I’ve been delving into a new book. It’s about gardening, or to be more accurate; not-gardening. (Stick with me – this is going to lead onto education). Not gardening as we know it in terms of managing our own isolated little spaces by prettying up some parts, killing others, controlling nature and forcing it to do what we want it to do, rather than what it wants to do. It’s not about any of that.
It’s about seeing our garden, front yard, window box, whatever, not as one small personal patch, but as part of a gigantic whole earth to which we are connected. And seeing ourselves as guardians of this bit of earth we actually share with other parts of nature, rather than gardeners who keep it out. We should steer away from a insular view of our space where we separate, tidy and control each corner, bed, or ‘room’ as contemporary garden design likes to label them. For in reality nothing in our garden actual exists in isolation, it is dependent on the bigger environment that it is inevitably connected to, despite our attempts to fight it; the insects, the soil, the location, the garden next door and down the street, local flora and fauna and climate. It is all invisibly connected. It’s all nature. It is all interdependent and consequentially important… (The book’s worth a read: ‘We Are the Ark’ by Mary Reynolds. Or find it here; wearetheark.org)
And I immediately thought; what an amazing parallel there is between this view of our gardens and our view of education and educating.
Nothing about learning exists in isolation. So we should equally stop trying to compartmentalise it, or the kids. It might just work so much better for so many.
Over the decades we’ve been generally led to believe that educating needs to be a manageable and controllable process of developing certain outcomes in our kids through rigid and structured approaches, that requires separating kids into a plot (school), and isolating them from the rest of the world. We fertilise some aspects of our children’s development (the academic mostly) and try and kill off others (like their creativity for example), almost like we try and genetically modify crops. We keep subjects as separate from one another as brick edging so that no cross pollination occurs, instead of seeing all the language, maths, sciences and humanities as interconnected. We try and weed out the idiosyncrasies of our diverse learners in attempts to make them all the same, make them learn all in the same way, at the same time, in the same climate, which clearly doesn’t work for many children, just as it doesn’t work for all plants. Then, when the children don’t grow in the way we want them to grow, we try and prick out the weaker ones, giving them various labels that are in no way useful. Like ‘disruptive’. ‘Slow learner’. ‘Attention deficit’, thus making an issue of a child’s natural tendency to investigate, experiment, move about, be curious and intrigued and thus unable to sit still, which to my mind is a sign of their developing intelligence and eagerness to learn. Even worse, we try and ‘fix’ these traits on occasion by various means, some as harmful as crop spraying.
All instead of opening our eyes to the glaring obvious truth that many kids need something different from the suffocating education system we have allowed to become the norm.
When you’re home educating you can see their education as different from that. You can look at the bigger picture – the whole earth view rather than approaching it in isolate little patches of learning. And maybe you’ll begin to see the interconnectedness of all subjects, all approaches, all the little activities you do as important, however jumbled they are, and trust that they all contribute to each other and to the rounded development of an educated being (not a schooled being).
This is what real education looks like, as opposed to hot housing.
All learning overlaps. Whether the activity you’re doing is labelled ‘educational’ or not, it will have a valuable influence on your children’s learning as a whole. Just living a life has an influence on skill building, formulating knowledge, reinforcing it, that will transition into educational outcomes (if we want to label them).
I always think cooking is a good example of this – relevant to all ages. To cook you have to research, to read and use language, witness scientific changes as heat brings a change of state to certain substances, you have to learn and have a mathematical knowledge of amounts. You have to develop the skills needed to use and manipulate tools, materials and substances with different properties. You have to use creative thinking, imagination, and problem solving when compromise is needed. And doing this with others will develop the skills of cooperation, job sharing, conversation, among other social skills. Even the clearing up expands skills and understanding of yourself as part of a community, or team, and that you do not exist in isolation; that what you do impacts on others, particularly the mess you’ve left behind, and how to take responsibility for it.
If you wanted to label the subjects involved in all this you could call it ‘doing’ maths, English, science, language, PSE or whatever the latest personal development label is.
But if you see all activities your kids are doing as a valuable part of an infinite education, you’ll realise that anything they’re doing, in whatever form, wherever they are, impacts on this whole, from squatting on the pavement watching ants, to investigating YouTube, playing with their mates, or gaming. Including all the activities that don’t necessarily have a label!
I’m not saying we should regulate nothing. What I’m saying is that home educating gives us the opportunity to educate the whole child, and all their diversities, through a range of diverse activities that interconnect and are part of life, not just part of a school, directed towards schoolish outcomes (like test results) And perhaps that’s how we should see it, rather than a tidy, container-based, manipulated and isolated set of subjects to be ticked off, the result of which process often begets failures.
Our gardens are part of a whole ecosystem, and should not destroy any part of that ecosystem’s health from the smallest insect to the tiniest weed, in the way we take guardianship of them. Not least because we depend on that broader ecosystem for our own health!
Equally, our children’s education does not have to be contained in specific packages, subjects, rooms or timetables, or make kids suffer. It is a growth of interconnected skills, knowledge, understanding, and personal development, that evolve through a variety of overlapping experiences contributing to an educated whole, in a more organic and holistic way than it has been previously. Many unstructured home educating families are proving, have proved, how well this works. An organic, mostly unstructured, and holistic education is more compatible to the organic and natural earth that exists around our youngsters and which they will need to take guardianship of.
We are beginning to take a broader view of our gardens and their relationship to all nature, to the whole earth and the all other living organisms upon it .
Why not take the same view of education? Many families already do, with great success, proving it doesn’t have to be completely packaged, structured or rigidly contained in the way we’ve done previously. We need to be brave about broadening it beyond the restrictive concept we generally have had of it, because that’s as damaging to some kids as weed killer is to plants. Instead, allow it to expand, overlap and bloom in a much more holistic, diverse and healthier way, more related to an earth-wide whole.
Home educating gives you a wonderful opportunity to do just that.