The Innocence of Islamic Jihad: True or false?
The Innocence of Islamic Jihad: True or false?
The video was uploaded at midnight July 4. As of 12:16 it had 24
views.
While the greater part of the video is true and
easily verifiable, it ends with two egregious errors. Imran
Firasat allowed his optimism to overcome rational thought.
Islam is incapable of reform because it is
absolutist, presented as perfected and immutable. You can not improve perfection.
Jihad can not be removed from the Islamic doctrine
set. While Muslims are Muslims, we can not live in peace with
them. We can live in peace with apostates or dead Muslims, but
not with living Muslims who believe in and attempt to implement Allah’s
imperatives, threat & promise.
Pakistan’s Brig. S.K. Malik gave us the key to
victory in page 60 of The
Quranic Concept of War: we must destroy their faith; cause
them to abandon belief in Allah, his imperative, threat &
promise.
The Qur’an citations in the video are listed below, each linked to a
table of parallel translations.
- 2:191
- 2:193
- 2:244
- 2:216
- 9:39
- 9:111
- 3:169
- 5:82
- 9:41
- 3:158
- 8:12
- 8:13
- 9:73
- 9:123
- 47:4
- 5:33
- 9:29
- 8:60
- 8:65
- 9:14
- 4:150
- 4:151
- 2:85
- 8:39
- 4:84
- 9:38
- 8:39
- 3:169
The major bin Ladin quote comes from The al-Qaeda Reader. The Shari’ah of Jihad,
including the legal definition is found in The Reliance of the
Traveller O 9.
The most authentic traditions concerning Jihad are
found in Sahih Bukhari’s Books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition. The placards boasting of world
domination have their origin in three of Ibn Kathir’s Tafsirs:
- http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//48.49630.html
- http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//2.3156.html
- http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9075.html .
For more detail about Jihad, see:
- Hasan Al-Banna: Jihad
- Jihad: The Forgotten Obligation
- Maududi: Jihad In Islam
- Ibn Taymiyyah The Religious and Mora Doctrine of Jihad
- Suhas Majumdar Jihad:
The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War
While I was writing this review, the number of
viewings grew to 274, a good start considering the date and time of
release. This video lives up to its trailer, I am satisfied with
the production quality and factual content. I understand that
Muslims will not agree with my verdict. I have given you the
resources you need to verify the facts and explore the context of the
quotes.
Bullshit: Ghouse vs Geller–Jihad
Pamela Geller and Michael Ghouse argued about Islam & Jihad on Sean Hannity’s radio show. You can listen to the audio here. The title of this post reflects a phrase used by twice by Ghouse in this debate. This debate is in the context of revelation of the fact that John Brennan, nominated to head the CIA, is one of the enemy, a slave of Allah.
Thick accents and rapid speech make this argument hard to follow, but its context and content are extremely important. Mike is a liar: he asserted that “there is no offensive warfare in Islam”, that Islam only fights defensively. Pamela exhibits cognitive dissonance: at once demanding that violent imperatives be expunged from the Koran and acknowledging the impossibility of expunging them.
Muslim supremacists are super arrogant, condescendingly assuming us to be so stupid & gullible that their lies will never be fact checked. With the exception of Risala, which is only available on the web, the books you should be reading are available at Amazon and other book stores. The internet makes some of these texts available to those of us who are not sufficiently affluent to accrue large libraries.
The Muslim appointed to head the CIA claims that Jihad is a “legitimate concept” of self-purification & control in Islam. Each of the six canonical hadith collections, considered the most authentic by Islamic scholars, has a book of Jihad or expedition. I invite you to search each of those books and extract from them the ahadith relating to Jihad an-Nafs. What proportion of those books relate to offensive warfare against infidels and what proportion relate to wrestling with one’s ego? [Riyad us-salihin, Tirmidhi, al Nisa’i & Ibn Majah are large pdf files that may take some time to load. If you read Riyad & Tirmidhi, you will have most of the bases covered; there is much redundancy..]
- Sahih Bukhari
- Khan’s translation
- Bewley’s Translation (more complete, numbered differently and not anchored)
- Riyad as-Salihin
- Sahih Muslim
- Sunan Abu Dawud
- Malik’s Muwatta
- Tirmidhi
- Sunan al-Nasa’i
- Sunan Ibn Majah
Ghouse asserts that Jihad asghar is strictly defensive: he is a liar; I submit proof! Reliance of the Traveller, cited by Geller in the debate, defines Jihad as war against non-Muslims. Here is the full quote, with links added for reference.
Chapter O9.0: Jihad
(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.
“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);
-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);
-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);
and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;
and the hadith reported by Muslim,
“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)
Islamic law describes the obligation to wage war against passive infidels as communal: fard al kifaya, which lapses with respect to individuals once a sufficient number have responded. Other obligations, such as Saum & Zakat, are fard Ayn: individually binding. Jihad only becomes fard Ayn when Dar ul-Islam is invaded or threatened. I refer doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance O9.1. The obligation to attack passive infidels is described as binding upon Muslims in every year.
Subsequent sections of Chapter 9 inform us that “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians” and “fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. ” I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers: damned fools one and all, to O9.8 & 9.9 for a critical lesson in objective factual reality.
The handbook of Hanifi Fiqh makes it plain with slightly archaic language: war must be carried out continuously, and it is undertaken on Islamic initiative, not in reaction to provocation. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damned fools one and all, to Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 140 & 141 to obtain a clue.
- Text
- The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
- Marginal Note
- Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
The Sealed Nectar is described As the official biography of the Profit. I now present to you a portion of its Table of Contents. Note the frequent occurrence of terms such as battle and invasion. Islam is so peaceful! The violence started while the Profit was alive, in his last decade though Ghouse would have you believe that it is bida, inserted long after his death. Note the extortion letters dictated and dispatched to neighboring Kingdoms prior to several invasions.
[Emphasis added.] [Source: http://www.sunnipath.com/library/Books/B0033P0000.aspx ]
- The Third Phase: Calling unto Islam beyond Makkah
- Al-Isra’ and Al-Mir‘raj
- The First ‘Aqabah Pledge
- The Second ‘Aqabah Pledge
- The Vanguard of Migration (in the Cause of Allah)
- In An-Nadwah (Council) House The Parliament of Quraish
- Migration of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
- Life in Madinah
- The First Phase: The Status Quo in Madinah at the Time of Emigration
- A New Society being built
- A Cooperation and Non-Aggression Pact with the Jews
- The Prophet on the Battlefield
- The Battle of Badr – The First Decisive Battle in the History of Islam
- The Military Activities between Badr and Uhud
- Al-Kudr Invasion
- An Attempt on the Life of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
- Invasion of Bani Qainuqa‘
- The Qainuqa‘ Jews breach the Covenant
- As-Sawiq Invasion
- Dhi Amr Invasion
- Ka‘b bin Al-Ashraf, killed
- The Invasion of Buhran
- Zaid bin Harithah leads a Compaign on the Trade Routes of Quraish
- The Battle of Uhud
- A Consultation Assembly for a Defence Plan
- Dividing the Islamic Army into phalanxes and Departure to the Battlefield
- Parading the Army
- Passing the Night between Uhud and Madinah
- The Rebellion of ‘Abdullah bin Ubai and his Followers
- The Remainder of the Islamic Army are on the Move to Uhud
- The Defence Plan
- The Messenger of Allah SWT implants the Spirit of Bravery among his Armed Forces
- Recruitment of the Makkan Army
- Political Manoeuvres of Quraish
- The effort of Quraishite women at waging the Zeal of Men
- The Combat
- Assassination of Asadullah (the Lion of Allah) Hamzah bin ‘Abdul Muttalib
- Bringing the Situation under Control
- From his wife’s lap to Sword-fights and Sorrows
- The Contribution of the Archers squad to the Battle
- The Archers’s Fatal Mistake
- The Most Awkward Hour in the Messenger’s Life
- Mutilation of the Martyrs
- Burial of the Martyrs
- Hamrâ’ Al-Asad Invasion
- The Observations of the Noble Qur’ân on the Battle of Uhud
- Lessons and Moralities
- Military Platoons and Missions between the Battle of Uhud and the Battle of the Confederates
- Al-Ahzab (the Confederates) Invasion
- Invading Banu Quraiza
- Military Activities continued
- Bani Al-Mustaliq (Muraisi‘) Ghazwah Sha‘ban 6 Hijri
- Delegations and Expeditions following Al-Muraisi‘ Ghazwah
- Al-Hudaibiyah Treaty (Dhul Qu‘dah 6 A.H.)
- The Second Stage: A New Phase of Islamic Action
- The Prophet’s Plans to spread the Message of Islam to beyond Arabia
- A Deputation to Abyssinia (Ethiopia)
- Letter to the Vicegerent of Egypt, called Muqawqas
- A Letter to chosroes, Emperor of Persia
- The Envoy to Caesar, King of Rome
- A Letter to Mundhir bin Sawa, Governor of Bahrain
- A Letter to Haudha bin ‘Ali, Governor of Yamama.
- A Letter to Harith bin Abi Shamir Al-Ghassani, King of Damascus
- A Letter to the King of ‘Oman, Jaifer, and his Bother ‘Abd Al-Jalandi
- Post-Hudaibiyah Hostilities
- Dhu Qarad Invasion
- The Conquest of Khaibar (in Moharram, 7 A.H.)
- Sporadic Invasions
- The Compensatory ‘Umrah (Lesser Pilgrimage)
- The Battle of Mu’tah
- The Conquest of Makkah
- The Third Stage
- Hunain Ghazwah
- The Enemy’s march and their Encampment at Awtas
- The war-experienced Man wrongs the Leader’s Judgement
- Reconnoitering the Weapons of the Messenger of Allah SWT
- Reconnoitering the Enemy’s Weapons
- The Messenger of Allah SWT leaves Makkah for Hunain
- The Islamic Army stunned the Archers and the Attackers
- Muslims’ return to the Battlefield, and the fierceness of the Fight
- Reverse of Fortunes and the Enemy’s utter Defeat
- Hot pursuit of the Enemy
- Ta’if Compaign
- The Distribution of the Booty at al-Ji‘ranah
- The Helpers (Al-Ansar) are furious at the Messenger of Allah SWT
- Arrival of the Hawazin Delegation
- Lesser Pilgrimage (Al-‘Umrah) to Makkah and leaving for Madinah
- Missions and Platoons After the Conquest
- The Invasion of Tabuk in Rajab, in the year 9 A.H.
- The underlying Reasons
- General News about the Byzantines and Ghassanide Preparations for War
- Particular News about the Byzantine and Ghassanide preparations for War
- The Muslim Army is leaving for Tabuk
- The Army of Islam at Tabuk
- Returning to Madinah
- The People Who lagged Behind
- The Invasion of Tabuk and its Far-Reaching Ramifications
- The Qur’ânic Verses Relating to this Invasion
- Some Important Events that featured that Year
- Abu Bakr [R] performs the Pilgrimage
- A Meditation on the Ghazawat
The violence flows from Allah’s Jihad imperatives enshrined in the Koran. Obtain a clue from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which explains them.
- The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
- The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
Have you seen those signs which declare triumphantly that Islam will dominate the world? Where do Muslims get that idea? Once again, Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.
- The Good News that Islam shall prevail
- The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
- The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
We have foolishly allowed an enemy fifth column to invade our territory and infiltrate our government. It is essentially necessary to expel and exclude Muslims from America and Western Civilization. We must first strip off the false mantle of religion, exposing Islam as a mercenary & martial predator preying on the human race. Once exposed and defrocked, Islam can be removed from the penumbra of protection offered by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, its institutions closed and Allah’s slaves expelled & excluded.
Please do your part by sharing this blog post with as many people as you can hope to influence. Take the second step by signing the International Qur’an Petition, emailing it to your Representative & Senators.
Romney vs Obama on Foreign Policy: a Contest of Fools
I found a transcript of the third Presidential ‘debate’
at Fox News Insider and have excerpted what I consider to be the most
important statements. My comments are distinguished by red font
color. Footnotes appear below the horizontal line.
- Romney:
- “And so what we’re seeing is a pretty dramatic reversal in the
kind of hopes we had for that region.:- Nobody who is intelligent and informed had any such hopes; we
knew exactly what the short term outcome would be: replacing tyrants
with new tyrants. No other outcome is possible while Islam dominates
the region.
- Nobody who is intelligent and informed had any such hopes; we
- ” I congratulate him on — on taking out Osama bin Laden and
going after the leadership in al-Qaeda.”- Osama and subordinate leaders are
inconsequential distractions from the real enemy: Islam. While the
population and regimes of the region remain Islamic, our cause is lost;
our blood and treasure wasted by damned fools & traitors. This war
can not be won by decapitating the hydra, you must destroy its faith:
cause the population to cease believing in Allah, his imperatives,
threat & promise.
- Osama and subordinate leaders are
- “But we can’t kill our way out of this mess….”
- Yes we can: we have nukes, but not
the will to use them. We could have victory if we had the will to nuke
the enemy off the face of the earth.
- Yes we can: we have nukes, but not
- …”We’re going to have to put in place a very comprehensive
and robust strategy “…- Military: kill the leadership; bomb and
strafe their funeral processions. - Ideological: show Allah’s slaves
exactly what they are enslaved by and who enslaved them. Expose them to
the truth about Allah & Moe and their damnable doctrines &
practices. “The Innocence of Muslims” is a good start conceptually, but
weak in production values and woefully incomplete.
- Military: kill the leadership; bomb and
- …”to help the — the world of Islam and other parts of the
world, reject this radical
violent extremism, which is — it’s certainly not on the run.”- The highlighted phrase is why I
will not vote for Willard; I will do a write in because I swear that I
will never knowingly vote for a damned fool or a liar. Jihad, genocide & terrorism are neither
radical nor extreme: they are
normative Islam, enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in Moe’s
sunnah. - Islamic Jihad is not diminished and
can not be short of decimation or extermination. While Muslims
believe in Allah’s
Imperatives, threat
& promise
they will continue
waging Jihad.
- The highlighted phrase is why I
- “And so what we’re seeing is a pretty dramatic reversal in the
- Obama:
- “Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the
American people safe. And that’s what we’ve done over the last four
years.”- But for sheer luck and the
incompetence of the enemy’s fifth column, hundreds would have been
slaughtered and maimed by improvised explosive devices. You did
not protect the victims of the Fort Hood Massacre, you allowed it to
succeed by retaining a traitor in the ranks of officers. Political
Correctness had fatal consequences. - You have not kept our men and women
in the field safe; you imposed suicidal rules of engagement in
Afghanistan. You have neither the will to win nor a clue how to
achieve and secure victory.
- But for sheer luck and the
- “We ended the war in Iraq,”…
- Shi’ia & Sunni continue killing
each other and the government is corrupt and incompetent. Christians
are being terrorized, driven into exile and murdered with
impunity. You perpetuated Shrub’s treason: handing a victory to
Islam.
- Shi’ia & Sunni continue killing
- …” refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9/11“….
- The highlighted phrase is a prime
example of al-Taqiyya & kitman.- The overt lie: ‘The attack on the
WTC & Pentagon was the work of a tiny minority of extremists;
eliminating them will permanently solve the problem; preventing future
attacks.’. Saudi Arabia financed the attack, Iraq & Iran provided
logistical assistance. - The obfuscation: The enemy
is Islam. We were attacked because we are not Muslims; we are infidels
who ‘deserve to be killed‘, rebels whom Allah will punish by
the hands of Muslims. Allah’s Jihad imperatives
require
constant wars of conquest until the entire world is conquered.
Moe’s sunnah exemplifies conquest. Allah’s imperatives require
casting terror into the hearts of infidels. Allah’s promise
rewards
Muslims for Jihad & terrorism. Allah’s
threat condemns them
to Hell if they shirk Jihad.
- The overt lie: ‘The attack on the
- The highlighted phrase is a prime
- …”And as a consequence, Al Qaeda’s core leadership has
been decimated.”- The enemy is Islam, Al-Qaeda is a
subset of Islam, not the essential enemy. Leaders can be replaced
and have been. Jihad continues so long as there are sufficient Muslims
and material to carry it out.
- The enemy is Islam, Al-Qaeda is a
- “In addition, we’re now able to transition out of Afghanistan
in a responsible way,” …- Leaving the population & regime
Islamic is irresponsible: it wastes every dollar and drop of blood shed
there in the last 11 years. While they remain Muslim, we are defeated,
not victorious.
- Leaving the population & regime
- …”making sure that Afghans
take responsibility for their own security. “…- Both
capacity and will are ignored
in that deceptive clause. They want to take over the government
and participate in Jihad to conquer the world. From their
viewpoint, security means driving the invaders out and training new
terrorists to attack us again.
- Both
- “…And that allows us also to
rebuild alliances and make friends around the world to combat future
threats.”- Muslims are commanded not to have
equal or inferior relationships with infidels. Islam and Muslims
must be dominant. We do not and can not have Muslim friends and
allies!
- Muslims are commanded not to have
- ” when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure
that, number one, that we did
everything we could to secure those Americans who were still in
harm’s way;”…- When the crap hit the
fan there was nothing that could be done, our personnel were
doomed.
You were asked to increase security in response to previous threats and
you refused. The blood of four Americans is on your hands and can
never be washed off.
- When the crap hit the
- …” number two, that we would investigate exactly what
happened,”…- How in Hell do you expect to
investigate the attack and determine the identity of the
attackers? It happened in a foreign country, where the
regime is in sympathy with the attackers and the culture and language
are foreign.
- How in Hell do you expect to
- …”and number three, most importantly, that we would go after those who
killed Americans and we would bring them to justice.”- How in Hell do you expect to obtain
custody of the perpetrators and convict them in a court of law?
And that overlooks the upper eschelons who conceived of and
ordered the attack.- The security of our diplomatic
posts is dependent on a combination of deadly force and the will
to use it. That consulate nad neither the force nor the
will as a direct result of your treason &
malfeasance. Since you are more concerned about seeing dead
terrorists paraded on al-Jazira than about diplomats being tortured and
assassinated, you should have closed that consulate and evacuated the
staff.
- The security of our diplomatic
- How in Hell do you expect to obtain
- …” liberate a country that had been under the yoke of
dictatorship for 40 years. “- They are not liberated: they are
still Muslims; Allah’s slaves. You replaced one tyrant with another and
unleashed the arms he had stockpiled, permitting them to be widely
distributed for future use against us.
- They are not liberated: they are
- …”build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.”
- “Arab Spring” is a threat, not an
opportunity. It replaces more prudent or at least covert attackers
who were waiting for the right conditions and overtly supporting
terrorists with less patient and more overt enemies. Some changes
are not improvements.
- “Arab Spring” is a threat, not an
- “Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the
- Romney:
- “Well, my strategy is pretty straightforward, which is to go
after the bad guys, to
make sure we do our very best to interrupt them, to — to kill them, to
take them out of the picture.”- Romney shares Shrub’s intellectual
incapacity and moral turpitude. This is not a matter of “bad guys”, it
is a matter of an evil ideology which inculcates hatred, incites
violence and promises rewards for terrorism. As long as there is Islam;
as long as there are Muslims, there will be terrorists probing for
weakness, exploiting it and devising new ways to raise Hell.
- Romney shares Shrub’s intellectual
- …”But the key that we’re going to have to pursue is a — is a
pathway to get the Muslim
world to be able to reject extremism on its own.”- “:Extremism” is an egregious lie!
Offensive Jihad
conquest, genocide
& terrorism
are intrinsic
sacraments of Islam. Islam can not be reformed because it is perfected
and the Qur’an is immutable. Islam is all or nothing: the Qur’an
forbids selectivity.
- “:Extremism” is an egregious lie!
- “We don’t want another Iraq, we don’t want another Afghanistan.
That’s not the right course for us. “…- Invading Afganuistan & Iraq was
a fool’s errand: a total waste of blood and money. We should have nuked
them.
- Invading Afganuistan & Iraq was
- …”The right course for us is to make sure that we go after
the — the people who are leaders of these various anti-American groups and
these — these jihadists,”…- Jihadists are Muslims; Muslims are
Jihadists, if they are believers. We need to eliminate Islam entirely.
- Jihadists are Muslims; Muslims are
- … “but also help the Muslim world.”
- .There is only one way to help the
Muslim world: make it non-Muslim by inducing mass apostasy.
Document the character & works of Moe and give the movie global
distribution. Show Muslims exactly what they worship and
emulate. Escalate Father Zakaria’s mission.
- .There is only one way to help the
- “how we can help the — the world reject these — these
terrorists. And the answer they came up with was this:” …- They can not reject terrorists;
terrorists are their heroes, the most respected and celebrated of
Muslim believers.
- They can not reject terrorists;
- …”And the answer they came up with was this: One, more
economic development. We should key our foreign
aid, our direct foreign investment, and that of our friends, we should
coordinate it to make sure that we — we push back and give them more
economic development.”- Foreign aid to Islamic satraps
primarily benefits the tyrant and his close associates. It is
treason: giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Cut it off entirely! Number two, better education.- In Islam, education means
memorizing the Qur’an and hadith. Educating Muslims means showing
them the truth about their cult, its deity & founder and their
doctrines. Nothing else is of any benefit until we liberate them from
Allah’s yoke of slavery.
- In Islam, education means
- ”
Number three, gender equality.”- Gender equality is incompatible
with Islam. You must destroy their faith before it can become
possible.
- Gender equality is incompatible
- “Number four, the rule of law. We have to help these nations
create civil societies.”- In Islam, only Allah has the
right to legislate, which he delegated to Moe and his caliphs.
Islam and civil society are polar opposites.
- In Islam, only Allah has the
- Foreign aid to Islamic satraps
- …” Iran is the greatest national security threat we face.”
- Its Islam, not Iran. Iran is a
threat because it is dominated by Muslims. They will get a nuke
and they will use it on Israel. Neither Romney nor Obama will do
anything to prevent it.
- Its Islam, not Iran. Iran is a
- “Well, my strategy is pretty straightforward, which is to go
- Obama:
- …” number one, make sure that these countries are supporting
our counterterrorism efforts.”…- Islamic nations support terrorists
not counter terrorism. Russia & China will support the Muslims as a
means of taking us down a notch.
- Islamic nations support terrorists
- …”Number two, make sure that they are standing by our
interests in
Israel’s security, because it is a true friend and our greatest ally in
the region.”- Muslim nations hate Israel because Israel
is living proof that Allah is an impotent idol. Russia and China
have Islamic client states, so they will take the Islamic side, not
Israel’s.
- Muslim nations hate Israel because Israel
- //\\…”Number three, we do have to make sure that we’re
protecting religious
minorities and women because these countries can’t develop unless all
the population, not just half of it, is developing.”…- There is only two ways to protect indigenous Christian
minorities in Egypt, Nigeria, Arabia & Asia:: make them the
majori8ty by eliminating Islam or give them asylum in Muslim free
zones. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Shari’ah to obtain a
clue.
- There is only two ways to protect indigenous Christian
- …”Number four, we do have to develop their economic — their
economic capabilities.”;;;- Developing their economies means
increasing the resources available to support Jihad. Give them the
explosives to bomb us with.
- Developing their economies means
- …”But number five, the other thing that we have to do is
recognize that
we can’t continue
to do nation building in these regions. Part of
American leadership is making sure that we’re
doing nation building
here at home. That will help us maintain the kind of American
leadership that we need.”- There
is no expletive, profane or obscene, of sufficient power to express the
magnitude, depth and intensity of my contempt for that AssWhole and the feces it spews! Building
anything requires a good plan and good materials. The blueprint
for Afghanistan & Iraq was drawn by incompetent AssWholes engaged in fraud, misfeasance,
malfeasance & AssWholliness.
It is not possible to build a free, democratic, passive and anodyne
nation out of Muslims using the Qur’an as its foundation.
- There
- The
concept expressed in the second highlighted clause is so egregiously
offensive that it can not be properly discussed without the most
profound profanity. America was built on a solid foundation
221 years ago. We need to restore that foundation, not build a new one.
Its a blessed good thing I was not on the stage with that AssWhole!!! - …”We have provided humanitarian
assistance and we are helping the opposition organize, and we’re
particularly interested in making sure that we’re mobilizing the
moderate forces inside of Syria.”…- Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen and its
offshoots
have the organization, money, manpower, weapons and will to raise Hell
in their quest to seize power. Assad knows that, if deposed and
captured, he will be tortured and killed. He will decimate his
country to prevent that from happening. Those trying to depose
him will destroy the country to depose him. Let them kill each
other and watch from a safe distance; we have no dog in that fight; all
sides are inimical to our interests.
- Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen and its
- …”But we also have to recognize that, you
know, for us to get
more entangled militarily in Syria is a serious
step,”…- We need to save our blood and
money, not wasting treasure as we did in Libya.
- We need to save our blood and
- …”and we have to do
so”…- No! Damnit, we do not have
to get entangled in Syria! We need to mind our own business. We need to
let the Syrians exterminate themselves, the best possible
outcome.
- No! Damnit, we do not have
- …” making absolutely
certain that we know who
we are helping;”…- Shi’ah, Sunni or Alawaite, Al-Qaeda
or Al-Ikhwan, they are all Muslims and they are all enemies of the
human race. The sooner they are dead and buried the better. You
helped our enemies in Libya, with fatal consequences.
Unfortunately you are too stupid to learn from that and prior mistakes.
- Shi’ah, Sunni or Alawaite, Al-Qaeda
- …” that we’re not putting arms in the hands of folks who eventually could turn
them against us or allies in the region.”…- If they are Muslims, they are our
enemies. If they are our enemies, they will eventually attack us with
whatever resources we afford them.
- If they are Muslims, they are our
- …”But what
we can’t do
is to simply suggest that, as Governor Romney at times has
suggested,
that giving heavy
weapons, for example, to the Syrian opposition
is a
simple proposition that would lead us to be safer over the long term.”- Even a stopped clock is right
twice each day. The best con men sprinkle a little truth among
the lies.
- Even a stopped clock is right
- …” number one, make sure that these countries are supporting
- Romney:
- …”First of all, 30,000 people being killed by
their government is a humanitarian disaster.”…- They are dead, you can’t resurrect
them. More will die, you can’t prevent it; all you can do is kill
others, but you can’t kill them selectively or efficiently enough to
prevent further massacres.
- They are dead, you can’t resurrect
- …” Secondly, Syria is an
opportunity for us because Syria plays an important role in the
Middle
East, particularly right now.”- There is no limit on
stupidity. Syria is a client state of Iran & Russia, arming
Hezbollah and HAMAS against Israel; giving their leaders shelter.
Syria’s decimation is the best possible outcome. The world would
be improved by eliminating Syria, otherwise, stay out of
it.
- There is no limit on
- “Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route
to the sea. It’s the route for them to arm Hezbollah in Lebanon, which
threatens, of course, our ally, Israel. And so seeing Syria
remove
Assad is a very high priority for us.”…- Removing Assad is only beneficial
if his regime is replaced by a secular regime friendly to Israel and to
us. While Syria remains populated by Muslims, that is
impossible. If removing Assad & rendering Syria harmless is
the objective, then carpet bomb it with Daisy Cutters.
- Removing Assad is only beneficial
- …” Number two, seeing a — a replacement government
being responsible peopleis critical for us.”- Are you proposing to invade and
occupy Syria forever? Otherwise, forget about it; ain’t gonna
happen.
- Are you proposing to invade and
- …”And
finally, we don’t
want to have military involvement there. We don’t
want to get drawn into a military conflict.”
- Then stand on the sidelines and
watch the blood splatter without getting involved. - ”
And so the right course for us, is working through our partners and
with our own resources, to identify responsible
parties within Syria,
organize them, bring them together in a — in a form of — if not
government, a form of — of — of council that can take
the lead in
Syria. And then make sure they have the
arms necessary to defend
themselves. We do need to make sure that they don’t have arms that get
into the — the wrong hands. Those arms could be used to hurt us
down
the road. We need to make sure as well that we coordinate this effort
with our allies, and particularly with — with Israel.”- Responsible parties with the ability to do so left Syria long
ago. The Christian minority is too tiny, passive, poor and disorganized
to subvert and supplant the regime. Only Muslims have the
requisite will, passion, money, arms and organization to bring it off,
and they are our enemies, not our friends. All Muslim hands are the
wrong hands: arms in their hands will eventually be used against
Israel.
- Responsible parties with the ability to do so left Syria long
- …”we want to
make sure that we
have the relationships of friendship with the people
that take his place, steps that in the years to come we see Syria as a
— as a friend, and Syria as a responsible
party in the Middle East.”- None of those worthy objectives
are possible where there is a Muslim majority population. Having
Muslim friends
is impossible; Muslims are our enemies, not our friends.
- None of those worthy objectives
- …”First of all, 30,000 people being killed by
- Obama:
- …”We organized the Friends of
Syria. We are mobilizing humanitarian support, and support for the
opposition. And we
are making sure that those we help are those who
will be friends of ours in the long term and friends of our allies in
the region over the long term.”
- Muslims are our enemies, not our
friends. The new regimes in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia are not friends of
Israel. Get a clue, Moron. - “When we went in to Libya, and we
were able to immediately stop the massacre there, because of the
unique
circumstances and the coalition that we had helped to organize. We also
had to make
sure that Moammar Gadhafi didn’t staythere”- You stopped the massacre
immediately? That ain’t how I remember it. Show us the time line of our
involvement overlayed
with the casualty numbers. Replacing an alligator with a
crocodile is not an improvement. You accomplished nothing of value.
- You stopped the massacre
- …”That’s part of the reason why the Libyans stand with us.”
- What the Hell happened in
Benghazi??? If the people who perpetrated that attack were not
Libyans, who were they?
- What the Hell happened in
- ”
But we did so in a careful, thoughtful way, making certain that we
knew
who we were dealing with, that those forces of
moderation on the ground
were ones that we could work with,…”- “Forces of moderation” do not
wage revolutions, Muslims do. Muslims are not moderate; they are
militant enemies of the human race.
- “Forces of moderation” do not
- …”We organized the Friends of
- Romney:
- …”our objectives are to replace Assad and to have in
place a new government which is friendly to us, a responsible
government, if possible. And I want to make sure they get armed and
they have the arms necessary to defend themselves, but also to remove —
to remove Assad.”- Redundant & Moronic, a great
combination. Muslim governments are not responsible governments,
neither are they friendly to us.
- Redundant & Moronic, a great
- …”our objectives are to replace Assad and to have in
- Obama:
- “No, I don’t, because I think
that America has
to stand with
democracy. The notion that we would have tanks run over those
young
people who were in Tahrir Square, that is not the kind of American
leadership that John F. Kennedy talked about 50 years ago.”
- Standing with Islamic
revolutionaries is not standing with democracy, it is standing with
replacement tyrants. How would you have led the world at
Tiananmen Square when protesters were crushed by tanks? Would you
have started WW3? - …”you have a democratically
elected government in Egypt, that they have to make sure that they take
responsibility for protecting religious minorities.”…- How
an Islamic regime comes to power is irrelevant. Islamic regimes oppress
indigenous Christian minorities, that’s what Muslims do. Only a damn
fool expects a different outcome.
- How
- ”
They have to abide
by their treaty with Israel. That is a red line for
us, because not only is Israel’s security at stake, but our security is
at stake if that unravels.”- Mubarak did not fully enforce that
treaty, what makes you dream that Al-Ikhwan will? The people who voted
them into office need to annihilate Israel and
exterminate the
Jews, after all, they are Muslims.
- Mubarak did not fully enforce that
- ”
They have to make sure that they’re cooperating with us when
it comes to counterterrorism.”- How stupid does that arrogant AssWhole assume we are?! He pretends to expect
terrorists to counter themselves.
- How stupid does that arrogant AssWhole assume we are?! He pretends to expect
- ”
And we will help
them with respect to developing their own economy,
because ultimately what’s going to make the Egyptian revolution
successful for the people of Egypt, but also for the world, is
if those
young people who gathered there are seeing opportunities.”- Only a damned fool or a traitor
wants the Egyptian Revolution to succeed. Its tactical objective
is domination of Egypt. Its strategic objective is restoration and
domination of the caliphate, leading to world conquest.
- Only a damned fool or a traitor
- “No, I don’t, because I think
- Romney:
- `…”I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the
time
that I supported
his — his action there. I felt that — I wish we’d have
had a better vision of the future.”- Only fools and traitors supported
interfering in Egypt as Obamination did. Any rational and informed
person could easily predict the outcome. I knew what was going to
happen and so did many others.
- Only fools and traitors supported
- ”
I wish that, looking back at the beginning of the president’s term and
even further back than that, that we’d have recognized that there was a
growing energy and passion for freedom in that part of the world,
and
that we would have worked more aggressively with our friend and with
other friends in the region to have them make the transition towards a
more representative form of government, such that it didn’t
explode in
the way that it did.”
- An ignorant man exposes his ignorance when he opens his
mouth and speaks of that which he knows nothing. Romney would
smell a skunk and perceive it as the fragrance of rose blossoms. The
passion for freedom is only among a tiny minority of hypocrites,
apostates & Christians, not the majority of Muslims. For
Muslims, representative government means Islamic theocracy, not
democracy. Freedom and Islamic theocracy are polar opposites. - …”Because when there are elections,
people tend to vote for peace. They don’t vote for war.:- People vote for what they want.
Muslims want war, which is ordained for them. The Islamic economy
is based on perpetual war; commerce, trade and agriculture are inferior
alternatives which subject Muslims to a curse for abandoning Jihad..
The Muslim’s hope of avoiding the fire and being admitted to Paradise
isdependent on participation in war.
- People vote for what they want.
- …”when the students took to the streets in Tehran and the
people there
protested, the Green
Revolution occurred, for the president to be
silent I thought was an enormous mistake. We have to stand for our
principles, stand for our allies, stand for a strong military
and stand
for a stronger economy.”- Talk
is cheep; action is expensive.
Unless you are willing to mount an airborne invasion, depose the regime
and remain in place until the last Muslim is dead or apostate, the
dream of a free and democratic Iran is just that, a fond dream which
will never be realized. How’d that work out in Iraq? You can
not make a silk purse from a sow’s ear and you can’t make a free nation
out of Muslims.
- Talk
- `…”I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the
- Obama:
- ”
Now, Governor Romney has taken a different approach throughout this
campaign. Both at home and abroad, he has proposed wrong and reckless
policies. He’s praised George Bush as a good economic steward and Dick
Cheney as somebody who’s — who shows great wisdom and judgment. And
taking us back to
those kinds of strategies that got us into this mess
are not the way that we are going to maintain leadership in the 21st
century.”
- Rampant stock market speculation
in the roaring twenties, the .com bubble and the real estate bubble
have something in common: fantastic belief in more for less forever more;
the same toxin that poisoned the automobile industry and other
manufacturing industries. Legacy costs imposed by union
whipsawing sank the auto industry and bad loans which resulted from bad
government policy fueled the housing bubble. You Morons just
can’t learn! You think that trends always continue; that the
music never stops and that your chair will always be there if it
does. Your house is shelter, privacy and security, not a money
tree. Shrub and Republicans in Congress tried to correct the
toxic policies of Fannie & Freddie, but to no avail. Nature took
its course and Obamination blames the victims instead of the
guilty. - “But to the issue of Iran, as
long as I’m president of the United States Iran will not get a
nuclear
weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.”- You wasted four years in a cheat
& retreat negotiation
dance, accomplishing nothing while Iran doubled their centrifuge
capacity. They have broken the 20% enrichment barrier and will
soon have uranium sufficiently concentrated to build a fission
device. Exactly how will you stop them? Sanctions only make
life difficult for the general population, not the ruling class and
they do nothing to stop progress toward nuclear ascension. Once
they have the bomb, they will deploy it. Then its too late.
Taking down the regime is the only viable option for the long run.
- You wasted four years in a cheat
- ”
- Romney:
- “And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is
something
one would only – only consider if all of the other avenues had been —
had been tried to their full extent.”- Once
they have sufficient fissile
material, its too late. You can not wait until the last minute. Cheat
& retreat; promise & yank the ball will run out the clock.
Like Charlie Brown, you will fall, hitting your head on a rock.
There is no substitute for regime removal.
- Once
- “And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is
- Obama:
- “When I came into office, we were still bogged down in
Iraq and
Afghanistan had been drifting for a decade.”- We were bogged down because
we tried to mount invasions on the cheap and in a hurry without
identifying the enemy and without formulating realistic strategic
objectives and an exit strategy. We were drifting because of
suicidal rules of engagement and a lack of will to deal with external
interference from Iran & Pakistan.
- We were bogged down because
- …” We ended the war in Iraq,
refocused our attention on Afghanistan, and we did deliver a surge of
troops. That was facilitated in part because we had ended the war in
Iraq.”- Did we seize and hold territory,
removing the Taliban and excluding them from returning? Did we convert
the populace from Islam, which is the root cause of the conflict?
No. Instead, you doubled down on suicidal rules of engagement.
- Did we seize and hold territory,
- …”And we are now in a position where we have met many of the
objectives that got us there in the first place.”- If our leaders thought with brains instead of their butts,
our objective would have been the total and permanent removal of
Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan from membership in the set of terror
sponsoring states. That strategic objective requires an outcome
in which the populace is either apostate or dead and the regimes are
un-Islamic and secular. Instead, Afghanistan and Iraq have the Qur’an
as the foundation of their constitutions and the populace remains
Islamic. Our blood and treasure are wasted; sacrificed to
political correctness by traitors.
- If our leaders thought with brains instead of their butts,
- …”Part of what had happened is we’d forgotten why we had
gone. We went
because there were people who were responsible for 3,000 American
deaths. And so we decimated Al Qaida’s
core leadership in the border
regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.”- This
is what happens when you
elevate the village idiot to high office: idiotic policies and
actions. Focusing on Usama bin Laden and his colleagues is an
egregious error of the most idiotic sort. It is like cutting one
thorn off a bush because you got pricked. Future jabs are only
prevented by removing the bush. The damnable doctrines of Islam,
not Usama bin ladin, are at fault in the murders of 3000 people in New
York & Washington. You can kill bin Ladin and a handful of
his underlings, you could erase Afghanistan from the face of the earth,
but Islam and its damnable doctrines which caused the Hindu, Assyrian
& Armenian genocides as well ad the depredations of the Barbary
Pirates would remain, their real, proximate & persistent threat of
Jihad terrorism undiminished.Because terrorism
is an intrinsic
sacrament of Islam, it can not be eliminated without eliminating Islam.
- This
- ”
We then started to build up Afghan forces. And we’re now in a position
where we can transition out, because there’s no reason why Americans
should die when Afghans are perfectly capable of defending their own
country.”- Our troops are not defending
Afghanistan against external attack. They are there to eliminate the
terrorists who attacked us. Afghanistan’s security is not the
issue. Americans should not die; Afghans should, all of them,
suddenly in a big explosion on the 12 th day of September, 2001. Afghans
are shooting our troops because they are Muslims and we are not. When
we pull out, they will continue to fight each other because of tribal
and personal quests for power.
- Our troops are not defending
- “When I came into office, we were still bogged down in
- Romney:
- “No, it’s not time to divorce a nation on Earth that has 100
nuclear weapons and is on the way to double that at some point, a
nation that has serious threats from terrorist groups within its
nation, as I indicated before, the Taliban, Haqqani Network.It’s a nation that’s not like — like others and it does not have a
civilian leadership that is calling the shots there. You have the ISI,
their intelligence organization, is probably the most powerful of the —
of three branches there. Then you have the military and then you have
the civilian government.This is a nation, which, if it falls apart, if it — if it becomes a
failed state, there are nuclear weapons there and you’ve got — you’ve
got terrorists there who could grab their — their hands onto those
nuclear weapons.”
- Ignorance may be bliss, but it is a
dangerous condition. Terrorism is Pakistani state policy. Romney
might be aware of this fact if he had read “The Qur’anic Concept of
War“, a strategy manual used by the army of Pakistan.
Terrorists
are Muslims. Muslims are terrorists. Pakistan is ruled by
Muslims\terrorists. - “But it’s important for us to
recognize that we can’t just walk away from Pakistan. But we do need to
make sure that as we — as we send support for them, that this is tied
to them making progress on — on matters that would lead them to
becoming a civil society.”- To civilize Pakistan: induce mass
apostasy. This problem will not be solved while they remain enslaved by
Allah.
- To civilize Pakistan: induce mass
- “ We’re also going to have to
have a far more effective and
comprehensive strategy
to help move the world away from terror and
Islamic extremism. We haven’t done that yet.”…- “Islamic extremism” is the lie
which keeps me from voting for Romney. No such entity exists. “Its
Islam, stupid!”. Jihad,
terrorism
& genocide
are intrinsic
sacraments of Islam. Because they are enshrined in the Qur’an which is perfected and immutable, and
because selectivity
is prohibited in
Islam, terrorism will only end when Islam no longer exists. We need a
strategy to induce mass apostasy in the Ummah al-Islamiyya. You
need to prove to Muslims that Allah is an impotent, demonic idol.
Start by contrasting the Spanish & Israeli reconquests with
Surah Ar-Ra’d 13:41. Continue by showing the Ummah how Moe
received his inspiration &
revelations. Show them his true character and works. Goad the
literate minority to read the Qur’an, hadith & Sira to verify the
facts for themselves.
- “Islamic extremism” is the lie
- “Is — are Israel and the Palestinians closer to
reaching a peace agreement?”- They ain’t and never will be.
Ignorance of the damnable doctrines of Islam causes politicians to
believe that they can “solve the conflict”. They do not understand that
the conflict
is existential. Muslims are obligated to fight Jews until
they are converted to Islam or subjugated and extorted. That jihad does
not end until Judgment Day and it concludes with Jesus Christ leading
the Muslims in the final genocide of the Jews. Muslims will never
tolerate Israel because her recovery of stolen territory proves Allah
to be an impotent idol. Israel is the ultimate blasphemy.
It is impossible to obtain peace and security from an enemy under a
divine mandate to eradicate you unless you eradicate them.
- They ain’t and never will be.
- “We have not seen the progress
we need to have, and I’m convinced that with strong leadership and an
effort to build a strategy based upon helping these nations
reject
extremism, we can see the kind of peace and prosperity the world
demands.”- Extremism is Islam. Islam is
extremism. Help the Arabs to reject Islam; to emancipate themselves
from Allah.
- Extremism is Islam. Islam is
- “No, it’s not time to divorce a nation on Earth that has 100
- Obama:
- “Well, keep in mind our strategy wasn’t just going after bin
Laden. We created partnerships throughout the region to
deal with
extremism in Somalia, in Yemen, in Pakistan.”- Muslims do
not form partnerships or
alliances with infidels, the Qur’an explicitly forbids it. There is
no
extremism, there are no extremists there are only Islam and believers.
- Muslims do
- “Well, keep in mind our strategy wasn’t just going after bin
Jihad
- “holy fighting in Allah’s cause”
- “War against non-Muslims“
- Offensive: undertaken on Islam’s initiative; unprovoked.
- A communal obligation binding on the Muslims “in every year“.
- An eighth duty of subordinate rulers bordering on infidels: to wage jihad.
genocide
- “made a great slaughter“
- :”killed and wounded many of them“
- “those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed“
- “Muslims
would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or
a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of
Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him“ - “In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False
Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the
Jews.“
terrorism
- “We shall cast terror“
- “I will cast terror“
- “Allah cast terror”
- The Jews fear you more than they fear me.
- “to strike terror“
- “to terrify thereby“
- “made victorious with terror”
Allah’s Imperatives
- To be believed in and implemented.
- Commands to wage offensive Jihad:
- Commands to terrorize through barbarism and building a mighty
army. - Command to terrorize by mutilating fallen vctims.
- Genocide imperatives:
- Make a “great
slaughter“. - Kill & wound “many o
them“
- Make a “great
Allah’s Threat
- I will damn you if you do not join the Jihad
when called.- 9:38-39
- Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2497
- 1341. Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him)
reported: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH)said, “He who dies without having fought in the Cause of Allah or
without having thought of doing so,will die with one characteristic of hypocrisy in him.”
Allah’s Promise
- If you join the Jihad, I will forgive your
sins and admit you to my celestial bordello.- A “commerce which will save you from a painful punishment”
- 61:10-13
Jihad Imperatives
- Commands to wage offensive Jihad:
Infidels deserve to be
killed
rebels against Allah
Muslims love to quote Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32,
asserting that it prohibits “taking innocent life”. While doing so,
they conceal the definition of innocent: Muslim. They do not
quote 5:33 to us because it specifies hudud for waging
war “against Allah and his Messenger:. 5:33 does not define “wage war”,
but Tafsir Ibn Kathir does, and we can learn something
significant from it which Muslims wish to conceal from us.
includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.
If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war against him and are
subject to mutilation, crucifixion or expulsion. Hedaya is the
Hanifi school’s version of Shari’ah. In the section on jizya, it
reveals some juicy tidbits: Read pages 216-218
of the second volume to discover that Jizya is a species of punishment
for infidelity and a substitute for destruction.
punish by Muslim hands
your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and
heal the breasts of a believing people,
True that verse is in the context of the conquest of
Mekkah, but it has wider application as a general principle.
Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and
gathered together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.”
Muslim friends and allies
Muslims are explicitly forbidden to have equal or inferior
relationships with infidels. They were told to shun their pagan fathers
and brothers.
3:28 [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers,
etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never
be helped by Allâh in any way, except
if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you
against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.
Your Muslim friend or ally is either a hypocrite or
deceiving you.
perfected
Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:3 informs us that Islam is perfected.
Perfection can only be defiled, never improved.
you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm
as your religion. …
immutable
The Qur’an strictly forbids editing itself. Allah’s words are final, they an not be
changed.
- 10:64 …No
change can there be in the Words of Allâh,… - 30:30 …
No change let there be in
Khalqillâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh
Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion,… - 6:115 …. None can change His Words…
- 18:27 …None can change His Words,…
- Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from mercy), far
removed (from mercy), those
who changed (the religion) after me! “…
selectivity
Muslims are not
allowed to select the bits they like from the Qur’an; its a bundle: all
or nothing.
Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so
among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of
Resurrection they shall be consigned
to the most grievous torment….
inspiration & revelations
Moe had
auditory & visual hallucinations, probably related to epileptic
seizures. He first thought he was possessed by a demon and
decided to commit suicide. http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5
And Satan had some influence, too. http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.51.1
Existential Conflict
The Qur’an commands Muslims to fight Jews & Christians until
they are subjugated and pay extortion.
against
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor
forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and
those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.
The Qur’an also tells us that Allah will continue to send someone to
humiliate and torment the Jews. Who will he send?
certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection,
those who would afflict them
with a humiliating torment.
Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked)
and certainly He is OftForgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and
those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).
A hadith collected by Muslim & Bukhari informs us that
the gates of Allah’s celestial bordello will not swing open for Muslims
until they hunt down and kill the last Jew.
saying: The last hour would not come
unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would
kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree
and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah,
there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree
Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
Allah promised
He promised victory:
He promised that they could defeat a superior force twice their
size.
He promised that he would give them the land through irreversible
conquests.
Moe’s attitude
Moe displayed his attitude toward the Jews who resided in the
Hijaz: he wanted to expel them unless they embraced Islam. He told them
that he owned the world and wished to expel them. Moe told
his companion that Allah had, on his account, taken special care
of the people living in the Levant.
Israel: ultimate blasphemy
Allah commanded perpetual war against the Jews, made
their extinction a condition for the opening of his celestial bordello,
promised victory, promised irreversible conquest and a 2:1
superiority. But Israel got some of her land back and defeated
Muslims in four wars, proving Allah’s promise void and his status as an
impotent idol.
Muslims can not tolerate that blasphemy. They can
not allow Israel to continue existing. No good will gesture, no
concession will bring peace nor will any negotiation. Only eradicating
Islam can bring Israel peace and security. While there are
believers, there will be war.
partnership, friendship & alliance
Muslims are explicitly forbidden to have equal or
inferior
relationships with infidels. They were told to shun their pagan fathers
and brothers.
3:28 [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers,
etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never
be helped by Allâh in any way, except
if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you
against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.
Your Muslim friend or ally is either a hypocrite or
deceiving you.
believers
Only those who join the Jihad are believers. They
“go out from their homes” and “spend in Allah’s cause”. They kill
others and are killed. Allah tests them by sending them into
battle.
Shari’ah
Literally
‘the path to life giving waters”, Shari’ah is Islamic law codified from
the Qur’an & hadith and expanded by analogy & through the
consensus
of the jurists. It dictates every aspect of life from
conception to burial. Reliance of the Traveller is the standard
code. Islamic law of jihad is linked here.
Book O11.5
specifies restrictions imposed on conquered Jews & Christians.
They are forbidden to build higher than the Muslims, emulate
their clothing, own weapons, display crosses, ring bells, pray in
public, hold processions and build churches. O11.10 sets the death penalty for saying anything
negative about Allah, Moe or Islam.
Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah
Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah
News
Gingrich swerves dangerously close to the truth, but veers away at the
last moment. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Pulp Ark, who posted
a link on Facebook. I viewed the video and read the accompanying
article at Huffington Post.
give up Shari’ah
Including that phrase in a conditional clause is
either a token of irony or ignorance. I am not sure which applies
in this case. Abandonment of Shari’ah is an act of apostasy, one
of twenty such acts listed in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.
-14- to deny
the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims
(ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as
such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five
obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);
-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the
Sacred Law;
Allah’s permissions, prohibitions 7 imperatives,
expressed in the Qur’an, are the primary source of Shari’ah.
Only Allah has the right to rule
revealed, such are the Kâfirûn (i.e. disbelievers
– of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allâh’s Laws ).
5:49. And so judge (you O
Muhammad ) between them by what Allâh has revealed and follow not their vain desires,
[…]
22:41. Those (Muslim rulers) who, if We give them
power in the land, (they) order
for Iqamat-as-Salât. [i.e. to perform the five compulsory
congregational Salât (prayers) (the males in mosques)], to pay the Zakât and they enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm orders
one to do), and forbid
Al-Munkar (i.e. disbelief, polytheism and all that Islâm has
forbidden) [i.e. they make the Qur’ân
as the law of their country in all the spheres of life]. And
with Allâh rests the end of (all) matters (of creatures).
33:36. It is not for a believer, man or
woman, when
Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any
option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger,
he has indeed strayed in a plain error.
truly moderate
That phrase defines a hypocrite [47:20], not a believer. Believers are only those
who engage in jihad, killing others and being killed fighting in
Allah’s cause [9:111].
Newt appears to imply that he would endorse the candidacy of Dr. Zuhdi
Jasser if he seeks high office. I find Dr. Jasser to be an
exemplar of cognitive dissonance because, while professing to be
Muslim, he asserts that Islam can be modernized or reformed; that it is
compatible with our Constitution & Republic, which it clearly is
not. You will not catch me knowingly voting for a Muslim,
including Dr. Jasser!
bring Islam into modernity
Dr. Jasser might as well try to fly by jumping off
his roof and flapping his arms like wings. Islam is perfected and
immutable.
completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion.
[…]
6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been
fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is
the AllHearer, the AllKnower.
10.64. […] No change can there be in the Words
of Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success.
18:27. […] None can change His Words,
and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.
30:30. […] No change let there be in
Khalqillâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism),
that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir
AtTabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]
Sahih Bukhari 8.76.585 […] ‘I will say: They are of me (i.e. my followers). It
will be said, ‘You do not know
what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left’.
I will say, ‘Far removed, far removed (from mercy),
those who changed (their religion) after me.” Abu Huraira
narrated that the Prophet said, “On the Day of Resurrection a group of
companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the
Lake-Fount, and I will say, ‘O Lord (those are) my companions!’ It will
be said, ‘You have no knowledge
as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as
renegades (reverted from Islam).”
depends entirely on the person
Is the person a Muslim in name only, or
is he a zealous Muslim concealing what he believes to avoid offending
potential voters? In one of his books, President Obama said that
the would “side with the Muslims” if things turned ugly. Who did
he side with in the “Arab spring”? Who is he siding with on the
issue of censoring critic8ism of Islam? Is he exemplifying his
belief or is he practicing al-Taqiyya?
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters,
helpers, etc.) instead of the
believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh
in any way, except if you
indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against
Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.
The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers
[…](unless you indeed fear a
danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some
areas or times fear for their
safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the
disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance,
Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people
although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan
said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” […]
A Muslim’s oath of office can not be trusted.
66:2 is in the context of marital disputes and 9:1 is in the context of
breaking the hudna with Mecca to facilitate conquest. But the
hadith
collected by Muslim shows us that Muslims have a break your oath free
card from Moe. This dispensation vitiates a Muslim’s oath.
has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths.
And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is
the All-Knower, the All-Wise.
9:1. Freedom
from (all) obligations (is declared) from Allâh and His Messenger
() to those of the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters,
disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh), with whom you made a treaty.
9:3. And a declaration from
Allâh and His Messenger to mankind on the greatest day (the 10th
of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations
to the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if
you (Mushrikûn) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away,
then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And
give tidings (O Muhammad ) of a painful torment to those who
disbelieve.
9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who
have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone against
you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
Sahih Muslim Book 015, Number 4052:
Abu Huraira reported: A person sat
late in the night with Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him), and
then came to his family and found that his children had gone to sleep.
His wife brought food for him. but he took an oath that he would not
eat because of his children (having gone to sleep without food) He then
gave precedence (of breaking the vow and then expiating it) and ate the
food He then came to Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him)
and made mention of that to him, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace
he upon him) said: He who took
an oath and (later on) found something better than that should do that, and
expiate for (breaking) his vow.
recognize all religions
Islam is declared to be perfect, final &
superior. Allah declares Jews & Christians to be the “worst of living creatures” Allah, his angels and
Muslims curse Jews & Christians. The religion with Allah is Islam, and nothing else will be accepted. A Muslim who
tolerates other religions is either ignorant, deceptive or an apostate.
a President who tells the truth
Yes, we need a truthful President. First, we must
find truthful candidates who will acknowledge the fact that Islam is
the existential & irreconcilable enemy, with whom negotiation is
fruitless. It is Islam, not Wahhabism, ‘radicalism’ or
‘extremism’. Islam’s perpetual enmity and aggression are
functions of the core doctrines of Islam, having nothing to do with
nationality or sect.
modern Muslim
There is no moderate Islam. There is no modern
Islam. Islam is what Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago,
not what you wish it to be. Islam is defined by the Qur’an, which
is immutable because the text forbids editing and Moe’s sunnah, which
does not change because he is dead.
Shari’ah
If Allah or Moe said it or did it, it is
Shari’ah. A Muslim who abjures Shari’ah signs his death warrant
for believers to execute. Because Shari’ah is primarily derived
from the Qur’an, it is impossible to abjure it without abjuring
Islam.
mortal threat
If one is a Muslim believer, one is a mortal threat
to every person who is not a Muslim. Exactly what part of Islam
do you not comprehend?
them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all
be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they
cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is
All-Seer of what they do.
9:29. Fight
against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers
their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be
the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and
are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in
the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is
truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you
have concluded. That is the supreme success .
if HAMAS would recognize Israel
If pigs grew wings they could fly. HAMAS is
Islam. Allah promised Muslims that they would conquer the world, irreversibly. Allah’s judgment is final,
there is none to put it back, but Israel recovered some of her
territory stolen by Muslims in 638 & 1948. That recovery of
territory is the ultimate blasphemy; empirical proof of the fact that
Allah is an impotent idol. If you expect Muslims to tolerate
that, you need a brain transplant. It has not happened in 63
years, and it will never happen because it ain’t possible.
throw
out the folks
Brilliant idea, Newt, you found the solution!
Expel the Muslims from Israel, including Judea & Samaria. But
you must also push them back beyond rocket range.
Solving the Islam Problem: Slave Revolt
I am a Muslim But I don’t Hate the Great America By King Nazir Muhammad comes to us through News Blaze.
One Muslim who loves America because of its freedom & prosperity is not proof that all Muslims love America. Implying that it does involves over generalization.
There is a reason why Muslims in Arabia can not enjoy liberty and prosperity: Islam and tyranny. If enough Muslims emigrate here, they will bring those troubles with them as they are doing in Europe. The solution to their problem is not emigration, it is revolution. In 1776, our founders did something unprecedented, they removed the ancient regime and replaced it with a representative republic with enumerated powers specified by a written constitution. They outlawed theocracy and installed liberty. In doing so, they pledged their lives, fortunes and honors; many lost everything. They planted the tree of liberty and watered it with their blood.
If Muslims want liberty and prosperity, they must first shed the shackles of slavery. Allah’s slaves are not free, they wear Allah’s yoke and are compelled to follow his rules in every aspect of life. The first prerequisite is apostasy.
The second prerequisite is no less life shaking or risky. They can not remain enslaved to patriarchal, military or feudal regimes and be free and prosperous. In most cases, violent revolution will fail. Genuine regime opponents, seeking to remove, not supplant the regimes, need to unify, multiply, and work within the political system to reform it. Change will be incremental, slow, and not immune to reversals.
Indigenous Muslims need to begin studying economics, political science and comparative government. To be successful, they must adopt what works in other systems and carefully reject that which leads to failure. The horrific errors made by Afghanistan & Iraq should provide negative guidance.
Islam had a negative image in the perception of John Q. Adams and other American founders. Our navy developed as a result of attacks by the Barbary Pirates. It is reality, not image or reputation that is important. While terrorists may not represent all Muslims, they represent Islam, obeying Allah and emulating Muhammad. Open your Qur’an and read Surah Al-Anfal 12, 57 & 60. Then turn to Surah Al-Ahzab 26-27. Turn next to Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220. The problem is that Islam is an inseverable, take it or leave it package; refer to Surah Ar-Ra’d 36. If you loathe terrorism, you must disassociate from Islam to avoid being a part of it.
Islam is not radical, it is a violent predator, by design. If reformed, it would cease to be Islam. Unfortunately, it can not be reformed. How do you reform perfection? How do you reform a scripture and system that is fixed and immutable? Reformers would like to strip conquest, genocide & terrorism from the Qur’an. But Muhammad said that those who try it will be far, far from mercy . He also said that if you abandon jihad as a way of life, that you will be cursed until you return to it.
Unfortunately, you can do neither. You don’t have the power to ban Islam, and you can change only your own beliefs. Can you, as a confirmed lover of freedom, inspire other Muslims with that same love, and convince them of the existential conflict between Islam and freedom? If you can do that, perhaps you can ignite the spark of liberty and send it burning through the Ummah.
Islamic Reform?!
In an article published at Accuracy In Media, Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser asserts Ideological Standards Needed to Confront Militant Islam. I have details to pick with two items in his list.of ideological standards.
The acceptance that the root cause of terrorism is political Islam. Terror is only a means to the ends of the Islamic state. While many Islamists may say they are against “terror,” moderate, liberty-loving Muslims accept the fact that the root cause of terrorism is the ideology of Islamism and its intoxicating dreams of the Islamic state poised against the ascendancy of Western secular democracies. To blame American foreign policy and other conspiracy theories for terrorism is to live in denial.
- The acceptance that the root cause of terrorism is political Islam. Islam is inherently political; it envolves temporal enforcement of Allah’s commands & Muhammad’s rules. As Allah said: 33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error. The root cause of terrorism is found in Allah’s word and Muhammad’s example. [Emphasis added.]
- 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers).
- 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
- 33:26 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
- Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331 Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
- Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220 I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)
- Terror is only a means to the ends of the Islamic state. It is a battle tactic, designed to insure quick victory with minimal Muslim casualties. Warfare is Islam’s principal activity; the means to the ends of the Islamic state: enriching & empowering Muhammad & his Caliphs.
- 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
- 8:1 They ask you (O Muhammad) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers.
- 8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
- 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
- Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.
- To blame American foreign policy and other conspiracy theories for terrorism is to live in denial. Blaming anything other than orthodox Islamic doctrine is abject denial!
To acknowledge that much of current Islamic jurisprudence (sharia) is in dire need of ijtihad (reform) and being brought into the 21st century and modernity with a focus on liberty. Just as Chrisitianity and other faiths underwent reformation, so too is much of the current legal doctrine of Islam in need of a similar modernization to be in full synergy with the principles of individual freedom, limited constitutional government, and the separation of religion and state.
What does Sharia say about Jihad?
- O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day…
Thats from Reliance of the Traveler, a mainstream handbook of Fiqh. Do you recognize the conclusion of that last sentence? It is from 9:29, which I quoted above. Sharia is based on the words and actions of Allah & Muhammad.
There is one unsurmountable problem: Allah’s word, the basis of Sharia, can not be changed. It is perfect, permanent, and final. It can only be defiled, not improved.
- 30:30. So set you (O Muhammad ) your face towards the religion of pure Islâmic Monotheism Hanifa (worship none but Allâh Alone) Allâh’s Fitrah (i.e. Allâh’s Islâmic Monotheism), with which He has created mankind. No change let there be in Khalqillâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir AtTabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]
- 6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the AllHearer, the AllKnower.
- 5:3 …This day, I have perfected your religion for you…
How then do Dr. Jasser and other reformers hope to reform what Allah and his Messenger have established? Reform efforts are Kufr: rebellion against Allah.
Muslims Against Sharia
Evidently they want to keep Iman & Salat and chuck out everything else. I doubt that its possible, but: if they can bring it off, the effects would be life saving. Imagine Islam totally pacified, without violence!
At minimum, their efforts may wake a few Muslims up to reality. I learned about Muslims Against Sharia from a post at Jihad Chat. Here is a sample.
OUR GOALS
- to educate Muslims about dangers presented by Islamic religious texts and why Islam must be reformed
- to educate non-Muslims about the differences between moderate Muslims and Islamists (a.k.a. Islamic Religious Fanatics, Radical Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Islamic Extremists or Islamofascists)
- to educate both Muslims and non-Muslims alike that Moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic Terror
The need for reform
Islam, in its present form, is not compatible with principles of freedom and democracy. Twenty-first century Muslims have two options: we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century perpetuated by Hassan al-Banna, Abdullah Azzam, Yassir Arafat, Ruhollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Hamas, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, etc., leading to a global war between Dar al-Islam (Islamic World) and Dar al-Harb (non-Islamic World), or we can reform Islam to keep our rich cultural heritage and to cleanse our religion from the reviled relics of the past. We, as Muslims who desire to live in harmony with people of other religions, agnostics, and atheists choose the latter option. We can no longer allow Islamic extremists to use our religion as a weapon. We must protect future generations of Muslims from being brainwashed by the Islamic radicals. If we do not stop the spread of Islamic fundamentalism, our children will become homicidal zombies.
That is a small sample from their manifesto. Follow the link in this next excerpt to a long, detailed list of violent verses to be expunged.
- Outdated verses
The following verses promote divisiveness and religious hatred, bigotry and discrimination. They must be either removed from the Koran or declared outdated and invalid, and marked as such.
And violence?
- Islam vs. violence
Islam has no place for violence. Any person calling for an act of violence in the name of Islam must be promptly excommunicated. Any grievances must be addressed by lawful authorities. It is the religious and civic duty of every Muslim to unconditionally condemn any act of terrorism perpetrated in the name of Islam. Any Muslim group that has ties to terrorism in any way, shape, or form, must be universally condemned by both religious and secular Muslims.
Are they sincere? I believe they are. The group’s President endorsed the No2Jihad petition. That involves forswearing terrorism against Israel, the ultimate test for a Muslim.
Lets show some sincere support for http://www.reformislam.org.Blog them up and spread the word, particularly to your Moderate Muslim friends and associates. If Islam is to reform, it must start from within, and this effort could be the start.












