If things go on as they are, Russia will defeat the Ukrainian army and force Ukraine and its NATO allies to accept its terms of peace.
I don’t see how any reasonable person can deny this fact. The Ukrainians drafting young boys and old men into their army and still are not replenishing troop losses. The Russians still have most of their forces in reserve.
But war hawks hope that victory can be snatched from the jaws of defeat. They want to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles that will strike deep into Russia.
Some still hope that Russian forces can be driven out of Ukraine. Others are willing to settle for a cease-fire along existing battle lines.
Victory and compromise are both false hopes. Ukraine and its allies can’t win, and the Putin government is unwilling to negotiate except on the basis of the draft treaty presented prior to the invasion in February, 2024.
Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris, in the video above, sum up the situation very well.
Russia has overall military superiority in Europe, based on the size of its army, its superior production of missiles and artillery shells and its ability to match Western forces in electronic warfare.
Until now, Russia has been content to limit its proxy war with NATO to Ukrainian territory. It has gone along with the fiction of the NATO powers that they are not directly involved in the war, but merely supplying armaments to Ukraine so it can defend itself. Russia has responded to Ukrainian attacks on border areas by massive attacks on the Ukrainian power grid and other targets, but has not struck targets outside Ukraine itself.
President Putin said in a press conference in Uzbekistan on Tuesday that long-range missiles are different. They require American, British or other outside experts to operate. And the same is true of use of satellite reconnaissance for targeting.
For much of the 20th century, as Todd notes, the USA was, in fact, the “indispensable nation,” and in his view this was a good thing. 