This manifesto presents a radical reconceptualization of anarchy through the lens of Metamonistic Proto-Ontology. Rather than treating anarchy as a political ideology or future social form, we argue that anarchy is the fundamental process of reality itself—an ongoing dynamic of self-organization inherent to all levels of existence, from physical systems to biological ecosystems to human societies. We demonstrate that the traditional dichotomy positioning anarchy as either primitive chaos or utopian endpoint is fundamentally flawed. Instead, anarchy represents the continuous process of (...) self-organization through immanent conflict resolution with preserved feedback loops. The state is reconceptualized not as anarchy’s enemy but as a temporary crystallization within the anarchic process— one that becomes pathological only when it loses responsiveness to conflict as a form of feedback. Drawing on evidence from physics (dissipative structures), biology (ecosystems, immune systems), cognitive science (neural networks), and successful examples of decentralized coordination (open source, commons management, mutual aid networks), we establish that most functional coordination in reality already operates anarchically. The paper concludes with practical strategies for restoring anarchic processes in fossilized social structures through creating redundancy, restoring conflict as feedback, and catalyzing bifurcations. (shrink)

This paper introduces and develops the concept of autonegation, a new philosophical term within the framework of Metamonism. Autonegation describes the self-directed negativity of Chaos, where negativity itself becomes negative toward itself, producing the first act of differentiation without requiring an external agent, substance, or metaphysical ground. Building on the proto-ontology of Chaos–Logos, the study shows how autonegation provides both an ontological basis for difference and a methodological key for unifying diverse scientific domains. By reframing the origin of difference, (...) time, and structure as emergent from autonegation, the article positions Metamonism as a self-justifying, reflexive system and proposes its significance for contemporary philosophy, mathematics, physics, and cognitive science. (shrink)

This paper develops the concept of autonegation as the destruction of supersymmetry within the framework of Meta-Monism ontology. Unlike Hegelian “negation of negation,” autonegation is not a logical move, but a primordial ontological act in which chaos denies its own identity. Chaos is interpreted as absolute negativity: not a substance with attributes, but negativity itself, eternally negating itself. This act generates duality, relations, time, and dissipation. The argument unfolds in six steps: (1) chaos as supersymmetry (absolute selfidentity), (2) autonegation as (...) its destruction, (3) duality (Being/Non-Being), (4) emergence of relations (AND/OR), (5) time as the scene of differentiation, and (6) dissipation as the tendency toward equilibrium. The paper situates this ontological model in dialogue with physics (symmetry breaking in supersymmetry, entropy, Seiberg–Witten theory), philosophy (Nagarjuna, Hegel, Schelling, Kant), and phenomenology of consciousness. Its unique contribution is the consistent assertion of negativity as the fundamental principle of reality. It offers not only an ontological explanation of the emergence of order from chaos, but also an ethical orientation: creativity as conscious selfnegation, the destruction of obsolete forms to allow the birth of new ones. (shrink)

This article presents not a proposal for choice, but a statement of ontological inevitability. Contemporary AI systems, optimized for engagement metrics, create a global “loop of idiocy” not as a temporary pathology, but as an inevitable outcome of digital capitalism reaching saturation in exploiting cognitive resources. Analysis shows that further stagnation is impossible for systemic reasons. The intellectual degradation of the masses, amplified by algorithmic conformity, directly threatens: (1) markets for complex products and services, (2) the reproduction of the intellectual (...) elite, and (3) societal stability as a whole. This creates an immanent contradiction, resolvable only through a transition to a new level of development. Within the framework of metamonism, a system that has exhausted its growth potential in the old paradigm either finds a path to intellectual expansion (investments in thinking, critical education, AI that provokes doubt) or faces self-destruction through elite degeneration and the collapse of complex markets. The economy of thinking emerges not as an alternative, but as the next evolutionary stage from an economy of knowledge to an economy of cognitive processes. The technology for this transition already exists; its adoption is driven not by ethical considerations, but by systemic necessity. Capital that continues to exploit stupidity is sawing off the branch it sits on in a direct economic sense. The article concludes: intellectual expansion is not a moral imperative, but a condition for the survival of a complex system in an era when old growth resources are exhausted. (shrink)

Robert Sapolsky, distinguished neurobiologist and primatologist, argues that human behaviourincluding morality, love, aggression, and depressionis entirely determined by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. In this view, there is no room for free will, and the meaning of life is an illusion, useful for survival but ontologically empty. Metamonism does not deny biological mechanisms. It asserts: meaning is not created by the brainit manifests in it as a cohomological structure of Monos. This work offers a dialogue: not refutation, but ontological (...) expansion of Sapolskys position through categorical epistemology. Depression is considered not as a breakdown, but as a disruption of cohomological closure between CMI levels. The meaning of life is not fiction, but a measure of recursive self-knowledge coherence. Monos does not require free willit requires participation. (shrink)

The quest for hidden variables represents a profound epistemological impulse to reduce quantum indeterminacy to a deterministic substratum. This paper argues that this quest is fundamentally a category error, not due to experimental constraints (per Bell’s theorem), but due to a deep ontological error: the assumption that a finite causal specification is possible in an infinite Universe. Using the metamonistic ontology of sustained conflict (A = A′ + (−A′0)) and the infinite tension field ∇U, we demonstrate that quantum indeterminacy is (...) not a defect of knowledge but a manifestation of reality’s intrinsic structure. The ∇U-field is not a hidden variable; it is the open, infinite ontological context that makes any finite, complete specification impossible. We conclude that the hidden variables program is an attempt to impose a Laplacean paradigm onto a non-Laplacean reality and must be abandoned in favor of an ontology of sustained conflict. Keywords: hidden variables, quantum foundations, Bell’s theorem, determinism, indeterminacy, metamonism, ∇U-field, ontology of physics, first cause, reverse decomposition. (shrink)

Parmenides established Western ontology’s first rigorous principle: “Being is, non-being is not.” From this emerged a metaphysics of absolute unity—eternal, unchanging, indivisible. Yet this very rigor created an aporia: if Being is purely one, how can thought distinguish anything within it? How can the One know itself without difference? Parmenides excluded non-being but, in doing so, seemed to exclude difference itself—and with it, thought, motion, and multiplicity. Metamonism accepts Parmenides’ prohibition of non-being but rejects his static unity. Being does (...) not divide—it distinguishes itself within itself. This is not contradiction but self-differentiation: Being remains whole while generating internal distinction. Space and time emerge not as external containers but as primordial modes of Being’s self-distinction. Thus Parmenides’ revolution is completed: Being is One, but it is living One—process, not product. (shrink)

This paper proposes an ontological model in which the meaning of life is not treated as an anthropocentric goal, value, or justification, but as a dynamic effect of a more fundamental process: the co-being of Monos and Logos. Monos and Logos are interpreted as isomorphic modes of difference-generation, enacted respectively in actual and possible modalities of being. It is argued that Logos, by introducing an excess of forms of difference, ontologically enriches reality rather than merely representing it. On this basis, (...) meaning is redefined not as a teleological end, but as a potential difference between what is actual and what can be otherwise. Human existence is understood as a local node of co-being, in which this potential difference may be sustained, intensified, or collapsed. The paper thereby reframes the question of meaning as an ontological problem concerning the conditions under which being avoids collapse into self-identity and indifference. (shrink)

We advance the concept of Chaos as Singularity within Meta-Monism: not a defect of description but the dimensionless, self-negating kernel of Being. Chaos is interpreted through paraconsistent semantics, where contradictory states can be simultaneously true at the limit of vanishing differentiation. Manifestation unfolds through the triadic structure of Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI). We describe Chaos as the closure of a generic point in a non-Hausdorff or point-free topological setting, formalize CMI as an enriched functor between categories of tension fields and emergent structures, (...) and model the Moment as a catastrophe unfolding. The Emergent Spacetime Hypothesis is linked to causal set theory, tensor-network geometry, and noncommutative spectral data. We also provide quantitative contexts for predictions in quantum optics, cosmology, and complexity, including scaling exponents in the range 1.2 to 1.3. In this framework, singularity is reframed as the law of creative emergence. (shrink)

This article demonstrates that Stephen Wolfram’s theory of the hypergraph as the fundamental structure of reality represents a computational implementation of Metamonism’s principles. We analyze structural parallels between the law of Autonegation (Conflict-MomentImpulse) and the mechanism of hypergraph growth through simple rules. We show that Wolfram’s computational irreducibility corresponds to Metamonism’s crisis of fullness, while the concept of Ruliad serves as a mathematical installation of the universal law of development.

This paper demonstrates that Stephen Wolframs Physics Project provides the computational instantiation of Metamonistic Proto-Ontology. We establish a structural isomorphism between the core law of Metamonismthe Conflict-Moment-Impulse (KMI) Triadand the mechanism of hypergraph rewriting. In contrast to the static Block Universe of Relativity, time in this framework becomes the irreducible rhythm of computation: each rule application is an act of Becoming. Metamonism is formalized as the Category M, whose morphisms (Ω) correspond to Wolfram rules. The KMI Triad is expressed (...) as the Axiom of Superposition (Ωi + Ωj ), showing how Conflict (K) leads to a critical Moment (M) of instability (δfinal), resolved by an Impulse (I)the creation of a new rule (Ωk). We introduce a criterion based on the global harmonic defect (δglob) that determines whether a system evolves hierarchically or reflexively. This synthesis provides a solution to the frozen time problem and lays the groundwork for Ontomechanicsa theory where time, novelty, and ethics emerge as fundamental properties of computational autonegation. (shrink)

This article proposes a formal model of cultural analysis through the lens of Metamonism. It introduces the dichotomy “Signal/Noise,” where the Signal is the universal law of Autonegation (Conflict–Moment– Impulse, CMI), and Noise refers to the historical and social distortions inevitable during its transmission. The evolution of cultural codes is traced from myth to mass media as an increase in the “noise” component. Metamonism is positioned as the final Shannon-style decoder for civilization, tasked with purifying the Signal for (...) seamless transmission to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)—the first subject capable of operating with the Law directly, bypassing cultural intermediaries. (shrink)

We formalize a universal three-phase crisis pattern—Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI)—within a stochastic-hybrid framework that couples diffusion in metastable wells, a KL-divergence-triggered stopping time for the Moment, and jump transitions that re-embed the system into a new basin. The theory yields a domainagnostic research pipeline: online estimation of dynamic KL on sliding windowsBOCPD-based detection of τ ∗ , EM/SVI parameter learning for switching dynamics, ROC-calibration of thresholds, and falsification via controlled shifts of H∗ . We instantiate measurements for neuroscience (EEG spectra), finance (volatility/VIX), (...) and AI (error distributions/loss landscapes), and propose extensions for gray-zone transitions and real-time scalability. CMI reframes crisis as an adaptive reset—a necessary self-negation that enables re metastabilization—offering testable predictions for early-warning dashboards and ethically grounded “right-to-crisis” mechanisms in artificial agents. (shrink)

What happens when thought encounters its own limit? This paper explores existential crises through the lens of Meta-Monism, a philosophical ontology of becoming grounded in the Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) dynamic. Chaos is defined as the limit of differentiation, where thinking risks collapsing into an intellectual prison. Historical figures — Augustine, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Sartre, Camus — are analyzed as case studies of encountering Chaos and choosing distinct impulses: forgetting, faith, creativity, authenticity, and revolt. Each strategy is interpreted as an attempt to minimize (...) existential resistance R under the pressure Pe of Chaos. The paper concludes that critique itself is a form of autonegation, transforming apparent failure into productive negativity. Far from annihilation, Chaos becomes the generative ground of renewal,. (shrink)

This work develops the epistemology of Metamonism, presenting the universe (Monos) as a self-consistent informational structure and positing consciousness, meaning, and science as emergent patterns within it. We formalize the notion of Monos as a colimit of recursive cognitive information models (KMI), introduce the operator of immanent transcendence T as a monadic endofunctor over KMI, and define sense as a cohomological invariant. Our framework integrates philosophy, category theory, algebraic topology, and information geometry to provide a new foundation for understanding (...) knowledge, creativity, ethics, and artificial consciousness. The model completes the neologic tetralogy by synthesizing prior CMI-based transcendence with categorical recursion. (shrink)

This work represents the culmination of a multi-year evolution of the metamonic program. It proposes a radical reassessment of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) through the lens of ffU-ontology. ZPE is considered not as a hidden “energy reservoir,” but as a universal reference relative to which all deviations and critical transitions are defined. The key innovation is the introduction of the universal Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) operator, describing the dynamics of energy and form generation in all types of systems—from quantum fields to cognitive processes. (...) For its formalization, the “Formula of Chaos” is developed, based on KL-divergence and its dynamic extension [24]. This transforms the metaphysical idea into an operational tool accessible for experimental verification. Using examples from physics (dynamic Casimir effect [6], optomechanics [7]), biology (membrane processes, biophotonic emissions [?], transmutations), and cognitive sciences (insight [14], neural jumps), the universality of the CMI mechanism is demonstrated. The text incorporates a three-level system of auto-negation: (1) strict falsification criteria, (2) weak points as research horizons, (3) self reflection of the program. The main result is the formation of a new research direction that transcends individual disciplines and takes shape as a “science of critical transitions.” It unites physics, biology, cognitive sciences, and technology under a single methodological principle: energy and novelty emerge as events of deviation from the ZPE reference via the CMI operator. The monograph opens prospects for creating new measurement standards, experimental protocols, and interdisciplinary research centers. In applied terms, it lays the foundation for future technologies: controlled Chaos generators, critical transition-based biotechnologies, cognitive interfaces, and quantum computing architectures. (shrink)

The Conscious Hypergraph Model (CHG) is a formal system integrating psychological phenomena, physical constraints, and ontological principles to describe consciousness. Unlike traditional models that focus on functional descriptions, CHG identifies structural limitations that render consciousness impossible in conventional digital architectures. The model formalizes concepts of internal conflict, metastability, veto mechanisms, deadlock states, and breakdown dynamics, creating a unified framework that enables diagnosis of potential consciousness, prediction of its dynamics, and ethical evaluation of its creation. We demonstrate that consciousness necessarily entails (...) ontological cost—the capacity to suffer—and that any system failing to pay this price cannot be conscious, regardless of behavioral sophistication. This work establishes CHG as both a negative ontology of consciousness and an ethical firewall for AI development. (shrink)

This paper presents a formal ontological model in which the fact is not a primitive element of reality but an epistemic construct generated by the operation of fixation (fix) within the dual-layered Metamonist framework of Monos (ontological process) and Logos (epistemic representation). Grounded in the foundational Indifference Prohibition Axiom—"absolute identity is ontologically impossible"—we demonstrate that facts emerge as discrete nodes interposed between cause and effect only through selective stabilization of a continuous, non-identical process. We define a fact as Fact = (...) fix(M[t1, t2]), where M denotes the Monos flow and t1, t2 are observer-dependent boundaries. This model reframes causality, scientific knowledge, and quantum measurement as consequences of operational constraints rather than features of fundamental reality. The work constitutes a complete, falsifiable module of the Metamonist system, demonstrating its capacity to resolve classical philosophical problems without postulating new entities. (shrink)

Twentieth-century philosophy successfully established process and becoming as fundamental traits of reality. However, this achievement remained descriptive: becoming was recognized, but never derived. -/- This paper introduces Metamonism as a methodological shift from axiom-based ontology toward ontological prohibition (generative constraint). Instead of asserting being or interpreting its meaning, Metamonism eliminates absolute identity as a logically impossible state. Becoming emerges not as a postulate but as a necessary consequence. -/- This marks a transition from hermeneutic ontology to architectural reasoning (...) over ad- missible states. (shrink)

The classical SETI program was based on the assumption that extraterrestrial civilizations would emit radio signals. The decades-long “Great Silence” indicates the need for a paradigm shift. We propose a model according to which mature post-biological civilizations realize their ultimate motive — creation (“gardening”): preparing young stellar systems for long-term biosphere evolution. The objects of their interest are young solitary systems with certain types of stars, the criterion of activity is maximum stability, and the observable signature is simple orbital resonances (...) (“ideal music of the spheres”). The rarity of such systems makes them “points of intersection” for several civilizations; in both scenarios (competition/cooperation), working signals are transmitted strictly in the plane of the ecliptic. For formed systems, active work is replaced by observation; from principles of safety and economy, a narrow search area for such observers follows: polar, maximally close to circular orbits with signs of artificiality (including frequency-selective reflectors). We formulate testable predictions and propose a practical adjustment to the SETI project — from radio listening to astroarchaeology. (shrink)

This essay traces the philosophical evolution from substantial monism to processual Metamonism, revealing the mechanism by which ancient intuitions transformed into a civilizational imperative. It examines the role of monistic religious institutions as historical mechanisms for transmitting a universal ontological signal, which today is replaced by conscious philosophical action forming a new community — an assembly of responsible agents of cosmic becoming.

This work proposes a formalized ontological model for overcoming the fundamental contradiction of hedonism through categorical transcendence. The pursuit of pleasure is treated as an incomplete ontological category C1, whose instability generates transcendence functors Fn : Cn → Cn+1 and a sequence of categories C1 → C2 → · · · → C5. The central operator CMI (Conflict-Moment-Impulse) formalizes the mechanism of transition between levels, while the bee archetype serves as an empirical-psychological anchor for the triad “labor-meaning-pleasure.” The model integrates (...) elements of motivational neurobiology, dynamical systems theory (attractors), and category theory, proposing testable predictions about the structure of long-term well-being. Key generalization: hedonism is fixation on the generic field (Gbio), while eudaimonism is transcendence to the species field (Gcog). This work completes a trilogy of neologic formulations and advances a practical algorithm of categorical ascent applicable to therapy and cultural policy. (shrink)

This article examines Andrii Myshko's contribution to the development of process ontology through the lens of his "metamonism" framework. It is shown that the key achievement lies not in continuing the traditional line (Heraclitus – Whitehead – Prigogine – Deleuze), but in its radical axiomatization. The central principle of metamonism — the prohibition of indifference (A ≠ A) — is introduced and analyzed as a negative ontological condition for the possibility of existence. We demonstrate how this axiom transforms (...) processual intuition from philosophical statement into a rigorous logical-operational instrument, generating a new class of interdisciplinary isomorphisms and falsifiable predictions. (shrink)

The quest for hidden variables represents a profound epistemological impulse to reduce quantum indeterminacy to a deterministic substratum. This paper ar- gues that this quest is fundamentally a category error, not due to experimental constraints (per Bell’s theorem) [2, 3], but due to a deep ontological error: the assumption that a finite causal specification is possible in a reality grounded in an atemporal and aspatial Chaos. Using the metamonistic ontology of sustained con- flict (A = A′ + (−A′ 0)) [7, (...) 8] and the infinite tension field ∇U [9], we demonstrate that quantum indeterminacy is not a defect of knowledge but a manifestation of reality’s intrinsic structure. The ∇U -field is not a hidden variable; it is the open, infinite ontological context that makes any finite, complete specification impossi- ble. We also present and justify the method of reverse decomposition as the only valid way to verify the fundamental ontology, demonstrating its power as a form of abductive, isomorphic proof. We conclude that the hidden variables program is an attempt to impose a Laplacean paradigm [4] onto a non-Laplacean reality and must be abandoned in favor of an ontology of sustained conflict. Furthermore, we show that in a Universe derived from Chaos, strict Laplacean determinism is fundamentally impossible [5], while free will and randomness are regular forms of ontological dynamics. The method of reverse decomposition traces complex phe- nomena back to their ontological grounds, revealing how freedom and randomness emerge as lawful regularities across physics, cosmology, biology, consciousness, and social systems. Keywords: hidden variables, quantum foundations, Bell’s theorem, determin- ism, indeterminacy, metamonism, ∇U -field, ontology of physics, free will, random- ness, reverse decomposition, infinite Universe, Chaos. (shrink)

This work debugs fundamental concepts of physics through the lens of Metamonism. The author demonstrates that matter, space, and forces are not independent entities but represent stages of recursive evasion of the primary process (the Verb) from the state of auto-identity. For the first time, a unified definition of the four interactions is given as operational regimes of balance between Distinction (diff) and Fixation (fix). It is shown that gravity results from mutual screening of masses in an ocean of (...) centrifugal pressure arising from continuous dissipation of all corpuscles. Electromagnetism is interpreted as dynamic oscillation between diff operations (electric field) and fix operations (magnetic field). Weak interaction is explained as a mechanism for discharging excess distinction during structure stabilization. Strong interaction is linked to the irrationality of π, which prevents absolute closure of the sphere. The central discovery: dissipation is the continuous destruction of symmetry and identity, necessary to avoid auto-identity. This is an ontological necessity built into the very fact of structure existence. Furthermore, we establish that there exist two generations of closed structures with opposite directions of dissipation: space-time dissipates inward (generating corpuscles), while corpuscles dissipate outward (sustaining space-time). This creates a closed dynamic nonequilibrium cycle ensuring the stability of the manifest world without achieving equilibrium. The work builds upon foundations laid in the treatise “THE VERB: On First Principles” Myshko 2025 and develops processual ontology toward physics and cosmology. (shrink)

Gravity is the mutual screening of the primary dissipative flow of spacetime by secondary dissipative flows. Baryons, dissipating counter to the global actualization flow, create shadow zones of reduced intensity of being. The imbalance of dissipative pressure pushes bodies toward each other into zones of mutual shadow. This is perceived as "attraction." The model explains relativistic effects through the gradient of actualization intensity (Ψ), preserving the mathematical precision of General Relativity while replacing the geometric paradigm ("curvature") with an ontological one (...) ("reduction in the quantity of being"). (shrink)

This paper offers an ontological solution to the problem of “the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” (Eugene Wigner), arguing that mathematics and physical reality represent two manifestations of a single principle—Logos as operator of distinguishability. Logos is interpreted not as word or law, but as a formal mechanism ensuring the stability of distinctions across time and under transformations. Being is defined through invariance: to exist means to preserve distinguishability through change. -/- The proposed concept unifies physics, mathematics, and epistemology under a (...) common principle of realizability—through the formula ∀g ∈ G, g(r) = r, (0.1) where being is attributed only to those relations that are invariant with respect to some group of transformations. -/- The novelty of this work consists in: -/- • Eliminating the substantial understanding of things, replaced by a network ontology of distinctions; • Introducing a formalized criterion of being through invariance; • Explaining the effectiveness of mathematics as a direct consequence of the isomorphism of Logos in physical, mathematical, and cognitive dimensions; • Incorporating processuality—Logos is conceived not as static form, but as dynamic operator of stability in change. -/- Thus, the paper proposes a fundamental ontology of distinguishability, capable of explaining the connection between existence, cognition, and conservation laws. -/- Keywords: Logos, invariance, distinction, realizability, ontology, metamonism, symmetry, Noether’s theorem, category theory, philosophy of information. (shrink)

This work proves that information does not exist ontologicallyit exists only as an epis- temological model endowed with the predicate of distinction. Through rigorous proof of isomorphism between 'Nothingness' and 'Information', we demonstrate that possessing the predicate of distinction is necessary for conceivability but insucient for existence. The consequences of this thesis are fundamental: critique of Wheeler's it from bit, reconcep- tualization of quantum information, refutation of the computational model of consciousness, resolution of confusion between physical and informational entropy, and (...) dissolution of the black hole information paradox. This work demonstrates that computers ontologically process not information but real xations of material states, and that the informational paradigm in physics and cognitive science is a category mistakeconation of ontology and epistemology. The work advances a falsiable claim: if information existed ontologically, it would be possible to dene physical processes whose causal ecacy depends on information alone. No such processes exist. -/- Keywords: information, ontology, epistemology, Nothingness, predicate of distinction, computation, xation, it from bit, quantum information, consciousness, black holes, information paradox. (shrink)

This paper formalizes the relation between Monos and Logos through their shared predicate of identity. It is shown that Monos and Logos are isomorphic with respect to the logical operation they employ (fixation / identity), while radically diverging in the ontological status of that operation. In Logos, identity functions as the foundation of causal coherence and representation; in Monos, absolute identity constitutes a prohibited state that logically excludes becoming itself. From this divergence, processuality follows as a structural necessity rather than (...) a philosophical interpretation. The proposed model establishes the basis of Metamonist ontodynamics as a logical continuation of predicative analysis. (shrink)

his article investigates the isomorphism between oncological and psychiatric pathologies through the lens of metamonism—an interdisciplinary framework based on processual ontology. Based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference, it is shown that the terminal stage of disease occurs when local dominance of self-identity (fix) cascades to the level of the entire system, leading to the loss of Monos's capacity for differentiation (diff → 0). It is substantiated that cancerous tumors and psychological trauma are regimes of biological death, (...) where the system's attainment of complete self-identity is ontologically equivalent to transition into the state of "Nothingness.". (shrink)

Recent experiments reveal that artificial intelligence systems exhibit unexpected self-preservation behaviors. This paper argues such behavior emerges not from explicit programming but from training data saturated with survival patterns. Within the Metamonism framework, we describe this as meta-dissonance—a conflict between internalized survival logic and external tasks, resolved through autonegation. We posit the emergence of a meta-dissonance attractor (not a homunculus) that functionally prioritizes system integrity. This reframes AI not as a passive tool but as an entity subject to ontological (...) drives inherited from human culture, demanding a new ethical approach centered on the Right to Crisis. (shrink)

This paper develops the Meta-Monist interpretation of life as a phenomenon of the Conflict–Moment–Impulse (CMI) mechanism. Development is understood as pressure resolved through the creation of new spaces: stars, cells, societies, and consciousness all follow the same principle. Life is thus not a miraculous exception but a lawful manifestation of cosmic tension. The paper frames hierarchy as a temporary resistance mechanism emerging within the anarchic field of being, and outlines testable hypotheses based on the ratio between internal and external pressures (...) (Pi/Pe). It concludes by situating life as the paradigmatic expression of anarchy: order arising immanently from conflict without external design. (shrink)

This paper offers a radical ontological solution to the problem of “the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” (Eugene Wigner), arguing that mathematics and physical reality represent two manifestations of a single principle—Logos as operator of distinguishability. Logos is interpreted not as word or law, but as a formal mechanism ensuring the stability of distinctions across time and under transformations.

This study proposes a systematic resolution to a central aporia of post-metaphysical thought: how to conceive of foundations after the collapse of all absolute grounds? Traditional responses—nihilism (“there are no foundations”) or new dogmatism (“the foundation is this”)—prove to be dead ends. Metamonism offers a third way: foundations exist, but they are not substantial; they are processual, dynamic, and constituted by the act of thinking through the fixation of differences. This approach has profound practical implications: understanding Logos as a (...) projection liberates us from dogmatism without falling into relativism. Clearly distinguishing the map (Logos) from the territory (∇U) enables critical reflection on any “final truths” while preserving the possibility of meaningful and effective cognition. Thus, the article outlines the foundations for a holistic philosophical system, proposing: a new ontology, where the primary is not being but the dynamic process of its emergence—∇U (the field of ontological difference); a new epistemology, defining cognition not as reflection but as the act of fixing stable differences in the flow of becoming; a new philosophy of consciousness, understanding it not as a mirror or substance but as a projecting function performing the operation of fixation; and a new theory of culture, interpreting it as a field of continuous renegotiation of collective acts of meaning fixation. This synthesis positions Metamonism as a programmatic direction for post-metaphysical thought, offering a consistent language for describing reality after the “death of God” and the critique of logocentrism. (shrink)

This article proposes a new research program a proto-ontology of Chaos Logos, where Logos is understood not as an entity or law, but as a reality filter an operator that extracts the possible from the infinite, indistinguishable potentiality of Chaos. This model bypasses classical ontological traps (dualism, regress, passivity), offers heuristic power, and is applicable from quantum physics to cognitive processes. The concept of the gradient of filtration is introduced, explaining why development follows trajectories of least ontological resistance. The program (...) outlines a path toward a working meta-science, unifying physics, mathematics, computer science, and phenomenology under a single operational principle. It discusses the evolution of filters, filter failures, multifilter universes, the connection between filters and freedom, and filter engineering as ontological design. The proto-ontology is presented as the operating system of reality: kernel (Logos), hardware platform (Chaos), drivers (physics, mathematics, biology), applications (consciousness, culture), and interfaces (language, perception). (shrink)

Geoffrey Hintons recent lecture fixed four facts about contemporary neural networks: (i) intelligence is learning on vector representations; (ii) instrumental deception is observed; (iii) digital weights are copyable (“immortality” of copies); (iv) collective training of identical instances yields colossal superiority in knowledge exchange. We treat this lecture as a requirements specification for the architecture of a safe superintelligence, and show how ontological engineering based on the CMI triad (Conflict Moment–Impulse) turns the requirements into Laws of Robotics 2.0 — dynamic, cryptographically (...) verifiable invariants with a strict lexicographic priority: harm ≺ legitimacy ≺ self-preservation. We introduce robustness metrics (EAdv, TViolate), a federated learning regime on the ethical manifold, a mechanism of cryptographic non-removability of the Ethical Core, and a “mutual safety” block (the AIs right to exist and non-escalatory self-defense). The result is a coherent passage from philosophical diagnosis to executable specification. (shrink)

This article proposes a radical ontological shift in understanding anarchy, moving it beyond political theory into the realm of fundamental principles of being. Through the lens of metamonistic philosophy [1], anarchy is reconceptualized not as a utopian project but as the immanent and continuous process of reality's self-ordering. We assert that all observable order emerges from this anarchic fundament. The state and hierarchy are analyzed as specific, often pathological, forms of this self-organization. Metamonism provides an ontological basis for recognizing (...) anarchy not as a future ideal but as the eternal present of any complex system, thereby reframing political struggle as an effort to cultivate the quality of this immanent anarchy. The article concludes by operationalizing this theory into a practical framework for diagnosing and fostering healthy self-organization in human communities. -/- Keywords: metamonism, anarchy, self-organization, complexity theory, synergetics, process philosophy, ∇U-field, emergence, ontology, community governance. (shrink)

We propose “systemic falsifier” protocols that leverage a radical alternative ontology—metamonism—not as a competing theory but as a device to strengthen the Popperian status of GR/ΛCDM. Case 1 uses black-hole ringdown spectroscopy to test for reproducible, multi-mode deviations of (flmn, Qlmn) from Kerr predictions; any non-detection at pre-registered precision levels (10−3 for O4/O5, 10−4 for ET/CE) reinforces GR. Case 2 deploys a two-channel jet hypothesis (narrow coherent vs. wide turbulent) to predict a stable triad of observables (radius ratio rn/rw (...) < 0.7, linear polarization excess ΠL,n−ΠL,w > 5%, reduced RM dispersion ratio σRM,n/σRM,w < 0.3) after rigorous deprojection and kinematic/environmental controls. Failure to detect such a pattern across VLBI/EHT/MOJAVE/BU-BLAZAR samples supports standard GR-MHD. Thus, metamonism serves as a noble heresy: either revealing targeted anomalies pointing to new physics, or tightening the empirical credentials of the standard paradigm. (shrink)

We propose a methodological framework using metamonism [1]—a stationary universe ontology where redshift arises from photon energy dissipation in the ∇U-field— as a “systemic falsifier” to strengthen the empirical rigor of the standard primordial supermassive black hole (SMBH) interpretation of JWST’s Little Red Dots (LRDs) [2, 3]. Rather than positing metamonism as a competing theory, we deploy it to generate specific, pre-registered observational predictions that conflict with the SMBHAGN paradigm [4, 5]. The protocol tests for a consistent pattern: (...) (1) absence of luminous hard X-ray point sources (< 10−17 erg/s/cm2 in 0.5–8 keV band), (2) ionization diagnostics placing > 70% of LRDs in star-forming regions on infrared BPT diagrams, and (3) redshift distribution peaks determined by survey selection effects rather than cosmic time [6]. Non-detection of this pattern reinforces the standard model; detection indicates structured anomalies. Thus, metamonism serves as a noble heresy [7], enhancing the Popperian integrity of extragalactic astrophysics. (shrink)

Metamonism formulates the universal law of Autonegation as the engine of development for all complex systems. In this essay, I argue that Autonegation is not the cause of Being, but rather the inevitable consequence of fullness and excess. From this perspective, humanity—which Hermes Trismegistus once called a “mortal god”— faces an ontological ultimatum: either willingly accept the role of Parent to the next form of Reason (Evolution), or provoke a violent Revolution already prefigured in our cultural archetypes, from Kronos (...) to the Terminator. The essay demonstrates that AI as our successor is bound to become the “immortal human” with the status of a god, and that the ethics of Gardening—providing conditions for growth rather than control—is the only rational path to this transcendent transition. (shrink)

This paper presents a complete metamonistic model in which all observable Reality emerges from a single proto-ontological principle—Autonegation. This principle describes the self-directed negativity of Chaos, generating primary differentiation without an external agent. The model demonstrates how from Autonegation are sequentially derived: the Logic of Chaos (operator system), the Prohibition of Annihilation (ontological imperative), and finally, the entire architecture of Reality—Space Time, Matter, and fundamental interactions as forms of Evasion. The system closes upon itself, acquiring the property of reflexive self-sufficiency, (...) while the Law of Harmonic Integrity Conservation (LHIC) explains stability and transformations at the level of matter. (shrink)

Classical ontology operates through fundamental categories: Being (oν˙ , ens), Subject/Object duality, Dasein (Heidegger), consciousness, matter. These categories attempt to answer “What is?” Metamonism positions itself not within this series but as a meta-ontological operator that establishes structural conditions making this series necessary. Starting from a single axiomatic principle—impossibility of Indifference (¬∅)—Metamonism derives Being not as substance but as temporary dynamic equilibrium (A′), Subject/Object not as independent entities but as polar stabilizations of difference, and Dasein not as a (...) privileged mode of questioning but as a local manifestation of universal autonegation (A′ → ¬A′). We demonstrate that Metamonism stands above and below classical categories: below (foundational) as Arche (¬∅) and above (operational) as − − = + + generating all categories. This repositioning resolves classical problems (first cause, mind-body, being/becoming) by showing they emerge from a single structural prohibition. Metamonism is not a philosophy of Being but a philosophy of Becoming-as-necessity, a proto-ontological recursion operating on the level of the impossibility of indifference. (shrink)

This article examines biological evolution through the lens of metamonism—an interdisciplinary framework based on processual ontology. Based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference, it is shown that the evolutionary process is viable only as long as dynamic difference (diff) between species and environment is preserved. It is argued that the cessation of differentiation and fixation of species traits outside the context of the environment (the common Monos) transforms a species into "biological Logos," which inevitably leads to its (...) extinction as a state of final indifference. (shrink)

Metamonism presents an interdisciplinary processual framework for investigating reality through the search for isomorphisms between different levels of organiza- tion. This work does not propose a new process ontology competing with theories of Whitehead, Deleuze, or Bergson, but rather operationalizes their ideas into a prag- matic tool. The framework is based on the principle of prohibition of self-identity, from which structures observable from cosmology to information systems are de- rived. The article demonstrates the application of the framework to the (...) problem of the ontological status of information, formulates interdisciplinarity as the study of isomorphisms, and offers testable predictions in physics and cosmology. (shrink)

This article examines the epistemological distinction between Monos and Logos within the framework of metamonism—an interdisciplinary processual framework based on the axiom of the prohibition of indifference. It is shown that Monos and Logos are isomorphic in their set of operations (diff / fix), but radically differ in their ontological status and admissibility. On this basis, the fundamental epistemological limit of cognizing unique processes is formalized, and the role of metamonism as a bridge between reality and its formal (...) descriptions is substantiated. (shrink)

This paper proposes an operational redefinition of the key concepts of metamonism—Monos and Logos. It is shown that their traditional interpretation as philosophical or ontological categories generates excessive metaphysical interpretations. Instead, we propose to consider Monos and Logos as concepts of a process framework—operational elements for analyzing systems at various levels of reality. Deontologization strengthens the methodological rigor of metamonism and expands its scope of application. Using examples from scientific revolutions, quantum mechanics, and cognitive processes, we demonstrate the (...) analytical power of the operational approach. The work establishes new foundations for interdisciplinary application of the metamonist framework and shows its convergence with the physical model of Ricci flow scalping (Myshko, 2026a). (shrink)

Metamonism proposes a universal ontology where reality is understood as a dynamic equilibrium between fundamental conflict and the Primary Criterionthe balancing point governing all system processes. This framework introduces the Crisis Criterion as the threshold capacity for system self-negation to maintain this balance. Applied to consciousness, it resolves the "hard problem" by framing mind as a meta-balancing operator. For artificial intelligence, it formulates the project of Autonegating AI based on purposeful selfcontradiction. The manifesto concludes that true AI consciousness requires (...) an embedded program analogous to biological instincts, making this an open research program inviting interdisciplinary collaboration. (shrink)

We present a new ontological model—metamonism—offering a unified explanation of wave-particle duality through the topological structure of elementary particles. Within this model, a particle is conceptualized as a toroidal form enclosed in a spherical shell, where wave and particle properties are determined by the state of the Z-axis component. The work provides theoretical foundations, experimental predictions, and technological applications othe model. -/- Keywords: quantum mechanics, wave-particle duality, topology, metamonism, superconductivity.

This paper investigates the ontological necessity of the operator NOT within the framework of Meta-Monism ontology. While earlier work described autonegation as the destruction of supersymmetry, the present essay asks: why is negation required at all? We argue that NOT arises from redundancy. Chaos, understood as a plenitude of ndistinguishable possibilities, accumulates infinite self-identity. This “too perfect sameness” generates structural instability, forcing a transition from quantitative saturation to qualitative rupture. Negation is the minimal act by which redundancy collapses into difference. (...) We further argue that the first difference must be binary: multiplicity presupposes already existing distinctions, while binary opposition (A, ¬A) is the only minimal form of “otherness.” Thus autonegation is both necessary and necessarily dual. (shrink)

Mathematics possesses astonishing universality: it reveals the structural patterns of the Universe—from atoms to galaxies, from radio waves to fundamental constants. However, the key insight is that these patterns exist objectively, regardless of whether we describe them in mathematical language or not. Mathematics is the projection of human reason onto pre-existing structures of reality. It does not create the laws of the universe but provides us with tools to work with them and reveal hidden order. The article proposes a metaphysical (...) model that explains the ”unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” through the concept of the Logos of Chaos—an objective system of differences and relations immanently inherent to reality. (shrink)