Nick Kristof’s New York Time’s piece — China’s Genocide Olympics — justifies the conclusion that he and Bob Herbert are the largely unsung stars of the paper’s Op-Ed Page. China gets lots of bad raps but it is its support of the outlaw Sudan Government that is both reprehensible and worthy of the censure Kristof has dealt by associating genocide with the Olympics. I appeal now for my candidate Barack Obama to say his yes to Kristof’s column.
Sudan feels confident enough with Chinese backing that on Jan. 7, the Sudanese military ambushed a clearly marked U.N. convoy of peace keepers in Darfur. Sudan claimed the attack was a mistake, but diplomats and U.N. professionals are confident that this was a deliberate attack ordered by the Sudanese leaders to put the U.N. in its place.
Sudan has already barred units from Sweden, Norway, Nepal, Thailand and other countries from joining the U.N. force. It has banned night flights, dithered on a status-of-forces agreement, held up communications equipment and refused to allow the U.N. to bring in foreign helicopters. The growing fear is that the U.N. force will be humiliated in Sudan as it was in Rwanda and Bosnia, causing enormous damage to international peacekeeping.
Another possible sign of Sudan’s confidence: an American diplomat, John Granville, was ambushed and murdered in Khartoum early this month. Many in the diplomatic and intelligence community believe that such an assassination could not happen in Khartoum unless elements of the government were involved.
When I went to UNICEF as a media consultant in 1998 my passion became the achievement of steps to stop the outlaw regime in Sudan from governing with impunity, cynically allowing those who might profit by genocidal acts to run rampant. I soon concluded that my best efforts were impotent. We got our head to visit Sudan and a page or so of good coverage. So what.
I firmly believe that there is a tipping point to power and that when people in power act with courage, things change. Both Bob Herbert and Nick Kristof tell it like it is. If anything, they operate with close attention to lines they cannot cross. One responsibility we relatively impotent blog folk can take with pleasure is making clear how accurate and telling the writings of these two are.
Nick Kristof has many allies. Mia Farrow and others have operated modestly and with extreme dedication to try to alert the world to Sudan’s evil.
Why do I speak with such obvious rancor? I do so because I have watched Sudan play their game with impunity close up. I have seen how aid workers have had to literally prostrate their ideals in order to remain in the country and to do what good they can do.
As I write. I see that The New York Times has endorsed Hillary Clinton. This is a vast and significant misjudgment. I am sure there are many Times people who are seriously depressed at this decision, made by a few but implicating many in what is assent to a politics that has been and is now divisive and without the concept or vision to do what the Obama campaign can do. I pray that the verdict of The New York Times is roundly rejected by the electorate.
I wonder if Khartoum is happy with the Times endorsement of someone who is as unlikely as her husband was to act decisively against this criminal regime.
nick+kristof
bob herbert
sudan genocide