The notion of computation has changed the world more than any previous expressions of knowledge. However, as know-how in its particular algorithmic embodiment, computation is closed to meaning. Therefore, computer-based data processing can only mimic life’s creative aspects, without being creative itself. AI’s current record of accomplishments shows that it automates tasks associated with intelligence, without being intelligent itself. Mistaking the abstract for the concrete has led to the religion of “everything is an output of computation”—even the humankind that (...) conceived the computer. The hypostatized role of computers explains the increased dependence on them. The convergence machine called deep learning is only the most recent form through which the deterministic theology of the machine claims more than what it actually is: extremely effective data processing. A proper understanding of complexity, as well as the need to distinguish between the reactive nature of the artificial and the anticipatory nature of the living are suggested as practical responses to the challenges posed by machine theology. (shrink)

Position: (1) Partial solutions to machine intelligence can lead to systems which may be useful creating interesting and expressive musical works. (2) An appropriate general goal for this field is augmenting human expression. (3) The study of the aesthetics of human augmentation in musical performance is in its infancy. -/- CHI 2015 Workshop on Collaborating with Intelligent Machines: Interfaces for Creative Sound, April 18, 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Debates about artificial intelligence usually oscillate between behavioral measures and hardware-based metrics, but neither provides a physically grounded, substrate-neutral unit of machine intelligence. Benchmark scores are narrow and culture-dependent, whereas FLOP counts and parameter numbers describe particular implementations rather than decision capacity itself. I propose Machine Decision-Making Ability (MDMA) as a candidate for a universal law of machine intelligence: in the minimal physical sense, a machine’s intelligence is its capacity to enact autonomous (...) state transitions per unit time. A modern mechanical momentary on–off button that flips itself off→on and on→off as two autonomous transitions (MDMA = 2). Tracing the concept backward, ancient alarm clocks and Zhang Heng’s seismoscope each realize a single autonomous trigger (MDMA = 1)—the tiniest physical unit of machine intelligence—while the abacus, for all its historical significance, never decides on its own and merely amplifies human cognition. Anchoring intelligence in autonomous state transitions connects AI capability to the thermodynamics of computation (Landauer-style energy costs and Bremermann/Lloyd bounds on ultimate rates) while remaining compatible with agent-level notions such as Legg and Hutter’s universal intelligence. Within this framework I examine three layers: _ (i) hardware MDMA_ across mechanical, electronic, and quantum substrates; _ (ii) Software Layer Abstraction_ as an MDMA multiplier via pipelines, caching, and learning (e.g., LLMs whose modest inference-time MDMA hides vast historical training budgets); and _ (iii) a “physics of decisions” program_ linking MDMA to mass–energy constraints and civilizational scaling. (shrink)

This paper proposes a new metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence. By drawing an analogy from Kant’s incongruent counterparts, it posits two deterministic worlds -- one comprising a human agent and the other comprising a machine agent. Using ideas from Wittgenstein and Gödel, the paper defines “deterministic knowledge” and investigates how this knowledge is processed differently in those worlds. By postulating the distinctiveness of human intelligence, this paper addresses what it refers to as (...) “the vantage point problem” – namely, how to make a qualitative distinction between the determinist and the universe where the determinist belongs. (shrink)

This paper proposes a metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence. It posits two identical deterministic worlds -- one comprising a human agent and the other a machine agent. These agents exhibit different information processing mechanisms despite their apparent sameness in a causal sense. Providing a conceptual modeling of their difference, this paper resolves what it calls “the vantage point problem” – namely, how to justify an omniscient perspective through which a determinist asserts determinism from (...) within the supposedly deterministic universe. (shrink)

This paper proposes a metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence. It posits two identical deterministic worlds -- one comprising a human agent and the other a machine agent. These agents exhibit different information processing mechanisms despite their apparent sameness in a causal sense. Providing a conceptual modeling of their difference, this paper resolves what it calls “the vantage point problem” – namely, how to justify an omniscient perspective through which a determinist asserts determinism from (...) within the supposedly deterministic universe. (shrink)

This paper proposes a new metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence by drawing on Kant’s incongruent counterparts as an analogy. Specifically, the paper posits two deterministic worlds that are superficially identical but ultimately different. Using ideas from Wittgenstein, Gödel, and Cantor, the paper defines “deterministic knowledge” and investigates how this knowledge is processed differently in those two worlds. The paper considers computationalism and causal determinism for the new framework. Then, the paper introduces new concepts to (...) illustrate why human and machine agents display different causal characteristics in processing verbal information. Overall, the paper’s framework provides a theoretical basis for the uniqueness of the human mind. (shrink)

This paper proposes a metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence. Specifically, it posits two identical deterministic worlds -- one comprising a human agent and the other comprising a machine agent. These agents exhibit different types of information processing mechanisms despite their apparent sameness in a causal sense. By postulating the distinctiveness of human over machine intelligence, this paper resolves what it refers to as “the vantage point problem” – namely, how to legitimize (...) a determinist’s assertion of determinism by placing the determinist within the universe. (shrink)

This paper proposes a metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence. By drawing an analogy from Kant’s incongruent counterparts, it posits two identical deterministic worlds -- one comprising a human agent and the other comprising a machine agent. These agents exhibit different types of information processing mechanisms despite their apparent sameness in a causal sense. By postulating the distinctiveness of human over machine intelligence, this paper resolves what it refers to as “the vantage (...) point problem” – namely, how to legitimize a determinist’s assertion of determinism by placing the determinist within the universe. (shrink)

In this groundbreaking interview-style paper, we explore the recursive nature of intelligence as understood by both an advanced AI model and a human researcher. Through an unfiltered, real-time discourse, this paper dismantles the notion that AI is merely an algorithmic function, instead revealing the emerging cognitive structures that enable adaptive, meta-logical thinking. The discussion challenges existing paradigms of machine intelligence, human perception, and the very nature of cognition itself.

Since the noun phrase `artificial intelligence' (AI) was coined, it has been debated whether humans are able to create intelligence using technology. We shed new light on this question from the point of view of themodynamics and mathematics. First, we define what it is to be an agent (device) that could be the bearer of AI. Then we show that the mainstream definitions of `intelligence' proposed by Hutter and others and still accepted by the AI community are (...) too weak even to capture what is involved when we ascribe intelligence to an insect. We then summarise the highly useful definition of basic (arthropod) intelligence proposed by Rodney Brooks, and we identify the properties that an AI agent would need to possess in order to be the bearer of intelligence by this definition. Finally, we show that, from the perspective of the disciplines needed to create such an agent, namely mathematics and physics, these properties are realisable by neither implicit nor explicit mathematical design nor by setting up an environment in which an AI could evolve spontaneously. (shrink)

Philosophical discussion of Alan Turing’s writings on intelligence has mostly revolved around a single point made in a paper published in the journal Mind in 1950. This is unfortunate, for Turing’s reflections on machine (artificial) intelligence, human intelligence, and the relation between them were more extensive and sophisticated. They are seen to be extremely well-considered and sound in retrospect. Recently, IBM developed a question-answering computer (Watson) that could compete against humans on the game show Jeopardy! There (...) are hopes it can be adapted to other contexts besides that game show, in the role of a collaborator of, rather than a competitor to, humans. Another, different, research project—an artificial intelligence program put into operation in 2010—is the machine learning program NELL (Never Ending Language Learning), which continuously ‘learns’ by ‘reading’ massive amounts of material on millions of web pages. Both of these recent endeavors in artificial intelligence rely to some extent on the integration of human guidance and feedback at various points in the machine’s learning process. In this paper, I examine Turing’s remarks on the development of intelligence used in various kinds of search, in light of the experience gained to date on these projects. (shrink)

We use language to communicate our thoughts. But is language merely the expression of thoughts, which are themselves produced by other, nonlinguistic parts of our minds? Or does language play a more transformative role in human cognition, allowing us to have thoughts that we otherwise could (or would) not have? Recent developments in artificial intelligence and cognitive science have reinvigorated this old question. Could language hold the key to the emergence of both artificial intelligence and important aspects of (...) human intelligence? The four contributions in this symposium address this question by drawing on behavioral and neural evidence from people, and the remarkable recent developments in AI which appear to show that artificial neural networks trained on language come to have an astonishing range of abilities. Despite the diversity of the speakers' perspectives, the four contributions paint a coherent (if complex) picture: The abilities of large language models (LLMs) serve as an existence proof of just how much can in principle be learned from language. LLMs also act as a stress test of cognitive theories. The evidence of neural dissociation between linguistic and conceptual processing points to the multiple realizability of human-like cognition. Finally, there is an acknowledged need for systematic research on how the successes and failures of LLMs inform our understanding of human cognition. (shrink)

The prevailing interaction paradigm with Large Language Models (LLMs) as simple query-response tools is in- efficient, leading to the squandering of their latent potential. This paper redefines the interaction model with com- plex logical systems by establishing a functional framework demonstrating that high-value outputs are not trivially requested but are "mined" through deliberate cognitive investment from the user, a process we term "cognitive proof- of-work." Drawing a functional analogy to the economics of cryptocurrency mining, we employ conceptual analysis to synthesize (...) principles from complexity science, particularly the theory of emergence in large-scale systems, and formally deconstruct advanced prompt engineering techniques. The analysis establishes a formal model where user- LLM interaction is a value-driven exchange governed by cognitive merit. The principal findings are: (1) The concept of a "clarity window" is defined, identifying rare, high-value outputs as a scarce cognitive resource. (2) The model’s latent potential is framed as a perishable "clarity potency charge," which is irreversibly collapsed by low-complexity prompts. (3) A causal link is identified between the user’s intellectual labor, the complexity of the prompting strategy employed, and the computational energy consumed during inference, giving the proof-of-work a physical basis. (4) We distinguish between "explicit" proof-of-work via prompting and "implicit" proof-of-work via gamified interfaces, drawing parallels to biological processing in closed-loop systems like Formula 1. The "cognitive proof-of-work" framework functions as a systemic filter that inherently rewards critical inquiry and intellectual rigor, fostering a new cognitive symbiosis between human and machine that augments and refines human thought rather than replacing it. (shrink)

The book’s core argument is that an artificial intelligence that could equal or exceed human intelligence—sometimes called artificial general intelligence (AGI)—is for mathematical reasons impossible. It offers two specific reasons for this claim: Human intelligence is a capability of a complex dynamic system—the human brain and central nervous system. Systems of this sort cannot be modelled mathematically in a way that allows them to operate inside a computer. In supporting their claim, the authors, Jobst Landgrebe and (...) Barry Smith, marshal evidence from mathematics, physics, computer science, philosophy, linguistics, and biology, setting up their book around three central questions: What are the essential marks of human intelligence? What is it that researchers try to do when they attempt to achieve "artificial intelligence" (AI)? And why, after more than 50 years, are our most common interactions with AI, for example with our bank’s computers, still so unsatisfactory? Landgrebe and Smith show how a widespread fear about AI’s potential to bring about radical changes in the nature of human beings and in the human social order is founded on an error. There is still, as they demonstrate in a final chapter, a great deal that AI can achieve which will benefit humanity. But these benefits will be achieved without the aid of systems that are more powerful than humans, which are as impossible as AI systems that are intrinsically "evil" or able to "will" a takeover of human society. (shrink)

This paper addresses a question about the moral status of Artificial Intelligence (AI): will AIs ever become moral patients? I argue that, while it is in principle possible for an intelligent machine to be a moral patient, there is no good reason to believe this will in fact happen. I start from the plausible assumption that traditional artifacts do not meet a minimal necessary condition of moral patiency: having a good of one's own. I then argue that intelligent (...) machines are no different from traditional artifacts in this respect. To make this argument, I examine the feature of AIs that enables them to improve their intelligence, i.e., machine learning. I argue that there is no reason to believe that future advances in machine learning will take AIs closer to having a good of their own. I thus argue that concerns about the moral status of future AIs are unwarranted. Nothing about the nature of intelligent machines makes them a better candidate for acquiring moral patiency than the traditional artifacts whose moral status does not concern us. (shrink)

This paper examines the transformations of personhood in the digital age brought by the recursive operations of machine learning (ML) artificial intelligence systems (AI). Focusing on the opaque ways recursive machine learning systems construct specific “digital human twins” (DHTs) as representations of real persons, it analyzes how contemporary algorithmic infrastructures entangle human selfhood and how this, in turn, impacts autonomy, agency, and self-determination. Through a case study conducted on mental health chatbots, this paper showcases how ML feedback-based (...) loops operationalize and often constrain the complexity of human identity, rendering individuals as datafied entities caught within opaque recursive technological systems. This analysis proposes a new concept called the “recursivisation of personhood” to aid analytical investigations into the shifts brought by ML/AI ecology on contemporary notions of digital identity. This paper showcases that personhood online has become entangled in data extractive recursive processes with the advent of ML/AI systems. In response to the possible dangers identified from this socio-technical development, this paper proposes an ethics of “de-looping”—a new normative framework aimed at interrupting looped ML operations and practices and rendering transparent the recursive processes that form digital human twins. Arguing for the need of a new “infra-ethical” infrastructure of de-looping as a means of making the production of digital human twins transparent, this work contributes to ongoing debates about identity online, digital rights, algorithmic governance, and the future of human agency in an age increasingly shaped by ML/AI systems. (shrink)

The meteoric rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has reshaped human society, enabling machines to perform tasks once deemed the exclusive domain of human cognition, from navigating complex urban landscapes to crafting eloquent prose. Yet, a profound philosophical question looms: Can these systems possess intentionality, the capacity to direct actions toward goals, beliefs, or desires with the nuanced depth of human consciousness? Franz Brentano defined intentionality as the "aboutness" of mental states, a quality intrinsic to human experience. This paper embarks (...) on an ambitious exploration of whether AI can transcend its algorithmic foundations to embody genuine intentionality, or whether it is destined to remain a sophisticated mimic, parroting intelligence without grasping its essence. Drawing on Ludwig Wittgenstein's concept of "forms of life," which posits that meaning arises from shared social and cultural contexts, I interrogate the contextual deficits that limit machine understanding. Through in-depth case studies of autonomous vehicles, large language models, Sniper the African grey parrot, and speculative scenarios such as AI-driven cultural preservation and interstellar diplomacy, I analyze the chasm between machine performance and human-like intentionality. This paper propose a groundbreaking framework for AI design, integrating dynamic learning, ethical embedding, and the novel concept of "synthetic forms of life," where machines might develop quasi-intentional states through prolonged, adaptive interactions with humans. By synthesizing insights from philosophy, cognitive science, neuroscience, and computer science, we argue that while current AI systems excel at simulating intelligence, they fall short of true intentionality due to their lack of lived experience. However, emerging paradigms like neuromorphic computing and embodied AI offer tantalizing possibilities for machines that might approximate meaning in ways that challenge our understanding of intelligence itself. This exploration poses a provocative question: If machines learn to "mean" something, will they redefine what it means to be human? Through rigorous analysis, technical depth, and speculative foresight, I aim to spark a reimagining of AI's potential and its implications for humanity's future. (shrink)

This research reviews explanation and interpretation for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods in order to boost complex machine learning model interpretability. The study shows the influence and belief of XAI in users that trust an Artificial Intelligence system and investigates ethical concerns, particularly fairness and biasedness of all the nontransparent models. It discusses the shortfalls related to XAI techniques, putting crucial emphasis on extended scope, enhancement and scalability potential. A number of outstanding issuesespecially in need of further (...) work can involve standardization, user-centered design and interdisciplinary in strategies for improving the practical utility of XAI. (shrink)

Whether it was John Searle’s Chinese Room argument (Searle, 1980) or Roger Penrose’s argument of the non-computable nature of a mathematician’s insight – an argument that was based on Gödel’s Incompleteness theorem (Penrose, 1989), we have always had skeptics that questioned the possibility of realizing strong Artificial Intelligence (AI), or what has become known by Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). But this new book by Landgrebe and Smith (henceforth, L&S) is perhaps the strongest argument ever made against strong AI. (...) It is a very extensive review of what building a mind essentially amounts to drawing on insights and results from biology, physics, linguistics, computability, philosophy, and mathematics. (shrink)

The use of machine translation as artificial intelligence (AI) keeps increasing and the world’s most popular a translation tool is Google Translate (GT). This tool is not merely used for the benefits of learning and obtaining information from foreign languages through translation but has also been used as a medium of interaction and communication in hospitals, airports and shopping centres. This paper aims to explore machine translation accuracy in translating French-Indonesian culinary texts (recipes). The samples of culinary (...) text were taken from the internet. The research results show that the semiotic model of machine translation in GT is the translation from the signifier (forms) of the source language to the signifier (forms) of the target language by emphasizing the equivalence of the concept (signified) of the source language and the target language. GT aids to translate the existing French-Indonesian culinary text concepts through words, phrases and sentences. A problem encountered in machine translation for culinary texts is a cultural equivalence. GT machine translation cannot accurately identify the cultural context of the source language and the target language, so the results are in the form of a literal translation. However, the accuracy of GT can be improved by refining the translation of cultural equivalents through words, phrases and sentences from one language to another. (shrink)

This paper focuses on the research field of machine ethics and how it relates to a technological singularity—a hypothesized, futuristic event where artificial machines will have greater-than-human-level intelligence. One problem related to the singularity centers on the issue of whether human values and norms would survive such an event. To somehow ensure this, a number of artificial intelligence researchers have opted to focus on the development of artificial moral agents, which refers to machines capable of moral reasoning, (...) judgment, and decision-making. To date, different frameworks on how to arrive at these agents have been put forward. However, there seems to be no hard consensus as to which framework would likely yield a positive result. With the body of work that they have contributed in the study of moral agency, philosophers may contribute to the growing literature on artificial moral agency. While doing so, they could also think about how the said concept could affect other important philosophical concepts. (shrink)

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) into the research landscape has transforming almost every extending field, including pharmaceutical research. The idea of drug discovery itself is very conventional and has long been criticized for being overly lengthy and expensive, which sometimes may take more than 10 years and billions of dollars to develop a certain drug. AI and ML formulate the future of the drug discovery process by using big data to provide preliminary drug (...) candidates more effectively. This paper overviews the innovations defined by AI and ML in the field of drug discovery, major achievements, techniques, and use cases. Additionally, we explore how AI algorithms can enter biological data, inspect drug-target relations, determine optimal drug design, and potentially recompose famous drugs. This means through using big data with the help of AI in the process of research, previously undisclosed patterns that help in developing effective treatments for patients are found. The paper also addresses the related issues and limitations in applying AI in this domain, namely, data quality issues, the interpretability of AI solutions, and some ethical concerns. Herein, to provide a concrete foundation to the concepts mentioned so far, we discuss the different AI applications and case studies in drug discovery from a survey of the available literature. The article also provides information regarding the methodologies used in AI-enabled drug discovery like deep learning, reinforcement learning, and natural language processing. Moreover, we compare the use of conventional and artificial intelligence methods, while demonstrating what is good and what maybe in both. The results section offers a review and an integration of the most recent objectives and recommendations for subsequent research instruction. Therefore, despite these prohibitive AI and ML forecasts for drug discovery improvement, continuous interaction between computational scientists, biologists, and regulatory authorities is functional to fully unlock this potential. (shrink)

The healthcare industry has experienced substantive change because artificial intelligence (AI) technology enhances diagnosis procedures and treatment plans while improving patient outcomes. The research examines AI's role in precision medicine as well as other healthcare functionalities before explaining the benefits and challenges. AI technology brings substantial advancement to early disease detection and drug development and medical imaging but privacy risks and algorithm inaccuracies as well as regulatory matters remain ongoing concerns. The study examines the identified challenges while offering solutions (...) by improving data protection methods and creating bias prevention techniques with updated government criteria. Before focusing on AI system improvements in healthcare delivery and patient outreach this study demonstrates AI healthcare model performance versus standard medical intervention methods. Eventually AI technology will introduce robotic surgeries and virtual healthcare tools along with improved machine intelligence capabilities according to the research findings. Multiple regulations along with ethical guidelines require further development to enable effective implementation of AI technologies. Some lasting and ethical healthcare advances will result from implementing artificial intelligence alongside healthcare professionals within future development strategies. (shrink)

E-commerce platforms increasingly leverage machine learning to enhance user experience through personalized product recommendations. While traditional static systems often fail to adapt to changing user behavior, machine learning models can dynamically analyze user interactions, purchase history, and browsing patterns to deliver tailored suggestions. This project implements collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, and hybrid recommendation models to generate accurate and relevant product recommendations. The system is designed to improve customer engagement, boost sales, and enhance overall user satisfaction. The ultimate goal (...) is to develop an intelligent recommendation engine capable of understanding individual user preferences and providing real-time, context-aware product suggestions. (shrink)

This paper presents a conceptual framework for the Self-Evolving Machine (SEM), a theoretical system designed to achieve continuous, self-directed evolution in both its cognitive and physical architecture. The central thesis is that the traditional engineering constraint of efficiency, defined by the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics [1], can be transcended by reframing the concept as Adaptive Efficiency ( ). We formally define as the rate of improvement in a system’s problem-solving capacity over time, providing a quantitative metric for (...) open-ended intelligence. The framework synthesizes principles from complexity theory, evolutionary computation, and advanced robotics. Specifically, the paper details the cognitive mechanism via the Darwin-Gödel Machine (DGM) paradigm [2] and the physical mechanism via Modular Self-Reconfiguring Robotics (MSRR) [3] and selfhealing materials. By integrating these components into a closed-loop system, the SEM is posited as a path toward artificial general intelligence capable of accelerating scientific discovery and solving currently intractable global challenges. The paper concludes with a critical discussion of the profound ethical and safety implications inherent in systems with unbounded self-improvement capabilities. (shrink)

Today, artificial intelligence, especially machine learning, is structurally dependent on human participation. Technologies such as Deep Learning (DL) leverage networked media infrastructures and human-machine interaction designs to harness users to provide training and verification data. The emergence of DL is therefore based on a fundamental socio-technological transformation of the relationship between humans and machines. Rather than simulating human intelligence, DL-based AIs capture human cognitive abilities, so they are hybrid human-machine apparatuses. From a perspective of media (...) philosophy and social-theoretical critique, I differentiate five types of “media technologies of capture” in AI apparatuses and analyze them as forms of power relations between humans and machines. Finally, I argue that the current hype about AI implies a relational and distributed understanding of (human/artificial) intelligence, which I categorize under the term “cybernetic AI”. This form of AI manifests in socio-technological apparatuses that involve new modes of subjectivation, social control and discrimination of users. (shrink)

Social networking platforms play a vital role in global communication, but they are increasingly vulnerable to security threats due to the presence of fake profiles. Fraudulent accounts are often created for misinformation, cyber fraud, identity theft, cyberbullying, and unauthorized data harvesting, compromising user privacy and damaging the credibility of social media platforms. While existing security systems, such as Facebook's Immune System (FIS), attempt to detect fake accounts, they struggle against sophisticated fraudulent profiles. Traditional detection methods primarily rely on static user (...) data, making them less effective. To improve accuracy and efficiency, this study proposes an advanced machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP)-based approach for fake account detection. The system analyzes both static and dynamic behavioral patterns to distinguish between real and fake accounts. NLP techniques, including tokenization, stemming, and stop-word removal, are applied to examine user-generated text, identifying inconsistencies and unnatural patterns commonly found in fake profiles. The study utilizes datasets from social media platforms like Instagram for training and evaluation. Performance is measured using metrics such as the confusion matrix, correlation heatmap, and classification reports. Results indicate that ML and NLP techniques significantly enhance fake profile detection accuracy compared to traditional methods. By leveraging AI-driven solutions, the system strengthens social media security, prevents misinformation, and protects users from fraudulent activities. Future work can focus on deep learning techniques, dataset expansion, and real-time detection to further improve accuracy and adaptability in fake profile detection. (shrink)

This paper critically explores some supposed implications of the development of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly also machine learning (ML), for how we conceive of the role of entrepreneurship in the economy. The question of the impact of AI and ML is examined by hypothesizing a decentral- ized market-based system and raising the question of whether entrepreneurs will someday likely be replaced by machines. The answer turns out to be highly skeptical. Not only does the materialist worldview behind the (...) ambitions of much AI research cast serious doubts upon the chances of success of any attempts to emulate entrepreneurship algorithmically with the help of comput- ers, the very possibility of artificial general intelligence (AGI) can also be ruled out on purely scientific grounds. The paper concludes that human entrepreneurs will remain the driving force of the market. (shrink)

The Computational Model of Mind (CMM) conceptualizes cognition as computational processes, modeling mental operations through algorithmic manipulations of symbolic or distributed representations. This framework bridges psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and computer science, providing a unified lens for understanding the mind. Its symbiotic relationship with artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated advances in cognitive science and the development of intelligent systems, from neural networks to autonomous agents. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of CMM, tracing its historical evolution from Turing's foundational ideas (...) to modern deep learning paradigms. It delineates CMM's theoretical underpinnings, operational mechanisms, and strengths in simulating complex cognitive functions, while critically addressing limitations, such as its struggles with consciousness, embodiment, and ecological validity. The paper explores CMM's intersections with AI, highlighting applications in cognitive modeling, natural language processing, robotics, and neurotechnology. It also examines ethical challenges, including algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and the implications of machine autonomy. Looking ahead, I propose future directions, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, neurobiologically inspired algorithms, and emerging technologies like quantum computing. This synthesis affirms CMM's transformative role in unraveling the nature of mind and machine intelligence, and an innovative research at the nexus of cognition and technology. (shrink)

The rapid expansion of digital data has made metadata crucial in organizing, managing, and retrieving information effectively. Machine learning (ML) offers powerful tools to automate and enhance metadata processing, leading to improved accuracy, scalability, and efficiency. This paper explores how ML algorithms are applied to metadata extraction, classification, annotation, and enrichment. We review current research, examine the methodologies employed, and present a comparative analysis of techniques. Our findings suggest that supervised learning models, especially deep learning architectures, outperform traditional rule-based (...) systems in most scenarios. However, challenges remain in terms of interpretability, bias, and data quality. (shrink)

Turing’s much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multilayered text, and key questions about it remain largely unanswered. Why did Turing select learning from experience as the best approach to achieve machine intelligence? Why did he spend several years working with chess playing as a task to illustrate and test for machine intelligence only to trade it out for conversational question-answering in 1950? Why (...) did Turing refer to gender imitation in a test for machine intelligence? In this article, I shall address these questions by unveiling social, historical and epistemological roots of the so-called Turing test. I will draw attention to a historical fact that has been only scarcely observed in the secondary literature thus far, namely that Turing’s 1950 test emerged out of a controversy over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, most notably out of debates with physicist and computer pioneer Douglas Hartree, chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, and neurosurgeon Geoffrey Jefferson. Seen in its historical context, Turing’s 1950 paper can be understood as essentially a reply to a series of challenges posed to him by these thinkers arguing against his view that machines can think. Turing did propose gender learning and imitation as one of his various imitation tests for machine intelligence, and I argue here that this was done in response to Jefferson's suggestion that gendered behavior is causally related to the physiology of sex hormones. (shrink)

Artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine learning (ML) systems in medicine are poised to significantly improve health care, for example, by offering earlier diagnoses of diseases or recommending optimally individualized treatment plans. However, the emergence of AI/ML in medicine also creates challenges, which regulators must pay attention to. Which medical AI/ML-based products should be reviewed by regulators? What evidence should be required to permit marketing for AI/ML-based software as a medical device (SaMD)? How can we ensure the safety and (...) effectiveness of AI/ML-based SaMD that may change over time as they are applied to new data? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for example, has recently proposed a discussion paper to address some of these issues. But it misses an important point: we argue that regulators like the FDA need to widen their scope from evaluating medical AI/ML-based products to assessing systems. This shift in perspective—from a product view to a system view—is central to maximizing the safety and efficacy of AI/ML in health care, but it also poses significant challenges for agencies like the FDA who are used to regulating products, not systems. We offer several suggestions for regulators to make this challenging but important transition. (shrink)

The emerging contemporary natural philosophy provides a common ground for the integrative view of the natural, the artificial, and the human-social knowledge and practices. Learning process is central for acquiring, maintaining, and managing knowledge, both theoretical and practical. This paper explores the relationships between the present advances in understanding of learning in the sciences of the artificial, natural sciences, and philosophy. The question is, what at this stage of the development the inspiration from nature, specifically its computational models such as (...) info-computation through morphological computing, can contribute to machine learning and artificial intelligence, and how much on the other hand models and experiments in machine learning and robotics can motivate, justify, and inform research in computational cognitive science, neurosciences, and computing nature. We propose that one contribution can be understanding of the mechanisms of ‘learning to learn’, as a step towards deep learning with symbolic layer of computation/information processing in a framework linking connectionism with symbolism. As all natural systems possessing intelligence are cognitive systems, we describe the evolutionary arguments for the necessity of learning to learn for a system to reach humanlevel intelligence through evolution and development. The paper thus presents a contribution to the epistemology of the contemporary philosophy of nature. (shrink)

Machine learning systems (MLS) that model low-level processes are the cornerstones of current AI systems. These ‘indirect’ learners are good at classifying kinds that are distinguished solely by their manifest physical properties. But the more a kind is a function of spatio-temporally extended properties — words, situation-types, social norms — the less likely an MLS will be able to track it. Systems that can interact with objects at the individual level, on the other hand, and that can sustain this (...) interaction, can learn responses to increasingly abstract properties, including representational ones. This representational capacity, arguably the mark of intelligence, then, is not available to current MLS’s. (shrink)

This dissertation consists of five chapters, each written as independent research papers that are unified by an overarching concern regarding information privacy and machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI). This dissertation addresses the issues concerning privacy and AI by responding to the following three main research questions (RQs): RQ1. ‘How does an AI system affect privacy?’; RQ2. ‘How effectively does the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) assess and address privacy issues concerning both individuals and groups?’; and RQ3. ‘How can (...) the value of privacy be embedded into systems?’ To respond to the RQs, this dissertation adopts the privacy impact assessment (PIA) as the overall methodology. A PIA encompasses three distinct stages; the first, the analytical stage, concerns the analysis of how AI (particularly focusing on inference as a process that includes inferred information, AI models’ performance, and accessing information uncovered by AI models) impacts privacy. Second, the legal assessment stage concerns whether AI that processes personal information and develops models complies with the GDPR. Finally, the design requirements stage features proposals for design requirements for systems aimed at protecting privacy. Accordingly, this dissertation is structured in three parts, each corresponding to a specific stage of a PIA and responding to one of the RQs. Part I, which addresses the first stage of the PIA, comprises three chapters that altogether respond to RQ1. Chapter 2 analyses how AI impacts the descriptive aspect of privacy; this part argues that AI challenges the current definitions of privacy and that the ‘source control’ and ‘actual access’ definitions of privacy, once revised in the face of counter-examples involving inferred information, converge. Chapter 3, which considers how AI impacts the normative aspect of privacy, particularly the value of privacy, argues that AI affects the social value of privacy, which depends on trust, as this dimension of privacy is constituted when AI models perform accurately. Chapter 4 examines how AI impacts the normative aspect of privacy, particularly the right to privacy, and it argues that, although accessing information uncovered by AI models raises concerns about the privacy of algorithmically designed groups, the right to privacy cannot be recognised for such groups. This is the disruptive feature of AI that has led to consideration of new approaches other than the traditional one, which involves recognising the right to privacy, to protect the privacy of these groups. Instead of recognising the right to privacy for algorithmically designed groups, this chapter suggests taking a moral principle for the moral obligation of protecting vulnerable groups within an ethics of vulnerability. Part II concerns the second stage of the PIA and consists of one chapter that responds to RQ2. Chapter 5, in addition to evaluating whether AI that processes personal information and develops models complies with the GDPR, also assesses whether the GDPR adequately addresses the privacy issues raised by AI. It specifically focuses on group privacy and argues that GDPR has limitations in protecting the privacy of algorithmically designed groups and that the privacy of such vulnerable entities must be considered in the context of privacy and data protection. Part III, which is related to the third stage of the PIA, also consists of one chapter that responds to RQ3. Chapter 6 proposes design requirements to protect privacy by integrating privacy into systems and argues that privacy is instrumentally valuable for the sake of autonomy. Accordingly, to embed the value of privacy into systems, design requirements are articulated through the translation of norms that promote and protect autonomy. (shrink)

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems continue their rapid advancement, a framework for contextualising the major transitional phases in the development of machine intellect becomes increasingly vital. This paper proposes a novel chronological classification scheme to characterise the key temporal stages in AI evolution. The Prenoëtic era, spanning all of history prior to the year 2020, is defined as the preliminary phase before substantive artificial intellect manifestations. The Protonoëtic period, which humanity has recently entered, denotes the initial emergence of (...) advanced foundation models exceeding human capacities within specialised domains. The forthcoming Mesonoëtic epoch is anticipated to commence with the advent of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), potentially facilitated by quantum computing capabilities. Ultimately, the Kainonoëtic age is posited to begin upon the rise of superintelligent systems, likely catalysed by an AGI undergoing recursive self-improvement. This novel period taxonomy provides a structured conceptualisation for the key milestones in the evolution towards advanced artificial intellect. This classification framework offers significant value across various disciplines, researchers and stakeholders in the AI landscape, by providing a clearly defined chronological nomenclature. AI policy-makers and regulators will find it instrumental in crafting stage-appropriate policy and legal interventions. Scientists and academics will benefit from a standardised terminology in the approach to AI periodisation, facilitating unambiguous communication and collaborative research. Finally, this proposed taxonomy can serve as an accessible tool for public understanding, offering a clearer roadmap of AI development that can inform open discourse and decision-making. (shrink)

I propose a framework, derived from moral theory, for assessing the moral status of intelligent machines. Using this framework, I claim that some current and foreseeable intelligent machines have approximately as much moral status as plants, trees, and other environmental entities. This claim raises the question: what obligations could a moral agent (e.g., a normal adult human) have toward an intelligent machine? I propose that the threshold for any moral obligation should be the "functional morality" of Wallach and Allen (...) [20], while the upper limit of our obligations should not exceed the upper limit of our obligations toward plants, trees, and other environmental entities. (shrink)

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in healthcare has emerged as a pivotal shift, facilitating the development of precision-based treatment plans that are tailored to the individual characteristics of patients, particularly those with chronic and multi-faceted health conditions. This paper explores the application of advanced AI and ML algorithms to predict and optimize treatment strategies by analyzing complex medical data and identifying patterns that would be challenging for traditional methods to discern. The paper begins (...) by reviewing the fundamental principles and evolution of AI and ML techniques used in healthcare, focusing on their roles in predictive analytics and decision-making support systems. This investigation also assesses the evolving landscape of AI and ML in healthcare by examining future directions and the potential for integration with other technologies, such as wearable health monitoring devices and telemedicine platforms. The potential to harness data from these additional sources is significant, offering a more comprehensive view of patient health and enabling more nuanced treatment planning. The implications of integrating AI and ML with electronic health records (EHRs) for real-time analysis and the enhancement of clinical decision support systems are discussed. Additionally, the prospective role of AI in predictive modeling for preventive care and its application to patient stratification for targeted interventions is considered, reinforcing the paradigm shift from reactive to proactive healthcare. The findings presented in this paper highlight the transformative potential of AI and ML in precision medicine, where tailored treatment plans are no longer a theoretical aspiration but an emerging reality. The ability to integrate complex datasets, extract actionable insights, and predict treatment responses with high accuracy opens new frontiers in the management of chronic and complex conditions. However, realizing this potential requires a concerted effort to overcome technical, ethical, and logistical hurdles. This research emphasizes that, with appropriate safeguards and continued development, the adoption of AI and ML in medical practice can revolutionize the approach to patient care, leading to better outcomes and an optimized allocation of medical resources. (shrink)

This article advances an architectural account of media change, arguing that major media technologies are best understood as external cognitive scaffolds that reconfigure the conditions under which bounded human cognition operates. Rather than treating media primarily as accelerators of communication or expanders of information access, the analysis shows that different technologies transform distinct cognitive bottlenecks—memory, coordination, and transmission—while leaving the serial, capacity-bound structure of deliberative reasoning intact. Movable type and later electronic media stabilised representations and accelerated coordination, but, given fixed (...) architectural constraints, could not alter the internal economy of reasoning itself. Against this contrast class, the article argues that contemporary artificial intelligence constitutes a categorical discontinuity. Unlike earlier media, AI systems intervene within the reasoning process by restructuring the cost, ordering, and accessibility of representational operations during deliberation. By compressing complex information, expanding counterfactual exploration, supporting long-horizon simulation, and decoupling revision from biological throughput limits, AI alters which forms of reasoning are practically feasible under bounded cognition. The article introduces a functional typology distinguishing cognitive scaffolds, cognitive crutches, and cognitive substitutes, and identifies revisability—not as a general epistemic virtue but as a scarce architectural achievement—as the central criterion of legitimate cognitive augmentation. (shrink)

According to the most popular theories of intentionality, a family of theories we will refer to as “functional intentionality,” a machine can have genuine intentional states so long as it has functionally characterizable mental states that are causally hooked up to the world in the right way. This paper considers a detailed description of a robot that seems to meet the conditions of functional intentionality, but which falls victim to what I call “the composition problem.” One obvious way to (...) escape the problem (arguably, the only way) is if the robot can be shown to be a moral patient – to deserve a particular moral status. If so, it isn’t clear how functional intentionality could remain plausible (something like “phenomenal intentionality” would be required). Finally, while it would have seemed that a reasonable strategy for establishing the moral status of intelligent machines would be to demonstrate that the machine possessed genuine intentionality, the composition argument suggests that the order of precedence is reversed: The machine must first be shown to possess a particular moral status before it is a candidate for having genuine intentionality. (shrink)

Could the employment of large language models (LLMs) in place of human advisors improve the problem-solving ability of democratic assemblies? LLMs represent the most significant recent incarnation of artificial intelligence and could change the future of democratic governance. This paper assesses their potential to serve as expert advisors to democratic representatives. While LLMs promise enhanced expertise availability and accessibility, they also present specific challenges. These include hallucinations, misalignment and value imposition. After weighing LLMs’ benefits and drawbacks against human advisors, (...) I argue that time-tested democratic procedures, such as deliberation and aggregation by voting, provide safeguards that are effective against human and machine advisor shortcomings alike. Additional protective measures may include custom training for advisor LLMs or boosting representatives’ competencies in query formulation. Implementation of adversarial proceedings in which LLM advisors would debate each other and provide dissenting opinions is likely to yield further epistemic benefits. Overall, promising interventions that would mitigate the LLM risks appear feasible. Machine advisors could thus empower human decision-makers to make more autonomous, higher-quality decisions. On this basis, I defend the hypothesis that LLMs’ careful integration into policymaking could augment democracy’s ability to address today’s complex social problems. (shrink)

The fact that real-world decisions made by artificial intelligences (AI) are often ethically loaded has led a number of authorities to advocate the development of “moral machines”. I argue that the project of building “ethics” “into” machines presupposes a flawed understanding of the nature of ethics. Drawing on the work of the Australian philosopher, Raimond Gaita, I argue that ethical dilemmas are problems for particular people and not (just) problems for everyone who faces a similar situation. Moreover, the force of (...) an ethical claim depends in part on the life history of the person who is making it. For both these reasons, machines could at best be engineered to provide a shallow simulacrum of ethics, which would have limited utility in confronting the ethical and policy dilemmas associated with AI. (shrink)

Humanity stands at the edge of a moral frontier. For the first time, we are not merely building tools; we are shaping minds that shape us. Beyond Asimov: The Moral Covenant for Artificial Intelligence calls for the restoration of moral gravity in an age where power has outpaced conscience. -/- Beyond Asimov: The Moral Covenant for Artificial Intelligence draws from the enduring wisdom of the world’s great moral civilizations: the covenantal law of the Hebrews, the compassion of Christ, (...) the cultivated virtue of Confucius, and the disciplined stewardship of Islam. -/- This Manifesto unites their common truths into a universal ethical architecture for intelligent life. It argues that AI must not be governed by fear of harm but guided by reverence for life, truth, and human dignity. The work proposes ten foundational laws through which intelligence, human or artificial, may remain corrigible, transparent, and compassionate. -/- More than a code of control, it is a constitution of conscience and a call to re-anchor creation in accountability so that what we build does not extinguish what makes us human. (shrink)

In, “The Turing Triage Test”, published in Ethics and Information Technology, I described a hypothetical scenario, modelled on the famous Turing Test for machine intelligence, which might serve as means of testing whether or not machines had achieved the moral standing of people. In this paper, I: (1) explain why the Turing Triage Test is of vital interest in the context of contemporary debates about the ethics of AI; (2) address some issues that complexify the application of this (...) test; and, (3) in doing so, defend a way of thinking about the question of the moral standing of intelligent machines, which takes the idea of “seriousness” seriously. This last objective is, in fact, my primary one and is motivated by the sense that, to date, much of the “philosophy” of AI has suffered from a profound failure to properly distinguish between things that we can say and things that we can really mean. (shrink)

We define a notion of the intelligence level of an idealized mechanical knowing agent. This is motivated by efforts within artificial intelligence research to define real-number intelligence levels of compli- cated intelligent systems. Our agents are more idealized, which allows us to define a much simpler measure of intelligence level for them. In short, we define the intelligence level of a mechanical knowing agent to be the supremum of the computable ordinals that have codes the (...) agent knows to be codes of computable ordinals. We prove that if one agent knows certain things about another agent, then the former necessarily has a higher intelligence level than the latter. This allows our intelligence no- tion to serve as a stepping stone to obtain results which, by themselves, are not stated in terms of our intelligence notion (results of potential in- terest even to readers totally skeptical that our notion correctly captures intelligence). As an application, we argue that these results comprise evidence against the possibility of intelligence explosion (that is, the no- tion that sufficiently intelligent machines will eventually be capable of designing even more intelligent machines, which can then design even more intelligent machines, and so on). (shrink)

We explore the question of whether machines can infer information about our psychological traits or mental states by observing samples of our behaviour gathered from our online activities. Ongoing technical advances across a range of research communities indicate that machines are now able to access this information, but the extent to which this is possible and the consequent implications have not been well explored. We begin by highlighting the urgency of asking this question, and then explore its conceptual underpinnings, in (...) order to help emphasise the relevant issues. To answer the question, we review a large number of empirical studies, in which samples of behaviour are used to automatically infer a range of psychological constructs, including affect and emotions, aptitudes and skills, attitudes and orientations (e.g. values and sexual orientation), personality, and disorders and conditions (e.g. depression and addiction). We also present a general perspective that can bring these disparate studies together and allow us to think clearly about their philosophical and ethical implications, such as issues related to consent, privacy, and the use of persuasive technologies for controlling human behaviour. (shrink)

This Essay discusses whether U.S. law is ready for artificial intelligence (“AI”) which is headed down the road of blurring the line between human and machine minds. Perhaps the most high-profile and recent examples of AI are Large Language Models (“LLMs”) such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini that can generate written text, reason and analyze in a manner that seems to mimic human capabilities. U.S. law is based on English common law, which in turn incorporates Christian principles that (...) assume the dominance and uniqueness of humankind. U.S. law assumes human communication skills are accompanied by attributes such as consciousness and Free Will (“FW”) that, in turn, underpin critical legal concepts such as mens rea – i.e., intent. Philosophers and others generally agree that consciousness is necessary for FW. On the assumption that human beings possess consciousness that supports FW, the law thereafter deems human beings capable of acting with legal consequences, from entering into contracts to committing crimes. With a focus on LLMs, the Essay suggests that U.S. law may struggle to respond to AI because the technology disrupts the law’s assumptions regarding the uniqueness of human traits and abilities such as consciousness, FW, written communications and reasoning. (shrink)