ attention the ethical challenges associated to existing technologies, there has been little empirical research examining how, in practice, prospective public deliberative processes should be organized to inform anticipatory governance. The goal of this article is to generate methodological insights into the way such methods can stimulate the public's moral (...) imagination regarding what may (or may not) happen in the future and what should (or should not) happen in the future. Our qualitative analyses draw on a public deliberation study that included videos and online scenarios to support participants’ (n = 57) deliberations about fictional interventions for genetically at-risk individuals. Our findings clarify how participants: (1) challenged key elements of our scenarios; (2) extended several of their technical and moral prospects; (3) engaged personally with others, including our scenarios’ characters; and (4) mobilized the past creatively to reason about the future. Our methodology enabled participants to creatively and empathetically envision complex sociotechnical futures. Yet, important methodological limits should be acknowledged by those who design, implement and use public engagement methods to inform anticipatory governance. (shrink)

Global discussions around the risks, benefits and governance of solar radiation modification (SRM) in the climate change response portfolio are accelerating, but the topic remains nascent in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). In 2023, a US start-up (Make Sunsets) performed a small-scale, non-research deployment of SRM in Baja California, Mexico, without prior permission or community engagement. Their actions prompted Mexico to announce its intention to ban SRM experimentation, underscoring the need for governance to prevent irresponsible practices that (...) could discredit legitimate research. We perform an empirical and ethical analysis of the landscape of academic discussions and media coverage on SRM in the LAC region, focusing on the Make Sunset case. Our analysis leads us to three conclusions: first, a lack of regulations in LAC that fosters mistrust, fuels perceptions of neo-colonialism and restricts potentially valuable and responsible research; second, we argue that the theatrical Make Sunsets case is not ethically justified in light of the diversity of risks associated with it; third, we offer foundational, participatory recommendations to promote effective, transparent and sustainable governance of SRM, including LAC in global conversations. (shrink)

Governments are increasingly using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate policy interventions. RCTs are often understood to provide the highest quality evidence regarding the causal efficacy of an intervention. While randomization plays an essential epistemic role in the context of policy RCTs however, it also plays an important distributive role. By randomly assigning participants to either the intervention or control arm of an RCT, people are subject to different policies and so, often, to different types and levels of benefits. In (...) this paper, I identify one necessary condition as well as a set of sufficient conditions for the permissible use of random assignment by government agencies. I argue first that random assignment is permissible only if it is consistent with governments’ duty to realize morally important outcomes. I argue second that random assignment is permissible in cases where investigators are in a state of genuine equipoise regarding all arms of the experiment and the policy to which people have a claim of justice. Finally, I defend a set of conditions under which random assignment is permissible in cases where one or more arms of a policy RCT are reasonably expected to be either superior or inferior to this policy. (shrink)

According to the governing conception of the laws of nature, laws, in some sense, determine concrete goings-on. Just how to understand the sort of determination at play in governance is, however, a substantial question. One potential answer to this question, which has recently received some attention, is that laws govern by grounding what happens in the concrete world. If this account succeeded, it would show that governance can be understood in terms of an independently motivated and widely accepted (...) notion. Thus far, though, the grounding conception of governance has not been developed or evaluated in detail. In this paper, I fill this gap by mapping out and evaluating various possible ways of developing this conception of governance. My main conclusion is that the grounding conception runs into serious difficulties in trying to capture the key idea that governing laws determine the distribution of fundamental property instances. (shrink)

Regulation is nothing without enforcement. This particularly holds for the dynamic field of emerging technologies. Hence, this article has two ambitions. First, it explains how the EU´s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) will be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies, thus clarifying the governance framework of the AIA. Second, it proposes a normative model of governance, providing recommendations to ensure uniform and coordinated execution of the AIA and the fulfilment of the legislation. Taken together, the article explores (...) how the AIA may be implemented by national and EU institutional bodies, encompassing longstanding bodies, such as the European Commission, and those newly established under the AIA, such as the AI Office. It investigates their roles across supranational and national levels, emphasizing how EU regulations influence institutional structures and operations. These regulations may not only directly dictate the structural design of institutions but also indirectly request administrative capacities needed to enforce the AIA. (shrink)

This paper introduces AI Governance OS v1.0, a non-derogable constitutional operating system for artificial intelligence within the Consciousness Civilization Framework (CCF). It addresses a central limitation of existing AI governance approaches: the absence of a fixed and non-bypassable source of interpretive authority. -/- The framework formalizes a document-fixed authority model in which all governance, interpretive, and enforcement authority for AI systems is anchored in publicly registered canonical documents, rather than institutions, policies, or committees. Unlike policy-based or organizational (...) governance models, AI Governance OS establishes a deterministic constitutional hierarchy governing AI Ethics OS, AI Behavior OS, and subordinate operational layers. -/- By defining explicit authority boundaries and inheritance rules, the system provides a civilization-scale governance architecture for AGI and autonomous systems, ensuring coherence, non-escalatory behavior, and long-horizon stability across multi-agent and institutional contexts. (shrink)

National and international organisations have implemented governance mechanisms to address a diversity of ethical, security and policy challenges raised by advances in research and innovation. These challenges become particularly complex when research or innovations are considered ‘dual-use’, i.e. can lead to both beneficial and harmful uses, and in particular, civilian (peaceful) and military (hostile) applications. While many countries have mechanisms (i.e. export controls) to govern the transfer of dual-use technology (e.g. nuclear, cryptography), it is much less clear how dual-use (...) research from across the range of academic disciplines can or should be governed. Using the Canadian research and policy context as case study, this paper will first, examine the governance mechanisms currently in place to mitigate the negative implications of dual-use research and innovation; second, compare these with other relevant international governance contexts; and finally, propose some ways forward (i.e. a risk analysis approach) for developing more robust governance mechanisms. (shrink)

Governments are increasingly making use of field experiments to evaluate policy interventions in the spheres of education, public health and welfare. However, the research ethics literature is largely focused on the clinical context, leaving investigators, institutional review boards and government agencies with few resources to draw on to address the ethical questions they face regarding such experiments. In this article, we aim to help address this problem, investigating the conditions under which informed consent is required for ethical policy research conducted (...) or authorized by government. We argue that investigators need not secure participants' informed consent when conducting government policy experiments if: the government institution conducting or authorizing the experiment possesses a right to rule over the spheres of policy targeted by the research; and data collection does not involve the violation of participants' autonomy rights. (shrink)

In her paper, “The Non-Governing Conception of Laws,” Helen Beebee argues that it is not a conceptual truth that laws of nature govern, and thus that one need not insist on a metaphysical account of laws that makes sense of their governing role. I agree with the first point but not the second. Although it is not a conceptual truth, the fact that laws govern follows straightforwardly from an important (though under-appreciated) principle of scientific theory choice combined with a highly (...) plausible claim about the connection between scientific theory choice and theory choice in metaphysics. I present and defend this argument and then show how the resulting understanding of governance gives rise to an especially strong version of recent explanatory circularity arguments against Humeanism about laws of nature. Finally, I present three options for a further understanding of the governance relation that are compatible with my argument. (shrink)

Autonomous AI agents present transformative opportunities and significant governance challenges. Existing frameworks, such as the EU AI Act and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, fall short of addressing the complexities of these agents, which are capable of independent decision-making, learning, and adaptation. To bridge these gaps, we propose the ETHOS (Ethical Technology and Holistic Oversight System) framework—a decentralized governance (DeGov) model leveraging Web3 technologies, including blockchain, smart contracts, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). ETHOS establishes a global registry (...) for AI agents, enabling dynamic risk classification, proportional oversight, and automated compliance monitoring through tools like soulbound tokens and zero-knowledge proofs. Furthermore, the framework incorporates decentralized justice systems for transparent dispute resolution and introduces AI-specific legal entities to manage limited liability, supported by mandatory insurance to ensure financial accountability and incentivize ethical design. By integrating philosophical principles of rationality, ethical grounding, and goal alignment, ETHOS aims to create a robust research agenda for promoting trust, transparency, and participatory governance. This innovative framework offers a scalable and inclusive strategy for regulating AI agents, balancing innovation with ethical responsibility to meet the demands of an AI-driven future. (shrink)

Longtermists have argued that humanity should significantly increase its efforts to prevent catastrophes like nuclear wars, pandemics, and AI disasters. But one prominent longtermist argument overshoots this conclusion: the argument also implies that humanity should reduce the risk of existential catastrophe even at extreme cost to the present generation. This overshoot means that democratic governments cannot use the longtermist argument to guide their catastrophe policy. In this paper, we show that the case for preventing catastrophe does not depend on longtermism. (...) Standard cost-benefit analysis implies that governments should spend much more on reducing catastrophic risk. We argue that a government catastrophe policy guided by cost-benefit analysis should be the goal of longtermists in the political sphere. This policy would be democratically acceptable, and it would reduce existential risk by almost as much as a strong longtermist policy. (shrink)

I provide a new account of what it is for the laws of nature to govern the evolution of events. I locate the source of governance in the content of law propositions. As such, I do not appeal to primitive notions of ground, essence, or production to characterize governance. After introducing the account, I use it to outline previously unrecognized varieties of governance. I also specify that laws must govern to have two theoretical virtues: explanatory power as (...) well as a theoretical virtue I call expansiveness. A theory is expansive, roughly, when it can do more with less. (shrink)

What is wrong with government whistleblowing and when can it be justified? In my view, ‘government whistleblowing’, i.e., the unauthorized acquisition and disclosure of classified information about the state or government, is a form of ‘political vigilantism’, which involves transgressing the boundaries around state secrets, for the purpose of challenging the allocation or use of power. It may nonetheless be justified when it is suitably constrained and exposes some information that the public ought to know and deliberate about. Government whistleblowing (...) should then be viewed, along the lines of civil disobedience, as a collective cognition- and legitimacy-enhancing device. (shrink)

It is widely agreed that one of the core functions of government is to supply public goods that markets either fail to provide or cannot provide efficiently. I will suggest that arguments for government provision of public goods require fundamental moral judgments in addition to the usual economic considerations about the relative efficacy of markets and governments in supplying them. While philosophers and policymakers owe a debt of gratitude to economists for developing the theory of public goods, the link between (...) public goods and public policy cannot be forged without moral reflection on the proper function and scope of government power. (shrink)

Most AI governance efforts focus on outputs, behaviours, or downstream harms. AoLOS takes a different stance: governance is not an after-the-fact control layer, but a structural shell that precedes reasoning itself. -/- This document describes the governance architecture of AoLOS as a constraint-first system that shapes what reasoning is allowed to become, rather than attempting to correct it after the fact. The architecture is domain-agnostic, non-prescriptive, and deliberately non-answer-producing.

The book presents an interdisciplinary exploration aimed at renewing interest in Luigi Einaudi’s search for “good government”, broadly understood as “good society”. Prompted by the Einaudian quest, the essays - exploring philosophy of law, economics, politics and epistemology - develop the issue of good government in several forms, including the relationship between public and private, public governance, the question of freedom and the complexity of the human in contemporary societies.

This chapter examines the limitations of both command-and-control and market-based legal mechanisms in the pursuit of environmental justice. If the environment is to be protected to at least a minimally acceptable degree, approaches that focus on the coercive force of the state must be complemented by the development of an “ecological ethos,” whereby groups and individuals are motivated to act with non-self-interested concern for the environment. The need for this ethos means that the state is dependent on the cooperation of (...) a wide range of non-state actors. Recent work on environmental governance emphasizes the delegation of aspects of governing to such actors and supports efforts to increase popular participation in governmental processes. The chapter therefore advocates a governance approach that seeks to rectify some of the limitations of state-led environmental law, while encouraging popular participation in a way that can encourage the development of an ecological ethos among the citizenry. (shrink)

This study investigates the eschatological roles and theological significance of Imam Mahdi and Jesus Christ within Islamic thought, focusing on the events anticipated before, during, and after their emergence. It examines the political and spiritual characteristics of the prophesied global government under their joint leadership, contextualizing these expectations within scriptural texts and theological traditions. The paper also explores the titles and miracles attributed to Imam Mahdi and situates Jesus Christ’s unique status within Quranic and Hadith literature, emphasizing his pivotal role (...) in establishing divine governance alongside Imam Mahdi. The methodology involved a systematic literature review executed in four phases: identification, selection, collation, and synthesis of relevant studies. The findings suggest that Imam Mahdi’s future governance reflects the model of the Prophet Muhammad’s early Islamic rule yet transcends historical precedents in scope and universality. The research explicitly addresses three core questions: (1) How will Imam Mahdi and Jesus Christ collaboratively establish a divine global government? (2) How is Jesus Christ introduced and characterized in Islamic sources? and (3) What defining features distinguish Imam Mahdi’s governance? This study aspires to deepen scholarly understanding of Mahdist eschatology and contribute to interreligious dialogue on shared eschatological visions. (shrink)

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies rapidly evolve and permeate various aspects of society, the need for effective regulation and governance has become increasingly critical. This paper explores the current landscape of AI regulation, examining existing frameworks and their efficacy in addressing the unique challenges posed by AI. Key issues such as ensuring compliance, mitigating biases, and maintaining transparency are analyzed. The paper also delves into ethical considerations surrounding AI governance, emphasizing the importance of fairness and accountability. Through case (...) studies of different regulatory approaches and their outcomes, the paper highlights both successes and areas for improvement. Finally, it offers insights into future directions for AI regulation, advocating for innovative policies and enhanced international cooperation to ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. This comprehensive analysis aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on creating robust regulatory mechanisms that can keep pace with the rapid advancement of AI. (shrink)

What is the relation between the ethics, the law, and the governance of the digital? In this article I articulate and defend what I consider the most reasonable answer.

This paper responds to the call "For Planetary Governance" written by Benjamin Bratton and issued by The Terraforming and Strelka Mag. Through a hermeneutics of the nuclear facilitated by Martin Heidegger, Jean Baudrillard, and Patrick Jagoda, it examines the atomic bomb as the final symbol of a nationalist, metaphysical age of spirit, and the initial structure of a postnational, antimetaphysical age of control. Progressing from Baudrillard's nihilism through Jagoda's ludology, this paper then deploys David Graeber's critique of bureaucracy to (...) interpret the generalization of control in the intermediate international age, a generalization that prevents passage to the ethical planetary governance Bratton solicits. Finally, Jagoda's theory of experimental games is placed into conversation with Legacy Russell's glitch feminism and Fred Moten and Stefano Harney's critique of governance in an attempt articulate a combinatorial science of play and planning suited to a properly antimetaphysical and ethical planetarity. (shrink)

In this chapter, we analyse the debate around the implementation of responsible research and innovation (RRI) in Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (HEFRCs). We will illustrate some proposals about how to implement RRI in HERFCs in a good way. Open and inclusive governance is key to fruitful implementation of RRI in these organizations. Governance in this context refers to ways of steering processes in a desirable direction, in this case in the direction of responsible research and innovation (...) that is ethically acceptable and socially desirable. We will present and assess different models of governance and aim to provide ethical governance of research and innovation (R&I) inspired by the most convincing ideas emerged in the current debate. (shrink)

Government activities in Nigeria need more reinforcement in spite of the computer technology available to us in the present world. Hence, transactions at all the tiers and levels of government in the country are characterized by high process inefficiency, low service quality, wastage and redundancies. The pivot which will run quality governance through due diligence, due process and transparency actually needs to be formally strengthened and institutionalized for widespread effectiveness through computer-assisted modern process now commonly known as e-government. This (...) paper discusses the status of e-government programme in Nigeria and little effort they have made. It also identifies the possible challenges the Nigerian government will face in implementing e-government and outlines some strategies for its success. Recommendations were made and concluded that e-government, when successfully implemented, will enhance quality governance for economic growth and sustainable development. (shrink)

The accelerating polycrisis has become a defining condition of governance in the Anthropocene, as ecological, economic, and political crises increasingly reinforce one another and generate systemic risk. This essay argues that policy paralysis in response to planetary instability is not simply a failure of coordination, expertise, or political will, but an ethical refusal embedded within prevailing political and economic structures. Contemporary governments repeatedly privilege short term stability and economic continuity over the existential requirement of planetary security, thereby sustaining the (...) conditions that reproduce crisis. Drawing on normative political theory and critical political economy, the paper examines how fossil fuel dependency and petroaggression exemplify the moral failure of political prioritisation. It further critiques market based approaches to climate governance, including the promise of green growth, and argues that such frameworks are incapable of addressing systemic ecological limits. The essay advances the claim that governance in the Anthropocene requires a fundamental revision of normative standards through which political performance is evaluated. Political systems must be judged primarily by their demonstrated capacity to protect planetary stability and ecological integrity. Without such a shift in moral orientation, policy paralysis will remain a structurally embedded feature of contemporary governance, undermining the possibility of meaningful planetary protection. (shrink)

When we say that ‘the government should be ashamed’, can we be taken literally? I argue that we can: organisations have duties over their emotions. Emotions have both functional and felt components. Often, emotions’ moral value derives from their functional components: from what they cause and what causes them. In these cases, organisations can have emotional duties in the same way that they can have duties to act. However, emotions’ value partly derives from their felt components. Organisations lack feelings, but (...) can have duties to increase the likelihood that their members have relevant emotions (with the right felt components), in virtue of and in accordance with their role in the organisation. To systematise these conclusions, I provide a taxonomy of organisations’ – and individuals’ organisationally situated – emotional duties. This taxonomy will enable scholars of electoral politics, international politics and public policy to systematically integrate emotions into the study of organisations. (shrink)

At the heart of Kant’s legal-political philosophy lies a liberal, republican ideal of justice understood in terms of private independence (non-domination) and subjection to public laws securing freedom for all citizens as equals. Given this basic commitment of Kant’s, it is puzzling to many that he does not consider democracy a minimal condition on a legitimate state. In addition, many find Kant ideas of reform or improvement of the historical states we have inherited vague and confusing. The aim of this (...) paper is to untangle both puzzles by exploring Kant’s idea of self-governance. I argue that Kant’s idea of self-governance gives us a very good starting point for thinking about how to leave room for a variety of political systems—different ideals—that have grown out of and responding to different contingent historical and cultural circumstances. It also helps us identify those areas where we want to take extra care to build in safeguards to secure stability and to take sufficiently seriously humankind’s truly nasty sides. (shrink)

Regulatory governance frameworks have become essential building blocks of world society. From supply chains to the regimes surrounding international organizations, extensive governance frameworks have emerged which structure and channel a variety of social exchanges, including economic, political, legal and cultural, on a global scale. Against this background, this special issue sets out to explore the multifaceted meaning, potential and impact as well as the social praxis of regulatory governance. Under the notions rules, resistance and responsibility the special (...) issue pins out three overall dimensions of regulation and governance thereby providing a theoretical and conceptual framework for grasping the phenomenon of regulatory governance. This is combined with extensive case studies on a number of regulatory governance settings ranging from the World Bank to agricultural reforms carried by the International Transitional Administrations (ITAs) in Kosovo and Iraq as well as global supply chains and their impact on the garment industry in Bangladesh. (shrink)

An analysis of the nature of good governance as it figures into the Royal Government of Bhutan's policy of Gross National Happiness.

Health is often moralized not only by individuals, but also by governments, which was particularly conspicuous during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper addresses the ethics of whether governments should moralize health. It first introduces a definition of moralizing health. It then distinguishes between different ways of moralizing health that affect its moral acceptability, including negative or positive framing, as well as different potential targets toward which moralizing may be directed: (1) persons, (2) behavior, or (3) society. It concludes that targeting (...) individual persons and behavior, especially negatively, is morally unacceptable. Positive moralizing about a healthy society by governments may be more acceptable, but important conditions remain. Governments should not single out individuals or groups and moralizing should not be excessive. Moralized health outcomes should be equally achievable by all citizens and implementation of moral frames should be grounded in robust evidence that it will bring about desired outcomes (i.e., a healthier society) without being harmful or counterproductive. In short, governments should be very cautious about moralizing health. If one of the basic tasks of governments is to protect collective health, this is all too easily undermined by undue moralizing. (shrink)

The Government System: The Foundation of Society’s Stability and Progress -/- Introduction -/- The government system is the most crucial social structure in any society, serving as the foundation for law, order, economic stability, and public welfare. A well-functioning government ensures that citizens live in a secure and prosperous environment, while a failing government leads to instability, poverty, and suffering. Throughout history, nations with strong governance have thrived, whereas those with weak or corrupt governments have struggled. This essay examines (...) the significance of government systems, emphasizing their role in law enforcement, economic development, security, public services, and crisis management, while also comparing examples of successful and failing governments worldwide. -/- The Role of government in Society -/- 1. Law and Order: Maintaining Stability and Justice -/- One of the primary responsibilities of the government is to establish and enforce laws that regulate behavior and maintain societal order. A strong legal system deters crime and ensures that justice prevails, fostering a safe and peaceful environment. -/- Example of Effective Governance: Singapore is widely regarded as one of the safest countries in the world due to its strict but fair legal system. The government enforces laws effectively, which has resulted in low crime rates and a high level of public trust in law enforcement. -/- Example of Weak Governance: In contrast, Somalia has struggled with lawlessness for decades. Due to a lack of central authority and widespread corruption, crime, terrorism, and piracy have flourished, making it one of the most dangerous places in the world. -/- 2. Economic Stability and Development -/- Governments play a crucial role in managing a nation’s economy through policies that regulate industries, control inflation, and promote sustainable growth. A well-managed economy leads to prosperity, while poor governance can result in economic collapse. -/- Example of Effective Governance: Switzerland has a highly stable economy, thanks to strong government policies, a well-regulated banking system, and a commitment to innovation. Its government ensures low unemployment, high wages, and economic resilience. -/- Example of Weak Governance: Venezuela, on the other hand, has faced economic disaster due to government mismanagement. Corrupt leadership, excessive reliance on oil revenues, and poor economic policies have led to hyperinflation, food shortages, and mass poverty. -/- 3. Protection and Security -/- A nation’s security depends on the strength of its government. Governments are responsible for maintaining military forces, police, and intelligence agencies to protect citizens from both internal and external threats. -/- Example of Effective Governance: Finland is one of the safest countries in the world due to its well-organized military and law enforcement agencies. The Finnish government prioritizes national security while upholding democratic values. -/- Example of Weak Governance: Afghanistan has faced decades of instability due to weak governance and persistent conflict. The government’s inability to maintain security has allowed terrorist groups to flourish, leading to widespread violence and displacement. -/- 4. Public Services and Infrastructure -/- Governments are responsible for providing essential services such as education, healthcare, transportation, and utilities. These services improve the quality of life and contribute to a nation’s overall development. -/- Example of Effective Governance: Norway is a global leader in social welfare, with high-quality healthcare and education systems. The government invests heavily in infrastructure, ensuring a high standard of living for its citizens. -/- Example of Weak Governance: Haiti, however, suffers from severe infrastructure deficiencies due to government corruption and neglect. The lack of investment in education, healthcare, and public utilities has led to extreme poverty and poor living conditions. -/- 5. Human Rights and Justice -/- A strong government upholds human rights, promotes equality, and ensures justice for all citizens. In democratic societies, governments protect freedom of speech, assembly, and expression, while authoritarian regimes often violate these principles. -/- Example of Effective Governance: Canada is known for its commitment to human rights and social justice. The Canadian government ensures equality through progressive policies, a fair judicial system, and protections for minorities. -/- Example of Weak Governance: North Korea, in contrast, is an authoritarian state where human rights abuses are widespread. Citizens have little personal freedom, and government control over their lives is absolute, leading to oppression and suffering. -/- 6. Political Stability and Leadership -/- Good leadership is essential for effective governance. Stable political systems enable national progress, while corruption and dictatorship often result in turmoil and suffering. -/- Example of Effective Governance: Germany, particularly under the leadership of Angela Merkel, has maintained political stability and economic strength. The German government’s transparency and efficiency have made it a model for democratic governance. -/- Example of Weak Governance: Zimbabwe, under Robert Mugabe’s rule, suffered from dictatorship, economic mismanagement, and political oppression. His government’s corruption led to hyperinflation and widespread poverty. -/- 7. Crisis Management and Public Welfare -/- Governments must be capable of handling national emergencies such as natural disasters, pandemics, and economic crises. A well-prepared government can save lives and maintain stability, while an ineffective government can worsen crises. -/- Example of Effective Governance: New Zealand’s government successfully managed the COVID-19 pandemic through decisive action, clear communication, and strong public health policies, minimizing infections and deaths. -/- Example of Weak Governance: Brazil’s inconsistent response to COVID-19 led to high infection rates and public confusion. The government’s lack of coordination resulted in severe economic and health consequences. -/- Conclusion -/- The government system is the most important social structure in the world, as it directly influences law enforcement, economic prosperity, security, public services, and crisis management. Countries with strong governance, such as Norway, Singapore, Switzerland, Canada, and Germany, provide stability, safety, and development for their citizens. In contrast, nations with weak or corrupt governments, like Venezuela, Somalia, North Korea, and Zimbabwe, suffer from poverty, violence, and instability. A well-functioning government is essential for national success, and its leadership and policies determine whether a country thrives or fails. To ensure a prosperous future, societies must strive for transparent, efficient, and just governance that prioritizes the well-being of all citizens. -/- . (shrink)

The prospect of human genetic enhancement requires an institutional response, and probably the creation of new institutions. The governance of genetic enhancement technologies, moreover, needs to be global in scope. In this article, I analyze the debate on the global governance of human genetic enhancement. I begin by offering a philosophical justification for the need to adopt a global framework for governance of technologies that would facilitate the improvement of non-pathological genetic traits. I then summarize the main (...) concrete proposals that have recently emerged to govern genome editing at the global level. Finally, I develop some impediments that limit the impetus for global governance of genetic enhancement. (shrink)

Between 2016 and 2024, the rapid development of emerging military technologies, such aslethal autonomous weapons, artificial intelligence applied to warfare, and cyber warfare, has posedsignificant challenges to International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This article critically analyzes the influenceof States, international organizations, and civil society in shaping the legal and ethical frameworksaddressing these issues. Using a qualitative, hermeneutic approach, it examines global actors’ discourses,principles, and regulatory proposals. The study identifies three key findings: (i) a critical normative gapconcerning autonomous systems and cyberconflicts; (ii) (...) the need to reframe the notion of meaningfulhuman control as a substantive legal safeguard; and (iii) the reluctance of technologically advanced Statesto accept binding frameworks. The discussion highlights the role of civil society as a normative co-designerand proposes a more inclusive, anticipatory, and adaptive global governance. Finally, the article providesrecommendations to strengthen multilateral spaces, define clear principles, and promote proactive, ethical,and effective regulation of emerging military technologies. (shrink)

Governance encompasses the processes by which organizations are directed, controlled and held to account. It includes the authority, accountability, leadership, direction, and control exercised in an organization. Greatness can be achieved when good governance principles and practices are applied throughout the whole organization. Ethical Governance requires that public officials adhere to high moral standards while serving others. Authentic Governance entails the systematic process of continuous, gradual, and routine personal/corporate improvement, steering, and learning that lead to sustainable (...) high personal/corporate performance and excellence. Thus authentic governance represents the ability to discern right from wrong and the commitment to do what is right, good, and proper. Benevolent governance is perceived to be for benefit of the population as a whole. Sikhism, a panentheistic religion, originated in the Punjab province of the Indian subcontinent, during the 15th century. It is one of the youngest and fifth major world religions, founded by Guru Nanak. The fundamental beliefs of Sikhism have been enshrined in the sacred scripture, Sri Guru Granth Sahib [1-3]. These beliefs include faith in one universal creator, unity of all humankind, engaging in selfless service, striving for social justice for all, honest livelihood and ethical conduct while living a householder's life. Sri Guru Grant Sahib provides very useful insights for governance through religious or secular organizations, that address human rights, education, or diplomacy to end all forms of disparity/discrimination among people [4-5]. In this article, an attempt is made to understand how the doctrines of Sikhism encourage us for better governance and by which means. Whether these doctrines align with the above-mentioned forms of governance or conflict with these. It is pointed out the most of the attributes of good, ethical, authentic and benevolent governance are genuinely supported by the Sikh doctrines. The adherence to democratic and republican organizations, for providing high-quality governance, is encouraged in Sikh principles and practices. (shrink)

This essay argues that a new subfield of AI governance should be explored that examines the policy-making process and its implications for AI governance. A growing number of researchers have begun working on the question of how to mitigate the catastrophic risks of transformative artificial intelligence, including what policies states should adopt. However, this essay identifies a preceding, meta-level problem of how the space of possible policies is affected by the politics and administrative mechanisms of how those policies (...) are created and implemented. This creates a new set of key considerations for the field of AI governance and should influence the action of future policymakers. This essay examines some of the theories of the policymaking process, how they compare to current work in AI governance, and their implications for the field at large and ends by identifying areas of future research. (shrink)

Government transparency and accountability during Covid 19: The data underpinning decisions.

Introduction -/- Government corruption remains one of the most pervasive and persistent challenges faced by societies across the globe. From democratic states to authoritarian regimes, the misuse of public office for private gain undermines trust, development, and social cohesion. Understanding the root causes of corruption requires not only political and legal analysis but also a comprehensive scientific exploration of the psychological, sociological, biological, and systemic factors that make corruption behavior manifest. -/- Corruption, in its essence, reflects the failure of balance—between (...) self-interest and collective interest, between power and accountability, and between human nature and institutional control. This paper applies insights from evolutionary psychology, sociology, political science, neuroscience, and systems theory to provide a unified explanation of why corruption emerges and persists in governments worldwide. -/- . (shrink)

In this paper, I explore how theorists might navigate a course between the twin dangers of piety and excess cynicism when thinking critically about state apologies, by focusing on two government apologies to indigenous peoples: namely, those made by the Australian and Canadian Prime Ministers in 2008. Both apologies are notable for several reasons: they were both issued by heads of government, and spoken on record within the space of government: the national parliaments of both countries. Furthermore, in each case, (...) the object of the apology – that which was apologized for – comes closer to disrupting the idea both countries have of themselves, and their image in the global political community, than any previous apologies made by either government. Perhaps as a result, both apologies were surrounded by celebration and controversy alike, and tracing their consequences – even in the short term – is a difficult business. We avoid excessive piety or cynicism, I argue, when we take several things into account. First, apologies have multiple functions: they narrate particular histories of wrongdoing, they express disavowal of that wrongdoing, and they commit to appropriate forms of repair or renewal. Second, the significance and the success of each function must be assessed contextually. Third, when turning to official political apologies, in particular, appropriate assessment of their capacity to disavow or to commit requires that consider apologies both as performance and as political action. While there remain significant questions regarding the practice of political apology – in particular, its relationship to practices of reparation, forgiveness and reconciliation – this approach can provide a framework with which to best consider them. (shrink)

This paper examines the UK Civil Service’s participatory experiments at the London Design Biennale, framing them not as democratic innovation but as fiduciary–epistemic breaches. Drawing on fiduciary law, deliberative democracy, and epistemic injustice theory, it shows how the workshops—presented as ‘serious games’—functioned as scripted performances of openness, distributing recognition selectively while silencing dissent. I develop the concept of Fairness Duties in Participatory Design, a normative framework grounded in fiduciary law and public law principles of reason-giving, transparency, and proportionality. The analysis (...) demonstrates that without such duties, participatory governance risks devolving into epistemic clientelism and democratic spectacle. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36704.34568. (shrink)

Some scholars have identified a puzzle in the writings of Mary Astell (1666–1731), a deeply religious feminist thinker of the early modern period. On the one hand, Astell strongly urges her fellow women to preserve their independence of judgement from men; yet, on the other, she insists upon those same women maintaining a submissive deference to the Anglican church. These two positions appear to be incompatible. In this paper, I propose a historical-contextualist solution to the puzzle: I argue that the (...) seeming inconsistency can be dispelled through a close examination of (i) the concepts of selfhood and self-government in Anglican women’s devotional texts of the period, and of (ii) the role that these concepts play in Astell’s feminist arguments. (shrink)

This paper reconstructs the governance science of Laozi’s political philosophy from the perspectives of scientific-philosophical reasoning, systemic governance, and historical empiricism. By analyzing the “Dao–De–Zhi” logic in the Daodejing and examining the historical practices of King Zhuang of Chu and Sun Shuao, it demonstrates that Wu-Wei governance is not merely a philosophical ideal, but a practical, low-friction, structurally prioritized complex system governance model. The study employs an interdisciplinary approach: internal textual analysis, historical institutional case studies, research (...) on the cultural generation of Chu, and modeling using systems science and evolutionary governance theory. Findings indicate that the Chu model, through minimal intervention, power invisibility, conditional constraints, and feedback loops, achieved long-term state stability, societal resilience, and civilizational continuity. This contrasts sharply with the high-intervention, centralized legalist model of Shang Yang under Duke Xiao of Qin, highlighting the profound impact of philosophical principles on state form and institutional choice. Further, Wu-Wei governance is abstracted into a cross-temporal governance science model, offering operational principles including low-friction administration, efficiency–stability optimization, civilizational adaptability, and self-organizing mechanisms. This research argues that Laozi’s political philosophy provides theoretical guidance for modern complex social governance, transnational institutional design, ecological and resource management, and technological and AI governance, establishing a framework that integrates classical philosophical wisdom with complex systems science. This study not only enriches interdisciplinary research across political philosophy, historical institutions, and systems science but also offers practical classical insights for contemporary governance. -/- . (shrink)

Customer relationship management has been signed up as an integral part of the organization and is widely implemented within Salesforce, which operates globally. Such modern CRM systems are a must-have for data governance and consent management. As such, they must follow regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and the like. To remedy this problem, in this paper, we will discuss the intricacies of data governance as well as the other (...) side of obtaining consent in Salesforce, how regulatory laws play into the situation, and what challenges exist with regard to Salesforce for data governance and consent management and what does not exist to replace them in terms of data governance and consent management provided by Salesforce specifically. We then describe how we approach the IAC and describe a structured approach using automated consent tracking, role-based access control, data classification, encryption mechanisms, and audit logs. We also dive deep into how Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) influence salesforce data governance. Industry case studies show empirical results of improvement in compliance and operational efficiency. Finally, this paper provides recommendations and future directions to those organizations trying to build resilient data governance for their Salesforce organization. (shrink)

Alaskan communities are facing complex challenges associated with energy security and changing environmental and climatic conditions. They require access to affordable, sustainable, and renewable energy resources to navigate their changing landscapes. With unprecedented investments and commitments from the federal and state governments to bolster energy resiliency in urban and rural communities, renewable energy development in the waters offshore Alaska could become a reality within two to three decades. Offshore wind is the most feasible option for renewable energy production for the (...) Alaska Outer Continental Shelf, including the federal waters of Cook Inlet. This paper asks: to what extent does the applicable, legal regulatory regime potentially facilitate a just and equitable renewable energy transition for Alaska's Railbelt grid? Framed in the umbrella concept of inclusive governance, the author compares conceptual tenets of energy justice, participatory stakeholder planning, and collective action against the legal framework that directs the federal decision-making process. The analysis demonstrates deficits in the current federal legal mandates and process and recommends how the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management can expand its existing tools to account for energy justice, improve participation, and proactively design and implement collective action for planning and siting offshore wind energy projects. If energy regulators expand how they apply the legal mandates and leverage innovative policies and regulations, they can increase energy justice, improve stakeholder participation, and achieve inclusive governance for a renewable energy transition in the region serviced by Alaska's Railbelt electrical grid. (shrink)